水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究

张伟兵; 鲁杰; 吴凯; 杨兴福; 李鹏; 段新胜

doi:doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1864

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究

更新时间：2026-03-06

- 水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究
- 水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究
- 太阳能学报 2026年47卷第2期页码：654-661
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1864
  中图分类号： TK529
- 网络首发：2026-03-05，
  
  纸质出版：2026-03-05
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张伟兵, 鲁杰, 吴凯, 等. 水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(2):654-661.

张伟兵, 鲁杰, 吴凯, et al. 水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究[J]. 2026, 47(2): 654-661.
张伟兵, 鲁杰, 吴凯, 等. 水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(2):654-661. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1864.

张伟兵, 鲁杰, 吴凯, et al. 水平及垂直地埋管换热器热响应试验研究[J]. 2026, 47(2): 654-661. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1864.

摘要

基于实际工程

分别开展水平和垂直地埋管热响应试验研究。分析不同埋管方式下地层热物性及地埋管换热能力的区别及经济性。结果表明

垂直地埋管范围内岩土体平均导热系数比水平地埋管高74.5%

平均热扩散系数高61.5%

热阻小18.9%。供暖工况下水平与垂直地埋管每延米换热功率分别为9.20和42.36 W/m

水平比垂直地埋管低78.3%。制冷工况下水平与垂直地埋管每延米换热功率分别为12.62和67.55 W/m

水平比垂直地埋管换热功率低81.3%。采用水平与垂直地埋管结合的方式较只采用垂直地埋管节省成本448300元。

Abstract

Based on practical engineering

this paper conducts the thermal response test of horizontal and vertical borehole heat exchangers. Analyzed the thermal properties and heat transfer capacity differences of heat exchangers under different burial methods

as well as economics

are analyzed. The results indicate that the average thermal conductivity of the rock and soil mass within the vertical borehole heat exchanger range is 74.5% higher than that of the horizontal

the average thermal diffusion coefficient is 61.5% higher

and the thermal resistance is 18.9% lower. Under heating conditions

the heat transfer per linear meter of horizontal and vertical borehole heat exchanger is 9.20 and 42.36 W/m

respectively. The horizontal borehole heat exchanger is 78.3% lower than that of vertical. Under cooling conditions

the heat transfer per linear meter of horizontal and vertical borehole heat exchanger is 12.62 and 67.55 W/m

respectively. The horizontal borehole heat exchanger is 81.3% lower than that of vertical. The combination of horizontal and vertical borehole heat exchanger saves 448300 RMB in cost compared to using only vertical borehole heat exchanger.

关键词

Keywords

references

张晨, 关鹏, 段新胜, 等. 地埋管间断工作进出孔平均温度预测方法研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(5): 30-35.

LUO J, TUO J S, HUANG W, et al.Influence of groundwater levels on effective thermal conductivity of the ground and heat transfer rate of borehole heat exchangers[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2018, 128: 508-516.

关鹏, 段新胜, 焦玉勇, 等. 同轴地埋管换热器岩土热响应试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(2): 55-61.

LIU J, WANG F H, CAI W L, et al.Numerical study on the effects of design parameters on the heat transfer performance of coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger[J]. International journal of energy research, 2019, 43(12): 6337-6352.

李鹏, 郑雨, 李杭哲, 等. 对岩土热响应试验的回顾与展望[J]. 暖通空调, 2019, 49(5): 27-33.

段新胜, 顾湘, 林浩欣, 等. 热响应试验后的热恢复试验理论与应用研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2017, 38(8): 2317-2322.

OH K, LEE S, PARK S, et al.Field experiment on heat exchange performance of various coaxial-type ground heat exchangers considering construction conditions[J]. Renewable energy, 2019, 144: 84-96.

WANG Y R, WANG Y M, YOU S J, et al.Operation optimization of the coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger coupled with ground source heat pump for building heating[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2022, 213: 118656.

LI P, GUAN P, ZHENG J, et al.Field test and numerical simulation on heat transfer performance of coaxial borehole heat exchanger[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(20): 5471.

卿菁, 王勇. 不同埋深水平蛇形地埋管换热器换热性能比较分析[J]. 制冷与空调(四川), 2015, 29(5): 496-501.

赵嵩颖, 付言, 肖姚, 等. 伞状地埋管换热器储热温度场研究[J]. 洁净与空调技术, 2015(3): 5-9.

吴晓澍, 茅靳丰, 李宁, 等. 环形均匀分布桩群应用螺旋埋管换热器的数值模拟[J]. 暖通空调, 2020, 50(10): 99-106, 113.

PU L, QI D, XU L L, et al.Optimization on the performance of ground heat exchangers for GSHP using Kriging model based on MOGA[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2017, 118: 480-489.

WANG Z H, WANG F H, LIU J, et al.Field test and numerical investigation on the heat transfer characteristics and optimal design of the heat exchangers of a deep borehole ground source heat pump system[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2017, 153: 603-615.

WAGNER V, BAYER P, KÜBERT M, et al. Numerical sensitivity study of thermal response tests[J]. Renewable energy, 2012, 41: 245-253.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同类型地埋管换热器换热性能试验研究

同轴地埋管换热器岩土热响应试验研究

基于柱热源模型的同轴套管分段耦合模型研究

垂直螺旋盘管地源热泵供暖制冷实验研究

岩溶地区特殊地质条件对U型地埋管换热器的传热影响研究