ZHAO L, CUI W, SHEN X M, et al. A fast on-site measure-analyze-suppress response to control vortex-induced-vibration of a long-span bridge[J]. Structures, 2022, 35: 192−201. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.017

SHARMA A, MITTAL H, GAIROLA A. Mitigation of wind load on tall buildings through aerodynamic modifications: Review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 18: 180−194. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.005

LIVANOS D. Investigation of vortex induced vibrations on wind turbine towers[D]. Delft, Netherlands: Technische Universiteit Delft, 2018.

DAVENPORT A G. The application of statistical concepts to the wind loading of structures[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1961, 19(4): 449−472. doi: 10.1680/iicep.1961.11304

BORRI C, ZHOU S, CHEN Z Q. Coupling investigation on vortex-induced vibration and galloping of rectangular cylinders[C]// 7th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications, Shanghai, 2012.

AMMANN OTHMAR H, VON KÁRMÁN T, WOODRUFF G B. The failure of the Tacoma Narrows bridge[R]. Federal Works Agency, Washington D. C. , 1941.

ZHU L D, XU Y L. Buffeting response of long-span cable-supported bridges under skew winds. Part 1: Theory[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005, 281(3−5): 647−673. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.026

SCANLAN R H. The action of flexible bridges under wind, Ⅱ: Buffeting theory[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1978, 60(2): 201−211. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80029-7

WANG H C, FU T F, DU Y Q, et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence[J]. Nature, 2023, 620(7972): 47−60. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2

JI J, LI H. State-of-the-arts in artificial intelligence for disaster prevention and mitigation of civil engineering[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2023, 37(5): 840−853(in Chinese).

LAI M, LI W J, FENG H, et al. Research progress of machine learning in bridge wind engineering[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(8): 1−13(in Chinese).

HORNIK K, STINCHCOMBE M, WHITE H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators[J]. Neural Networks, 1989, 2(5): 359−366. doi: 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8

RUMELHART D E, HINTON G E, WILLIAMS R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors[J]. Nature, 1986, 323: 533−536. doi: 10.1038/323533a0

KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84−90. doi: 10.1145/3065386

MANDIC D P, CHAMBERS J. Recurrent neural networks for prediction: Learning algorithms, architectures and stability[M]. John Wiley Sons, Inc. , New York, 2001.

MURTAGH F, CONTRERAS P. Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: An overview[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2012, 2(1): 86−97. doi: 10.1002/widm.53

VINCENT P, LAROCHELLE H, LAJOIE I, et al. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010, 11: 3371−3408.

KINGMA D P, WELLING M. An introduction to variational autoencoders[J]. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 2019, 12(4): 307−392. doi: 10.1561/2200000056

BELLMAN R. A Markovian decision process[J]. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 1957, 6(4): 679−684. doi: 10.1512/iumj.1957.6.56038

RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686−707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

LU L, MENG X H, MAO Z P, et al. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations[J]. SIAM Review, 2021, 63(1): 208−228. doi: 10.1137/19m1274067

CHEN Z, LIU Y, SUN H. Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce data[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 6136. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26434-1

ZHANG Z Y, LI S W, FENG H, et al. Machine learning for bridge wind engineering[J]. Advances in Wind Engineering, 2024, 1(1): 100002. doi: 10.1016/j.awe.2024.100002

LAIMA S J, ZHOU X X, JIN X W, et al. DeepTRNet: Time-resolved reconstruction of flow around a circular cylinder via spatiotemporal deep neural networks[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(1): 015118. doi: 10.1063/5.0129049

ZHOU X X, JIN X W, LAIMA S J, et al. Large-scale flow field super-resolution via local-global fusion convolutional neural networks[J]. 2024, 36(5): 055130. DOI:10.1063/5.0207575

JIANG C, VINUESA R, CHEN R L, et al. An interpretable framework of data-driven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(5): 055133. doi: 10.1063/5.0048909

BRUNTON S L, NOACK B R, KOUMOUTSAKOS P. Machine learning for fluid mechanics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 52: 477−508. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214

ZHAO S, ZHANG C T, DAI X X, et al. Review of wind-induced effects estimation through nonlinear analysis of tall buildings, high-rise structures, flexible bridges and transmission lines[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(8): 2033. doi: 10.3390/buildings13082033

MOSTAFA K, ZISIS I, MOUSTAFA M A. Machine learning techniques in structural wind engineering: A state-of-the-art review[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(10): 5232. doi: 10.3390/app12105232

WU T, SNAIKI R. Applications of machine learning to wind engineering[J]. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2022, 8: 811460. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.811460

KAREEM A. Emerging frontiers in wind engineering: Computing, stochastics, machine learning and beyond[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 206: 104320. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104320

CHEN Y, KOPP G A, SURRY D. Interpolation of wind-induced pressure time series with an artificial neural network[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(6): 589−615. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00155-1

FU J Y, LI Q S, XIE Z N. Prediction of wind loads on a large flat roof using fuzzy neural networks[J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(1): 153−161. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.006

FU J Y, LIANG S G, LI Q S. Prediction of wind-induced pressures on a large gymnasium roof using artificial neural networks[J]. Computers Structures, 2007, 85(3−4): 179−192. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.070

GAVALDA X, FERRER-GENER J, KOPP G A, et al. Interpolation of pressure coefficients for low-rise buildings of different plan dimensions and roof slopes using artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99(5): 658−664. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.02.008

BRE F, GIMENEZ J M, FACHINOTTI V D. Prediction of wind pressure coefficients on building surfaces using artificial neural networks[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 158: 1429−1441. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.045

NI Y Q, LI M. Wind pressure data reconstruction using neural network techniques: A comparison between BPNN and GRNN[J]. Measurement, 2016, 88: 468−476. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.049

HUANG Y Q, OU G H, FU J Y, et al. Prediction of mean and RMS wind pressure coefficients for low-rise buildings using deep neural networks[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 274: 115149. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115149

TIAN J Q, GURLEY K R, DIAZ M T, et al. Low-rise gable roof buildings pressure prediction using deep neural networks[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 196: 104026. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104026

DING Z X, ZHANG W, ZHU D P. Neural-network based wind pressure prediction for low-rise buildings with genetic algorithm and Bayesian optimization[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 260: 114203. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114203

HU G, LIU L B, TAO D C, et al. Deep learning-based investigation of wind pressures on tall building under interference effects[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 201: 104138. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104138

HU G, KWOK K C S. Predicting wind pressures around circular cylinders using machine learning techniques[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 198: 104099. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104099

MEDDAGE D P P, EKANAYAKE I U, WEERASURIYA A U, et al. Explainable Machine Learning (XML) to predict external wind pressure of a low-rise building in urban-like settings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 226: 105027. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105027

DU K, CHEN B. A hybrid semi-supervised regression based machine learning method for predicting peak wind loads on a group of buildings[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 275: 115245. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115245

JIN X W, CHENG P, CHEN W L, et al. Prediction model of velocity field around circular cylinder over various Reynolds numbers by fusion convolutional neural networks based on pressure on the cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(4): 047105. doi: 10.1063/1.5024595

MI J Y, JIN X W, LI H. Cascade-Net for predicting cylinder wake at Reynolds numbers ranging from subcritical to supercritical regime[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(7): 075132. doi: 10.1063/5.0155649

YAN M T, ZHANG Z M, GAO S C, et al. Predicting aerodynamic pressure on a square cylinder from wake velocity field by masked gated recurrent unit model[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(11): 115101. doi: 10.1063/5.0110491

RAISSI M, WANG Z C, TRIANTAFYLLOU M S, et al. Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 861: 119−137. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2018.872

LIU J L, SHUM K, TSE T K T, et al. Bidirectional prediction between wake velocity and surface pressure using deep learning techniques[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(2): 025162. doi: 10.1063/5.0191568

HUANG D M, HE S Q, HE X H, et al. Prediction of wind loads on high-rise building using a BP neural network combined with POD[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 170: 1−17. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.021

KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. Dynamic mode decomposition and its applications in fluid dynamics[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2018, 36(2): 163−179. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0134

ZHANG W W, DOU Z H, LI X T, et al. Various flow-induced vibrations of bridges and von Kármán vortex street[J]. ACTA AERODYNAMICA SINICA, 2020, 38(3): 405−412. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0088

SCANLAN R H, TOMKO J J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1971, 97(6): 1717−1737. doi: 10.1061/jmcea3.0001526

CHEN C H. Determination of flutter derivatives via a neural network approach[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 263(4): 797−813. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01279-8

CHEN C H, WU J C, CHEN J H. Prediction of flutter derivatives by artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(10−11): 1925−1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.044

CHUNG J Y, LEE S W, CHANG S K, et al. Estimation of flutter derivatives of various sections using numerical simulation and neural network[C]// The 2012 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM’ 12), Seoul, Korea, 2012.

WANG Z L, ZHAO L, WEI W. Active aerodynamic flap flutter control optimization for bridges driven by neural network[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transportation, 2023, 36(8): 32−41.

LI Y, LI C, LIANG Y D, et al. Fast prediction of the flutter critical wind speed of streamlined box girders by using aerostatic force coefficients and artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 222: 104939. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104939

JUNG S, GHABOUSSI J, KWON S D. Estimation of aeroelastic parameters of bridge decks using neural networks[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(11): 1356−1364. doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:11(1356

LUTE V, UPADHYAY A, SINGH K K. Support vector machine based aerodynamic analysis of cable stayed bridges[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2009, 40(9): 830−835. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.008

LIAO H L, MEI H Y, HU G, et al. Machine learning strategy for predicting flutter performance of streamlined box girders[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 209: 104493. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104493

ZHU G S, SHAO Y H. Reliability analysis of bridge flutter based on neural network and adaptive stochastic sampling[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2022, 45(06): 770−777.

TINMITONDÉ S, HE X H, YAN L, et al. Data-driven prediction of critical flutter velocity of long-span suspension bridges using a probabilistic machine learning approach[J]. Computers Structures, 2023, 280: 107002. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107002

WU T, KAREEM A, GE Y J. Linear and nonlinear aeroelastic analysis frameworks for cable-supported bridges[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 74(3): 487−516. doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-0984-7

ABBAS T, KAVRAKOV I, MORGENTHAL G, et al. Prediction of aeroelastic response of bridge decks using artificial neural networks[J]. Computers Structures, 2020, 231: 106198. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106198

WU T, KAREEM A. Modeling hysteretic nonlinear behavior of bridge aerodynamics via cellular automata nested neural network[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99(4): 378−388. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.011

ZHANG W M, FENG D D, ZHAO L M, et al. A deep learning-based method for full-bridge flutter analysis considering aerodynamic and geometric nonlinearities[J]. Computers Structures, 2025, 310: 107693. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107693

ZHAO L M, ZHANG W M, WANG Z W, et al. Nonlinear unsteady aerodynamic forces prediction and aeroelastic analysis of wind-induced bridge response at multiple wind speeds: A deep learning-based reduced-order model[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2024, 254: 105905. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105905

LI W J, LAIMA S J, JIN X W, et al. A novel long short-term memory neural-network-based self-excited force model of limit cycle oscillations of nonlinear flutter for various aerodynamic configurations[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2020, 100(3): 2071−2087. doi: 10.1007/s11071-020-05631-5

AN X Y, LI S P, WU T. Modeling nonlinear aeroelastic forces for bridge decks with various leading edges using LSTM networks[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(10): 6005. doi: 10.3390/app13106005

KAVRAKOV I, MORGENTHAL G, MCROBIE A. Data-driven aeroelastic analyses of structures in turbulent wind conditions using enhanced Gaussian Processes with aerodynamic priors[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2024, 253: 105848. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105848

LI S W, LAIMA S J, LI H. Cluster analysis of winds and wind-induced vibrations on a long-span bridge based on long-term field monitoring data[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 138: 245−259. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.024

DUAN M L, DONG H T. Cluster-analysis-based research on vortex-induced vibration fromWind tunnel tests of a sectional bridge model[J]. Structural Engineers, 2023, 39(4): 138−145.

HE M, LIANG P, ZHANG Y, et al. Identification, track ing and warning of vortex induced vibration using k -means clustering method[J ] . Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2024, 20(3): 380−393. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2022.2096081

ARUL M, KAREEM A, KWON D K. Identification of vortex-induced vibration of tall building pinnacle using cluster analysis for fatigue evaluation: Application to burj khalifa[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(11): 04020234. doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002799

LIM J, KIM S, KIM H K. Using supervised learning techniques to automatically classify vortex-induced vibration in long-span bridges[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 221: 104904. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104904

KIM S, KIM T. Machine-learning-based prediction of vortex-induced vibration in long-span bridges using limited information[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 266: 114551. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114551

HUANG M F, LI X Z, CAI K, et al. Motion adaptive vision-based vibration measurement and modal identification for the roof masts of a tall building[J]. Engineering Structures, 2025, 323: 119278. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119278

SU X, MAO J X, WANG H, et al. Deep learning-based automated identification on vortex-induced vibration of long suspenders for the suspension bridge[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2025, 224: 112070. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112070

KIM S, LEE S H, KIM S. Pointwise multiclass vibration classification for cable-supported bridges using a signal-segmentation deep network[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 279: 115599. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115599

LEE S, KIM S. Pointwise vortex-induced vibration detection: Learning from synthetic time-series data[J]. Engineering Structures, 2025, 326: 119525. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119525

HOU J L, CAO S G, HU H, et al. Vortex-induced vibration recognition for long-span bridges based on transfer component analysis[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(8): 2012. doi: 10.3390/buildings13082012

WAN C F, HOU J L, ZHANG G C, et al. Domain adaptation based automatic identification method of vortex induced vibration of long-span bridges without prior information[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 139: 109677. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109677

LIN P F, HU G, LI C, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of crosswind vibrations of rectangular cylinders[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 211: 104549. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104549

WANG Z, ZHU J S, ZHANG Z T. Machine learning-based deep data mining and prediction of vortex-induced vibration of circular cylinders[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 285: 115313. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115313

LIU P, CHU X L, CUI W, et al. Bayesian inference based parametric identification of vortex-excited force using on-site measured vibration data on a long-span bridge[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 266: 114597. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114597

YAN W J, FENG Z Q, YANG W, et al. Bayesian inference for the dynamic properties of long-span bridges under vortex-induced vibration with Scanlan's model and dense optical flow scheme[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 174: 109078. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109078

MA Z X, LI J W, WANG F, et al. Prediction of vortex-induced vibration response of open bridge girder based on machine learning method[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2024, 24(2): 2450017. doi: 10.1142/s0219455424500172

YAN Z X, ZHENG S X, TAI X Y, et al. Machine learning models for predicting VIV amplitude of streamlined steel box girders[J]. Structures, 2024, 63: 106444. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106444

LI S W, KAISER E, LAIMA S J, et al. Discovering time-varying aerodynamics of a prototype bridge by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems[J]. Physical Review E, 2019, 100(2−1): 022220. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.022220

YAN Z X, ZHENG S X, YANG F F, et al. A simplified approach to recognize vortex-induced vibration response using machine learning[J]. Structural Engineering International, 2024, 34(4): 670−682. doi: 10.1080/10168664.2023.2287460

IJAZ A, MANZOOR S. Vortex induced vibration prediction through machine learning techniques[J]. AIP Advances, 2024, 14(11): 115025. doi: 10.1063/5.0236511

CHEN Z S, ZHANG L K, LI K, et al. Machine-learning prediction of aerodynamic damping for buildings and structures undergoing flow-induced vibrations[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 63: 105374. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105374

SANYAL P, PAUL R, DALUI S K. Machine learning-based wind-induced response analysis in rectangular building models with limbs[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2024, 33(12): e2116. doi: 10.1002/tal.2116

LI S W, LAIMA S J, LI H. Physics-guided deep learning framework for predictive modeling of bridge vortex-induced vibrations from field monitoring[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(3): 037113. doi: 10.1063/5.0032402

WANG Y F, FENG H, XU N, et al. A data-driven model for predictive modeling of vortex-induced vibrations of a long-span bridge[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(6): 2233. doi: 10.3390/app14062233

LI S W, LAIMA S J, LI H. Data-driven modeling of vortex-induced vibration of a long-span suspension bridge using decision tree learning and support vector regression[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 172: 196−211. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.022

CHENG C, MENG H, LI Y Z, et al. Deep learning based on PINN for solving 2 DOF vortex induced vibration of cylinder[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 240: 109932. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109932

TANG H S, LIAO Y Y, YANG H, et al. A transfer learning-physics informed neural network (TL-PINN) for vortex-induced vibration[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 113101. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113101

BAI X D, ZHANG W. Machine learning for vortex induced vibration in turbulent flow[J]. Computers Fluids, 2022, 235: 105266. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105266

ZHU P, LIU Z L, XU Z Q, et al. An adaptive weight physics-informed neural network for vortex-induced vibration problems[J]. Buildings, 2025, 15(9): 1533. doi: 10.3390/buildings15091533

FENERCI A, ØISETH O. Measured buffeting response of a long-span suspension bridge compared with numerical predictions based on design wind spectra[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(9): 04017131. doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001873

DING Y, YE X W, GUO Y. A multistep direct and indirect strategy for predicting wind direction based on the EMD-LSTM model[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2023, 2023(1): 4950487. doi: 10.1155/2023/4950487

YE X W, SUN Z, LU J. Prediction and early warning of wind-induced girder and tower vibration in cable-stayed bridges with machine learning-based approach[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 275: 115261. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115261

LIU C Y, GONG Y, JIANG Z S, et al. Buffeting analysis of a suspension bridge under construction based on adjacent wind field data[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 251: 113490. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113490

CASTELLON D F, FENERCI A, OLE Ø. A comparative study of wind-induced dynamic response models of long-span bridges using artificial neural networks, support vector regression and buffeting theory[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 209: 104484. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104484

HAREENDRAN S P, ALIPOUR A. Prediction of nonlinear structural response under wind loads using deep learning techniques[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 129: 109424. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109424

HU P, CHENG W, XU G J, et al. Prediction of buffeting responses of the thin plate under joint action of wave and wind using LSTM and transfer learning[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2023, 134: 103514. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2023.103514

FANG C, TANG H J, LI Y L. Stochastic response assessment of cross-sea bridges under correlated wind and waves via machine learning[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25(6): 04020025. doi: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001554

FANG C, TANG H J, LI Y L, et al. Stochastic response of a cable-stayed bridge under non-stationary winds and waves using different surrogate models[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 199: 106967. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106967

ZHU S Y, YI R, LI Y L, et al. Buffeting reliability of high-rise bridge tower in mountain area based on CNN-BiLSTM[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2024, 163: 111872. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111872

CASTELLON D F, FENERCI A, PETERSEN Ø W, et al. Full long-term buffeting analysis of suspension bridges using Gaussian process surrogate modelling and importance sampling Monte Carlo simulations[J]. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2023, 235: 109211. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109211

NIKOSE T J, SONPAROTE R S. Dynamic wind response of tall buildings using artificial neural network[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2019, 28(13): e1657. doi: 10.1002/tal.1657

YUCEL M, BEKDAŞ G, NIGDELI S M. Machine learning-based model for prediction of optimum TMD parameters in time-domain history[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2024, 46(4): 192. doi: 10.1007/s40430-024-04747-8

ZHANG Y W, SCHAUER T, BLEICHER A. Optimized passive/semi-active vibration control using distributed-multiple tuned facade damping system in tall buildings[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 52: 104416. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104416

LYSTAD T M, FENERCI A, OLE Ø. Buffeting response of long-span bridges considering uncertain turbulence parameters using the environmental contour method[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 213: 110575. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110575

LIU P, ZHAO L, FANG G S, et al. Explicit polynomial regression models of wind characteristics and structural effects on a long-span bridge utilizing onsite monitoring data[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2021, 28(5): e2705. doi: 10.1002/stc.2705

ZHANG Y M, WANG H, MAO J X, et al. Probabilistic framework with Bayesian optimization for predicting typhoon-induced dynamic responses of a long-span bridge[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147(1): 04020297. doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002881

TAO T Y, DENG P, WANG H, et al. Intelligent prediction of buffeting responses of long-span bridge under the action of thunderstorm winds[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transportation, 2023, 36(8): 87−95.

KAVRAKOV I. Buffeting analysis of structures using Gaussian processes with semi-analytical priors[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4966271

LI S W, LI S C, LAIMA S J, et al. Data-driven modeling of bridge buffeting in the time domain using long short-term memory network based on structural health monitoring[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2021, 28(8): e2772. doi: 10.1002/stc.2772

LAIMA S J, FENG H, LI H, et al. A buffeting-net for buffeting response prediction of full-scale bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 275: 115289. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115289

PETERSEN Ø W, O Ø, LOURENS E. Wind load estimation and virtual sensing in long-span suspension bridges using physics-informed Gaussian process latent force models[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 170: 108742. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108742

ALI K. New mathematical formulation of nonlinear unsteady wind loads on long-span bridge decks under nonstationary winds using time-delay neural network[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2022, 148(10): 06022003. doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003476

TONDO G R, KAVRAKOV I, MORGENTHAL G. Bayesian non-linear load estimation in long-span bridges via physics-informed Gaussian processes[M]// JENSEN J S, FRANGOPOL D M, SCHMIDT J W. Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Digitalization and Sustainability. CRC Press, 2024: 3522−3529. doi: 10.1201/9781003483755

ENTEZAMI A, SARMADI H. Machine learning-aided prediction of windstorm-induced vibration responses of long-span suspension bridges[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2025, 40(8): 1043−1060. doi: 10.1111/mice.13387[LinkOut

ALAM K M R, SIDDIQUE N, ADELI H. A dynamic ensemble learning algorithm for neural networks[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32(12): 8675−8690. doi: 10.1007/s00521-019-04359-7

MAKKE N, CHAWLA S. Interpretable scientific discovery with symbolic regression: A review[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, 57(1): 2. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10622-0

TIBSHIRANI R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1996, 58(1): 267−288. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x

THALER S, PAEHLER L, ADAMS N A. Sparse identification of truncation errors[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 397: 108851. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.07.049

SCHMELZER M, DWIGHT R P, CINNELLA P. Discovery of algebraic Reynolds-stress models using sparse symbolic regression[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2020, 104(2): 579−603. doi: 10.1007/s10494-019-00089-x

SCHMIDT M, LIPSON H. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5923): 81−85. doi: 10.1126/science.1165893

BONGARD J, LIPSON H. Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(24): 9943−9948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609476104

VADDIREDDY H, RASHEED A, STAPLES A E, et al. Feature engineering and symbolic regression methods for detecting hidden physics from sparse sensor observation data[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(1): 015113. doi: 10.1063/1.5136351

LONG Z C, LU Y P, DONG B. PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 399: 108925. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108925

KIM S, LU P Y, MUKHERJEE S, et al. Integration of neural network-based symbolic regression in deep learning for scientific discovery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021, 32(9): 4166−4177. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3017010

D'ASCOLI S, KAMIENNY P A, LAMPLE G, et al. Deep symbolic regression for recurrence prediction[C]// 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 162: 4520−4536, 2022.

KAMIENNY P A, LAMPLE G, LAMPRIER S, et al. Deep generative symbolic regression with monte-carlo-tree-search[C]// 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’23), 2023: 15655−15668.

ANGELIS D, SOFOS F, KARAKASIDIS T. Artificial intelligence in physical sciences: Symbolic regression trends and perspectives[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2023, 30: 3845−3865. doi: 10.1007/s11831-023-09922-z

CRANMER M, SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ A, BATTAGLIA P, et al. Discovering symbolic models from deep learning with inductive biases[J]. 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, Canada. 2020.

LAIMA S J, ZHANG Z Y, JIN X W, et al. Identification of the form of self-excited aerodynamic force of bridge deck based on machine learning[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(1): 017114. doi: 10.1063/5.0176875

MA T, CUI W, GAO T T, et al. Data-based autonomously discovering method for nonlinear aerodynamic force of quasi-flat plate[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(2): 024103. doi: 10.1063/5.0133526

AMICO E, CAFIERO G, IUSO G. Deep reinforcement learning for active control of a three-dimensional bluff body wake[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(10): 105126. doi: 10.1063/5.0108387

VARELA P, SUÁREZ P, ALCÁNTARA-ÁVILA F, et al. Deep reinforcement learning for flow control exploits different physics for increasing Reynolds number regimes[J]. Actuators, 2022, 11(12): 359. doi: 10.3390/act11120359

ZHENG C D, JI T W, XIE F F, et al. From active learning to deep reinforcement learning: Intelligent active flow control in suppressing vortex-induced vibration[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(6): 063607. doi: 10.1063/5.0052524

CHEN H, GAO C Q, WU J F, et al. Study on optimization design of airfoil transonic buffet with reinforcement learning method[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(5): 486. doi: 10.3390/aerospace10050486

MNIH V, KAVUKCUOGLU K, SILVER D, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning[J]. Nature, 2015, 518(7540): 529−533. doi: 10.1038/nature14236

REN K, GAO C Q, XIONG N, et al. Adaptive control of transonic buffet and buffeting flow with deep reinforcement learning[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(1): 016143. doi: 10.1063/5.0189662

PARIS R, BENEDDINE S, DANDOIS J. Robust flow control and optimal sensor placement using deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 913: A25. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1170

RABAULT J, KUCHTA M, JENSEN A, et al. Artificial neural networks trained through deep reinforcement learning discover control strategies for active flow control[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 865: 281−302. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2019.62

TANG H W, RABAULT J, KUHNLE A, et al. Robust active flow control over a range of Reynolds numbers using an artificial neural network trained through deep reinforcement learning[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(5): 053605. doi: 10.1063/5.0006492

REN F, RABAULT J, TANG H. Applying deep reinforcement learning to active flow control in weakly turbulent conditions[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(3): 037121. doi: 10.1063/5.0037371

FAN D X, YANG L, WANG Z C, et al. Reinforcement learning for bluff body active flow control in experiments and simulations[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(42): 26091−26098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004939117

DENG X L, HU G, CHEN W L. Intelligent active flow control of long-span bridge deck using deep reinforcement learning integrated transfer learning[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2024, 244: 105632. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105632

CHEN W J, WANG Q L, YAN L, et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based active flow control of vortex-induced vibration of a square cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(5): 053610. doi: 10.1063/5.0152777

DENG X L, HU G, CHEN W L. Deep reinforcement learning based intelligent flow control of vortex-induced vibration for box girder[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2025, 43(5): 1−10. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2025.0016

ILBEIGI S, BAGHERZADEH A, SHARIFI A. Applied neural network-based active control for vortex-induced vibrations suppression in a two-degree-of-freedom cylinder[J]. 2025, 37(1): 017150. doi: 10.1063/5.0251228

WU T, HE J C, LI S P. Active flutter control of long-span bridges via deep reinforcement learning: A proof of concept[J]. Wind and Structures. 2023, 36(5): 321−331. doi: 10.12989/was.2023.36.5.321

HE X J, WANG Y Z, HUA Y, et al. Policy transfer of reinforcement learning-based flow control: From two- to three-dimensional environment[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(5): 055116. doi: 10.1063/5.0147190

RABAULT J, KUHNLE A. Accelerating deep reinforcement learning strategies of flow control through a multi-environment approach[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(9): 094105. doi: 10.1063/1.5116415

MAO Y Q, ZHONG S, YIN H J. Active flow control using deep reinforcement learning with time delays in Markov decision process and autoregressive policy[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(5): 053602. doi: 10.1063/5.0086871

DONG X H, HONG H, DENG X L, et al. Surrogate model-based deep reinforcement learning for experimental study of active flow control of circular cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(10): 105147. doi: 10.1063/5.0170316

KALLA D, SMITH N, KURAKU S, et al. Study and analysis of chat GPT and its impact on different fields of study[J]. International journal of innovative science and research technology, 2023, 8(3): 827−833.

PROTTASHA N J, SAMI A A, KOWSHER M, et al. Transfer learning for sentiment analysis using BERT based supervised fine-tuning[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(11): 4157. doi: 10.3390/s22114157

LIU Z H, WANG Y H, HAN K, et al. Post-training quantization for vision transformer[C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2021, 34: 28092−28103.

LEWIS PATRICK, PEREZ ETHAN, PIKTUS ALEKSANDRA, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks[C]// Advances in neural information processing systems. 2020, 33: 9459−9474.

TAPEH A T G, NASER M Z. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in structural engineering: A scientometrics review of trends and best practices[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2023, 30(1): 115-159. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09793-w