中国航天空气动力技术研究院,北京,100074
闫万方*,高级工程师,研究方向:实验空气动力学,风洞试验技术,风洞天平与气动力试验应用. E-mail:yanwanfang_zizhan@163.com
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
闫万方, 穆向阳, 蒋坤, 等. 考虑测量干扰抑制的风洞天平拓扑优化方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(8): 58−69.
Yan Wanfang, Mu Xiangyang, Jiang Kun, et al. Topology optimization method for wind tunnel balance considering suppression of measurement interference[J]. 2026, 44(8): 58-69.
闫万方, 穆向阳, 蒋坤, 等. 考虑测量干扰抑制的风洞天平拓扑优化方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(8): 58−69. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2026.0011
Yan Wanfang, Mu Xiangyang, Jiang Kun, et al. Topology optimization method for wind tunnel balance considering suppression of measurement interference[J]. 2026, 44(8): 58-69. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2026.0011.
针对大载荷比天平小量值分量易受干扰、测量精度低,以及传统方法难以突破性能瓶颈问题,发展了考虑测量干扰抑制的风洞天平拓扑优化设计方法。基于轴向力测量干扰模式,提出“最小柔度”和“最小干扰”两种拓扑优化模型并建立数值优化流程,结合设计域“上下镜像”和“非镜像”策略完成多组算例,并开展典型算例实物加工和地面加载验证。结果表明:该方法可获得结构清晰、可制造拓扑构型,“最小干扰”模型所得构型更简洁可靠,“非镜像”策略虽能拓展设计空间,但工艺复杂度与计算成本提升;天平实物目标分量
F
x
灵敏度显著,单独施加其余载荷时最大干扰输出小于2.3%。该方法显著提升天平抗干扰能力和测量精度,为高精度天平及力传感器设计提供了新途径。
The strain gauge balance is the core device for accurately measuring aerodynamic loads acting on aircraft models in wind tunnel tests. As a special type of six-component force sensor
its design faces greater challenges due to the constrained design space
extreme mismatch in load magnitudes across the measured components
and harsh testing conditions. For sting-type balances
the measurement accuracy of the axial force component is inherently limited
as the measuring elements are prone to nonlinear deformation and torsional interference within the restricted design space – problems that are further exacerbated under high load-ratio condit
ions (e.g.
when subjected to large longitudinal loads). To address the interference susceptibility and low accuracy of low-magnitude components under high load-ratios
as well as the limitations of conventional design methods
a topology optimization method considering measurement interference suppression was developed for wind tunnel balances. Based on the interference patterns of axial force measurement
two optimization models- “minimum compliance” and “minimum interference” —were proposed
and a numerical optimization framework integrating the SIMP model
the MMA algorithm
and filtering/projection techniques was established. Multiple design cases were studied using mirrored and non-mirrored design domains strategies
and a prototype was fabricated and calibrated through ground loading tests. Results show that the proposed method yields clear and manufacturable topological configurations; the “minimum interference” model produces simpler and more reliable layouts; the non-mirrored strategy expands the design space but increases manufacturing complexity and computational cost. The fabricated balance exhibits high sensitivity in the target component
F
x
with a maximum interference output below 2.3% when other loads are individually applied. The proposed method significantly enhances the anti-interference capability and measurement accuracy of the wind tunnel balance
providing a new approach for the design of high-precision balances and multi-component force sensors.
He Dexin. Wind tunnel balance[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2001(in Chinese).
Burns D E, Williams Q L, Phillips B D, et al. Review of potential wind tunnel balance technologies[C]// Proc of 10th International Symposium on Strain Gauge Balance, Mianyang, 2016.
Ewald B F R. Multi-component force balances for conventional and cryogenic wind tunnels[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2000, 11(6): R81. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/201
Yan Wanfang, Jiang Kun, Zhang Jiang. Development of a six-component wind tunnel balance with lower interference on axial force measurement[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(6): 61−67(in Chinese). doi: 10.11729/syltlx20180082
Chaisson T, Lee S, Burns D E. Design optimization of a wind tunnel force balance using stepwise response surface method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2022, 36(6): 3071−3079. doi: 10.1007/s12206-022-0537-4
Liu Chunfeng, Wang Ruiting, Wang Xuefeng, et al. Balance calibration method based on modern design of experiments[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2024, 42(3): 111−118(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0107
Wang Yunpeng, Nie Shaojun, Wang Yue, et al. Application of convolutional neural network in static calibration of wind tunnel balance[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(3): 25−32(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0096
Ringel M, Levin D. Improved drag element for wind tunnel sting balances[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1985, 22(11): 979−982. doi: 10.2514/3.45234
Zhai Junnai, Ewald B, Hufnagel K. An investigation on the interference of internal six-component wind tunnel balances with FEM[C]// Proc of 95th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities(ICIASF), Dayton, OH, USA, 1995. doi: 10.1109/ICIASF.1995.519122
Swapna L, Katta B, Suresh B S. Shape optimization of a drag force element of a force transducer for wind tunnel measurements[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, 2015, 5(3B): 33−38. doi: 10.5923/c.jmea.201502.07
Min Fu, Xie Zhendong, Dai Jinwen, et al. Optimization analysis of modified axial force element of sting balance[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 36(5): 76−82(in Chinese). doi: 10.11729/syltlx20210083
Shi Yujie, Peng Chao, Mi Peng, et al. Development of internal strain gauge balance with variable cross-section axial force flex beam based on finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 35(5): 128−133(in Chinese). doi: 10.11729/syltlx20200109
Zhang S X, Li X, Ma H Q, et al. Mechanical analysis of normal force interference on axial force measurement for internal sting balance[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 58: 351−357. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.028
Yan Wanfang, Wei Wei, Jiang Kun, et al. Calibration modeling of wind tunnel balance based on multivariate orthogonal functions[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2026, 44(1): 39−47(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0078
Chen Zekun, Jiang Jiaxi, Wang Yujia, et al. Defects, microstructures and mechanical properties of materials fabricated by metal additive manufacturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(12): 3190−3205(in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-472
Yan Wanfang, Jiang Kun, Wei Zhongwu, et al. Development of a wind tunnel strain-gauge balance based on additive manufacturing[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2025, 39(6): 101−108(in Chinese). doi: 10.11729/syltlx20230121
Burns D E, Parker P A. Additively manufactured wind-tunnel balance[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2020, 57(5): 958−963. doi: 10.2514/1.C035889
Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
Bendsøe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197−224. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2
Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, et al. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(1): 1−16. doi: 10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7
Querin O M, Steven G P, Xie Y M. Evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) using a bidirectional algorithm[J]. Engineering Computations, 1998, 15(8): 1031−1048. doi: 10.1108/02644409810244129
Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2004, 194(1): 363−393. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.032
Guo X, Zhang W S, Zhong W L. Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically: a new moving morphable components based framework[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014, 81(8): 081009. doi: 10.1115/1.4027609
Chen Xiaoqian, Zhang Zeyu, Li Yu, et al. Research on structure topology optimization design empowered by deep learning method[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2024, 54(2): 213−258 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-23-052
Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes: a new method for structural optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(2): 359−373. doi: 10.1002/nme.1620240207
Zillober C. A globally convergent version of the method of moving asymptotes[J]. Structural Optimization, 1993, 6(3): 166−174. doi: 10.1007/BF01743509
Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, et al. Stress-based topology optimization for continua[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(4): 605−620. doi: 10.1007/s00158-009-0440-y
Chen Xiaoqian, Zhao Yong, Huo Senlin, et al. A review of topology optimization design methods for multi-scale structures[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(15): 17−52(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28863
Duysinx P, Sigmund O. New developments in handling stress constraints in optimal material distribution[C]//Proc of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1998: 4906. doi: 10.2514/6.1998-4906
Bruggi M, Venini P. A mixed FEM approach to stress-constrained topology optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 73(12): 1693−1714. doi: 10.1002/nme.2138
Cheng G D, Guo X. ε -relaxed approach in structural topology optimization[J ] . Structural Optimization, 199 7, 13(4): 258−266. doi: 10.1007/BF01197454
Deng H, Vulimiri P S, To A C. An efficient 146-line 3D sensitivity analysis code of stress-based topology optimization written in MATLAB[J]. Optimization and Engineering, 2022, 23(3): 1733−1757. doi: 10.1007/s11081-021-09675-3
Sigmund O. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization[J]. Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 1997, 25(4): 493−524. doi: 10.1080/08905459708945415
Takezawa A, Nishiwaki S, Kitamura M, et al. Topology optimization for designing strain-gauge load cells[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 42(3): 387−402. doi: 10.1007/s00158-010-0491-0
Sung M K, Lee S, Burns D E. Robust topology optimization of a flexural structure considering multi-stress performance for force sensing and structural safety[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 65(1): 6. doi: 10.1007/s00158-021-03088-7
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621