东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定

吴彩虹; 宋跃; 代加林; 俞剑; 顾晓强

doi:doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1500

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定

更新时间：2026-02-06

- 东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定
- 东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定
- 太阳能学报 2026年47卷第1期页码：468-475
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1500
  中图分类号： TU411
- 网络首发：2026-02-05，
  
  纸质出版：2026-02-05
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴彩虹, 宋跃, 代加林, 等. 东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(1):468-475.

吴彩虹, 宋跃, 代加林, et al. 东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定[J]. 2026, 47(1): 468-475.
吴彩虹, 宋跃, 代加林, 等. 东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(1):468-475. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1500.

吴彩虹, 宋跃, 代加林, et al. 东海风电场黏土不排水抗剪强度的静力触探标定[J]. 2026, 47(1): 468-475. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1500.

摘要

该研究开展原位和室内的CPT、十字板剪切（VST）试验

分析土体在不同深度下的抗剪峰值强度（Sup）、抗剪残余强度（Su）

以及相应的Nkp和Nkr的取值。依据原位和室内Nk系数结果计算得到上海黏土Su预测值。研究结果表明

原位试验浅层土体的Sup和Sur随深度增加而增大

而这两者在较深土层中差距较小。计算得到的Nkp波动范围较Nkr小。室内试验中

黏土固结所需时间较短

且在相同上覆应力下不同深度的土体抗剪强度差异较小。原位和室内试验单一土层Nkp、Nkr结果差异不大

使用Nkp可预测原位不同深度土体Su

Abstract

The cone factor （） can be used to estimate the undrained shear strength （） of clay

which in turn enables the calculation of the bearing capacity of offshore wind turbine foundations based on empirical correlations. In this study

both in-situ and laboratory cone penetration tests （CPT）

together with vane shear tests （VST）

were conducted to analyze the peak shear strength （） and residual shear strength （） of soil at various depths

as well as the corresponding and values. Based on the obtained in-situ and laboratory coefficients

the predicted values for Shanghai clay were calculated. The results indicate that both Sup and Sur in the shallow soil layers increase with depth

while their difference becomes less significant in deeper layers. The fluctuation range of was found to be smaller than that for . In the laboratory tests

the required consolidation time for the clay was short

and the variation in shear strength at different depths under the same overburden stress was not pronounced. Furthermore

the and values obtained from both in-situ and laboratory tests for a given soil layer showed little difference

suggesting that at various depths can be reliably predicted using .

关键词

Keywords

references

张双益, 李熙晨. 气候变化背景下未来中国近海风能资源预估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(1): 29-35.

朱蓉, 徐红, 龚强, 等. 中国风能开发利用的风环境区划[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(3): 55-66.

林逸凡, 杨梓豪, 刘玉飞, 等. 中国沿海风电施工窗口期及功效分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(1): 273-280.

宋二祥, 付浩, 林世杰, 等. 饱和黏性土不排水分析中总应力强度指标的选用[J]. 土木工程学报. 2021, 54(9): 88-95.

ABDEL RAHMAN I.Correlation of cone resistance with undrained shear strength for clay soils[R]. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysisa, 2007.

GEBRESELASSIE B.Experimental, analytical and numerical investigations of excavations in normally consolidated soft soils[M]. Kassel: Kassel University. Press, 2003.

CHEN C.Evaluating undrained shear strength of Klang clay from cone penetration test[C]//International Conference on In-situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories. Bali, Indonesia. 2001:141-148.

ISMAIL H, ZEIN A.Prediction of undrained shear strength and SPT using the static CPT data[C]//Proceedings 9th regional African Conference on SMFE.Lagos, Nigeria. 1987: 185-192.

OTOKO G R, MANUEL I, IGWAGU M, et al.Empirical cone factor for estimation of undrained shear strength[J]. Electronic journal of geotechnical engineering, 2016, 21: 6069-6076.

HONG S, LEE M, KIM J, et al.Evaluation of undrained shear strength of Busan clay using CPT[C]//2nd Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT, Huntington Beach, USA, 2010.

RÉMAI Z. Correlation of undrained shear strength and CPT resistance[J]. Periodica polytechnica civil engineering, 2013, 57: 39-44.

SCHMERTMANN J H.Guidelines for cone penetration test: performance and design[M]. Washington: Federal Highway Administration, 1978.

TERZAGHI K, PECK R B, MESRI G.Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M]. Hoboken: John wiley & sons, 1996:480-490.

YI J T, GOH S H, LEE F H, et al.A numerical study of cone penetration in fine-grained soils allowing for consolidation effects[J]. Géotechnique, 2012, 62(8): 707-719.

YU H S, HERRMANN L R, BOULANGER R W.Analysis of steady cone penetration in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2000, 126(7): 594-605.

林毅峰, 朱俊霖, 俞剑, 等. 考虑黏土非线性特性的锥尖系数小孔扩张计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(S2): 67-71.

SHENG D C, CUI L, ANSARI Y.Interpretation of cone factor in undrained soils via full-penetration finite-element analysis[J]. International journal of geomechanics, 2013, 13(6): 745-753.

HAUSER L, SCHWEIGER H F.Numerical study on undrained cone penetration in structured soil using G-PFEM[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 133: 104061.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123—2019[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

海上风电静力触探中小应变非线性刚度影响的数值研究

波流共同作用下桩基局部冲刷计算方法研究与初步验证

基于精细化叠加尾流模型的海上风电场微观选址

计及恶劣天气约束的海上风能波浪能资源分布研究

考虑控制链路延时的风电场经MMC-HVDC并网系统稳定性分析及提升策略