1. 北京空天技术研究所,北京,100074
2. 天津大学 机械工程学院,天津,300072
3. 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 上海飞机设计研究院,上海,201210
4. 西北工业大学 航空学院,西安,710072
文豪(1997—),男,陕西汉中人,硕士研究生,研究方向:流动稳定性和边界层转捩. E-mail:1229881022@qq.com
苏彩虹*(1979—),女,内蒙古包头人,教授,研究方向:流动稳定性和边界层转捩. E-mail:su_ch@tju.edu.cn
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
文豪, 苏彩虹, 张美红, 等. 不同外罩型线短舱边界层的转捩位置预测[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(11): 43−54.
WEN Hao, SU Caihong, ZHANG Meihong, et al. Transition prediction of boundary layers over an engine nacelle with different outer covers[J]. 2024, 42(11): 43-54.
文豪, 苏彩虹, 张美红, 等. 不同外罩型线短舱边界层的转捩位置预测[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(11): 43−54. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0130
WEN Hao, SU Caihong, ZHANG Meihong, et al. Transition prediction of boundary layers over an engine nacelle with different outer covers[J]. 2024, 42(11): 43-54. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0130.
在设计短舱外罩型线时,希望尽可能使其表面边界层保持层流状态,以减小摩阻,提高有效载荷。理解边界层的转捩机制,并准确预估转捩发生的位置,有利于有效评估不同外罩型线设计方案。以巡航状态下3种不同外罩型线的通气短舱为研究对象,采用线性稳定性理论分析了边界层稳定性特征,并综合考虑T-S波和激波诱导分离泡这两种转捩机制,预测了不同外罩型线下短舱边界层的转捩位置。结果表明,逆压梯度越大,T-S波越不稳定,流动分离的位置也越靠前。因此,设计时应尽可能保持大范围的顺压梯度并减小逆压梯度,这将有利于推迟转捩发生。此外,针对风洞实验中的短舱缩比模型,比较了预测的转捩位置与实验转捩位置,发现两者的转捩线在形态上非常一致,进一步证实了预测方法的有效性。
In the design of the nacelle outer cover profile
it is crucial to maintain the boundary layer's laminar state to minimize wall friction and enhance payload capacity. Understanding the boundary-layer transition mechanisms and accurately predicting the transition front is fundamental to effectively evaluate different designs of the nacelle. In this work
we focus on the stability characteristics of boundary layers over nacelle with three different outer covers under cruise conditions. Considering transition mechanisms correlated with the T-S waves and the shock wave-induced separation bubbles
the transition fronts are predicted. The results indicate that as the unfavorable pressure gradient increases
T-S waves become more unstable
leading to earlier boundary-layer separation. Therefore
maintaining a relatively large range of favourable pressure gradient as well as reducing unfavorable pressure gradient will delay the boundary-layer transition. In addition
for a scaled nacelle model
the predicted transition front and that obtained in wind tunnel tests are morphologically similar
confirming the validity of the prediction method.
JOSLIN R D . Aircraft laminar flow control[J ] . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1998 , 30 : 1 − 29 .
RADESPIEL R, HORSTMANN K H, REDEKER G . Feasibility study on the design of a laminar flow nacelle[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 1990 , 27 ( 11 ): 959 − 965 .
RIEDEL H, HORSTMANN K H, RONZHEIMER A, et al . Aerodynamic design of a natural laminar flow nacelle and the design validation by flight testing[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 1998 , 2 ( 1 ): 1 − 12 .
HE X L, BAI J Q, XIA L, et al . Natural laminar flow nacelle optimization design based on EFFD method[J ] . Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014 , 29 ( 10 ): 2311 − 2320 (in Chinese).
LI S Y, ZHONG Y J. A turbofan-engine nacelle shape design and optimization method for natural laminar flow control[C]// ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Seoul, South Korea, 2016.
CAO F, HU X, ZHANG M F, et al . Transonic natural laminar flow nacelle optimization design at high Reynolds number[J ] . Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021 , 36 ( 8 ): 1729 − 1739 (in Chinese).
LIN Y J, ROBINSON T, EARLY J, et al . Implementation of menter's transition model on an isolated natural laminar flow nacelle[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2011 , 49 ( 4 ): 824 − 835 .
VERMEERSCH O, BOUTEILLER X . Numer ical study of laminar nacelles: Natural and hybrid laminar flow designs[J ] . International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 2014 , 6 ( 3/4 ): 191 .
MENG X X, BAI J Q, ZHANG M H, et al . Laminar transition influencing factors of nacelle based on double e N method[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019 , 40 ( 11 ): 123040 (in Chinese).
NIU M H, WEN H, HAN Y F, et al . Boundary-layer stability analysis and transition prediction over a nacelle[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022 , 40 ( 6 ): 117 − 128 (in Chinese).
DU X, YAN H J, WU Y A, et al . Aerodynamic design and wind tunnel test of a transonic natural laminar flow nacelle[J ] . Aeronautical Science Technology, 2019 , 30 ( 9 ): 63 − 72 (in Chinese).
MCAULIFFE B R, YARAS M I . Numerical study of instability mechanisms leading to transition in separation bubbles[J ] . Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008 , 130 ( 2 ): 021006 .
SPALART P R, STRELETS M K . Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000 , 403 : 329 − 349 .
SCHLICHTING H. Boundary layer theory[M]. KESTIN J, Trans. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
DOVGAL A V, KOZLOV V V, MICHALKE A . Laminar boundary layer separation: Instability and associated phenomena[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1994 , 30 ( 1 ): 61 − 94 .
LIU Y H, WU D R, DU X, et al . Fast transition prediction for wind tunnel testing of the transonic natural laminar flow standard model CRM-NLF[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023 , 41 ( 7 ): 36 − 47 (in Chinese).
ZHOU H, ZHAO G F. Hydrodynamic stability[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2004(in Chinese).
YU G T, LUO J S . Application of e N method in three-dimensional hyper sonic boundary layers[J ] . Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014 , 29 ( 9 ): 2047 − 2054 (in Chinese).
SU C H . Progress in key scientific problems of hypersonic bounary-layer transition prediction: Receptivity, evolution of disturbances and transition criterion[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020 , 38 ( 2 ): 355 − 367 (in Chinese).
STOCK H W, HAASE W . Navier-Stokes airfoil computations with e transition prediction including transitional flow regions[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2000 , 38 ( 11 ): 2059 − 2066 .
KRIMMELBEIN N, KRUMBEIN A . Automatic transition prediction for three-dimensional configurations with focus on industrial application[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2011 , 48 ( 6 ): 1878 − 1887 .
FISCHER J S, SOEMARWOTO B I, VAN DER WEIDE E T A . Automatic transition prediction in a Navier-Stokes solver using linear stability theory[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2021 , 59 ( 7 ): 2409 − 2426 .
SOMERS D M. Design and experimental results for a natural-laminar-flow airfoil for general aviation applications: NASA-TP-1861[R]. 1981.
BURGMANN S, BRÜCKER C, SCHRÖDER W . Scanning PIV measurements of a laminar separation bubble[J ] . Experiments in Fluids, 2006 , 41 ( 2 ): 319 − 326 .
GASTER M. The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles: Reports and Memoranda No. 3595[R]. NPL, 1967.
OWEN P R, KLANFER L. On the laminar boundary layer separation from the leading edge of a thin aerofoil: C. P. No. 220[R]. Aeronautical Research Council, 1955.
ALAM M, SANDHAM N D . Direct numerical simulation of ‘short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000 , 410 : 1 − 28 .
NIU J Q, ZHOU L . Optimization of self-developed parallel computing software by TAU software[J ] . Changjiang Information Communications, 2020 , 33 ( 1 ): 124 − 126 (in Chinese).
YAN H J, DU X . A matching method for variable mass flow ratio for through-flow nacelle[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018 , 39 ( 12 ): 122379 (in Chinese).
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621