1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
2. 军事科学院,北京,100071
闵耀兵(1982—),男,湖北黄冈人,博士,高级工程师,研究方向:计算流体力学. E-mail:minyb@126.com
马燕凯*,助理研究员,研究方向:高阶精度有限差分方法及其应用. E-mail:mayankai_cardc@163.com
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
闵耀兵, 谢宁, 马燕凯, 等. 高阶精度有限差分格式的全局守恒特性初探[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(1): 19−29.
Min Yaobing, Xie Ning, Ma Yankai, et al. Exploration of global conservation properties in high-order finite difference schemes[J]. 2026, 44(1): 19-29.
闵耀兵, 谢宁, 马燕凯, 等. 高阶精度有限差分格式的全局守恒特性初探[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(1): 19−29. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0111
Min Yaobing, Xie Ning, Ma Yankai, et al. Exploration of global conservation properties in high-order finite difference schemes[J]. 2026, 44(1): 19-29. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0111.
高阶精度有限差分格式的守恒特性一直都饱受质疑,这限制了其在复杂工程问题中的应用。基于对称守恒网格导数方法(symmetric conservation metric method
SCMM)的高阶精度WCNS(weighted compact nonlinear schemes)格式,具有与有限体积方法相媲美的几何守恒特性,但其全局守恒特性问题却未能彻底解决。本文基于等距网格上的全场一致高阶精度WCNS格式,将整个计算区域内所有求解点上的积分权值作为未知量,以满足全局守恒为条件,直接数值解出所有求解点上的积分权值,并结合理论分析给出积分权值应该满足的4个约束条件,然后通过针对性的数值实验分别验证了4个约束条件的合理性,并进一步研究了全局守恒特性对高阶精度差分格式模拟结果的影响。研究结果可用于指导适用于工程实际问题模拟高阶精度边界差分格式和对应的数值积分方法的设计。
The conservation properties of high-order finite difference schemes have consistently been questioned
limiting their application in complex engineering problems. Based on the symmetric conservative metric method (SCMM)
high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes (WCNS) exhibit geometric conservation properties comparable to those of the finite volume method. However
their global conservation properties have not been fully addressed. This paper introduces a uniformly high-order WCNS scheme on equidistant grids
where the integral weights at all solution points are treated as unknowns and directly solved numerically to ensure exact satisfaction of global conservation. Theoretical analysis provides four constraint conditions that the integral weights should satisfy
which are then validated through targeted numerical experiments. Additionally
we examine the impact of the global conservation property on the simulation results of high-order finite difference schemes. The findings of this study can inform the design of high-order boundary difference schemes and numerical integration methods for engineering applications.
Wang Z J. High-order methods for the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations on unstructured grids[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2007, 43(1-3): 1−41. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.05.001
Wang Z J, Fidkowski K, Abgrall R, et al. High-order CFD methods: current status and perspective[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013, 72(8): 811−845. doi: 10.1002/fld.3767
Xu Dan. Research on high-precision finite difference method satisfying geometric conservation law and its application in large eddy simulation[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2017(in Chinese).
Deng Xiaogang, Min Yaobing, Mao Meiliang, et al. Further studies on Geometric Conservation Law and applications to high-order finite difference schemes with stationary grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 239: 90−111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.002
Deng Xiaogang, Zhu Huajun, Min Yaobing, et al. High-order finite difference schemes based on symmetric conservative metric method: decomposition, geometric meaning and connection with finite volume schemes[J]. Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2020, 12(2): 436−479. doi: 10.4208/aamm.oa-2017-0243
Liao F, He G W. High-order adapter schemes for cell-centered finite difference method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 403: 109090. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109090
Perot J B. Discrete conservation properties of unstructured mesh schemes[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43: 299−318. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160645
Deng Xiaogang, Zhang Hanxin. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 165(1): 22−44. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6594
Svärd M, Nordström J. Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial–boundary-value problems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 268: 17−38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.02.031
Del Rey Fernández D C, Hicken J E, Zingg D W. Review of summation-by-parts operators with simultaneous approximation terms for the numerical solution of partial differential equations[J]. Computers Fluids, 2014, 95: 171−196. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.02.016
Morinishi Y, Lund T S, Vasilyev O V, et al. Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 143(1): 90−124. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5962
Morinishi Y. Skew-symmetric form of convective terms and fully conservative finite difference schemes for variable density low-Mach number flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(2): 276−300. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.021
Pirozzoli S. Generalized conservative approximations of split convective derivative operators[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(19): 7180−7190. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.006
Van’T Hof B, Veldman A E P. Mass, momentum and energy conserving (MaMEC) discretizations on general grids for the compressible Euler and shallow water equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(14): 4723−4744. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.03.005
Coppola G, Capuano F, De Luca L. Discrete energy-conservation properties in the numerical simulation of the navier–stokes equations[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2019, 71(1): 010803. doi: 10.1115/1.4042820
Coppola G, Capuano F, Pirozzoli S, et al. Numerically stable formulations of convective terms for turbulent compressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 382: 86−104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.007
Turner J M, Haeri S, Kim J W. Improving the boundary efficiency of a compact finite difference scheme through optimising its composite template[J]. Computers Fluids, 2016, 138: 9−25. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.08.007
Brady P T, Livescu D. High-order, stable, and conservative boundary schemes for central and compact finite differences[J]. Computers Fluids, 2019, 183: 84−101. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.12.010
Deng Xiaogang, Chen Yamin. A novel strategy for deriving high-order stable boundary closures based on global conservation, I: Basic formulas[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 372: 80−106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.06.012
Qin Jiaxian, Chen Yaming, Deng Xiaogang. On the role of global conservation property for finite difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 440: 110437. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110437
Zhong Xiaolin, Tatineni M. High-order non-uniform grid schemes for numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary-layer stability and transition[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 190(2): 419−458. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00282-1
Shukla R K, Zhong Xiaolin. Derivation of high-order compact finite difference schemes for non-uniform grid using polynomial interpolation[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 204(2): 404−429. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.014
Hermanns M, Hernández J A. Stable high-order finite-difference methods based on non-uniform grid point distributions[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2008, 56(3): 233−255. doi: 10.1002/fld.1510
Gustafsson B. The convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary value problems[J]. Mathematics of Computation, 1975, 29(130): 396−406. doi: 10.1090/s0025-5718-1975-0386296-7
Gustafsson B. The convergence rate for difference approximations to general mixed initial-boundary value problems[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1981, 18(2): 179−190. doi: 10.1137/0718014
Min Yaobing, Ma Yankai, Li Song. Accuracy analysis of numerical error with statistical forms in CFD[J]. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 123554(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23554
Abe Y, Nonomura T, Iizuka N, et al. Geometric interpretations and spatial symmetry property of metrics in the conservative form for high-order finite-difference schemes on moving and deforming grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 260: 163−203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.019
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621