网络首发:2026-05-08,
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
梁功有, 江斌, 韩昆, 等. 高压储氢罐氢气泄漏实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(4):593-598.
梁功有, 江斌, 韩昆, et al. 高压储氢罐氢气泄漏实验研究[J]. 2026, 47(4): 593-598.
梁功有, 江斌, 韩昆, 等. 高压储氢罐氢气泄漏实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(4):593-598. DOI: doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2238.
梁功有, 江斌, 韩昆, et al. 高压储氢罐氢气泄漏实验研究[J]. 2026, 47(4): 593-598. DOI: doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2238.
基于自行设计的高压氢气泄漏试验系统
测量高压储氢罐内氢气经直径为1 mm的圆形喷嘴、在不同喷射压力下的泄漏质量流量。喷射压力在10~70 MPa之间
涵盖了国内长管拖车、氢燃料电池商用车的储氢装置设计工作压力。采用Abel-Noble非理想气体状态方程和一维等熵膨胀关系式计算理论质量流量
以及在不同压力工况下的喷嘴流量系数。结果表明
在此压力工况范围内
所采用喷嘴的流量系数在0.57~0.60之间。
In this study
self-designed test facilities were constructed to investigate the high-pressure hydrogen leakage process. The mass flow rates of hydrogen leakage from a nozzle with a 1 mm diameter were measured for various storage pressures ranging from 10 to 70 MPa
encompassing the designed working pressures of onboard storage tanks of tube trailers and fuel cell vehicles. The mass flow rates were calculated by assuming quasi-one-dimensional
isentropic flow using the Abel-Noble equation of state. Subsequently
the discharge coefficients were determined as the ratio of the measured to calculated mass flow rates for various test conditions. The results show that the discharge coefficients range from 0.57 to 0.60 for the present tests.
AHMAD S, ULLAH A, SAMREEN A, et al.Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and utilization for energy sector: a current status review[J]. Journal of energy storage, 2024, 101: 113733.
张盛, 郑津洋, 戴剑锋, 等. 可再生能源大规模制氢及储氢系统研究进展[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(1): 457-465.
廖红波, 张雪霞, 岳嘉玲, 等. 氢气储运技术发展及展望[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(11): 691-699.
WEN J X, HECHT E S, MEVEL R.Recent advances in combustion science related to hydrogen safety[J]. Progress in energy and combustion science, 2025, 107: 101202.
刘峻, 赵汪, 高学强, 等. 全球加氢站产业、技术及标准进展综述[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.
YANG N N, DENG J, WANG C P, et al.High pressure hydrogen leakage diffusion: research progress[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2024, 50: 1029-1046.
何太碧, 赵莉, 王晓东, 等. 车用加氢站火灾爆炸事故风险分析[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2024, 53(2): 131-138.
CUI G, LI Y X, WU D, et al.The progress of autoignition of high-pressure hydrogen gas leakage: a comprehensive review[J]. Fire, 2024, 7(8): 268.
EHRHART B D, HECHT E S, MOHMAND J A.Validation and comparison of HyRAM physics models[R]. SAND2021-5811,2021.
KOBAYASHI H, NARUO Y, MARU Y, et al.Experiment of cryo-compressed (90-MPa) hydrogen leakage diffusion[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2018, 43(37): 17928-17937.
HAN S H, CHANG D, KIM J S.Experimental investigation of highly pressurized hydrogen release through a small hole[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2014, 39(17): 9552-9561.
SHEN J H, ZOU X, ZHANG A J, et al.Study on high-pressure hydrogen leakage characteristics under different shapes of nozzles[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2024, 73: 619-631.
ANDERSON J D.Modern compressible flow :with historical perspective[M]. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2021: 191-237.
WANG L, CHEN J, MA T X, et al.Numerical study of leakage characteristics of hydrogen-blended natural gas in buried pipelines[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2024, 49: 1166-1179.
CORNELIUS K C,SRINIVAS K.Isentropic compressible flow for non-ideal gas models for a venturi[J]. Journal of fluids engineering, 2004, 126(2): 238-244.
MIDDHA P.Development, use, and validation of the CFD tool FLACS for hydrogen safety studies[D]. Bergen: University of Bergen, 2010:16-45.
0
浏览量
13
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621