基于射流流动控制的飞翼布局飞行器阵风载荷减缓研究

梅洋; 史志伟; 张维源; 廖雪琪; 郭鹏宇; 夏雨航

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0140

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于射流流动控制的飞翼布局飞行器阵风载荷减缓研究

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 基于射流流动控制的飞翼布局飞行器阵风载荷减缓研究
- Gust loads alleviation of flying wing aircraft based on jet flow control
- 空气动力学学报 2026年44卷第1期页码：85-95
- 作者机构：
  
  南京航空航天大学航空学院,南京,210016
- 作者简介：
  
  梅洋（2000—），男，湖南株洲人，硕士研究生，研究方向：空气动力学. E-mail：meiyang@nuaa.edu.cn
  史志伟*，教授，研究方向：飞行器设计与流动控制. E-mail：szwam@nuaa.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0140
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
梅洋, 史志伟, 张维源, 等. 基于射流流动控制的飞翼布局飞行器阵风载荷减缓研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(1): 85−95.

Mei Yang, Shi Zhiwei, Zhang Weiyuan, et al. Gust loads alleviation of flying wing aircraft based on jet flow control[J]. 2026, 44(1): 85-95.
梅洋, 史志伟, 张维源, 等. 基于射流流动控制的飞翼布局飞行器阵风载荷减缓研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(1): 85−95. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0140

Mei Yang, Shi Zhiwei, Zhang Weiyuan, et al. Gust loads alleviation of flying wing aircraft based on jet flow control[J]. 2026, 44(1): 85-95. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0140.

摘要

针对飞翼布局飞行器静稳定性较差的特点，通过控制面偏转应对阵风载荷的方法因受机械传动系统限制，存在操纵效率低、控制效能有限等问题。为此，本文采用CFD数值模拟方法，开展基于射流流动控制的阵风载荷减缓技术研究。首先对飞翼布局飞行器的阵风响应特性进行分析，在此基础上采用壁面射流和环量射流分别抑制阵风诱导的气动力载荷，并提出一种基于压力反馈的阵风载荷减缓控制方案。结果表明：阵风扰动主要影响飞行器上翼面前缘压力分布，导致气动力特性改变；施加壁面射流和环量射流均能有效控制阵风载荷，其中环量射流在现有激励器参数和布局配置下表现出更优的控制效率；在基于压力反馈的闭环控制下，环量射流可使阵风诱导的升力系数增量均方根值降低63.1%，俯仰力矩系数增量均方根值降低72.1%，验证了该方法的有效性。

Abstract

Due to the limitations of mechanical actuation systems

methods involving control surface deflections to address gust loads suffer from low maneuvering efficiency and limited control effectiveness. Considering the poor static stability characteristics of flying-wing aircraft

a study was conducted on gust load alleviation using jet flow control

based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Initially

the gust response characteristics of the flying wing aircraft were analyzed. Building upon this analysis

both wall jet and circulation control were employed to mitigate the aerodynamic loads induced by gusts. Additionally

a gust load alleviation control strategy based on pressure feedback was proposed. The results indicate that gusts predominantly alter the pressure distribution on the leading edge of the upper wing surface

thus affecting aerodynamic loads. Both wall jet and circulation control were found to be effective in controlling loads; however

the circulation control demonstrated higher efficiency in alleviating gust-induced loads under the current actuator parameters and configurations. In this study

a pressure feedback-based closed-loop control system was designed

which automatically adjusts the jet according to the intensity of the gusts to achieve load alleviation. Under closed-loop control based on pressure feedback

the root mean square value of the increment in lift coefficient induced by gusts was reduced by approximately 63.1%

and the root mean square value of the increment in pitch moment coefficient was reduced by approximately 72.1%.

关键词

Keywords

references

Yang Chao, Qiu Qisheng, Zhou Yitao, et al. Review of aircraft gust alleviation technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 208−248(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.27350

Regan C D, Jutte C V. Survey of applications of active control technology for gust alleviation and new challenges for lighter-weight aircraft: NASA/TM-2012216008[R]. California: NASA, 2012

Sun Quanbing, Shi Zhiwei, Geng Xi, et al. Attitude control of flying wing aircraft without control surfaces based on active flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 185−194(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.2020.24080

Yang Junbin, Wu Zhigang, Dai Yuting, et al. Wind tunnel test of gust alleviation active control for flying wing configuration aircraft[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(1): 184−192(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0079

Glezer A, Amitay M. Synthetic jets[J]. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 2002, 34(1): 503−529. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.34.090501.094913

Wood N, Nielsen J. Circulation control airfoils - past, present, future[C]// 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. AIAA, 1985: AIAA1985-204. doi: 10.2514/6.1985-204

Al-Battal N, Cleaver D, Gursul I. Aerodynamic load control through blowing[C]// 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. AIAA, 2016: AIAA 2016-1820. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1820

Wang Haifeng, Deng Feng, Liu Xueqiang, et al. Gust load alleviation control based on jets for natural laminar airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 246−257(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26767

Wang Hao, Luo Zhenbing, Deng Xiong, et al. Airfoil gust load alleviation based on Dual Synthetic Jets[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(16): 129660(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.29660

Deng Feng, Wang Haifeng, Xue Cheng, et al. A combined experimental and numerical study on aerodynamic load reduction for a swept wing by using jets[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 130: 107935. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107935

Xue Cheng, Deng Feng, Qin Ning. Numerical simulation of gust load control for an swept wing by active blowing[C]//4th National Conference on Unsteady Aerodynamics. Beijing: The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2018: 98–105 (in Chinese).

Li Yonghong, Qin Ning. Gust load alleviation by normal microjet[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 117: 106919. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106919

Li Yonghong, Qin Ning. Gust load alleviation on an aircraft wing by trailing edge circulation control[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2021, 107: 103407. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103407

Hou Yanxiang, Feng Lihao. Wind tunnel virtual flight test of flying wing configuration with active flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630636(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30636

Casella L, Langreder W, Fischer A, et al. Dynamic flow analysis using an OpenFOAM based CFD tool: Validation of turbulence intensity in a testing site[J]. ITM Web of Conferences, 2014, 2: 04002. doi: 10.1051/itmconf/20140204002

Yang Wei, Quan Yong, Jin Xinyang, et al. Influences of equilibrium atmosphere boundary layer and turbulence parameter on wind loads of low-rise buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(10-11): 2080−2092. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.014

European Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications for large aeroplanes CS-25[S]. European Aviation Safety Agency: Cologne, Germany, 2008.

Boulbrachene K, De Nayer G, Breuer M. Assessment of two wind gust injection methods: Field velocity vs . split velocity method[J ] . Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 218: 104790. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104790

Zaide A, Raveh D. Numerical simulation and reduced-order modeling of airfoil gust response[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(8): 1826−1834. doi: 10.2514/1.16995

Dong Weixing. Study on closed-loop control of aerodynamic drag reduction of 25-degree Ahmed car model[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017(in Chinese).

Niu Zhongguo, Liu Jie, Hu Qiuqi, et al. Experiment of the plasma active flow control based on pressure feedback[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(3): 74−81(in Chinese). doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220265

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于风雷软件的壁面距离场的快速迭代并行求解方法

无人机气动/风能获取一体化设计

某中型皮卡发动机冷却风扇布局优化

CFD软件可信度评估平台研制与应用

高阶精度非线性加权格式权函数研究综述