1. 国防科技大学 智能科学学院,长沙,410073
2. 装备状态感知与敏捷保障全国重点实验室,长沙,410073
周旭(1997—),男,江苏泰州人,博士,研究方向:电磁悬浮与推进. E-mail:zhouxu19@nudt.edu.cn
窦峰山*,副研究员,研究方向:电磁悬浮与推进. E-mail:Francis@nudt.edu.cn
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
周旭, 夏文韬, 窦峰山, 等. 基于气动力干扰补偿的磁悬挂天平位姿控制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(12): 144−152.
ZHOU Xu, XIA Wentao, DOU Fengshan, et al. Research on position and attitude control of magnetic suspension and balance system based on aerodynamic disturbance compensation[J]. 2025, 43(12): 144-152.
周旭, 夏文韬, 窦峰山, 等. 基于气动力干扰补偿的磁悬挂天平位姿控制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(12): 144−152. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0089
ZHOU Xu, XIA Wentao, DOU Fengshan, et al. Research on position and attitude control of magnetic suspension and balance system based on aerodynamic disturbance compensation[J]. 2025, 43(12): 144-152. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0089.
为提升试验模型在超声速风洞中的空间位姿稳定性,本文提出一种基于气动力干扰补偿的磁悬挂天平位姿控制算法。通过气动仿真获取试验模型阻力的特性,建立轴向系统动力学模型并设计标称控制器。针对气动力干扰估计问题,提出基于先验模型的扰动估计策略,仿真表明该方法能准确跟踪干扰力的变化。进一步,提出基于气动力干扰补偿的轴向悬挂控制策略,仿真结果显示在风洞起动过程中,模型最大位移偏移量控制在0.0126 m。试验基于气动阻力模拟平台开展,与自抗扰控制对比表明:所提方法将最大位置偏移从0.03 m降至0.013 m,且收敛后稳态精度显著提升。该方法有效增强了系统抵抗气动干扰的能力。
To enhance the spatial stability of test models in supersonic wind tunnels
this paper proposes a position and attitude control algorithm for magnetic suspension and balance system based on aerodynamic disturbance compensation. The aerodynamic drag characteristics of the test model are obtained through simulation
based on which an axial system dynamic model is established and a nominal controller is designed. To address the estimation of aerodynamic disturbance
a disturbance estimation strategy based on a prior model is proposed. Simulation results indicate that the method can accurately track variations in disturbance forces. Furthermore
an axial suspension control strategy incorporating aerodynamic disturbance compensation is introduced. Simulation results show that during the wind tunnel startup process
the maximum displacement deviation of the model is within 0.0126 m. Experiments conducted on an aerodynamic resistance simulation platform demonstrate that
compared with active disturbance rejection control
the proposed method reduces the maximum position deviation from 0.03 m to 0.013 m and significantly improves steady-state accuracy after convergence. This approach effectively enhances the system's capability to resist aerodynamic disturbance.
LEE D K, LEE J S, HAN J H, et al. Dynamic calibration of magnetic suspension and balance system for sting-free measurement in wind tunnel tests[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2013, 27(7): 1963−1970. doi: 10.1007/s12206-013-0513-0
NEILL C K. Comparison of support methods for static aerodynamic testing and validation of a magnetic suspension and balance system [D]. Norfolk: Old Dominion University, 2019.
KAI D, SUGIURA H, TEZUKA A. Magnetic suspension and balance system for high-subsonic wind tunnel[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(6): 2489−2495. doi: 10.2514/1.j057679
PEI H T, CHEN J M, LIAO D X, et al. Calculation of flow turbulence and analysis on screens setting-up in continuous and transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2023, 41(1): 216−221 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1051/jnwpu/20234110216
WEI Z W, QIN Y M, YANG X J, et al. Investigation of grid fins on large-scale model test in supersonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2017, 35(3): 392−398 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0024
Li J F, WANG J M, JIANG Z L. Numerical calculation of pressure distribution and aerodynamic characteristics of complex combinations in subsonic potential flow fields[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 1981(3): 28−37 (in Chinese).
WANG J X, RONG J Y, YANG J. Adaptive fixed-time position precision control for magnetic levitation systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 458−469. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3156943
ZHOU D F, LI J, YU P C, et al. Analysis and adaptive control of track induced self-excited vibration for the maglev transport[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(12): 2328−2343 (in Chinese). doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190179
ZHOU D F, YU P C, WANG L C, et al. An adaptive vibration control method to suppress the vibration of the maglev train caused by track irregularities[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 408: 331−350. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.037
HAN J Q. From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3): 900−906. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621
ZHANG H H, XIAO G X, YU X H, et al. On convergence performance of discrete-time optimal control based tracking differentiator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 68(4): 3359−3369. DOI:10.1109/tie.2020.2979530
ZHANG H H, XIE Y D, SHE L H, et al. High-precision tracking differentiator via generalized discrete-time optimal control[J]. ISA Transactions, 2019, 95: 144−151. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.05.002
JIN H Y, SONG J C, LAN W Y, et al. On the characteristics of ADRC: A PID interpretation[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2020, 63(10): 209201. doi: 10.1007/s11432-018-9647-6
ACHARYA D S, MISHRA S K, SWAIN S K, et al. Real-time implementation of fractional-order PID controller for magnetic levitation plant with time delay[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 1−11. doi: 10.1109/tim.2022.3218566
CHAOS D, CHACÓN J, ARANDA-ESCOLÁSTICO E, et al. Robust switched control of an air levitation system with minimum sensing[J]. ISA Transactions, 2020, 96: 327−336. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.06.020
DING J F, YANG X, LONG Z Q. Structure and control design of levitation electromagnet for electromagnetic suspension medium-speed maglev train[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2019, 25(6): 1179−1193. doi: 10.1177/1077546318813405
BAI Y L, WANG X G, XU J T, et al. Adaptive quaternion tracking with nonlinear extended state observer[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 139: 494−501. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.07.010
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621