西北工业大学 航空学院,西安,710072
贾天昊(1998—),男,四川绵阳人,博士研究生,研究方向:跨声速空气动力学. E-mail:jiatianhao621000@163.com
高超*(1960—),男,陕西榆林人,教授,研究方向:复杂流动控制及应用,跨声速空气动力学. E-mail:chaogao2020@163.com
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
贾天昊, 高超, 王玉帅, 等. 零质量射流控制翼型跨声速激波抖振特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(3): 29−41.
JIA Tianhao, GAO Chao, WANG Yushuai, et al. Investigation on control characteristics of zero-net-mass-flux jet for transonic shock buffeting of airfoil[J]. 2025, 43(3): 29-41.
贾天昊, 高超, 王玉帅, 等. 零质量射流控制翼型跨声速激波抖振特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(3): 29−41. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0029
JIA Tianhao, GAO Chao, WANG Yushuai, et al. Investigation on control characteristics of zero-net-mass-flux jet for transonic shock buffeting of airfoil[J]. 2025, 43(3): 29-41. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0029.
跨声速激波抖振严重影响飞行器的安全性能和操纵性能。针对激波抖振的控制问题,提出采用基于尾缘吹/吸气的零质量射流方法,以翼型NASA SC(2)-0714为研究对象,通过风洞实验获得激波抖振的基本特性,基于雷诺应力模型求解非定常雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程开展数值模拟,研究了改变射流介入的时刻、攻角和自由来流的马赫数以及射流的强度对控制效果的影响。结果表明:零质量射流能够完全抑制翼型跨声速激波抖振,能否成功抑制以及控制效果的优劣与射流的介入时刻无关。射流在给定的多个翼型攻角和来流马赫数下都有效抑制了激波抖振,俯仰力矩系数的标准差基本下降了一个数量级以上,翼型升阻比平均提升超过10%,气动特性得到明显改善。射流强度对跨声速激波抖振的抑制作用存在临界值,当低于临界值时激波振荡减缓,当高于临界值时激波振荡完全被抑制。
Transonic shock buffeting poses a significant threat to aircraft safety and performance. This paper presents a novel approach utilizing a zero-net-mass-flux (ZNMF) jet method
implemented through trailing edge blowing/suction on the NASA SC(2)-0714 airfoil
to tackle the critical issue of transonic shock buffeting control. The fundamental characteristics of transonic shock buffeting were obtained through wind tunnel experiments. Numerical simulations
validated against experimental data
were carried out to investigate the control effects by the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations based on the Reynolds stress model. Key parameters including jet intervention timing
angle of attack
free stream Mach number
and the jet strength
were analyzed to optimize the suppression of transonic shock buffeting. Results show that the ZNMF jet can completely suppress the airfoil transonic shock buffeting
independent of the specific jet intervention timing. This suppression is maintained across a range of angles of attack and free stream Mach numbers
yielding significant improvement in aerodynamic characteristics. Specifically
the standard deviation of the pitching moment coefficient is reduced by more than an order of magnitude
and the lift-drag ratio is increased by more than 10% on average. Furthermore
the study identifies a critical threshold for the jet strength in suppressing the transonic shock buffeting. Sub-critical jet strengths result in reduced shock wave oscillation
while application of jet strengths above this threshold completely suppresses shock wave oscillation
offering valuable insights for pratical implementation in aircraft design and operation.
ZHANG W W, GAO C Q, YE Z Y . Research advances of wing/airfoil transonic buffet[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015 , 36 ( 4 ): 1056 − 1075 (in Chinese).
HUMPHREYS M D. Pressure pulsations on rigid airfoils at transonic speeds: NACA RM L51I12[R]. NASA, 1951.
MCDEVITT J B, LEVY L L Jr, DEIWERT G S . Transonic flow about a thick circular-arc airfoil[J ] . AIAA Journal, 1976 , 14 ( 5 ): 606 − 613 .
TIJDEMAN H, SEEBASS R . Transonic flow past oscillating airfoils[J ] . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1980 , 12 : 181 − 222 .
LEE B H K . Oscillatory shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary-layer interaction[J ] . AIAA Journal, 1990 , 28 ( 5 ): 942 − 944 .
LEE B H K, MURTY H, JIANG H . Role of Kutta waves on oscillatory shock motion on an airfoil[J ] . AIAA Journal, 1994 , 32 ( 4 ): 789 − 796 .
LEE B H K . Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001 , 37 ( 2 ): 147 − 196 .
HARTMANN A, KLAAS M, SCHRÖDER W . Time-resolved stereo PIV measurements of shock–boundary layer interaction on a supercritical airfoil[J ] . Experiments in Fluids, 2012 , 52 ( 3 ): 591 − 604 .
ROKONI A A, HASAN A B M T . Prediction of transonic buffet onset for flow over a supercritical airfoil: A numerical investigation[J ] . Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013 , 43 ( 1 ): 48 − 53 .
GARNIER E, DECK S. Large-eddy simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil[M]//DEVILLE M, LÊ TH, SAGAUT P. Turbulence and Interactions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 135−141.
SMITH A N, BABINSKY H, FULKER J L, et al . Shock wave/boundary-layer interaction control using streamwise slots in transonic flows[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2004 , 41 ( 3 ): 540 − 546 .
TIAN Y, GAO S Q, LIU P Q, et al . Transonic buffet control research with two types of shock control bump based on RAE2822 airfoil[J ] . Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017 , 30 ( 5 ): 1681 − 1696 .
ZHANG S H, DENG F, QIN N, et al . Numerical study on impact of shock control bump on transonic buffet[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022 , 43 ( 11 ): 353 − 368 (in Chinese).
CARUANA D, MIGNOSI A, CORRÈGE M, et al . Buffet and buffeting control in transonic flow[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2005 , 9 ( 7 ): 605 − 616 .
IOVNOVICH M, RAVEH D E . Transonic unsteady aerodynamics in the vicinity of shock-buffet instability[J ] . Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2012 , 29 : 131 − 142 .
GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y . Study on transonic buffet suppression with flapping rudder[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015 , 36 ( 10 ): 3208 − 3217 (in Chinese).
GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, LI X T, et al . Mechanism of frequency lock-in in transonic buffeting flow[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017 , 818 : 528 − 561 .
GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, et al . Active control of transonic buffet flow[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017 , 824 : 312 − 351 .
REN K, GAO C Q, ZHANG W W . Model-free adaptive control of shock buffet flow over an airfoil[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021 , 39 ( 6 ): 149 − 155 (in Chinese).
LUO Z B, XIA Z X, DENG X, et al . Research progress of dual synthetic jets and its flow control technology[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017 , 35 ( 2 ): 252 − 264 (in Chinese).
RAGHUNATHAN S, HALL D E, MABEY D G . Alleviation of shock oscillations in transonic flow by passive controls[J ] . The Aeronautical Journal, 1990 , 94 ( 937 ): 245 − 250 .
JIANG R P, TIAN Y, LIU P Q . Transonic buffet control by rearward buffet breather on supercritical airfoil and wing[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019 , 89 : 204 − 219 .
ZHANG S L, YANG X D, SONG B F, et al. Numerical and experimental study of the co-flow jet airfoil performance enhancement[C]// 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: AIAA 2017−1694.
ZHA G C, YANG Y C, REN Y, et al. Super-lift and thrusting airfoil of coflow jet actuated by micro-compressors[C]// 2018 Flow Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018: AIAA 2018−3061.
JIA T H, GAO C, XU H Y, et al . Numerical simulation on dynamic stall control of airfoil based on co-flow jet under variable free stream[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023 , 41 ( 9 ): 59 − 69 (in Chinese).
DANO B, ZHA G C, CASTILLO M. Experimental study of co-flow jet airfoil performance enhancement using discreet jets[C]// 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011: AIAA 2011−941.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621