混合式风电塔架风荷载特性及风致响应研究

邱法强; 宋杰; 邹良浩

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0207

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

混合式风电塔架风荷载特性及风致响应研究

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 混合式风电塔架风荷载特性及风致响应研究
- Wind load and wind-induced response of hybrid wind turbine towers
- 空气动力学学报 2025年43卷第4期页码：43-52
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 武汉大学土木建筑工程学院,武汉,430072
  2. 湖北省城市综合防灾与消防救援工程技术研究中心,武汉,430072
- 作者简介：
  
  邱法强（2000—），男，广西贺州人，硕士研究生，研究方向：结构风工程. E-mail：fqqiuwhu@163.com
  邹良浩*，副教授，研究方向：高层、高耸及大跨度结构抗风. E-mail：Lhzou@whu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金（52478556）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0207
  中图分类号： TU312+.1
- 纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
邱法强, 宋杰, 邹良浩. 混合式风电塔架风荷载特性及风致响应研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(4): 43−52.

QIU Faqiang, SONG Jie, ZOU Lianghao. Wind load and wind-induced response of hybrid wind turbine towers[J]. 2025, 43(4): 43-52.
邱法强, 宋杰, 邹良浩. 混合式风电塔架风荷载特性及风致响应研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(4): 43−52. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0207

QIU Faqiang, SONG Jie, ZOU Lianghao. Wind load and wind-induced response of hybrid wind turbine towers[J]. 2025, 43(4): 43-52. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0207.

摘要

上部圆筒、下部格构式的混合式风电塔架是一种极具潜力的新型抗风结构，但目前其抗风性能还尚未彻底明晰，相关研究较少。通过高频测力天平风洞试验，测量了两种不同高度比（格构与圆筒高度的比值）的混合式塔架刚性模型在不同风向角下的风荷载，并对其风荷载特性进行了分析研究。此外，基于线性振型假定和振型分解法计算了两种塔架在设计风速下的风致响应，分析了风向角及塔架形式对风致响应的影响。结果表明：两种塔架的平均阻力系数随风向角的变化规律一致，在30°或45°风向角下取得较大值，约为1.4；相较于高度比较小的塔架，高度比较大的塔架升、阻力系数均方根、响应均更小，其合位移、合加速度响应是前者的66%～87%；两种塔架的阻力均小于对应的圆筒式塔架，风致动态响应在45°风向角时达到最大。本文研究可为实际工程应用中的塔架结构选型提供一定参考。

Abstract

The hybrid wind turbine tower with an upper cylindrical section and a lower lattice structure is a promising novel wind resistant structure. However

the wind resistance performance of this type of structure is not yet fully understood

and there is limited correlational research. In this study

high-frequency force balance (HFFB) wind tunnel tests were conducted to measure the wind loads on rigid models of two hybrid tower configurations with different height ratios (the ratio of the height of the lattice part to that of the cylindrical part)

under various wind directions

and the wind load characteristics of the towers were analyzed. The linear mode assumption and modal analysis method were then used to calculate the wind-induced responses of both towers at the design wind speed

and the effects of wind direction and tower configuration on the wind responses were evaluated. The results show that

the mean drag coefficients of both towers show consistent patterns with changes in the wind direction

reaching a relatively high value around 1.4 at wind angles of 30° or 45°. Compared to the tower with a smaller height ratio

the one with a larger height ratio exhibits smaller root-mean-square values for both drag and lift coefficients

as well as smaller response

whose resultant displacement and acceleration are approximately 66%–87% of those of the former. The mean drag forces of both hybrid towers are lower than that of the corresponding cylindrical tower. The wind-induced dynamic response of both towers reaches the maximum value at a wind angle of 45°. This paper provides valuable insights for selecting structural configurations in practical engineering applications.

关键词

Keywords

references

CHEN X, XU J Z. Structural failure analysis of wind turbines impacted by super typhoon Usagi[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 60: 391−404. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.028

VELJKOVIC M, FELDMANN M, NAUMES J, et al. Wind turbine tower design, erection and maintenance[J]. Wind Energy Systems, 2011: 274–300. doi: 10.1533/9780857090638.2.274

CHEN J L, YANG R C, MA R L, et al. Design optimization of wind turbine tower with lattice-tubular hybrid structure using particle swarm algorithm[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2016, 25(15): 743−758. doi: 10.1002/tal.1281

GKANTOU M, REBELO C, BANIOTOPOULOS C. Life cycle assessment of tall onshore hybrid steel wind turbine towers[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(15): 3950. doi: 10.3390/en13153950

CHEN J L, YANG R C, MA R L. Structural design optimization of a composite tower for large wind turbine systems[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2015, 42(5): 29−35(in Chinese).

XIA S L. Application of topology optimization in tower structure design of large wind turbine[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2020(in Chinese). doi: 10.27380/d.cnki.gwkju.2020.000284

LI H, KE K. Probabilistic spectral model of the strength reduction factors for a hybrid wind turbine tower[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2023, 25(9): 73−82(in Chinese). doi: 10.13969/j.cnki.cn31-1893.2023.09.008

SHAH H J, DESAI A K. Experimental and computational dynamic response comparison of hybrid and mono windmill towers considering soil–structure interaction[J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 21(3): 463−478. doi: 10.1007/s42107-019-00201-6

SHAH H J, DESAI A K. Comparison of monopole and hybrid wind turbine tower response for seismic loading under operational conditions[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering Technologies, 2022, 10(7): 2557−2575. doi: 10.1007/s42417-022-00504-0

LUO G X. Comparative study on mechanical properties of 1.25 MW wind turbine tower and hybrid tower[D]. Baotou: Inner Mongolia University of Science Technology, 2013(in Chinese).

WEI Y. Study on basic mechanical properties of hybrid wind turbine tower[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2016(in Chinese).

Wind turbine generaator system—Desigen reguirements: JB/T 10300—2001[S]. 2001(in Chinese).

Ministry of Construction of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of high-rising structures: GB 50135—2006[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press(in Chinese).

Ministry of Construction of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Load code for the design of building structures: GB 50009—2001[S]. Beijing: China Architecture Building Press, 2002(in Chinese).

LIANG F, TAO D. Structural design of transition piece of 140 m-high quadrilateral lattice prestressed anti-fatigue wind turbine tower[J]. Building Structure, 2019, 49(14): 23−28(in Chinese). doi: 10.19701/j.jzjg.2019.14.005

GKANTOU M, MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ P, BANIOTOPOULOS C. On the structural response of a tall hybrid onshore wind turbine tower[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 199: 3200−3205. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.535

FARHAN M, MOHAMMADI M R S, CORREIA J A, et al. Transition piece design for an onshore hybrid wind turbine with multiaxial fatigue life estimation[J]. Wind Engineering, 2018, 42(4): 286−303.

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Standard for wind tunnel test of buildings and structures: JGJ/T 338—2014[S]. Beijing: China Architecture Building Press, 2015(in Chinese).

TAMURA Y, KAREEM A, SOLARI G, et al. Aspects of the dynamic wind-induced response of structures and codification[J]. Wind and Structures, 2005, 8(4): 251−268. doi: 10.12989/was.2005.8.4.251

HU X Q, XIE Z N, ZHANG L L. Aerodynamic loads correction method based on wavelet packet transform in high-frequency force balance tests[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 228: 105129. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105129

ZOU L H, LIANG S G, LI Q S, et al. Investigation of 3-D dynamic wind loads on lattice towers[J]. Wind and Structures, 2008, 11(4): 323−340. doi: 10.12989/was.2008.11.4.323

ZHU Y, YAN Y L, QIU H. Study on equivalent static wind load of radio and TV transmitting tower based on HFFB technology[J]. Special Structures, 2020, 37(5): 29−33(in Chinese). doi: 10.19786/j.tzjg.2020.05.006

HOLMES J D. Mode shape corrections for dynamic response to wind[J]. Engineering Structures, 1987, 9(3): 210−212. doi: 10.1016/0141-0296(87)90017-4

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

阻力舵机翼颤振特性仿真与风洞试验

典型高速飞行器滚转失稳特性研究

典型山体地形下低矮房屋风荷载受周边建筑群干扰效应研究

基于双气动弹性模型风洞试验的邻近超高层建筑风致干扰效应

民用飞机大展弦比大柔性机翼高速静气动弹性载荷风洞试验