ZHANG S, TIAN S Y, ZHANG X M, et al. Research progress of skew and sweep aerodynamic technology for turbomachinery blades[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(11): 15 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200925

LI Y M, CHEN G, XU D. Opportunity and challenge of CAE technology for high-end equipment manufacturing[J]. Computer Aided Engineering, 2012, 21(1): 1−7 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0871.2012.01.001

ZHOU D. Numerical investigations of unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity of turbomachines[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019 (in Chinese). doi: 10.27239/d.cnki.gnhhu.2019.000002

ZHANG M M, LI S B, HOU A P, et al. A review of the research on blade flutter in turbomachinery[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(1): 13 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2011-1-lxjzj2009-157

刘春宝. 动静干涉流动数值模拟技术与应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2022.

TANG Z H, SONG W W, OU M. An analysis of impeller strength and fatigue life of centrifugal pump based on fluid-structure interaction low specific speed[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2024(10): 127−133 (in Chinese). doi: 10.12396/znsd.240313

HE X, ZHANG L P, ZHAO Z, et al. Research of general large scale CFD software architecture and data structure[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(5): 557−565 (in Chinese).

MATSSON J E. An introduction to ANSYS fluent 2022[M]. Mission, KS: Sdc Publications, 2022.

JASAK H. OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2009, 1(2): 89−94. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0011

ECONOMON T D, PALACIOS F, COPELAND S R, et al. SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 54(3): 828−846. doi: 10.2514/1.J053813

LAWRENCE C. An overview of three approaches to multidisciplinary aeropropulsion simulations: NASA TM-107443[R]. 1997. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19970025648/downloads/19970025648.pdf

WANG Y X, ZHANG L L, LIU W, et al. Performance optimizations for scalable CFD applications on hybrid CPU+MIC heterogeneous computing system with millions of cores[J]. Computers Fluids, 2018, 173: 226−236. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.005

CAO J G. Status, challenges and perspectives of aero-engine simulation technology[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(5): 961−970 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2018.05.001

BRADSHAW P. Turbulence modeling with application to turbomachinery[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1996, 32(6): 575−624. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(96)00003-6

DENTON J D. Some limitations of turbomachinery CFD: GT 2010-22540[R]. ASME Paper, 2010.

SPALART P. Reflections on RANS modelling[M]//Progress in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 7-24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14168-3_2

SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//Proc of the 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1992: 439. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-439

LAUNDER B E, SPALDING D B. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence[M]. London, New York: Academic Press, 1972.

WILCOX D C. Turbulence modeling for CFD[M]. La Cãnada, CA: DCW Industries, Inc. , 1993.

DURBIN P A. Separated flow computations with the k-epsilon-v-squared model[J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(4): 659−664. doi: 10.2514/3.12628

SPALART P R. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2000, 21(3): 252−263. doi: 10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00007-2

SPALART P R, SHUR M. On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 1997, 1(5): 297−302. doi: 10.1016/S1270-9638(97)90051-1

SMIRNOV P E, MENTER F R. Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the spalart–shur correction term[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2009, 131(4): 041010. doi: 10.1115/1.3070573

MENTER F R, LANGTRY R B, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables: Part I: Model formulation[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3): 413. doi: 10.1115/1.2184352

MENTER F R, SMIRNOV P E, LIU T, et al. A one-equation local correlation-based transition model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2015, 95(4): 583−619. doi: 10.1007/s10494-015-9622-4

LIU Y W, LU L P, FANG L, et al. Modification of Spalart–Allmaras model with consideration of turbulence energy backscatter using velocity helicity[J]. Physics Letters A, 2011, 375(24): 2377−2381. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.05.023

LIU Y W, TANG Y M, SCILLITOE A D, et al. Modification of shear stress transport turbulence model using helicity for predicting corner separation flow in a linear compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2020, 142(2): 021004. doi: 10.1115/1.4045658

LIU Y W, LUO P Z, TANG Y M. Improved prediction of turbomachinery flows using Reynolds stress model with γ [J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 144: 108812. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2023.108812

KIM S, PULLAN G, HALL C A, et al. Stall inception in low-pressure ratio fans[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2019, 141(7): 071005. doi: 10.1115/1.4042731

LEE K B, WILSON M, VAHDATI M. Validation of a numerical model for predicting stalled flows in a low-speed fan. Part I: Modification of spalart–allmaras turbulence model[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2018, 140(5): 051008. doi: 10.1115/1.4039051

LOPEZ D I, GHISU T, KIPOUROS T, et al. Extending highly loaded axial fan operability range through novel blade design[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2022, 144(12). doi: 10.1115/1.4055350

WANG Z W, FAN Z L, LI B, et al. Key technologies for massive unsteady simulation of whole compressor[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(18): 129865 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.29865

RAI M. Navier-Stokes simulations of rotor-stator interaction using patched and overlaid grids[C]// 7th Computational Physics Conference, Cincinnati, OH. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1985: 1519. doi: 10.2514/6.1985-1519

ERDOS J I, ALZNER E. Computation of unsteady transonic flows through rotating and stationary caseades: NASA CR-2900 [R]. 1977. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19780012139

GILES M B. UNSFLO: A numerical method for unsteady inviscid flow in turbomachinery[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104734

HE L. Modelling issues for computation of unsteady turbomachinery flows[R]. Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines, von Karman Inst. Lecture Series 1996-05, Rhode Saint Genese, Belgium, 1996

HALL K C, THOMAS J P, CLARK W S. Computation of unsteady nonlinear flows in cascades using a harmonic balance technique[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(5): 879−886. doi: 10.2514/2.1754

DENTON J D. The calculation of three-dimensional viscous flow through multistage turbomachines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1992, 114(1): 18−26. doi: 10.1115/1.2927983

ADAMCZYK J J. Model equation for simulating flows in multistage turbomachinery: NASA TM-86869[R]. 1984.

ADAMCZYK J J. Aerodynamic analysis of multistage turbomachinery flows in support of aerodynamic design[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2000, 122(2): 189−217. doi: 10.1115/1.555439

RHIE D M, GLEIXNER A J, FISCHBERG C J, et al. Development and application of a multistage Navier-Stokes Solver. Part 1: Multistage modeling using bodyforces and deterministric stresses[R], ASME Paper, 95-GT-342

LIU Y W, LIU B J, LU L P. Study of modeling unsteady blade row interaction in a transonic compressor stage. Part 1: Code development and deterministic correlation analysis[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2012, 28(2): 281−290. doi: 10.1007/s10409-012-0049-z

LIU Y W, LIU B J, LU L P. Study of modeling unsteady blade row interaction in a transonic compressor stage. Part 2: Influence of deterministic correlations on time-averaged flow prediction[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2012, 28(2): 291−299. doi: 10.1007/s10409-012-0061-3

LIU Y W, TANG Y M, LIU B J, et al. An exponential decay model for the deterministic correlations in axial compressors[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2019, 141(2): 021005. doi: 10.1115/1.4041380

LIU Y W, WEI X D, TANG Y M. Investigation of unsteady rotor-stator interaction and deterministic correlation analysis in a transonic compressor stage[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2023, 145(7): 071004. doi: 10.1115/1.4056716

YONG X S, LIU Y W, TANG Y M. Development of unsteady reduced-order methods for multi-row turbomachinery flow simulation based on the computational fluids laboratory three-dimensional solver[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(4): 045135. doi: 10.1063/5.0197247

YONG X S, LIU Y W, TANG Y M. Graphic processing unit accelerated time-domain harmonic balance method for multi-row turbomachinery flow simulation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(9): 095179. doi: 10.1063/5.0228157

MAHALLATI A, MCAULIFFE B R, SJOLANDER S A, et al. Aerodynamics of a low-pressure turbine airfoil at low-Reynolds numbers. Part 1: Steady flow measurements[C]//Turbo Expo 2007, Parts A and B, Montreal, Canada. ASMEDC, 2007: 1011-1023. doi: 10.1115/gt2007-27347

DONG P, HUANG H Y, FENG G T. Conjugate heat transfer analysis of a high pressure turbine vane with radial internal cooling passages[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(2): 201−207 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2008.02.009

ZENG J, QING X J. Conjugate flow and heat transfer investigation of a turbine cascade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(6): 1204−1210 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2009.06.003

LI T, BIAN X, FENG Y, et al. Conjugate heat transfer simulation of air-cooled turbine based on gama-theta transition model[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(7): 932−940 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2014.07.009

CORRAL R, WANG Z. An efficient steady state coupled fluid-solid heat transfer method for turbomachinery applications[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2018, 130: 59−69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.04.003

WANG P, BAI H Q, SHEN Y. Five-axis NC machining simulation and optimization for integral impeller[J]. Tool Engineering, 2017, 51(7): 67−69 (in Chinese). doi: 10.16567/j.cnki.1000-7008.2017.07.018

BAZILEVS Y, KOROBENKO A, DENG X, et al. Fluid–structure interaction modeling for fatigue-damage prediction in full-scale wind-turbine blades[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2016, 83(6): 061010. doi: 10.1115/1.4033080

BELYTSCHKO T, KRONGAUZ Y, ORGAN D, et al. Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 139(1-4): 3−47. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01078-X

LI S F, LIU W K. Meshfree and particle methods and their applications[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2002, 55(1): 1−34. doi: 10.1115/1.1431547

LIU M B, LIU G R. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): An overview and recent developments[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2010, 17(1): 25−76. doi: 10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7

LIU G R, GU Y T. A point interpolation method for two-dimensional solids[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(4): 937−951. doi: 10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4937::AID-NME623.0.CO;2-X

ZHANG X, LIU X, LU M. A meshless method based on the local partition of unity for elasticity problems[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2010, 45(5): 465−474.

MA H, YU M Y, GAO A, et al. Dynamic modeling method of bolted joint interfaces based on nonlinear transversely isotropic virtual material[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2021, 42(8): 1111−1119. doi: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.08.008

JIA S, LI G, LI H N. Comparative analysis of the iterative algorithms for nonlinear method based on the Woodbury formula[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(8): 16−29, 58 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.06.0320

LIN T, OWENS D H, HÄTÖNEN J. Newton method based iterative learning control for discrete non-linear systems[J]. International Journal of Control, 2006, 79(10): 1263−1276. doi: 10.1080/00207170600821187

BYRD R H, LU P H, NOCEDAL J, et al. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1995, 16(5): 1190−1208. doi: 10.1137/0916069

NAKSHATRALA P B, TORTORELLI D A, NAKSHATRALA K B. Nonlinear structural design using multiscale topology optimization. Part I: Static formulation[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 261-262: 167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.12.018

ELMASRY A, AZOTI W, EL-SAFTY S A, et al. A comparative review of multiscale models for effective properties of nano- and micro-composites[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2023, 132: 101022. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101022

XING J T, ZHOU S, CUI E J. A survey on the fluid solid interaction mechanics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 1997, 27(1): 19−38 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-1997-1-j1998-223

ZUO Y Y, ZHANG B C. Investigation of combustion liner wall cooling in gas turbine combustor[J]. Aeroengine, 2002, 28(4): 38−43 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3147.2002.04.009

DU Z X, HAN S H, LIU Y Q, et al. Fluid-solid interaction strength and vibration of compressor blade[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement Diagnosis, 2013, 33(5): 789−793, 910 (in Chinese). doi: 10.16450/j.cnki.issn.1004-6801.2013.05.025

SHI J Z, QIN H Q, YIN H, et al. Structural dynamics analysis on gas turbine compressor blade based on fluid-solid coupling[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2016, 29(5): 1−5,19 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-290X.2016.05.001

SHI J Z. Aeroelastic stability study of compressor blade based on fluid-solid coupling[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2017 (in Chinese).

ZHANG X H. Fluid-structure interaction static strength analysis of a certain compressor stage blade[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2011 (in Chinese).

ZHANG R Q. Blade aeroelasticity analysis based on fluid solid coupling[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009 (in Chinese).

JIN Y. Numerical study of several fluid-induced vibration problems in turbomachineries by fluid-structure coupling approach[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2002 (in Chinese).

WANG S B, LI S B, SONG X Z. Static aeroelastic analysis of a transonic compressor blade based on fluid-structure interaction method[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2016, 38(1): 38−42 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-15-170

BLOM F J. A monolithical fluid-structure interaction algorithm applied to the piston problem[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1998, 167(3-4): 369−391. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00151-0

CETIN A, SAHIN M. A monolithic fluid-structure interaction framework applied to red blood cells[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 35(2): e3171. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3171

HÜBNER B, WALHORN E, DINKLER D. A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction using space–time finite elements[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193(23-26): 2087−2104. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.01.024

RYZHAKOV P B, ROSSI R, IDELSOHN S R, et al. A monolithic Lagrangian approach for fluid–structure interaction problems[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2010, 46(6): 883−899. doi: 10.1007/s00466-010-0522-0

YIN L, JIANG J C, ZHANG L X. Monolithic approach to thermal fluid-structure interaction with nonconforming interfaces[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 2012, 33(2): 211−222. doi: 10.1007/s10483-012-1544-x

LANGER U, YANG H D. Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction problems with hyperelastic models: A monolithic approach[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2018, 145: 186−208. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2016.07.008

WICK T, WOLLNER W. Optimization with nonstationary, nonlinear monolithic fluid-structure interaction[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2021, 122(19): 5430−5449. doi: 10.1002/nme.6372

DEGROOTE J, BATHE K J, VIERENDEELS J. Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–structure interaction[J]. Computers Structures, 2009, 87(11-12): 793−801. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013

HEIL M, HAZEL A L, BOYLE J. Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: Segregated versus monolithic approaches[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2008, 43(1): 91−101. doi: 10.1007/s00466-008-0270-6

YU M L, NIE X Y, YANG G W, et al. Fixed-point fluid structure interaction analysis based on geometrically exact approach[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 10322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66854-5

TIBA A, DAIRAY T, DE VUYST F, et al. Machine-learning enhanced predictors for accelerated convergence of partitioned fluid-structure interaction simulations[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2025, 310: 109522. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109522

GARG H, KUNDU A, SOTI A K, et al. Immersed boundary method based fluid–structure–thermal interaction solver with conjugate heat transfer[J]. Sādhanā, 2023, 48(4): 200. doi: 10.1007/s12046-023-02241-w

ZHU Y Z, ZHAO S J, ZHOU Y Y, et al. An unstructured adaptive mesh refinement for steady flows based on physics-informed neural networks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2025, 540: 114283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114283

DOHERTY M, NAMGOONG H. Impact of turbofan intake distortion on fan noise propagation and generation[C]//Proc of the 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Lyon, France. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 2841. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-2841

MILIDONIS K F, HYNES T, DOHERTY M, et al. The effect of steady intake distortion on fan mpt noise under sideline flight conditions[C]//Proc of the 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018: 4188. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-4188

PERELMAN T L. On conjugated problems of heat transfer[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1961, 3(4): 293−303. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(61)90044-8

GILES M B. Stability analysis of numerical interface conditions in fluid–structure thermal analysis[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1997, 25(4): 421−436. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970830)25:4421::AID-FLD5573.0.CO;2-J

HENSHAW W D, CHAND K K. A composite grid solver for conjugate heat transfer in fluid–structure systems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228(10): 3708−3741. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.02.007

PIPERNO S, FARHAT C. Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems–Part II: Energy transfer analysis and three-dimensional applications[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(24-25): 3147−3170. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00386-8

PIPERNO S, FARHAT C, LARROUTUROU B. Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aroelastic problems Part I: Model problem, theory and two-dimensional application[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1995, 124(1-2): 79−112. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(95)92707-9

PIPERNO S. Explicit/implicit fluid/structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2D inviscid aeroelastic simulations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1997, 25(10): 1207−1226. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19971130)25:101207::AID-FLD6163.0.CO;2-R

ALIZADEH O, MOHAMMADI S. The variable node multiscale approach: Coupling the atomistic and continuum scales[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2019, 160: 256−274. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.003

WANG Y Z, QIN G L, TAMMA K K, et al. Numerical investigations on model order reduction to SEM based on POD-DEIM to linear/nonlinear heat transfer problems[J]. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 2021, 80(3-4): 39−52. doi: 10.1080/10407790.2021.1939609

GABRIEL E, FAGG G E, BOSILCA G, et al. Open MPI: Goals, concept, and design of a next generation MPI implementation[C]//Recent Advances in Parallel Virtual Machine and Message Passing Interface. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 97-104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30218-6_19

PADUA D, GHOTING A, GUNNELS J A, et al. METIS and ParMETIS[M]//Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011: 1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09766-4_500

ANGERSON E, SORENSEN D, BAI Z, et al. LAPACK: A portable linear algebra library for high-performance computers[C]//Proceedings Supercomputing '90, New York, NY, USA. IEEE, 1990: 2-11. doi: 10.1109/superc.1990.129995

ÁLVAREZ-FARRÉ X, GOROBETS A, TRIAS F X. A hierarchical parallel implementation for heterogeneous computing. Application to algebra-based CFD simulations on hybrid supercomputers[J]. Computers Fluids, 2021, 214: 104768. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104768

KHAN A H, AL-MEHDHAR H. Memory pooling for enhanced data loading in GPU-accelerated environments[J]. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 87175−87182. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3570500

XU C F, DENG X G, ZHANG L L, et al. Collaborating CPU and GPU for large-scale high-order CFD simulations with complex grids on the TianHe-1A supercomputer[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 278: 275−297. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.08.024

FENG Z, LI P. Multigrid on GPU: Tackling power grid analysis on parallel SIMT platforms[C]//Proc of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, San Jose, CA, USA. IEEE, 2008: 647-654. doi: 10.1109/ICCAD.2008.4681645

VÎLCEANU V, CHAWDHURY S, MORGENTHAL G. A novel partitioned numerical coupling between vortex particle method–structure–smoothed particle hydrodynamics models for wind-induced vibration analysis[J]. Results in Engineering, 2024, 23: 102435. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102435

MÜLLER E. Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations for real gases[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 79(1): 227−230. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90013-7

ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 135(2): 250−258. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5705

BURG C. Higher order variable extrapolation for unstructured finite volume RANS flow solvers[C]// 17th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005: 4999. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-4999

VENKATAKRISHNAN V. Convergence to steady state solutions of the Euler equations on unstructured grids with limiters[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995, 118(1): 120−130. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1084

THOMAS J L, DISKIN B, NISHIKAWA H. A critical study of agglomerated multigrid methods for diffusion on highly-stretched grids[J]. Computers Fluids, 2011, 41(1): 82−93. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.09.023

JAMESON A, SCHMIDT W, TURKEL E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes[C]//Proc of the 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1981: 1259. doi: 10.2514/6.1981-1259

YOON S, JAMESON A. Lower-upper symmetric-Gauss-seidel method for the Euler and navier-stokes equations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1988, 26(9): 1025−1026. doi: 10.2514/3.10007

WANG G Y, LIU Y W, TANG Y M, et al. Modification of DDES-SA model using helicity for predicting tip leakage flow[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2024, 45(8): 2290−2298 (in Chinese).

ZHUANG Z. Nonlinear finite element analysis and examples of ABAQUS[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005 (in Chinese).

KANG G Z, KAN Q H, ZHANG J. Principle, structure and application of large-scale finite element program[M]. 2nd ed. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 2008 (in Chinese).

WANG X C, SHAO M. Basic principle and numerical method of finite element method[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1997 (in Chinese).

LESOINNE M, FARHAT C. Stability analysis of dynamic meshes for transient aeroelastic computations[C]// 11th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1993: 3325. doi: 10.2514/6.1993-3325

BENSON D J, HALLQUIST J O. A single surface contact algorithm for the post-buckling analysis of shell structures[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1990, 78(2): 141−163. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(90)90098-7

BELYTSCHKO T, LIN J I. A three-dimensional impact-penetration algorithm with erosion[J]. Computers Structures, 1987, 25(1): 95−104. doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(87)90220-3

HEINSTEIN M W, MELLO F J, ATTAWAY S W, et al. Contact: Impact modeling in explicit transient dynamics[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 187(3-4): 621−640. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00342-4

JAIMAN R K, JIAO X, GEUBELLE P H, et al. Conservative load transfer along curved fluid–solid interface with non-matching meshes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 218(1): 372−397. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.02.016

FARHAT C, LESOINNE M, LE TALLEC P. Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1998, 157(1-2): 95−114. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00216-8

DE BOER A, VAN ZUIJLEN A H, BIJL H. Review of coupling methods for non-matching meshes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(8): 1515−1525. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.03.017

BECKERT A, WENDLAND H. Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2001, 5(2): 125−134. doi: 10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01087-7

WENDLAND H. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree[J]. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 1995, 4(1): 389−396. doi: 10.1007/BF02123482

ZHOU X, LI S X, SUN S L, et al. Advances in the research on unstructured mesh deformation[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(5): 547−561 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2011-5-lxjzJ2011-050

ZHAO Y, TAI J, AHMED F. Simulation of micro flows with moving boundaries using high-order upwind FV method on unstructured grids[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2002, 28(1): 66−75. doi: 10.1007/s00466-001-0271-1

GAO Y S, WU Y Z, XIA J. A discrete adjoint-based approach for airfoil optimization on unstructured meshes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(2): 244−249,265 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2011.0306

TANG J, DENG Y Q, MA M S, et al. Parameterization and grid deformation techniques for flying-wing aerodynamic optimization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(5): 1480−1490 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0331

CHEN K. Numerical simulation of air cooling turbine with conjugate heat transfer[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006 (in Chinese).

DONG P. Numerical simulation study on gas-heat coupling of aero-engine air-cooled turbine blades[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009 (in Chinese).

GUO Z Y. Research on methodology of thermal-flow-elastic coupling numerical simulation in air-cooled turbine with the finite difference[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009 (in Chinese).

WANG Q. Research on numerical methods for improving accuracy of coupled heat transfer simulations of air cooled turbines [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009 (in Chinese).

ZHAO Y Z. Numerical study on ablation of turbine cascade of aviation gas turbine[D]. Mianyang: China Academy of Engineering Physics, 2016 (in Chinese).

ZHAO X L, SUN Z X, TANG L S, et al. Coupled flow-thermal-structural analysis of hypersonic aerodynamically heated cylindrical leading edge[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 5(2): 170−179. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2011.11015361

JOHN B, SENTHILKUMAR P, SADASIVAN S. Applied and theoretical aspects of conjugate heat transfer analysis: A review[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2019, 26(2): 475−489. doi: 10.1007/s11831-018-9252-9

MURTY M C, MANNA P, CHAKRABORTY D. Conjugate heat transfer analysis in high speed flows[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2013, 227(10): 1672−1681. doi: 10.1177/0954410012464920

WANG P, LI Y, ZOU Z P, et al. Conjugate heat transfer investigation of cooled turbine using the preconditioned density-based algorithm[J]. Propulsion and Power Research, 2013, 2(1): 56−69. doi: 10.1016/j.jppr.2012.10.004

ZHANG S T, CHEN F, LIU H. Time-adaptive, loosely coupled strategy for conjugate heat transfer problems in hypersonic flows[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2014, 28(4): 635−646. doi: 10.2514/1.T4278

FARRELL P E, PIGGOTT M D, PAIN C C, et al. Conservative interpolation between unstructured meshes via supermesh construction[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 198(33-36): 2632−2642. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.03.004

FARRELL P E, MADDISON J R. Conservative interpolation between volume meshes by local Galerkin projection[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(1-4): 89−100. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.015

REID L, MOORE R D. Performance of a single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 1.82: NASA TP-1338 [R]. 1978.

LIU T Q, ZHAO Y Z, WANG Y M, et al. Design and experimental investigation of a highly loaded single-stage axial compressor with loading coefficient of 0.5[J]. Aeroengine, 2022, 48(5): 1−39 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13477/j.cnki.aeroengine.2022.05.001

HYLTON L D, MIHELC M S, TURNER E R, et al. Analytical and experimental evaluation of the heat transfer distribution over the surfaces of turbine vanes[C]// AAS/Division of Dynamical Astronomy Meeting, 1983.