HINTON G E, OSINDERO S, TEH Y W. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets[J]. Neural Computation, 2006, 18(7): 1527-1554. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527

SILVER D, HUANG A, MADDISON C J, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7587): 484-489. DOI: 10.1038/nature16961

LU L, JIN P Z, PANG G F, et al. Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3(3): 218-229. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-021-00302-5

BI K F, XIE L X, ZHANG H H, et al. Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks[J]. Nature, 2023, 619(7970): 533-538. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06185-3

RAO C P, REN P, WANG Q, et al. Encoding physics to learn reaction-diffusion processes[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2023, 5(7): 765-779. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-023-00685-7

LI Y F, CHANG J T, KONG C, et al. Recent progress of machine learning in flow modeling and active flow control[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(4): 14-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2021.07.027

XIE L J, ZHANG S, ZHANG J F, et al. A feature-based data mining method for fluid dynamics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2010, 28(5): 540-546. (in Chinese)

QIAN W Q, ZHAO T, HUANG Y, et al. Modeling and data mining of engineering airfoil aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(6): 175−183 (in Chinese).

LIU S S, CHEN J T, GUI Y W, et al. Knowledge discovery for vehicle aerodynamic configuration design using data mining[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524708. (in Chinese)

WANG W Z, ZHENG K P, CHEN G, et al. Application research of data-mining method to flight test data analysis and aerodynamic parameter identification[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(6): 778-782. (in Chinese)

ŽEGKLITZ J, POŠÍK P. Benchmarking state-of-the-art symbolic regression algorithms[J]. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2021, 22(1): 5-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10710-020-09387-0

LU Q, ZHANG Y. Solving symbol regression based on Monte Carlo tree search[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2020, 41(8): 2158-2164. (in Chinese)

AHVANOOEY M T, LI QM, WU M, et al. A survey of genetic programming and its applications[J]. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 2019, 13(4): 1765-1794. Doi: 10.3837/tiis.2019.04.002

ZHONG J H, FENG L, ONG Y S. Gene expression programming: a survey[review article[J]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2017, 12(3): 54-72. DOI: 10.1109/MCI.2017.2708618

DURIEZ T, PAREZANOVIC V, LAURENTIE J C, et al. Closed-loop control of experimental shear flows using machine learning[C]// Proceedings of the 7th AIAA Flow Control Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014: AIAA2014-2219. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2219

ZHAO Y M, AKOLEKAR H D, WEATHERITT J, et al. RANS turbulence model development using CFD-driven machine learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 411: 109413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109413

HAMMOND J, MONTOMOLI F, PIETROPAOLI M, et al. Machine learning for the development of data driven turbulence closures in coolant systems[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2022, 144(8): 081003-1-081003-10DOI: 10.1115/1.4053533

MA H P. Model establishments and performance analyses of evolutionary algorithms[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2014. (in Chinese)

LIU C, FEI W, HU S. Review on research and application of wolf pack algorithm[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(9): 3378-3386. (in Chinese)

BRUNTON S L, NATHAN KUTZ J, MANOHAR K, et al. Data-driven aerospace engineering: reframing the industry with machine learning[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021: 1-26. DOI: 10.2514/1.j060131

ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, LIU Y L. Prospect of artificial intelligence empowered fluid mechanics[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524689. (in Chinese)

WU Z, FAN D W, ZHOU Y. Advances in control of turbulence by artificial intelligence: systems, algorithms, achievements and data analysis methods[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2023, 53(2): 273-307. (in Chinese)

ZHANG W W, WANG X, KOU J Q. Prospects of multi-paradigm fusion methods for fluid mechanics research[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2023, 53(2): 433-467. (in Chinese)

ZHANG T J, QIAN W Q, ZHOU Y, et al. Preliminary thoughts on the combination of artificial intelligence and aerodynamics[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2019, 10(1): 1-11. (in Chinese)

THUEREY N, WEIßENOW K, PRANTL L, et al. Deep learning methods for reynolds-averaged navier–stokes simulations of airfoil flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(1): 25-36. DOI: 10.2514/1.j058291

GUO X X, LI W, IORIO F. Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation[C]//Proc of the Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco California USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939738

DURU C, ALEMDAR H, BARAN Ö U. CNNFOIL: convolutional encoder decoder modeling for pressure fields around airfoils[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33(12): 6835-6849. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05461-x

DURU C, ALEMDAR H, BARAN O U. A deep learning approach for the transonic flow field predictions around airfoils[J]. Computers Fluids, 2022, 236: 105312. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105312

WU M Y, WU Y, YUAN X Y, et al. Fast prediction of flow field around airfoils based on deep convolutional neural network[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(23): 12075. DOI: 10.3390/app122312075

HUI X Y, BAI J Q, WANG H, et al. Fast pressure distribution prediction of airfoils using deep learning[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 105: 105949. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105949

BHATNAGAR S, AFSHAR Y, PAN S W, et al. Prediction of aerodynamic flow fields using convolutional neural networks[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2019, 64(2): 525-545. DOI: 10.1007/s00466-019-01740-0

WANG M L, LI H X, CHEN X, et al. Deep learning-based model reduction for distributed parameter systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2016, 46(12): 1664-1674. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2605159

OMATA N, SHIRAYAMA S. A novel method of low-dimensional representation for temporal behavior of flow fields using deep autoencoder[J]. AIP Advances, 2019, 9(1): 015006. DOI: 10.1063/1.5067313

FUKAMI K, FUKAGATA K, TAIRA K. Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 870: 106-120. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.238

ZUO K J, BU S H, ZHANG W W, et al. Fast sparse flow field prediction around airfoils via multi-head perceptron based deep learning architecture[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 130: 107942. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107942

HU J W, ZHANG W W. Mesh-Conv: Convolution operator with mesh resolution independence for flow field modeling[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 452: 110896. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110896

GOODFELLOW I J, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2014, 27.

WU H Z, LIU X J, AN W, et al. A deep learning approach for efficiently and accurately evaluating the flow field of supercritical airfoils[J]. Computers Fluids, 2020, 198: 104393. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104393

WU H Z, LIU L, AN W, ET AL. . A generative deep learning framework for airfoil flow field prediction with sparse data[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(1): 470-484.

KASHEFI A, REMPE D, GUIBAS L J. A point-cloud deep learning framework for prediction of fluid flow fields on irregular geometries[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(2): 027104. DOI: 10.1063/5.0033376

MIYANAWALA T P, JAIMAN R K. Decomposition of wake dynamics in fluid–structure interaction via low-dimensional models[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 867: 723-764. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.140

LI J X, LIU T Y, WANG Y Q, et al. Integrated graph deep learning framework for flow field reconstruction and performance prediction of turbomachinery[J]. Energy, 2022, 254: 124440. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124440

ZUO K J, YE Z Y, ZHANG W W, et al. Fast aerodynamics prediction of laminar airfoils based on deep attention network[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(3): 037127. DOI: 10.1063/5.0140545

CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition: what we know, where shall we go[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(3): 311-337. (in Chinese)

SCHMISSEUR J D. Hypersonics into the 21st century: a perspective on AFOSR-sponsored research in aerothermodynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 72: 3-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.09.009

HU Z Y, WANG Z L, CHEN J Q, et al. Prediction of crossflow transition based on deep neural networks[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(1): 38-51. (in Chinese)

LI B L, YANG Z X, ZHANG X, et al. Using machine learning to detect the turbulent region in flow past a circular cylinder[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 905: A10. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.725

MENG D Y, SHI M T, SHI Y P, et al. A machine learning method for transition prediction in hypersonic flows over a cone with angles of attack[J]. AIP Advances, 2022, 12(2): 025116. DOI: 10.1063/5.0077734

YANG M C, XIAO Z X. Improving the k–ω–γ–Ar transition model by the field inversion and machine learning framework[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(6): 064101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0008493

DURAISAMY K, ZHANG Z J, SINGH A P. New approaches in turbulence and transition modeling using data-driven techniques[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: AIAA2015-1284. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-1284

ZHANG T X, CHEN J Q, ZENG F Z, et al. Improvement of transition prediction model in hypersonic boundary layer based on field inversion and machine learning framework[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(2): 064101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0137819

ZHAO Y M, XU X W. Data-driven turbulence modelling based on gene-expression programming[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(10): 2640-2655. (in Chinese)

AKOLEKAR H D, WASCHKOWSKI F, ZHAO Y M, et al. Transition modeling for low pressure turbines using computational fluid dynamics driven machine learning[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(15): 4680. DOI: 10.3390/en14154680

ZHENG T Y, WANG S Y, WANG G X, et al. High-order natural transition simulation method based on deep residual network[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20): 204701. (in Chinese)

WU L, CUI B, XIAO Z L. Artificial neural network-based one-equation model for simulation of laminar-turbulent transitional flow[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2023, 13(1): 100387. DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2022.100387

CHEN J Q, TU G H, WAN B B, et al. Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 124317. (in Chinese)

CROUCH J D, CROUCH I W M, NG L. Transition prediction for three-dimensional boundary layers in computational fluid dynamics applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40: 1536-1541. DOI: 10.2514/3.15228

ZAFAR M I, XIAO H, CHOUDHARI M M, et al. Convolutional neural network for transition modeling based on linear stability theory[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(11): 113903. DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.5.113903

ZAFAR M I, CHOUDHARI M M, PAREDES P, et al. Recurrent neural network for end-to-end modeling of laminar-turbulent transition[J]. Data-Centric Engineering, 2021, 2: e17. DOI: 10.1017/dce.2021.11

XIANG X H, REN H J, ZHANG Y F, et al. Transition prediction with hypersonic cross-flow model on HIFiRE-5[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1786(1): 012051. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1786/1/012051

XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, CHEN J Q, et al. Uncertainty quantification analysis and application research on cross-flow transition model parameters[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41(9): 1141-1150. (in Chinese)

XIANG X H, CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, et al. Cross-flow transition model predictions of hypersonic transition research vehicle[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 122: 107327. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107327

TU G H, WAN B B, CHEN J Q, et al. Investigation on correlation between wind tunnel and flight for boundary layer stability and transition of MF-1 blunt cone[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica Astronomica), 2019, 49(12): 118-128. (in Chinese)

CHEN S Y, JIANG T, CHANG Y, et al. Hypersonic boundary layer transition over blunt nosetipped bodies: experiment[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 124098. (in Chinese)

REN H J. WANG S, YUAN X X, et al. Prediction of hypersonic transition based on neural network[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34: 054106.

SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD vision 2030 study: a path to revolutionary computational aerosciences[J]. Mchenry County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan, 2014.

PARISH E J, DURAISAMY K. A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 305: 758-774. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.012

SINGH A P, DURAISAMY K. Using field inversion to quantify functional errors in turbulence closures[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(4): 045110. DOI: 10.1063/1.4947045

SINGH A P, MEDIDA S, DURAISAMY K. Machine-learning-augmented predictive modeling of turbulent separated flows over airfoils[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(7): 2215-2227. DOI: 10.2514/1.j055595

YAN C Y, ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X. Application of field inversion based on discrete adjoint method in turbulence modeling. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524695.

YAN C Y, ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X. Data augmented turbulence modeling for three-dimensional separation flows[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(7): 075101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0097438

WANG J X, WU J L, XIAO H. Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2017, 2(3): 034603. DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603

WANG J X, HUANG J J, DUAN L, et al. Prediction of Reynolds stresses in high-Mach-number turbulent boundary layers using physics-informed machine learning[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2019, 33(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00162-018-0480-2

WU J L, XIAO H, PATERSON E. Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: a comprehensive framework[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2018, 3(7): 074602. DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.3.074602

XIAO H, WU J, WANG J, et al. Physics informed machine learning for predictive turbulence modeling: Progress and perspectives: 2017-1712 [J]. Reston: AIAA, 2017.

XIAO H, WU J L, LAIZET S, et al. Flows over periodic hills of parameterized geometries: a dataset for data-driven turbulence modeling from direct simulations[J]. Computers Fluids, 2020, 200: 104431. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104431

LING J L, KURZAWSKI A, TEMPLETON J. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 807: 155-166. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.615

NOVATI G, DE LAROUSSILHE H L, KOUMOUTSAKOS P. Automating turbulence modelling by multi-agent reinforcement learning[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3(1): 87-96. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-020-00272-0

SUN X X, CAO W B, LIU Y L, et al. High Reynolds number airfoil turbulence modeling method based on machine learning technique[J]. Computers Fluids, 2022, 236: 105298. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105298

ZHU L Y, SUN X X, LIU Y L, et al. One neural network approach for the surrogate turbulence model in transonic flows[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2022, 38(3): 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-021-09057-z

ZHU L Y, ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, et al. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(1): 015105. DOI: 10.1063/1.5061693

ZHU L Y, ZHANG W W, SUN X X, et al. Turbulence closure for high Reynolds number airfoil flows by deep neural networks[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 110: 106452. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106452

XIE C Y, WANG J C, LI H, et al. Artificial neural network mixed model for large eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(8): 085112. DOI: 10.1063/1.5110788

XIE C Y, XIONG X M, WANG J C. Artificial neural network approach for turbulence models: a local framework[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2021, 6(8): 084612. DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.6.084612

WANG Y P, YUAN Z L, XIE C Y, et al. Artificial neural network-based spatial gradient models for large-eddy simulation of turbulence[J]. AIP Advances, 2021, 11(5): 055216. DOI: 10.1063/5.0053590

WEATHERITT J, SANDBERG R. A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 325: 22-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.015

WEATHERITT J, SANDBERG R D, LING J L, et al. A comparative study of contrasting machine learning frameworks applied to RANS modeling of jets in crossflow[C]// ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. 2017. doi: 10.1115/GT2017-63403

BRUNTON S L, NOACK B R, KOUMOUTSAKOS P. Machine learning for fluid mechanics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 52: 477-508. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214

DURAISAMY K, IACCARINO G, XIAO H. Turbulence modeling in the age of data[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51: 357-377. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547

ZHANG W W, ZHU L Y, LIU Y L, et al. Progresses in the application of machine learning in turbulence modeling[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(3): 444-454. (in Chinese)

BECK A, KURZ M. A perspective on machine learning methods in turbulence modeling[J]. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 2021, 44(1): e202100002. DOI: 10.1002/gamm.202100002

MENTER F R. Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows: NASA-TM-103975[R]. NTRS, 1992.

WU J L, XIAO H, SUN R, et al. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with explicit data-driven Reynolds stress closure can be ill-conditioned[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 869: 553-586. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.205

HE K F, QIAN W Q, WANG Q, et al. Application ofdata fusion technique in aerodynamics studies[J]. ACTA Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 777-782.

PETTERSSON K, RIZZI A. Aerodynamic scaling to free flight conditions: past and present[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2008, 44(4): 295-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.03.002

CHEN J Q, ZHANG Y R, ZHANG Y F, et al. Review pf cprrelatipn analysis pf aerpdynamic data between flight and grpund predictipn fpr hyperspnic vehicle[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(5): 587-599. (in Chinese)

HE L, QIAN W Q, WANG Q, et al. Applications of machine learning for aerodynamic characteristics modeling[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(3): 470-479. (in Chinese)

BREVAULT L, BALESDENT M, HEBBAL A. Overview of Gaussian process based multi-fidelity techniques with variable relationship between fidelities, application to aerospace systems[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 107: 106339. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106339

CHEN S, DING Y, SUN H, et al. Methods and applications of physical information deep learning in wave numerical simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(1): 272-282. (in Chinese)

MENG X H, KARNIADAKIS G E. A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 401: 109020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109020

HAN C Z, ZHU H Y, DUAN Z S. Multi-source information fusion[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

MENG T, JING X Y, YAN Z, et al. A survey on machine learning for data fusion[J]. Information Fusion, 2020, 57: 115-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.001

LIU C S, TANG C L, MU H B, et al. A data fusion approach with high spatiotemporal resolution for wall temperature measurement upon jet impingement[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 183: 122084. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122084

KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. Dynamic mode decomposition and its applications in fluid dynamics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 163-179. (in Chinese)

ZHAO Y. High-precision control method for wind speed of large transonic wind tunnel[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2019.

WANG X, NING C J, WANG W Z, et al. Intelligent fusion method of multi-source aerodynamic data for flight tests[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(2): 12-20. (in Chinese)

HE L, QIAN W Q, ZHAO T, et al. Multi-fidelity aerodynamic data fusion with a deep neural network modeling method[J]. Entropy, 2020, 22(9): 1022. DOI: 10.3390/e22091022

MENG X H, BABAEE H, KARNIADAKIS G E. Multi-fidelity Bayesian neural networks: Algorithms and applications[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 438: 110361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110361

LADICKÝ L, JEONG S, SOLENTHALER B, et al. Data-driven fluid simulations using regression forests[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34(6)Article No. 199. doi: 10.1145/2816795.2818129

WANG Y Q, DENG L, WAN Y B, et al. An intelligent method for predicting the pressure coefficient curve of airfoil-based conditional generative adversarial networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023, 34(7): 3538-3552. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3111911

SEKAR V, JIANG Q H, SHU C, et al. Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(5): 057103. DOI: 10.1063/1.5094943

RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

RAISSI M, WANG Z C, TRIANTAFYLLOU M S, et al. Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 861: 119-137. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.872

RAISSI M, YAZDANI A, KARNIADAKIS G E. Hidden fluid mechanics: learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations[J]. Science, 2020, 367(6481): 1026-1030. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw4741

ZHU Y H, ZABARAS N, KOUTSOURELAKIS P S, et al. Physics-constrained deep learning for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification without labeled data[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 394: 56-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.024

GENEVA N, ZABARAS N. Modeling the dynamics of PDE systems with physics-constrained deep auto-regressive networks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 403: 109056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109056

KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. Data-driven modeling for unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2021, 125: 100725.DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100725

WANG Z, WANG Z Y, WANG X, et al. A data-driven aeroheating prediction model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(5): 12-19 (in Chinese).doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0010

LI T, GUO L, YANG Z G, et al. An automatic shape-aware method for predicting heat flux of supersonic aircraft based on a deep learning approach[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(7). doi: 10.1063/5.0098341

LIANG Z. A novel intelligent feature detection and recognition method of fluid fields[J]. Computer Engineering Science. 2009, 31 (5): 27–30.

ZHANG L, DENG Q, MACHIRAJU R, et al. Boosting techniques for physics-based vortex detection[J]. Computer Graphics Forum, 2014, 33(1): 282-293. DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12275

BISWAS A, THOMPSON D, HE W B, et al. An uncertainty-driven approach to vortex analysis using oracle consensus and spatial proximity[C]// 2015 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), Hangzhou, China. IEEE, 2015: 223-230. doi: 10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2015.7156381

BIN T. CNN-based flow field feature visualization method[J]. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 2018: 434. doi: 10.23940/ijpe.18.03.p4.434444

LGUENSAT R, SUN M, FABLET R, et al. EddyNet: a deep neural network for pixel-wise classification of oceanic eddies[C]// IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain. IEEE, 2018: 1764-1767. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8518411

STROFER C M, WU J L, XIAO H, et al. Data-driven, physics-based feature extraction from fluid flow fields using convolutional neural networks[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2019, 25(3): 625–650. DOI: 10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0035

RAJENDRAN V, KELLY K Y, LEONARDI E, et al. Vortex detection on unsteady CFD simulations using recurrent neural networks[C]// 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2018: AIAA2018-3724. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-3724

LIU F Y, ZHOU H, WEN B Y. DEDNet: offshore eddy detection and location with HF radar by deep learning[J]. Sensors, 2020, 21(1): 126. DOI: 10.3390/s21010126

JAKOB J, GROSS M, GÜNTHER T. A fluid flow data set for machine learning and its application to neural flow map interpolation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2021, 27(2): 1279-1289. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3028947

POPINET S. Free Computational Fluid Dynamics [J]. ClusterWorld. 2004, 2 (6): 7.

KASHIR B, RAGONE M, RAMASUBRAMANIAN A, et al. Application of fully convolutional neural networks for feature extraction in fluid flow[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2021, 24(4): 771-785. DOI: 10.1007/s12650-020-00732-0

ABRAS J, HARIHARAN N S. Application of machine learning to automate flow-physics identification in computed solutions: hover rotor wake vortex identification and breakdown analysis[C]// AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, VIRTUAL EVENT. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021: AIAA 2021-0474. doi: 10.2514/6.2021-0474

CHEN T Q, GUESTRIN C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system[C]//Proc of the Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, California, USA. New York: ACM, 2016: 785-794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785

YE Z X, CHEN Q A, LI B H, et al. Flow structure segmentation for vortex identification using butterfly convolutional neural networks[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2020, 34(14n16): 2040121. DOI: 10.1142/s0217979220401219

LUO Y Y, SHAO Y H, CHU H Y, et al. CNN-based blade tip vortex region detection in flow field[C]//Proc SPIE 11373, Eleventh International Conference on Graphics and Image Processing (ICGIP 2019), 2020, 11373: 182-187. doi: 10.1117/12.2557248

DENG L, BAO W C, WANG Y Q, et al. Vortex-U-Net: an efficient and effective vortex detection approach based on U-Net structure[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 115: 108229.DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108229

AKIBA H, FOUT N, MA K. Simultaneous classification of time-varying volume data based on the time histogram [C]// Eurographics Conference on Visualization, 2006. doi: 10.2312/VisSym/EuroVis06/171-178

WANG C L, YU H F, MA K L. Importance-driven time-varying data visualization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2008, 14(6): 1547-1554. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.140

WOODRING J, SHEN H W. Multiscale time activity data exploration via temporal clustering visualization spreadsheet[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2009, 15(1): 123-137. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.69

MYERS K, LAWRENCE E, FUGATE M, et al. Partitioning a large simulation as it runs[J]. Technometrics, 2016, 58(3): 329-340. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2016.1158740

LING J L, KEGELMEYER W P, ADITYA K, et al. Using feature importance metrics to detect events of interest in scientific computing applications[C]// 2017 IEEE 7th Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV), Phoenix, AZ, USA. IEEE, 2017: 55-63. doi: 10.1109/LDAV.2017.8231851

PORTER W P, XING Y H, VON OHLEN B R, et al. A deep learning approach to selecting representative time steps for time-varying multivariate data[C]//Proc of the 2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), Vancouver, BC, Canada. IEEE, 2019: 1-5. doi: 10.1109/VISUAL.2019.8933759

LIU Y, LU Y T, WANG Y Q, et al. Key time steps selection for CFD data based on deep metric learning[J]. Computers Fluids, 2019, 195: 104318. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104318

BROMLEY J, GUYON I, LECUN Y, et al. Signature verification using a “siamese” time delay neural network [J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). 1993, 6: 737–744.

TONG X, LEE T Y, SHEN H W. Salient time steps selection from large scale time-varying data sets with dynamic time warping[C]//Proc of the IEEE Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV), Seattle, WA, USA. IEEE, 2012: 49-56. doi: 10.1109/LDAV.2012.6378975

FREY S, ERTL T. Flow-based temporal selection for interactive volume visualization[J]. Computer Graphics Forum, 2017, 36(8): 153-165. DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13070

DA SILVA L T, GIRALDI G A. Fluid flow summarization technique for computational fluid dynamics analysis [J]. Journal of Magnetohydrodynamics and Plasma Research. 2016, 21 (4): 471–509.

LU K C, WANG C L, WU K Q, et al. A unified framework for exploring time-varying volumetric data based on block correspondence[J]. Visual Informatics, 2019, 3(4): 157-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.visinf.2019.10.001

LIU C, LI Y D, YANG C H, et al. Event-based exploration and comparison on time-varying ensembles[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2020, 23(1): 111-123. DOI: 10.1007/s12650-019-00608-y

CHEN L C, FU D Y. Survey on machine learning methods for small sample data[J]. Computer Engineering, 2022, 48(11): 1-13. (in Chinese)

LI F C, LIU Y, WU P X, et al. A survey on recent advances in meta-learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2021, 44(2): 422-446. (in Chinese)

XU Z B. Ten fundamental problems for artificial intelligence: mathematical and physical aspects[J]. Scientia Sinica (Informationis), 2021, 51(12): 1967-1978. (in Chinese)

O’CONNELL M, SHI G Y, SHI X C, et al. Neural-Fly enables rapid learning for agile flight in strong winds[J]. Science Robotics, 2022, 7(66): eabm6597. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abm6597

FAWZI A, BALOG M, HUANG A, et al. Discovering faster matrix multiplication algorithms with reinforcement learning[J]. Nature, 2022, 610(7930): 47-53. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05172-4

LI K L, YANG W D, CHEN C, et al. Efficient computing for artificial intelligence and big data[J]. Frontiers of Data Computing, 2020, 2(1): 27-37. (in Chinese)