测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响

侯亚丽; 李存虎; 李琪; 韩玉霞; 王文新

doi:doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1556

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响

更新时间：2026-02-06

- 测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响
- 测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响
- 太阳能学报 2026年47卷第1期页码：532-541
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  内蒙古自然科学基金（2019LH05024）;内蒙古自治区科技计划（2022YFHH0048）;内蒙古自然科学基金（2024MS05068）;国家自然科学基金（52368010）
- DOI：doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1556
  中图分类号： TU119
- 网络首发：2026-02-05，
  
  纸质出版：2026-02-05
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
侯亚丽, 李存虎, 李琪, 等. 测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(1):532-541.

侯亚丽, 李存虎, 李琪, et al. 测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响[J]. 2026, 47(1): 532-541.
侯亚丽, 李存虎, 李琪, 等. 测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(1):532-541. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1556.

侯亚丽, 李存虎, 李琪, et al. 测量参数对建筑风场特征分析结果的影响[J]. 2026, 47(1): 532-541. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1556.

摘要

采用三维超声波风速仪

对内蒙古呼和浩特市某建筑环境内的风场特征开展现场测量实验

将10 Hz实验数据分别处理为采样频率为5、2和1 Hz的子数据样本

及平均周期为10、5及1 min的子数据样本

探寻分析采样频率和平均周期对建筑环境内风速、风向、湍流强度及湍流功率谱密度等参数的影响

结果表明：1 Hz采样频率即能准确捕捉建筑环境内风速和风向特征

而无需追求过高的采样频率;采用1 min平均周期能保留更多远大于或远小于平均风速的实际风速值

由此计算的风功率密度更接近实际情况;平均周期对风向频率有轻微的影响

但并不会改变测点风向分布特征和主风向;采样频率对建筑环境内湍流强度和湍流功率密度均不存在影响;采用1 min平均周期时建筑环境内的湍流强度和湍流功率谱密度均相对较小

采用10 min平均周期可能高估建筑环境内风场湍流强度

但却提供较为保险的风力机载荷分析依据。

Abstract

The wind measurement experiment was conducted by using three-dimensional ultrasonic anemometers in the building environment in Hohhot

Inner Mongolia

and the collected wind data were processed into sub-data samples with sampling frequencies of 10 Hz

5 Hz

2 Hz and 1 Hz and sub-data samples with averaging periods of 10 min

5 min and 1 min

respectively. The effects of sampling frequency and average period on wind speed

wind direction

turbulence intensity and turbulence power spectral density in the built environment were explored and analyzed. The results show that the wind field characteristics can be accurately captured by using a 1 Hz sampling frequency

without pursuing too high sampling frequency. Wind speeds which are much larger or smaller than the average wind speed can be retained by using1min averaging period

and the wind power density calculated is closer to the actual situation. While the averaging period has a slight influence on the wind direction frequency

but does not change the wind direction distribution characteristics and the main wind direction. Meanwhile

the averaging period has no effect on the turbulence intensity and turbulence power spectral density in the building environment. The turbulence intensity and turbulence power spectral spectrum density under a 1 min averaging period are relatively smaller. However

the turbulence intensity may be overestimated under a 10 min averaging period in the building environment

but it provides a relatively safe basis for wind turbine load analysis.

关键词

Keywords

references

REJA R K, AMIN R, TASNEEM Z, et al.A review of the evaluation of urban wind resources: challenges and perspectives[J]. Energy and buildings, 2022, 257: 111781.

PORCARO M, COMINO F, VANWALLEGHEM T, et al.Exploring the reduction of energy demand of a building with an eco-roof under different irrigation strategies[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2021, 74: 103229.

WILKE A, WELFENS P J J. Urban wind energy production potential: new opportunities[R]. Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, 2020.

DAI S F, LIU H J, PENG H Y.Assessment of parapet effect on wind flow properties and wind energy potential over roofs of tall buildings[J]. Renewable energy, 2022, 199: 826-839.

ZHANG S W, KWOK K C S, LIU H H, et al. A CFD study of wind assessment in urban topology with complex wind flow[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2021, 71: 103006.

TASNEEM Z, AL NOMAN A, DAS S K, et al.An analytical review on the evaluation of wind resource and wind turbine for urban application: prospect and challenges[J]. Developments in the built environment, 2020, 4: 100033.

BIANCHINI A, BANGGA G, BARING-GOULD I, et al.Current status and grand challenges for small wind turbine technology[J]. Wind energy science, 2022, 7(5): 2003-2037.

KC A, WHALE J, URMEE T.Urban wind conditions and small wind turbines in the built environment: a review[J]. Renewable energy, 2019, 131: 268-283.

侯亚丽, 栗广浩, 杨宇昕, 等. 基于现场测量的建筑环境风场特征分析及风力机出力评估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(11): 318-324.

RAKIB M I, EVANS S P, CLAUSEN P D.Measured gust events in the urban environment, a comparison with the IEC standard[J]. Renewable energy, 2020, 146: 1134-1142.

李荣阳, 侯亚丽, 栗广浩, 等. 城市建筑环境中阵风特征的实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2023, 44(2): 389-396.

TABRIZI A B, WHALE J, LYONS T, et al.Rooftop wind monitoring campaigns for small wind turbine applications: Effect of sampling rate and averaging period[J]. Renewable energy, 2015, 77: 320-330.

GB/T 18710—2002, 风电场风能资源评估方法[S].

侯亚丽, 汪建文, 王强, 等. 建筑物群内屋顶形状对屋顶风力机微观选址的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(2): 191-200.

ABOHELA I,HAMZAN,DUDEK S.Effect of roof shape,wind direction,building height and urban configurationon the energy yield and positioning of roof mounted wind turbines[J]. Renewable energy,2013, 50(3): 1106-1118.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

台风期间福建省平潭近海近地层风特性研究

热带气旋对风力发电的影响分析

新疆达坂城风电场风能资源特性分析

新型有源配电网保护失配风险定值甄别方法

极端气象条件下综合能源系统可靠性评估方法研究与展望