1. 中国运载火箭技术研究院,北京,100076
2. 中国科学院 力学研究所,北京,100190
陈海鹏(1979—),男,博士,研究员,研究方向:飞行器总体设计. E-mail:hitchenhp@163.com
鞠胜军*(1986—),男,辽宁东港人,助理研究员,研究方向:气动优化设计. E-mail:optju@imech.ac.cn
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
陈海鹏, 鞠胜军, 汪小卫, 等. 来流变化导致飞行器气动力/热不确定度量化分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(9): 114−123.
CHEN Haipeng, JU Shengjun, WANG Xiaowei, et al. Uncertainty quantification analysis of aerodynamic force and heat for air vehicle due to freestream variation[J]. 2024, 42(9): 114-123.
陈海鹏, 鞠胜军, 汪小卫, 等. 来流变化导致飞行器气动力/热不确定度量化分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(9): 114−123. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0051
CHEN Haipeng, JU Shengjun, WANG Xiaowei, et al. Uncertainty quantification analysis of aerodynamic force and heat for air vehicle due to freestream variation[J]. 2024, 42(9): 114-123. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0051.
为评估及量化来流条件变化导致高速飞行器气动力/热特性的不确定性程度,选择具有飞机前机身与座舱罩组合部件基本特征的双椭球模型为研究模型,采用数值模拟方法,获得了其流动结构和壁面热流、压力分布等特征,并通过与实验数据进行对比,验证了预测方法的可靠性。在此基础上,选取来流速度、来流温度、来流密度和壁面温度这4个来流参数作为不确定性变量,采用拉丁超立方试验设计与非嵌入式多项式混沌相结合的不确定度量化方法,开展了气动力/热不确定度量化分析和敏感性分析。结果表明,来流条件的不确定性对模型的升力、阻力及驻点热流的值均有较大影响,其中来流速度和来流温度的变化对壁面压强分布影响较大,来流速度、来流密度和壁面温度的变化对壁面热流的预测有着重要影响。
The flight environment of high-speed aircraft is relatively complex
and the reliability of numerical simulation results of this process can be affected by the freestream condition variation. In order to assess and quantify the aerodynamic and aerothermodynamics uncertainty of high-speed aircraft due to the freestream variation
a double ellipsoidal configuration featuring the combination of a front fuselage and a cockpit cover of the space shuttle was selected as the research model
and the numerical simulation approach was adopted to obtain the flow structures
wall heat flux
pressure distributions and other characteristics. The reliability of the prediction method was verified by comparing the simulation results with the experimental data
which demonstrated the reliability of the prediction method. Based on the Latin hypercube experimental design method and the non-intrusive polynomial chaos expansion method
the freestream density
freestream temperature
wall temperature
and freestream velocity were selected as the uncertainty input variables
and the uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis on the aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics of the double ellipsoid model were conducted. The research results indicate that
the uncertainty of freestream conditions has a significant impact on the lift
drag
and stagnation heat flux values of the double ellipsoid model. Variations in the freestream velocity and temperature significantly affects the wall pressure distribution
while variations in the freestream velocity
freestream density
and wall temperature strongly affect the wall heat-flux prediction.
CHEN J T, XIAO W, ZHAO W, et al . Advances in verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J ] . Advances in Mechanics, 2023 , 53 ( 3 ): 626 − 660 (in Chinese).
YUAN X X, CHEN J Q, DU Y X, et al. Research progress on fundamental CFD issues in National Numerical Windtunnel Project[J]. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 625733 (in Chinese).
GHAHARI S F, SARGSYAN K, ÇELEBI M, et al. Quantifying modeling uncertainty in simplified beam models for building response prediction[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2022, 29(10).
SCHAEFER J A, ROMERO V J, SCHAFER S R, et al. Approaches for quantifying uncertainties in computational modeling for aerospace applications[C]//AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Orlando, FL. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020.
ZHANG K L, LI S Y, DUAN Y, et al . Uncertainty quantification of parameters in SST turbulence model for inlet simulation[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023 , 44 ( S2 ): 729429 .
QIU Y W, LIN J, CHEN X S, et al . Nonintrusive uncertainty quantification of dynamic power systems subject to stochastic excitations[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021 , 36 ( 1 ): 402 − 414 .
KOBAYASHI K, KUMAR D, ALAM S B . AI-driven non-intrusive uncertainty quantification of advanced nuclear fuels for digital twin-enabling technology[J ] . Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2024 , 172 : 105177 .
BETTIS B, HOSDER S. Uncertainty quantification in hypersonic reentry flows due to aleatory and epistemic uncertainties[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: 252.
BRUNE A J, WEST T, HOSDER S, et al. A review of uncertainty analysis for hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator design[C]//21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Xiamen, China. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: 2373.
ELDRED M S, SWILER L P, TANG G . Mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification with stochastic expansions and optimization-based interval estimation[J ] . Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2011 , 96 ( 9 ): 1092 − 1113 .
WANG Y T, LIU G, CHEN Z B . Summary of the first aeronautical computational fluid dynamics credibility workshop[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019 , 37 ( 2 ): 246 − 261 (in Chinese).
CHEN Q, CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, et al . Progress on application of National Numerical Windtunnel Project for hypersonic[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021 , 42 ( 9 ): 87 − 109 (in Chinese).
ZHANG W, WANG X Y, YU J, et al . Uncertainty quantification analysis in hypersonic aerothermodynamics due to freestream[J ] . Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 , 44 ( 5 ): 1102 − 1109 (in Chinese).
WANG X Y, YAN C, JU S J, et al . Uncertainty analysis of laminar and turbulent aeroheating predictions for Mars entry[J ] . International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017 , 112 : 533 − 543 .
DENG X B, CHEN Q, YUAN X X, et al . Study of aerodynamic uncertainty on the complex slender vehicle at high angle of attack[J ] . Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2016 , 46 ( 5 ): 493 − 499 (in Chinese).
CHEN X, WANG G, YE Z Y, et al . A review of uncertainty quantification methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021 , 39 ( 4 ): 1 − 13 (in Chinese).
XIA Z H, LUO J Q . Uncertainty quantification of inlet incidence angle variation for turbine blade[J ] . Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020 , 35 ( 3 ): 519 − 531 (in Chinese).
LI S X. Hypersonic flow characteristics of typical shape[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2007(in Chinese).
MENTER F R . Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J ] . AIAA Journal, 1994 , 32 ( 8 ): 1598 − 1605 .
ELDRED M, BURKARDT J. Comparison of non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty quantification[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 976.
BRUNE A J, WEST T K, HOSDER S, et al . Uncertainty analysis of Mars entry flows over a hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator[J ] . Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015 , 52 ( 3 ): 776 − 788 .
GUO J H, LIN G P, BU X Q, et al . Effect of static shape deformation on aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics of hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator[J ] . Acta Astronautica, 2017 , 136 : 421 − 433 .
TAKAHASHI Y, KOIKE T, OSHIMA N, et al . Aerothermodynamic analysis for deformed membrane of inflatable aeroshell in orbital reentry mission[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019 , 92 : 858 − 868 .
ANDERSON J D. Fundamentals of aerodynamics[M]. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
LEES L . Laminar heat transfer over blunt-nosed bodies at hypersonic flight speeds[J ] . Journal of Jet Propulsion, 1956 , 26 ( 4 ): 259 − 269 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621