CHEN D H, LIN J, GUO D P, et al. Technical ways to solve high speed key aerodynamic problems of large air transporters[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2004(02): 1−5 (in Chinese).

XUE R, RUAN Y X, LAI H, et al. Numerical simulation of liquid nitrogen spray cooling in cryogenic wind tunnel[J]. Cryogenics, 2019(1): 35−40 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6516.2019.01.008

BUSHNELL D M. Scaling: Wind tunnel to flight[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 38: 111−128. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092208

SALTZMAN E J, AYERS T G. Review of flight-to-wind-tunnel drag correlation Edwin[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1982, 19(10): 801−811. doi: 10.2514/3.61561

NING C J, WU J F, LI G S, et al. Research on few-shot aerodynamic modeling methods for civil aircraft model with wide-range high Reynolds number[J]. Acta Aerodynamics Sinica, 2024, 42(8): 60−76 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0208

BAALS D D. High Reynolds number research: NASA-CP-2009 [R]. NASA, 1977.

PETTERSSON K, RIZZI A. Aerodynamic scaling to free flight conditions: Past and present[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2008, 44(4): 295−313. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.03.002

RUDNIK R, GERMAIN E. Reynolds number scaling effects on the European high-lift configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(4): 1140−1151. doi: 10.2514/1.36487

YANG Z, LI J, NIU X T. Analysis and correction of Reynolds number effect of a flight verification platform with laminar wing section[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 192−206(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27287

MELBER-WILKENDING S, WICHMANN G. Application of advanced CFD tools for high Reynolds number testing[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: AIAA2009−418. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-418

RECKZEH D. Aerodynamic design of the high-lift-wing for a Megaliner aircraft[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2003, 7(2): 107−119. doi: 10.1016/S1270-9638(02)00002-0

RE R J. Longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics and wing pressure distributions of a blended-wing-body configuration at low and high Reynolds Numbers: NASA/TM-2005-213754 [R]. NASA, 2013.

JIANG Y X, LI J, YANG Z. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 361−374(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26814

OM D, CURTIN M, BOGUE D, et al. Reynolds number effects on a subsonic transport at transonic conditions[C]//39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2001: AIAA2001−909. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-909

QUEST J, WRIGHT M. Investigation of a modern transonic transport aircraft configuration over a large range of Reynolds numbers[C]// 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002: AIAA2002−422. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-422

SODERMAN P T, AIKEN T N. Full-scale wind-tunnel tests of a small unpowered jet aircraft with a T-Tail[M]. Washington, D. C. : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1971.

WANG N, GAO C. Variable Reynolds number experimental study on aerodynamic characteristic of supercritical airfoil RAE2822[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 420: 42−46. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.420.42

SUN Z W, BAI J Q, GAO Z H, et al. Design and wind tunnel test investigation of the modern supercritical airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3): 804−818(in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0188

PETTERSSON K, RIZZI A. Estimating Reynolds number scaling and windtunnel boom effects with the help of CFD methods[C]// 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2006: AIAA2006−3162. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-3162

CRIPPA S, RIZZI A. Numerical investigation of Reynolds number effects on a blunt leading-edge delta wing[C]//24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: AIAA2006−3001. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-3001

NANGIA R, GHOREYSHI M, VAN ROOIJ M. Reynolds number effects on transonic designed multi-swept combat wing at subsonic supersonic speeds[C]//AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, National Harbor, MDOnline. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2023: AIAA2023-0821. doi: 10.2514/6.2023-0821

ZHANG P H, ZHOU N C, DENG Y Q, et al. The effects of Reynolds number on airplane aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(6): 693−698(in Chinese).

ZHANG H, LI J, GONG Z B. Drag correction to higher Reynolds number for a transport aircraft[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2012, 30(01): 20−24 (in Chinese).

ZHANG Y B, ZHOU N C, CHEN J T. Numerical investigation of Reynolds number effects on a low-aspect-ratio flying-wing model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(3): 279−288(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0051

LI Z W, LIANG Y H. Numerical simulations of Reynolds number effect on flow characteristics at high-lift devices[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2014, 32(1): 10−14 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0853.2014.01.003

ZHOU L, YANG Z, LI J. Experimental study on the influence of Reynolds number on aerodynamic characteristics of transport aircraft[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2019, 36(4): 966−970(in Chinese). doi: 10.11776/cjam.36.04.A016

MA M S, ZHANG Y B, DENG Y Q, et al. Investigation of Reynolds number effects on transport aircraft's wing, fuselage and wing-body by numerical simulation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(2): 194−198, 204(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2011.02.011

ZHANG Y J, DUAN Z Y, WEI J L, et al. Research of Reynolds number correction for supercritical wing based on wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6): 934−940(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0213

FENG T, CHENG H G, YANG L, et al. Receptivity of boundary layer to Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2005, 26(4): 328−334(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2005.04.009

JIN Y L, HU J. Numerical research of the influence of airfoil stall and Reynolds number change on wind turbine aerodynamic performance[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2009, 30(9): 1280−1285(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-0096.2009.09.023

ZHENG L Q. Effect of Reynolds number on aerodynamic characteristics of RAE2822 airfoil[J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2015(15): 47−48(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2015.15.015

HEFER G. ETW—A facility for high Reynolds number testing[C]// IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum IV. Dordrecht: Springer, 2003: 157−164. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0017-8_25

ZHANG Y J, ZHAO K, ZHANG T X, et al. The influence of Reynolds number on boundary layer development and stall characteristics of airfoil[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2019, 10(3): 319−329(in Chinese).

JIN Y, LIAO F, CAI J S. Numerical simulation of 30P30N multi-element airfoil using delayed detached-eddy simulation[C]// AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Virtual Event. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020: AIAA2020−2556. doi: 10.2514/6.2020-2556

LI Z W, LIANG Y H, ZHOU L, et al. Reynolds number effect of flow seperation on high lift devices of 3D low speed wing[J]. E-science Technology Application, 2012, 3(5): 42−47 (in Chinese).

Aircraft design manual general editorial board, aircraft design manual 6: Aerodynamic design[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2002: 65–66, 69, 71–72(in Chinese).

BUSHNELL D M, YIP L P, YAO C S, et al. Reynolds number influences in aeronautics: NASA-TM-107730 [R]. NASA, 1993.

QUEST J, WRIGHT M, HANSEN H, et al. First measurements on an Airbus high lift configuration at ETW up to flight Reynolds number[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002: AIAA2002−423. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-423

TAYLOR H D. The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators: R-4012−3[R]. United Airfcraft Corporation Report, 1947.

SESHAGIRI A, COOPER E, TRAUB L W. Effects of vortex generators on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(1): 116−122. doi: 10.2514/1.36241

WETZEL K, FAROKHI S. Interaction of riblets and vortex generators on an airfoil[C]//14th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1996: AIAA1996−2428. doi: 10.2514/6.1996-2428

BRUNET V, FRANCOIS C, GARNIER E, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of vortex generators effects[C]// 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006: AIAA2006−3027. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-3027

LIU G, LIU W, (MOU/MU) B, et al. CFD numerical simulation investigation of vortex generators[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25(2): 241−244(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2007.02.019

QI C Y, ZHOU G B, CAO H L, et al. Experimental investigation of heat transfer enhancement of a new vortex generator[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2002, 23(S1): 173−176 (in Chinese).

WANG J S, ZHANG J F, SUN J, et al. The investigation on heat transfer enhancement mechanism of small-scale vortex generator[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2007, 28(S02): 61−64 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2007.z2.017

HUANG G P, YANG D H, LIANG D W, et al. Using strake vortex to reduce the distortion of a Y-shaped inlet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2000, 21(2): 113−117(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2000.02.004

KLAUSMEYER S, PAPADAKIS M, LIN J. A flow physics study of vortex generators on a multi-element airfoil[C]// AIAA 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1996: AIAA-96-0548

HAO L S, QIAO Z D, SONG W P. Investigation on airfoil stall flow controlling and Reynolds number effect based on a vortex generator[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2011, 26(3): 323−328(in Chinese).

BAI N, DENG X Y, MA B F, et al. The effect of critical Reynolds number and zonal characteristics on asymmetric vortices at forebody[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 529−535(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2009.05.005

GREEN J, QUEST J. A short history of the European Transonic Wind Tunnel ETW[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(5): 319−368. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.06.002

WU J Q, CUI X C, WEI Z, et al. Research status and development tendency of large aircraft wind tunnel technologies in China[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(12): 83−94(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0147

PRAHARAJ S, ROGER R, CHAN S, et al. CFD computations to scale jet interaction effects from tunnel to flight[C]//35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1997: AIAA1997−406. doi: 10.2514/6.1997-406

KATZ J, WALTERS R. Investigation of wind-tunnel wall effects in high blockage testing[C]//33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1995: AIAA1995−438. doi: 10.2514/6.1995-438

MCKINNEY L W, BAALS D D. Wind-tunnel/flight correlation[R]. JAXA, 1982.

HAN Z H, CHEN J, ZHANG K S, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of natural-laminar-flow wing using surrogate-based approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7): 2579−2593. doi: 10.2514/1.j056661

KIMZEY W F, COVERT E E, ROONEY E C, et al. Thrust and drag: Its prediction and verification[M]. USA: Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1985. doi: 10.2514/4.865732

SOMMER S C, SHORT B J. Free-flight measurements of turbulent-boundary-layer skin friction in the presence of severe aerodynamic heating at Mach numbers from 2.8 to 7.0: NACA-TN-3391 [R]. NACA, 1955.

RAYMER D. Aircraft design: A conceptual approach, fifth edition[M]. Washington, D.C.: AIAA , 2012. doi: 10.2514/4.869112

BARLOW J B, RAE W H, POPE A. Low-speed wind tunnel testing, 3rd edition[M]. New York: Wiley, 1999.

JACOBS E N, SHERMAN A. Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number: NACA-TR-586[R]. NASA, 1937.

WILLIAMS J. Technical evaluation report on the flight mechanics panel symposium on ground/flight test techniques and correlation[R]. AGARD, 1983.

SELIG M, DETERS R, WILIAMSON G. Wind tunnel testing airfoils at low Reynolds numbers[C]// 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: AIAA2011−875. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-875

NICOLÌ A, IMPERATORE B, MARINI M, et al. Ground-to-flight extrapolation of the aerodynamic coefficients of the VEGA launcher[C]// 25th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006: AIAA2006−3829. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-3829

YIP L P, VIJGEN P M, HARDIN J D, et al. In-flight pressure distributions and skin-friction measurements on a subsonic transport high-lift wing section: 94N18435[R]. NASA, 1993.

ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, HUANG Y, et al. CFD technology in aeronautic engineering field: Applications, challenges and development[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(003): 1−25 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0311

HE L, QIAN W Q, ZHAO T, et al. Multi-fidelity aerodynamic data fusion with a deep neural network modeling method[J]. Entropy, 2020, 22(9): 1022. doi: 10.3390/e22091022

CHAKRABORTY S. Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural network[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 426: 109942. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109942

MAHMOUDABADBOZCHELOU M, CAGGIONI M, SHAHSAVARI S, et al. Data-driven physics-informed constitutive metamodeling of complex fluids: A multifidelity neural network (MFNN) framework[J]. Journal of Rheology, 2021, 65(2): 179−198. doi: 10.1122/8.0000138

ZHANG X S, XIE F F, JI T W, et al. Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 373: 113485. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113485

DAI J H, LIU P Q, QU Q L, et al. Aerodynamic optimization of high-lift devices using a 2D-to-3D optimization method based on deep reinforcement learning and transfer learning[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 121: 107348. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107348

TANG Z G, YUAN X X, QIAN W Q, et al. Research progress on the fusion of data obtained by high-speed wind tunnels, CFD and model flight[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(8): 44−58 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0096

SUBEL A, CHATTOPADHYAY A, GUAN Y F, et al. Data-driven subgrid-scale modeling of forced Burgers turbulence using deep learning with generalization to higher Reynolds numbers via transfer learning[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(3): 031702. doi: 10.1063/5.0040286

ZHAO Y, LIN W B, LIU B. Research of the corrected GA-elman algorithm with the Reynolds number on EGTM[J]. Science Technology Information, 2024, 22(2): 26−30(in Chinese).

YANG H, CHEN S S, GAO Z H, et al. Reynolds number effect correction of multi-fidelity aerodynamic distributions from wind tunnel and simulation data[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(10): 103113. doi: 10.1063/5.0170578