风力机翼型失速流动数据同化

孟令庭; 杨俊伟; 杨华

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0113

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

风力机翼型失速流动数据同化

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 风力机翼型失速流动数据同化
- Research on data assimilation of wind turbine airfoils in stall
- 空气动力学学报 2024年42卷第4期页码：37-45
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 扬州大学电气与能源动力工程学院,扬州,225127
  2. 扬州大学广陵学院,扬州,225000
- 作者简介：
  
  孟令庭（1999—），男，江苏南京人，硕士研究生，研究方向：风力机空气动力学. E-mail：mz120211133@stu.yzu.edu.cn
  杨华*（1975—），男，博士，教授，研究方向：流体机械及工程. E-mail：yanghua@yzu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  扬州市自然科学基金（YZ2023169）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0113
  中图分类号： TK83
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孟令庭, 杨俊伟, 杨华. 风力机翼型失速流动数据同化[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(4): 37−45.

MENG Lingting, YANG Junwei, YANG Hua. Research on data assimilation of wind turbine airfoils in stall[J]. 2024, 42(4): 37-45.
孟令庭, 杨俊伟, 杨华. 风力机翼型失速流动数据同化[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(4): 37−45. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0113

MENG Lingting, YANG Junwei, YANG Hua. Research on data assimilation of wind turbine airfoils in stall[J]. 2024, 42(4): 37-45. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0113.

摘要

为验证数据同化优化湍流模型参数方法在不同厚度翼型上的效果以及同一优化参数在不同翼型上的适用性，对应用在风力机上的3种不同厚度的翼型（NACA63415、S809、DU97W300）进行失速流动下的数据同化研究。基于现有的风洞试验数据，使用集合卡尔曼滤波方法优化S-A（Spalart-Allramas）湍流模型的参数，确定各模型参数对数值模拟的影响程度，并对比同一翼型优化前后以及在不同翼型上计算的表面压力分布结果。结果表明，模型参数优化后，计算误差减小，模拟的气流分离点和压力分布曲线都更加贴近实验值。此外，翼型S809的优化参数同样可以减小另两个翼型的计算误差，能够适应其他翼型的气动性能计算，但是误差略大于其自身优化计算结果。同化后，3种翼型的模型参数中变化较大的是

$C_{{\rm{b}}1} $

img text_id='Z-20240530102017' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530102017.jpg'>

、

$C_{\upsilon\text{1}}$

img text_id='Z-2024053007865294030' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-2024053007865294030.jpg'>

和

，其中

$C_{{\rm{b}}1} $

img text_id='Z-20240530102017' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530102017.jpg'>

变化幅度最大，且在各翼型上的变化趋势都表现为减小。因此可以推测

$C_{{\rm{b}}1} $

img text_id='Z-20240530102017' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530102017.jpg'>

对于模型参数的适用性至关重要，至少对于本文研究的3种翼型而言是如此。

Abstract

In the present paper

we utilize the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) method to optimize parameters of the turbulence model Spalart-Allramas (S-A) to simulate flow fields around three wind turbine airfoils (NACA63415

S809

and DU97W300) at the same stall degree. The optimized parameters of the medium-thickness airfoil S809 are further applied to the other two airfoils to investigate their performance on airfoils with various thicknesses. For each airfoil

comparisons to experimental data regarding the pressure coefficient distribution and separation location show that using the optimized parameters can reduce numerical errors significantly. Even though applying the optimized parameters of S809 to the other two can also considerably reduce the numerical errors

the errors are slightly larger than those obtained by the optimized parameters of their own. In addition

the model parameters with significant changes after assimilation are

$C_{{\rm{b}}1} $

img text_id='Z-20240530102257' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530102257.jpg'>

$C_{\upsilon\text{1}}$

img text_id='Z-20240530094030' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530094030.jpg'>

and

of which

$C_{{\rm{b}}1} $

img text_id='Z-20240530102257' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530102257.jpg'>

undergoes the most prominent change

and decreases posterior of assimilation for all three airfoils. It is speculated that

$C_{{\rm{b}}1} $

img text_id='Z-20240530102257' class='formula-img' style='display:none;' src='2023-113_Z-20240530102257.jpg'>

is crucial for the model parameters' universality

at least for the present three airfoils

of the model parameters.

关键词

Keywords

references

HE C X, DENG Z W, LIU Y Z. Turbulent flow data assimilation and its applications[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 161-178(in Chinese).

XIAO H, CINNELLA P. Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: a review[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 108: 1-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.10.001

CHEN H, YUAN X X, BI L, et al. Simulation of separated flow based on RANS/LES hybrid method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(8): 177-188 (in Chinese).

DURAISAMY K, IACCARINO G, XIAO H. Turbulence modeling in the age of data[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51: 357-377. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547

EVENSEN G. Data assimilation[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009.

ZHANG H K, SHEN F. Application of data assimilation in space weather[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2022, 42(3): 422-436(in Chinese). DOI: 10.6038/cjg2020N0267

RABIER F, JÄRVINEN H, KLINKER E, et al. The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2007, 126(564): 1143-1170. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712656415

ZHANG W W, ZHU L Y, LIU Y L, et al. Progresses in the application of machine learning in turbulence modeling[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(3): 444-454(in Chinese).

ROMAIN L, CHATELLIER L, DAVID L. Bayesian inference applied to spatio-temporal reconstruction of flows around a NACA0012 airfoil[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(4): 1699. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-014-1699-3

KATO H, YOSHIZAWA A, UENO G, et al. A data assimilation methodology for reconstructing turbulent flows around aircraft[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 283: 559-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.013

DA SILVA A F C, COLONIUS T. Ensemble-based state estimator for aerodynamic flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7): 2568-2578. DOI: 10.2514/1.j056743

DENG Z W, HE C X, WEN X, et al. Recovering turbulent flow field from local quantity measurement: turbulence modeling using ensemble-Kalman-filter-based data assimilation[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2018, 21(6): 1043-1063. DOI: 10.1007/s12650-018-0508-0

YANG M, XIAO Z. Parameter uncertainty quantification for a four-equation transition model using a data assimilation approach[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 158: 215-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.139

FANG P X, HE C X, XU S H, et al. Calibration of turbulence model constants using measurement data assimilation: prediction of steam valve flow characteristics with filter[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(2): 12-22(in Chinese).

ZHANG Y, DU L, ZHANG W W, et al. Research on data assimilation strategy of turbulent separated flow over airfoil[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 571-586. DOI: 10.1007/s10483-022-2827-7

TIMMER W. A. , ROOIJ R. P. J. O. M. V. Some aspects of high angle-of-attack flow on airfoils for wind turbine application[C ] // 2001 European International Wind Energy Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. http://www.lr.tudelft.nl/fileadmin/Faculteit/LR/Organisatie/Afdelingen_en_Leerstoelen/Afdeling_AEWE/Wind_Energy/Research/Publications/Publications_2001/doc/TimmerEWEC2001.pdf

GAO C, JIA Y Y, LIU Q K. Effect of relative thickness on aerodynamic performance of airfoil[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(S01): 380-386(in Chinese).

ZHONG W, WANG T G, WANG Q. Numerical simulation of transition effect on aerodynamic performance of aerofoil s809[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2011, 32(10): 1523-1527(in Chinese).

YAN W H, XUE R R. Comparison of turbulence models for numerical simulation of low-sped flow around NACA4412 airfoil. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(z1): 28-35(in Chinese).

LI X K, DAI L P, KANG S, et al. Numerical study of wind turbine airfoil with large-thickness blunt trailing edges[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2015, 35(11): 938-943(in Chinese).

SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]// 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1992. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-439

EVENSEN G. The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2003, 53(4): 343-367. DOI: 10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9

LIU T T, GAO L M, CAI M, et al. Research of data assimilation on two-dimensional compressor cascade flow field[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2022, 43(12): 3211-3218 (in Chinese).

BAK C, FUGLSANG P, JOHANSEN J, and et al. Wind tunnel tests of the NACA 63-415 and a modified NACA 63-415 airfoil, 1193(EN) [R]. Denmark: Forskningscenter Risoe, 2000.

BALDACCHINO D, FERREIRA C, DE TAVERNIER D, et al. Experimental parameter study for passive vortex generators on a 30% thick airfoil[J]. Wind Energy, 2018, 21(9): 745-765. DOI: 10.1002/we.2191

ZHOU D G, LIU Y W, WEN X Q, et al. Modification of SA model for predicting airfoil flow separation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(10): 1384-1388(in Chinese).

HU J J, CHEN J, QUAN L X, et al. Turbulence model correction and internal flow characteristics analysis of hydraulic manifold blocks[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 28(14): 1708-1713(in Chinese).

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于实验数据同化的湍流模型常数标定：含滤网蒸汽阀门通流特性数值预测

热防护材料动态烧蚀形貌结构光视觉测量技术

离心通风机降噪研究进展

交错型CPR方法的保正实现策略及其对比研究

个体间距对多扑翼气动噪声的影响特性