不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟

方云辉; 余豪华; 曾德龙; 陈宇; 马骏

doi:doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0034

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 读者登录期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟

更新时间：2025-12-17

- 不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟
- 不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟
- 太阳能学报 2025年第10期页码：128-137
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0034
  中图分类号： K91
- 网络出版：2025-10-31，
  
  纸质出版：2025-10-31
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
方云辉, 余豪华, 曾德龙, 等. 不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025,(10):128-137.

方云辉, 余豪华, 曾德龙, et al. 不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟[J]. 2025, (10): 128-137.
方云辉, 余豪华, 曾德龙, 等. 不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025,(10):128-137. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0034.

方云辉, 余豪华, 曾德龙, et al. 不同外界环境下加氢站泄漏扩散的数值模拟[J]. 2025, (10): 128-137. DOI： doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0034.

摘要

为探究加氢站泄漏后氢气扩散规律

制定相关防护措施

以宁波市某规划中加氢站为研究对象

使用CFD仿真软件Ansys Fluent

对不同外界环境条件影响下的氢气泄漏扩散进行了仿真模拟。结果表明

风对氢气泄漏扩散的影响极大：风速越大

形成的氢云体积越小

且更快达到稳态;建筑物、设备等会在一定程度上偏转风向、降低风速

此种情况下

形成的氢云体积略大

但仍小于无风状况;氢气容易在站房与顶棚交接处、加氢机上方积聚

在这些位置附近设置氢气传感器

可有效对泄漏的氢气进行报警

降低加氢站潜在风险。基于所构建模型

提出一套氢气传感器布置方案

该研究中案例全部报警成功。当风向与泄漏方向垂直时

形成的氢云体积较小

相对较难检测

可能会报警不及时

建议在此处增加人员巡视

或增设移动式报警装置。

Abstract

In order to explore the hydrogen diffusion law after hydrogen refueling station leakage and formulate corresponding protective measures

taking a planned hydrogen refueling station in Ningbo city as the research object

the CFD simulation software Ansys Fluent was used to simulate the hydrogen leakage diffusion under various external environmental conditions. Results indicate that wind has a significant impact on the leakage and diffusion of hydrogen: higher wind speeds correspond to smaller volume of hydrogen cloud formed and faster attainment of steady state. Structural elements such as buildings and equipment can redirect wind and reduce its speed to some extent. In such cases

the volume of formed hydrogen cloud is slightly larger but still smaller than under windless conditions. Hydrogen tends to accumulate at areas such as the junction of the station and the roof

as well as above the hydrogen dispenser. Placement of hydrogen sensors near these locations enables effective leak detection

reducing potential risks at hydrogen refueling station. Based on the constructed model

a layout scheme for hydrogen sensors is proposed

ensuring successful alarms in all studied scenarios. When wind direction is perpendicular to the direction of the leak

the volume of hydrogen cloud formed is small and detection may be relatively challenging

potentially leading to delayed alarms. Hence

it is suggested to increase personnel patrols or deploy additional mobile alarm devices in these areas.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘峻, 赵汪, 高学强, 等. 全球加氢站产业、技术及标准进展综述[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.

ZHOU Y, LI R Y, LV Z X, et al.Green hydrogen: a promising way to the carbon-free society[J]. Chinese journal of chemical engineering, 2022, 43: 2-13.

MORADI R, GROTH K.Hydrogen storage and delivery: Review of the state of the art technologies and risk and reliability analysis[J]. 2019, 44(23): 12254-12269.

SALEHI F, ABBASSI R, ASADNIA M, et al.Overview of safety practices in sustainable hydrogen economy-An Australian perspective[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2022, 47(81): 34689-34703.

郑津洋, 开方明, 刘仲强, 等. 高压氢气储运设备及其风险评价[J]. 太阳能学报, 2006, 27(11): 1168-1174.

王鑫, 陈叔平, 朱鸣. 液氢储运技术发展现状与展望[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(1): 500-514.

MIDILLI A, AY M, DINCER I, et al.On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies I: current status and needs[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2005, 9(3): 255-271.

QIAN J Y, LI X J, GAO Z X, et al.A numerical study of hydrogen leakage and diffusion in a hydrogen refueling station[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2020, 45(28): 14428-14439.

LIU S, HE R.Optimized model-based diagnosis approach for hydrogen leakage in hydrogen supply system of fuel cell truck[J]. International journal of energy research, 2022, 46(12): 17720-17725.

HE X, KONG D P, YU X R, et al.Prediction model for the evolution of hydrogen concentration under leakage in hydrogen refueling station using deep neural networks[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2024, 51: 702-712.

王旭, 丁珏, 杨小权, 等. 高压储氢系统泄漏爆炸事故的动力学演化[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(3): 150-156.

张静, 黄玉玺, 张巍, 等. 车库燃料汽车氢气泄漏模拟与分析[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2022, 53(6): 1068-1075.

何静, 刘宏波, 魏列, 等. 车载储氢瓶泄漏及车库内通风方式研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2022, 18(9): 181-188.

姚璐峤, 张小军, 王凯, 等. BP神经网络辅助的氢气泄漏检测方法研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 36(3): 289-294.

BIRCH A D, HUGHES D J, SWAFFIELD F.Velocity decay of high pressure jets[J]. Combustion science and technology, 1987, 52(1/2/3): 161-171.

BIRCH A D, BROWN D R, DODSON M G, et al.The structure and concentration decay of high pressure jets of natural gas[J]. Combustion science and technology, 1984, 36(5/6): 249-261.

EWAN B C R, MOODIE K. Structure and velocity measurements in underexpanded jets[J]. Combustion science and technology, 1986, 45(5/6): 275-288.

YÜCEIL K B, ÖTÜGEN M V. Scaling parameters for underexpanded supersonic jets[J]. Physics of fluids, 2002, 14(12): 4206-4215.

李雪芳. 储氢系统意外氢气泄漏和扩散研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2015.

黄雪驰, 马贵阳, 杨奇睿, 等. 天然气管道非稳态泄漏扩散的数值模拟[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(1): 183-188.

YANG F Y, WANG T Z, DENG X T, et al.Review on hydrogen safety issues: incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2021, 46(61): 31467-31488.

薄柯, 黄强华, 王骞, 等. 塑料内胆材料高压氢渗透实验装置研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(12): 487-491.

TOLIAS I C, GIANNISSI S G, VENETSANOS A G, et al.Best practice guidelines in numerical simulations and CFD benchmarking for hydrogen safety applications[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2019, 44(17): 9050-9062.

SHU Z Y, LIANG W Q, ZHENG X H, et al.Dispersion characteristics of hydrogen leakage: comparing the prediction model with the experiment[J]. Energy, 2021, 236: 121420.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

风力机塔架的结构动力分析