大型货机HWB布局气动性能与稳定性综合设计方法

张镕涵; 梁煜

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0090

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

大型货机HWB布局气动性能与稳定性综合设计方法

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-10-14

- 大型货机HWB布局气动性能与稳定性综合设计方法
- Comprehensive design method for aerodynamic performance and stability of HWB configuration in large cargo aircraft
- 空气动力学学报 2026年44卷第8期页码：29-45
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院,北京,100191
  2. 北京航空航天大学无人系统研究院,100083
- 作者简介：
  
  梁煜*，副研究员，研究方向：飞行器设计. E-mail：liangyuly@buaa.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0090
  中图分类号： V221.3;V212.1
- 纸质出版：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张镕涵, 梁煜. 大型货机HWB布局气动性能与稳定性综合设计方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(8): 29−45.

Zhang Ronghan, Liang Yu. Comprehensive design method for aerodynamic performance and stability of HWB configuration in large cargo aircraft[J]. 2026, 44(8): 29-45.
张镕涵, 梁煜. 大型货机HWB布局气动性能与稳定性综合设计方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(8): 29−45. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0090

Zhang Ronghan, Liang Yu. Comprehensive design method for aerodynamic performance and stability of HWB configuration in large cargo aircraft[J]. 2026, 44(8): 29-45. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0090.

摘要

针对混合翼身融合布局飞机在大型货运领域的应用潜力，提出了一种兼顾气动效率与动稳定性的优化设计方法。以巡航阶段的升阻比和荷兰滚模态飞行品质为优化目标，构建气动/稳定性优化框架，采用带边界层修正的欧拉方程求解器进行快速分析，并结合高精度RANS求解器对优化结果进行验证。在对初始构型分析的基础上，通过优化框架对目标构型的气动效率和动稳定模态响应特性进行优化。RANS计算结果表明，在保持设计约束的前提下，气动优化构型的总阻力系数减小约3.5 counts，巡航升阻比由21.244提升至21.784，提升效率约为2.54%；考虑气动性能与动稳定性的双目标优化构型的总阻力系数减小约2.4 counts，巡航升阻比提升至21.609，提升效率约为1.72%，荷兰滚模态的阻尼比与无阻尼固有频率的乘积由

0.02633

提升至

0.05117

，依据MIL-F-8785C规范，飞行品质由最低三级提升至二级，横航向动稳定性获得显著改善。该优化框架实现了气动性能与动稳定性的有效权衡，为HWB布局大型货机的工程应用与优化提供了思路与参考。

Abstract

To explore the application potential of the Hybrid Wing Body (HWB) configuration in the field of large cargo aircraft

an optimization design method balancing aerodynamic efficiency and dynamic stability is proposed. Taking the lift-to-drag ratio and the Dutch roll mode flight quality during the cruise phase as optimization objectives

an aerodynamic/stability optimization framework is constructed. An Euler e

quation solver with boundary layer corrections is employed for rapid analysis

while a high-fidelity RANS solver is used to validate the optimization results. Based on the analysis of the initial configuration

the optimization framework is applied to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency and dynamic stability modal response characteristics of the target configuration. RANS calculation results show that

under the premise of maintaining design constraints

the total drag coefficient of the aerodynamically optimized configuration is reduced by approximately 3.5 counts

with the cruise lift-to-drag ratio increasing from 21.244 to 21.784

achieving an efficiency improvement of approximately 2.54%. For the configuration optimized with both aerodynamic performance and dynamic stability objectives

the total drag coefficient is reduced by approximately 2.4 counts

the cruise lift-to-drag ratio is improved to 21.609 with an efficiency increase of approximately 1.72%

and the product of the Dutch roll mode damping ratio and the undamped natural frequency is increased from

0.02633

to 0.05117. This improvement elevates the flight quality from Level 3 to Level 2 according to the MIL-F-8785C standard

significantly enhancing the lateral-directional dynamic stability. The optimization framework effectively balances aerodynamic performance and dynamic stability

providing insights and references for the engineering application and optimization of HWB-configured large cargo aircraft.

关键词

Keywords

references

Sun Yukai, Wang Yuanyuan, Cheng Wenyuan, et al. Analysis and prospect of blended-wing-body configuration technology development of civil aircraft[J]. Aeronautical Science Technology, 2023, 34(7): 1−12 (in Chinese). doi: 10.19452/j.issn1007-5453.2023.07.001

Liu Lizhen. Conceptual design and optimization for next generation strategic transport aircraft[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021 (in Chinese).

Nickol C, Mccullers L. Hybrid wing body configuration system studies[C]//Proc of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. AIAA, 2009: AIAA 2009-931. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-931

Bonet J T, Schellenger H G, Rawdon B K, et al. Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project N+2 advanced vehicle concepts study and conceptual design of Subscale Test Vehicle (STV): CR-2011-216519[R]. Edwards: Dryden Flight Research Center, 2011.

Liebeck R. Design of the blended-wing-body subsonic transport[C]// 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. AIAA, 2002: AIAA 2002-2. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-2

Liebeck R H. Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(1): 10−25. doi: 10.2514/1.9084

Yang S L, Page M, Smetak E J. Achievement of NASA new aviation horizons N+2 goals with a blended-wing-body X-plane designed for the regional jet and single-aisle jet markets[C]// 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. AIAA, 2018: AIAA 2018-0521. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-0521

Mody P, Sato S, Hall D, et al. Conceptual design of an N+3 hybrid wing body subsonic transport[C]// 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Chicago, Illinois. AIAA, 2010: AIAA 2010-4812. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-4812

Wells D, Olson E. Hybrid wing body planform design with vehicle sketch pad[C]// 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. AIAA, 2011: AIAA 2011-360. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-360

Laughlin T, Corman J, Mavris D. A parametric and physics-based approach to structural weight estimation of the hybrid wing body aircraft[C]// 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas. AIAA, 2013: AIAA 2013-1082. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-1082

Liou M F, Gronstal D, Kim H J, et al. Aerodynamic design of the hybrid wing body with nacelle: N3-X propulsion-airframe configuration[C]// 34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Washington, D C. AIAA, 2016: AIAA 2016-3875. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3875

Wick A T, Hooker J R, Walker J, et al. Hybrid wing body performance validation at the national transonic facility[C]// 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. AIAA, 2017: AIAA 2017-0099. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0099

Liu Xiaojing, Wu Jianghao, Zhang Shuguang. Aerodynamic design and optimization of the blended wing body aircraft for 250 passengers[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(1): 78−84 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2011.01.013

Xia Ming, Yuan Changyun, Gong Wenxiu, et al. Low-speed longitudinal aerodynamic influence of canard on BWB aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(5): 1004−1010 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0004

Tian Rui, Wang Haiyan, Nie Xiaohua, et al. Multi-disciplinary optimization design method and application of BWB fuselage structure based on PRSEUS configuration[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2024, 42(5): 818−827 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1051/jnwpu/20244250818

He Meng, Zhang Liu, Jiang Yubiao, et al. Lift enhancement study for upper surface blowing technology of blended wing-body layout aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(1): 269−284 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220882

Yan Wanfang, Wu Jianghao, Zhang Yanlai. Effects of distributed propulsion crucial variables on aerodynamic performance of blended wing body aircraft[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(6): 1055−1065 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0390

Qiu Aoxiang, Sang Weimin, Zhang Tong, et al. Research on the effect of boundary layer ingestion of blended-wing-body aircraft with distributed propulsion[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(8): 2448−2467 (in Chinese). doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-23-552

Ruan Yuan, Zhang Heng, Luo Ben, et al. Wing aerodynamic design of amphibious aircraft with hybrid-wing-body configuration[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2025, 16(5): 69−78 (in Chinese). doi: 10.16615/j.cnki.1674-8190.2025.05.07

Wang Yanling, Feng Shuai, Bu Chen, et al. Stability characteristics of hybrid wing-body aircraft based on virtual flight[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(9): 2337−2344 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0684

Suo Xinshi. Integrated analysis, evaluation and optimization in conceptual design of blended wing body commercial aircraft[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017 (in Chinese).

Chai Xiao, Chen Yingchun, Tan Zhaoguang, et al. Analysis and optimization of overall parameters for blended-wing-body civil aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 623042 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23042

Yu Gang. Blended wing body optimization design and aerodynamic performance analysis with nacelle[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020 (in Chinese). doi: 10.27406/d.cnki.gxbgu.2020.000360

Zhang Shuguang, Lu Yanhui, Gong Lei, et al. Research on design of stability and control of a 250-seat tailless blended-wing-body civil transport aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(10): 1761−1769 (in Chinese). doi: CNKI:11-1929/V.20110712.0905.003

Wang Yutong, Lan Qingsheng, Zhou Zhu, et al. Design and aerodynamic analysis of blended wing body with variable camber technology[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, 50(4): 1292−1307 (in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0493

Goetzendorf-Grabowski T. Flight dynamics of unconventional configurations[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2023, 137: 100885. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100885

U. S. Department of Defense. Flying qualities of piloted airplanes: MIL-F-8785C (1980) [S]. 1980.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

一种面向离散伴随气动优化的高效混合时间推进策略

超低轨卫星减阻多目标伴随优化设计

典型高速飞行器滚转失稳特性研究

宽包线吸气式高超声速飞行器外形优化研究

考虑测量干扰抑制的风洞天平拓扑优化方法