计及多重不确定性的氢-电耦合热电联供系统配置优化

张雨檬; 李鑫; 王宁玲; 杨志平; 李承周; 王利刚

doi:doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0789

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 读者登录期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

计及多重不确定性的氢-电耦合热电联供系统配置优化

更新时间：2025-10-22

- 计及多重不确定性的氢-电耦合热电联供系统配置优化
- 暂无标题
- 太阳能学报 2025年46卷第9期页码：399-407
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0789
  中图分类号： TK91
- 网络出版：2025-10-14，
  
  纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张雨檬, 李鑫, 王宁玲, 等. 计及多重不确定性的氢-电耦合热电联供系统配置优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025,46(9):399-407.
张雨檬, 李鑫, 王宁玲, 等. 计及多重不确定性的氢-电耦合热电联供系统配置优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025,46(9):399-407. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0789.

DOI：

摘要

针对光伏-燃料电池-电解池-储氢-锂电池耦合热电联供系统

建立电-氢转化技术路线与容量配置协同优化的混合整数线性规划模型。计及关键部件成本以及电-氢转化技术路线不确定性

可选择的技术有可逆固体氧化物电池、质子交换膜燃料电池、质子交换膜电解池。结果显示

技术路线的选择和部件成本变化对用能成本有重要影响

用能成本范围为[0.40

1.15]元/kWh;可逆固体氧化物电池由于可以双模式运行

装备利用率及经济性较好

相较质子交换膜电池和锂电池更具优势。然而

当可逆固体氧化物电池成本达到2 万元/kW且质子交换膜电解池成本低至0.25万元/kW时

质子交换膜电池储能技术路线经济性更优;当可逆固体氧化物电池和质子交换膜电解池成本分别高于1.6万元/kW、0.4万元/kW

且锂电池成本低至0.04万元/kWh时

仅适合采用锂电池作为储能部件

此时用能成本低于0.73元/kWh。

Abstract

With the lowest total cost as the objective

this paper establishes a collaborative optimization model of technology selection and capacity allocation for the photovoltaic-fuel cell-electrolyzer-hydrogen storage-lithium battery coupling system

accounting for component cost uncertainty. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells

proton exchange membrane electrolyzers

and reversible solid oxide cells are optional hydrogen-electricity conversion technologies. Results revealed that the technical path selected and variations in component prices have a significant effect on the system configuration. Reversible solid oxide cells are able to operate in dual modes

resulting in high equipment utilization and economy

offering greater advantages over lithium battery storage technology

and proton exchange membrane cells. The levelized cost of energy ranges in [0.40

1.15] RMB/kWh. However

the electricity-hydrogen coupling technology route based on proton exchange membrane cells has greater advantages when the cost of reversible solid oxide cells is more than 20000 RMB/kW and the cost of proton exchange membrane electrolyzers is less than 2500 RMB/kW. When the cost of reversible solid oxide cells and proton exchange membrane electrolyzers is higher than 16000 RMB/kW and 4000 RMB/kW

respectively

and the cost of lithium batteries is as low as 400 RMB/kWh

it is only suitable to use lithium batteries as energy storage components. Under those scenarios

the levelized cost of energy is less than 0.73 RMB/kWh.

关键词

Keywords

references

徐岩, 张建浩, 张荟. 含冷、热、电、气的园区综合能源系统选址定容规划案例分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(1): 313-322.

袁昊哲, 叶欢欢, 陈耀廷, 等. 农村微电网光储容量优化配置研究[J]. 广东电力, 2023, 36(5): 49-57.

刘红. 基于改进粒子群算法的储能调峰容量优化配置研究[J]. 广东电力, 2023, 36(1): 68-76.

黄彦博, 冯忠楠, 随权, 等. 考虑实时SOC与动态循环效率的电池损耗评估及储能定容策略[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(11): 413-423.

OURAMDANE O, ELBOUCHIKHI E, AMIRAT Y, et al.Optimal sizing of domestic grid-connected microgrid maximizing self consumption and battery lifespan[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, 55(12): 683-688.

FAN H, WANG C Y, LIU L, et al.Review of uncertainty modeling for optimal operation of integrated energy system[J]. Frontiers in energy research, 2022, 9: 641337.

李笑竹, 王维庆, 王海云, 等. 基于鲁棒优化的风光储联合发电系统储能配置策略[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(8): 67-78.

ZHAI J Y, JIANG Y N, LI J N, et al.Distributed adjustable robust optimal power-gas flow considering wind power uncertainty[J]. International journal of electrical power & energy systems, 2022, 139: 107963.

LI C Z, WANG N L, WANG Z, et al.Energy hub-based optimal planning framework for user-level integrated energy systems: considering synergistic effects under multiple uncertainties[J]. Applied energy, 2022, 307: 118099.

LIU L C, CUI G M, CHEN J X, et al.Two-stage superstructure model for optimization of distributed energy systems (DES) part I: model development and verification[J]. Energy, 2022, 245: 123227.

FENG J W, WANG H X, YANG Z H, et al.Economic dispatch of industrial park considering uncertainty of renewable energy based on a deep reinforcement learning approach[J]. Sustainable energy, grids and networks, 2023, 34: 101050.

ADAIKKAPPAN M, SATHIYAMOORTHY N.Modeling, state of charge estimation, and charging of lithium-ion battery in electric vehicle: a review[J]. International journal of energy research, 2022, 46(3): 2141-2165.

BURKE A, OGDEN J, FULTON L.Hydrogen storage and transport: technologies and costs[R]. UCD-ITS-RR-24-17, 2024.

FAN L H, DENG H, ZHANG Y G, et al.Towards ultralow platinum loading proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Energy & environmental science, 2023, 16(4): 1466-1479.

BADGETT A, BRAUCH J, THATTE A A, et al.Updated manufactured cost analysis for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers[R]. NREL/TP-6A20-87625, 2024.

FAZLOLLAHI S, BUNGENER S L, MANDEL P, et al.Multi-objectives, multi-period optimization of district energy systems: I. selection of typical operating periods[J]. Computers & chemical engineering, 2014, 65: 54-66.

OYEWOLE O L, NWULU N I, OKAMPO E J.Optimal design of hydrogen-based storage with a hybrid renewable energy system considering economic and environmental uncertainties[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2024, 300: 117991.

TOOPSHEKAN A, RAHDAN P, VAZIRI RAD M A, et al. Evaluation of a stand-alone CHP-Hybrid system using a multi-criteria decision making due to the sustainable development goals[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2022, 87: 104170.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据