1. 电子科技大学 航空航天学院,成都,611731
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 高速空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
王紫浩(1998—),男,云南曲靖人,硕士研究生,研究方向:航空智能计算. E-mail:wangzhuestc@163.com
张书俊* (1976—),男,河南内乡人,研究方向:流体力学/飞行器多学科设计优化. E-mail: zhangsj@uestc.edu.cn
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
王紫浩, 李滚, 刘大伟, 等. 基于LSTM的超临界机翼抖振边界预测方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(6): 56−65.
WANG Zihao, LI Gun, LIU Dawei, et al. Buffeting boundary prediction method of supercritical wing using LSTM[J]. 2024, 42(6): 56-65.
王紫浩, 李滚, 刘大伟, 等. 基于LSTM的超临界机翼抖振边界预测方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(6): 56−65. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0146
WANG Zihao, LI Gun, LIU Dawei, et al. Buffeting boundary prediction method of supercritical wing using LSTM[J]. 2024, 42(6): 56-65. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0146.
超临界机翼的抖振对运输机的安全性和稳定性有着极大的影响,如何高效准确地确定抖振边界一直是备受关注的研究热点。针对CHN-T1型运输机标模,构建了一种基于长短时记忆(long short-term memory
LSTM)神经网络的超临界机翼抖振边界预测框架。根据CHN-T1标模的计算数据,设计了基于LSTM的气动力系数预测模型和抖振起始迎角判定模型,用于准确预测给定马赫数下气动力系数的变化趋势,并且实现了抖振起始迎角的快速判定;通过整合抖振起始迎角数据确定了CHN-T1标模的抖振边界,并用风洞试验数据验证了结果的准确性。研究结果显示,LSTM模型对气动力系数变化趋势有良好的预测能力,其均方根误差维持在2%以内;同时,在抖振起始迎角的判定方面表现出色,抖振边界的误差保持在2%以内。这些结果验证了该方法在抖振边界预测中的可靠性和准确性,为超临界机翼的抖振研究提供了有力支持。
The buffeting of supercritical airfoils significantly impacts the safety and stability of transport aircraft. Efficient and accurate determination of buffeting boundaries has been a focal point of research. In this study
a prediction framework for buffeting boundaries of supercritical airfoils was developed using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks
focusing on the CHN-T1 transport aircraft model. Utilizing computational data from the CHN-T1 model
LSTM-based models for predicting aerodynamic coefficients and determining buffeting onset angles were designed. These models forecast changes in aerodynamic coefficients accurately at a given Mach numbers and rapidly determine buffeting onset angles at a given Mach numbers. Integration of buffeting onset angle data ultimately defined the buffeting boundaries of the CHN-T1 model
validated with wind tunnel experimental data. The results demonstrated the LSTM model's excellent predictive capabilities for aerodynamic coefficient trends
maintaining a RMSE within 2%. Furthermore
the model exhibited outstanding performance in buffeting onset angle determination
with errors remaining within 2%. These findings validate the reliability and accuracy of this approach in buffeting boundary prediction
providing robust support for research on supercritical airfoil buffeting.
LEE B H K . Transonic buffet on a supercritical aerofoil[J ] . The Aeronautical Journal, 1990 , 94 ( 935 ): 143 − 152 .
ZHANG W W, GAO C Q, YE Z Y . Research advances of wing/airfoil transonic buffet[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015 , 36 ( 4 ): 1056 − 1075 (in Chinese).
JACQUIN L, MOLTON P, DECK S, et al . Experimental study of shock oscillation over a transonic supercritical profile[J ] . AIAA Jo urnal, 2009 , 47 ( 9 ): 1985 − 1994 .
LI Q, LIU D W, XU X, et al . Experimental study of aerodynamic characterictics of CHN-T1 standard model in 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019 , 37 ( 2 ): 337 − 344 (in Chinese).
HAN B, XU M . Prediction of vertical tail buffet using CFD/CSD coupling method[J ] . Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021 , 2021 : 1 − 9 .
GIANNELIS N F, LEVINSKI O, VIO G A . Origins of atypical shock buffet motions on a supercritical aerofoil[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020 , 107 : 106304 .
PETROCCHI A, BARAKOS G N . Buffet boundary prediction using RANS-based criteria and adjoint methods[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022 , 126 : 107664 .
KOU J Q, ZHANG W W, GAO C Q . Modal analysis of transonic buffet based on POD and DMD method[J ] . Acta Aeronau tica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016 , 37 ( 9 ): 2679 − 2689 (in Chinese).
LEI R W, BAI J Q, WANG H, et al . Deep learning based multistage method for inverse design of supercritical airfoil[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021 , 119 : 107101 .
ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, LIU Y L . Prospect of artificial intelligence empowered fluid mechanics[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021 , 42 ( 4 ): 524689 (in Chinese).
LIU Z Y, HAN R K, ZHANG M, et al . An enhanced hybrid deep neural network reduced-order model for transonic buffet flow prediction[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022 , 126 : 107636 .
ZAHN R, WINTER M, ZIEHER M, et al . Application of a long short-term memory neural network for modeling transonic buffet aerodynamics[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021 , 113 : 106652 .
LI K, KOU J Q, ZHANG W W . Deep neural network for unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic modeling across multiple Mach numbers[J ] . Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019 , 96 ( 3 ): 2157 − 2177 .
LI W, WANG Y T, HONG J W, et al . Aerodynamic characteristics simulation of CHN-T1model with TRIP3.0[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019 , 37 ( 2 ): 272 − 279 (in Chinese).
HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J . Long short-term memory[J ] . Neural Computation, 1997 , 9 ( 8 ): 1735 − 1780 .
ZHOU Y Q, KUMAR A, GANDHI C P, et al . Discrete entropy-based health indicator and LSTM for the forecasting of bearing health[J ] . Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2023 , 45 ( 2 ): 1 − 17 .
KUMAR B, SUNIL, YADAV N . A novel hybrid model combining βSARMA and LSTM for time series forecasting[J ] . Applied Soft Computing, 2023 , 134 : 110019 .
JIANG S C, YANG S H . Distributed state estimation method of distribution networks based on LSTM[J ] . Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2023 , 2418 ( 1 ): 012089 .
LEY A, BORMANN H, CASPER M . Intercomparing LSTM and RNN to a conceptual hydrological model for a low-land river with a focus on the flow duration curve[J ] . Water, 2023 , 15 ( 3 ): 505 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621