上海飞机设计研究院,上海,201210
陈恺(1995—),女,江苏泰兴人,工程师,研究方向:静气动弹性设计,无人飞行验证. E-mail:2497816916@qq.com
吴大卫*,研究员,研究方向:飞机总体设计,无人飞行验证. E-mail:wudawei@comac.cc
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
陈恺, 吴大卫, 孙宇辰, 等. 基于CFD方法的民用飞机缩比飞行试验尺度效应研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(8): 77−83.
CHEN Kai, WU Dawei, SUN Yuchen, et al. Research on scale effect in subscale flight testing of civil aircraft based on CFD method[J]. 2024, 42(8): 77-83.
陈恺, 吴大卫, 孙宇辰, 等. 基于CFD方法的民用飞机缩比飞行试验尺度效应研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(8): 77−83. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0218
CHEN Kai, WU Dawei, SUN Yuchen, et al. Research on scale effect in subscale flight testing of civil aircraft based on CFD method[J]. 2024, 42(8): 77-83. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0218.
缩比飞行试验在民用飞机的研制过程中日益受到重视,其尺度效应影响评估是设计缩比飞行试验工况的基础,也是确认飞行数据适用性的关键。基于几何和动力学相似准则,针对某民用飞机及其缩比验证机设计分析工况组,采用计算流体力学方法研究相似准则参数(马赫数
Ma
、雷诺数
Re
、弗劳德数
Fr
)对气动载荷、典型气动导数及弹性变形的影响。研究结果表明,在动力学相似时,验证机与原型机间的气动特性差异主要来源于马赫数,雷诺数影响较小;当原型机以中低马赫数(
Ma
0.5)飞行时,此时马赫数压缩效应不明显,验证机与原型机具有近似的展向与弦向载荷分布特征,典型稳定导数及操纵导数差异约10%,在控制律设计鲁棒性范围内;进一步保持质量与刚度分布相似时,机翼翼尖扭转变形差异不超过0.5°,挠度差异不超过0.5%,在工程上属于可接受的范围。
Scale effect evaluation is the foundation for designing scaled flight test conditions and the key to validate the flight data in the development of civil aircraft. Based on geometric similarity and dynamic similarity criteria
the present paper utilizes computational fluid dynamics to analyze the effects of similarity criteria parameters such as Mach number
Reynolds number
and Froude number on aerodynamic loads
aerodynamic coefficients
and elastic deformation for a civil aircraft and its scaled model. Results demonstrate that when the dynamic similarity is satisfied
t
he differences between the prototype and its scaled model come from the Mach number whereas the effects of the Reynolds number is relatively small. When the prototype is flying at low Mach numbers (
Ma
0.5)
the compression effects are not significant
and the scaled prototype exhibits similar spanwise and chordwise load distribution characteristics
with typical stability coefficients and control coefficients differing by approximately 10%
which is within the robustness range for control law design. Furthermore
when maintaining similar mass and stiffness distributions
the maximum deflection of the wingtip twist does not exceed 0.5°
and the maximum deflection does not exceed 0.5%
which are acceptable for engineering applications.
WOLOWICZ C H, BOWMAN J S, GILBERT W P. Similitude requirements and scaling relationships as applied to model testing: NASA-TP-1435 [R]. Washington, DC, USA: NASA, 1979.
CROOM M, KENNEY H, MURRI D, et al. Research on the F/A-18E/F using a 22%-dynamically-scaled drop model: AIAA-2000-3913[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2000.
STARKEY R, ARGROW B, KREVOR Z. Design and flight testing of a 15% dynamically scaled HL-20 vehicle model[C]// 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2012.
GOLDTHORPE S, ROSSITTO K, HYDE D, et al. X-48B blended wing body flight test performance of maximum sideslip and high to post stall angle-of-attack command tracking[C]// AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2010.
BENNETT R, ABEL I. Application of a flight test and data analysis technique to flutter of a drone aircraft[C]// Dynamics Specialists Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1981.
JONES J, CESNIK C E. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of the X-56 multi-utility aeroelastic demonstrator[C]// 15th Dynamics Specialists Conference, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016.
ROESSLER C, STAHL P, SENDNER F, et al. Aircraft design and testing of FLEXOP unmanned flying demonstrator to test load alleviation and flutter suppression of high aspect ratio flexible wings[C]// AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019.
ROTHHAAR P M, MURPHY P C, BACON B J, et al. NASA langley distributed propulsion VTOL TiltWing aircraft testing, modeling, simulation, control, and flight test development[C]// 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014.
BERGMANN D P, DENZEL J, STROHMAYER A . UAS as flexible and innovative test platform for aircraft configuration and systems testing[J ] . MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018 , 233 : 00001 .
ZHAO Z J, ZHENG H, MENG X Z . Free flight model simulation modeling and scaled control law design technology[J ] . Aircraft Design, 2019 , 39 ( 4 ): 1 − 4,14 (in Chinese).
MUNRO C D, KRUS P, JOUANNET C . Implications of scale effect for the prediction of high angle of attack aerodynamics[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005 , 41 ( 3-4 ): 301 − 322 .
BARLOW J B, RAE W H, POPE A. Low-speed wind tunnel testing[M]. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1999.
KLINE S J. Similitude and approximation theory[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
JAMESON A, SCHMIDT W, TURKEL E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes[C]// 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1981.
MENTER F R . Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J ] . AIAA Journal, 1994 , 32 ( 8 ): 1598 − 1605 .
MAO K, XUE F, BAI F, et al. An engineering correction method of static aeroelasticity and Reynolds number effect on wind tunnel pressure distribution[C]// 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology. Singapore: Springer, 2019.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621