网络出版:2025-10-31,
纸质出版:2025-10-31
移动端阅览
邱旭, 陈俊岭, 冯又全, 等. 风力发电塔筒屈曲承载力新旧欧洲壳结构规范对比[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025,(10):696-702.
邱旭, 陈俊岭, 冯又全, et al. 风力发电塔筒屈曲承载力新旧欧洲壳结构规范对比[J]. 2025, (10): 696-702.
邱旭, 陈俊岭, 冯又全, 等. 风力发电塔筒屈曲承载力新旧欧洲壳结构规范对比[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025,(10):696-702. DOI: doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1054.
邱旭, 陈俊岭, 冯又全, et al. 风力发电塔筒屈曲承载力新旧欧洲壳结构规范对比[J]. 2025, (10): 696-702. DOI: doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1054.
为探究风电行业内塔筒屈曲现象频发的原因
以风电塔筒屈曲计算最常用的欧洲EC3壳结构规范为研究对象
分析新、旧两本规范对于屈曲承载力计算方法的异同。针对两本规范计算方法中的制造质量、屈曲折减系数等关键参数开展了定量分析。经研究发现
新、旧EC3壳结构规范中经向屈曲承载力计算公式差异较大
制造质量对风电塔筒屈曲承载力影响较大
尤其是当采用新版规范进行塔筒设计时
应谨慎选择制造质量参数的取值。
To explore the reasons for frequent tower cylinder buckling phenomena in the wind power industry
this article takes the European EC3 shell structure code
which is the most commonly used calculation method for tower buckling
as the research object. It analyzes the similarities and differences between the new and old versions of this code in terms of their methodologies for calculating buckling capacity. A quantitative analysis is conducted on key parameters such as manufacturing quality and buckling reduction factors used in the calculation methods outlined in both codes. The study reveals significant differences in the formulas for calculating the meridional buckling capacity between the new and old EC3 Shell Structures Codes. Furthermore
it highlights that manufacturing quality has a substantial impact on the buckling capacity of wind turbine towers. Notably
when designing towers using the new version of the code
careful consideration should be given to the selection of manufacturing quality parameters to ensure accurate and reliable buckling capacity calculations.
李万润, 范科友, 杜永峰. 基于最不利塔顶位移相图法的风电塔筒动力屈曲研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(23): 8-20.
黄中华, 刘喆, 谢雅. 超大功率风力发电机组塔筒屈曲分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(4): 304-310.
CHOU J S, OU Y C, LIN K Y.Collapse mechanism and risk management of wind turbine tower in strong wind[J]. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2019, 193: 103962.
CHEN X, XU J Z.Structural failure analysis of wind turbines impacted by super typhoon Usagi[J]. Engineering failure analysis, 2016, 60: 391-404.
潘方树, 王法武, 柯世堂, 等. 考虑缺陷的大型风力机塔筒屈曲分析与稳定性设计[J]. 太阳能学报, 2017, 38(10): 2659-2664.
LWIN N N, SONG B.Effect of Initial geometrical imperfections on buckling strength and design of offshore wind turbine tower[C]//7th china-Japan-US trilateral symposium on lifeline earthquake engineering, shanghai, China, 2016.
YADAV K K, GERASIMIDIS S.Imperfection insensitive thin cylindrical shells for next generation wind turbine towers[J]. Journal of constructional steel research, 2020, 172: 106228.
SADOWSKI A J, CAMARA A, MALAGA-CHUQUITAYPE C, et al.Seismic analysis of a tall metal wind turbine support tower with realistic geometric imperfections[J]. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2017, 46(2): 201-219.
XU Y Z, REN Q Q, ZHANG H, et al.Collapse analysis of a wind turbine tower with initial-imperfection subjected to near-field ground motions[J]. Structures, 2021, 29: 373-382.
国家能源局. 风电机组钢塔筒设计制造安装规范: NB/T 10216—2019[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2019.
CEN. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures-part 1-6: strength and stability of shell structures: EN 1993-1-6: 2007[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2007.
CEN. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures-part 1-6: strength and stability of shell structures: EN 1993-1-6: 2007[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2017.
GL. Guideline for the certification of wind turbines[S]. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd, 2010.
IEC. Wind energy generation systems-part 6: tower and foundation design requirements: IEC 61400-6[S]. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2020.
IEC. Wind energy generation systems-part 1: design requirements: IEC 61400-1[S]. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2019.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621