1. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,武汉,430063
2. 中南大学 轨道交通安全教育部重点实验室,长沙,410075
刘锋(1983—),男,高级工程师,研究方向:铁道工程. E-mail:004392@crfdsi.com
杨明智*(1972—),男,教授,研究方向:列车空气动力学及行车安全. E-mail:yqyymz@126.com
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
刘锋, 岳思, 吴晓龙, 等. 开槽轨道对高速磁浮列车气动特性的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(3): 11−21.
Liu Feng, Yue Si, Wu Xiaolong, et al. Influence of slotted track on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed maglev train[J]. 2026, 44(3): 11-21.
刘锋, 岳思, 吴晓龙, 等. 开槽轨道对高速磁浮列车气动特性的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(3): 11−21. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0165
Liu Feng, Yue Si, Wu Xiaolong, et al. Influence of slotted track on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed maglev train[J]. 2026, 44(3): 11-21. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0165.
高速磁浮列车以600 km/h运行时,车底流动与轨道结构相互作用会引发不均匀的升力分布,显著增加悬浮控制的难度与安全风险。为解决此问题,本文以三车编组高速磁浮列车为研究对象,采用基于可压缩SST
k
-
ω
IDDES湍流模型的高精度数值方法,系统研究了轨道开槽宽度(320 ~
1280
mm)对列车气动特性与流场结构的影响,并通过风洞试验验证了数值模型的可靠性。研究结果表明:轨道开槽宽度对列车底部压力分布、速度结构与整体气动力具有决定性影响。随着开槽宽度增大,头车底部正压范围缩小,尾车底部负压区范围缩小且强度减弱,而滑橇迎风侧滞止区正压分布的范围与强度均有所增强。流场分析表明,开槽显著改变了车轨间隙内的流动结构,增大了间隙空气流量与高速气流分布范围,这是导致压力分布改变和气动力变化的主要原因。综合气动力分析表明,当开槽宽度为960 mm时,整车气动阻力最小,此时相较不开槽轨道,头车升力降低约 10.9%(减少 22.26 kN),尾车升力提高约 15.8%(增加 32.26 kN),头尾车升力差显著减小,气动平衡性达到最佳。本研究为通过轨道结构被动流动控制以提升高速磁浮列车运行平稳性与安全性提供了理论依据。
The interaction between the underbody flow of a high-speed maglev train and the track structure at 600 km/h results in a non-uniform lift distribution
substantially complicating suspension control and introducing safety risks. To address this issue
this study investigates a three-car formation using a high-precision numerical approach based on the compressible SST
k-ω
IDDES turbulence model. The
effects of slotted track width (320–1280 mm) on aerodynamic characteristics and flow structures are systematically examined
with wind tunnel tests validating the numerical model. Results show that slotted track width critically governs the pressure distribution
velocity field
and aerodynamic forces on the train underside. As slot width increases
the positive pressure zone beneath the leading car contracts
reducing its lift; conversely
the negative pressure zone under the trailing car weakens while the positive pressure region near the skid's windward side expands and intensifies
increasing trailing car lift. Flow field analysis indicates that the slot-induced modifications to the train-track gap flow enhance the airflow rate and high-speed flow coverage
driving changes in pressure distribution and aerodynamic forces. Comprehensive assessment reveals that at a slot width of 960 mm
total aerodynamic drag is minimized
leading to a 10.9% reduction (22.26 kN) in leading car lift and a 15.8% increase (32.26 kN) in trailing car lift compared to the non-slotted track
thereby significantly reducing the lift difference between cars and achieving optimal aerodynamic balance. This study provides a theoretical foundation for enhancing the stability and safety of high-speed maglev trains via passive flow control through slotted track design.
Ding Sansan. 600 km/h high-speed maglev transportation system[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific Technical Publishers, 2022 (in Chinese).
Deng Zigang, Liu Zongxin, Li Haitao, et al. Development status and prospect of maglev train[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(3): 455−474,530 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220001
Wang Ying, Zhang Kunlun, Zhang Huixian, et al. Characteristics and adaptability of different types of high-speed maglev transportation systems[J]. Science and Technology Foresinght, 2023, 2(4): 19−30 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2023.04.002
Zheng Qinghua, Ni Fei. High-speed maglev transportation: from Germany to China[J]. Science and Technology Foresinght, 2023, 2(4): 31−39 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2023.04.003
Liang Jianying. Development status and future prospects of the high-speed maglev transportation system in China[J]. Science, 2022, 74(5): 31−36 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0368-6396.2022.05.009
Ding Sansan, Fu Shanqiang, Liang Xin. Engineering practice and prospect of high-speed maglev transportation in China[J]. Science and Technology Foresinght, 2023, 2(4): 40−48 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2023.04.004
Lin Tongtong, Yang Mingzhi, Zhang Lei, et al. Influence of streamlined head arch structure of high-speed maglev train on aerodynamic characteristics of train and tunnel coupling[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 2515−2523 (in Chinese). doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.t20211132
Cheng Yajun, Huang Sha, Yang Mingzhi, et al. Effect of environmental temperature on aerodynamic performance of high-speed maglev trains running in open air[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 2407−2418 (in Chinese). doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.t20221326
Gao D G, Ni F, Lin G B, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of pressure wave of high-speed maglev vehicle crossing: modeling and calculation[J]. Energies, 2019, 12: 1−18. doi: 10.3390/en12193770
Lin T T, Yang M Z, Zhang L, et al. Influence of the suspension gap on the wake characteristics of a 600 km/h superconducting maglev train[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(2): 026121. doi: 10.1063/5.0190742
Lin T T, Yang M Z, Zhang L, et al. Effect of typical arch structure on slipstream and wake flow of 600 km/h maglev train[J]. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow, 2024, 34(7): 2748−2765. doi: 10.1108/HFF-10-2023-0632
Takizawa Hideyuki , Ren Daqing, Zhou Xianquan. The vehicle dynamics characteristics of a magnetic levitation train passing another train running in opposite direction[J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2004, 41(1): 30−33 (in Chinese).
Li Mingshui, Lei Bo, Lin Guobin, et al. Field measurement of passing pressure and train induced airflow speed on high speed maglev vehicles[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24(2): 209−212 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2006.02.013
Zhou P, Li T, Zhao C F, et al. Numerical study on the flow field characteristics of the new high-speed maglev train in open air[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, 2020, 21(5): 366−381. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1900412
Wang Feng, Zhang Lei, Yang Mingzhi, et al. Effect of line space on aerodynamic performance of two high-speed maglev trains passing by each other at the speed of 600 km/h in open air[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(4): 31−40 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0122
Meng Shi, Zhou Dan, Meng Shuang. Effect of rail gap on aerodynamic performance of maglev train[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2020, 51(12): 3537−3545 (in Chinese). doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2020.12.027
Wong J Y, Howell J P, Rhodes R G, et al. Performance and stability characteristics of an electrodynamically levitated vehicle over a split guideway[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1976, 98(3): 277−285. doi: 10.1115/1.3427035
Pulliam W, Marshakov A, Tyll J, et al. Aerodynamics of the AMT maglev train design[C]// 14th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA. AIAA, 1996: AIAA 1996-2476. doi: 10.2514/6.1996-2476
Tyll J, Liu D, Schetz J, et al. Experimental studies of maglev aerodynamics[C]// 13th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, USA. AIAA, 1995: AIAA 1995-1917. doi: 10.2514/6.1995-1917
Masahiro S, Shiro H, Takamasa I, et al. Summary of running test results of new vehicles for yamanashi maglev test line[C]//Kawasaki: The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2003: 1-5.
赵跃英, 盛胜我, 刘海生, 等. 磁悬浮列车行驶噪声及其对两侧环境的影响[C]//第九届全国建筑物理学术会议论文集. 南京, 2004: 348-351.
Fu Shanqiang, Du Juntao, Ding Sansan. Research on aerodynamic drag reduction of surface microstructure of high-speed maglev train[J]. Railway Technical Standard (Chinese English), 2023, 5(1): 1−8 (in Chinese).
Tian Hongqi, Zhang Lei, Wang Tiantian, et al. Aerodynamic design of high-speed maglev trains for running stability[J]. Science and Technology Foresinght, 2023, 2(4): 70−77 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2023.04.007
Ding Sansan, Liu Jiali, Chen Dawei. Aerodynamic design of the 600 km/h high-speed maglev transportation system[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37(1): 1−8 (in Chinese). doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220131
European Standard. Railway applications - Aerodynamics - Part 6: Requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment: DIN EN 14067-6: 2018[S]. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung, 2018.
European Standard. Railway applications - Aerodynamics - Part 4: Requirements and test procedures for aerodynamics on open track: DIN EN 14067-4: 2019[S]. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung, 2019.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621