一种单反馈通道振荡射流激励器设计

孙启翔; 王万波; 黄勇; 王勋年; 潘家鑫

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0086

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

一种单反馈通道振荡射流激励器设计

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-07-27

- 一种单反馈通道振荡射流激励器设计
- Design of a single feedback channel oscillating jet actuator
- 空气动力学学报 2024年42卷第7期页码：1-13
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 空天飞行空气动力科学与技术全国重点实验室,绵阳,621000
  2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心低速空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
  3. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
  
  孙启翔（1998—），男，河南郑州人，博士研究生，研究方向：流动控制. E-mail：3506620976@qq.com
  王万波*，副研究员，研究方向：流动控制. E-mail：bowanw@163.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0086
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孙启翔, 王万波, 黄勇, 等. 一种单反馈通道振荡射流激励器设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(7): 1−13.

SUN Qixiang, WANG Wanbo, HUANG Yong, et al. Design of a single feedback channel oscillating jet actuator[J]. 2024, 42(7): 1-13.
孙启翔, 王万波, 黄勇, 等. 一种单反馈通道振荡射流激励器设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(7): 1−13. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0086

SUN Qixiang, WANG Wanbo, HUANG Yong, et al. Design of a single feedback channel oscillating jet actuator[J]. 2024, 42(7): 1-13. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0086.

摘要

为了设计一种有利于分离控制的振荡射流激励器，选取单反馈通道的形式，重点研究第二喉道与扩张段参数对射流振荡特性与偏转襟翼分离控制效果的影响，并总结几何参数设计依据，完成激励器设计并对比了其与典型激励器的分离控制效果。结果表明：反馈段参数应使射流在混合段扩张部分的偏角最大；混合段参数应使射流附着于混合段壁面；第二喉道应使射流向流场中均匀传递动量，其过小或过大均会减小射流偏角并导致射流向流场中传递动量不均匀；扩张段扩张角应增大至刚好不阻挡射流偏转，过大会使扩张段内射流发生不对称附着现象；增大出口高度可以增大射流偏移量，但其过大会延长射流在扩张段两侧的停滞时间。不同激励器的分离控制效果对比表明，采用自主设计激励器时的偏转襟翼减阻量是采用典型激励器时的3.8倍。

Abstract

In order to design an oscillating jet actuator conducive to separation control

a single feedback channel form of the actuator is studied with focus on the influence of parameters of the second throat and the expansion section on the oscillation characteristics of the jet as well as on the separation control effect of a deflection flap. The selection of geometric parameters for the actuator is summarized

and the separation control effect of the present designed actuator is compared with that of other typical actuators. The results show that

for an optimal design

the feedback section should maximize the deflection angle of the jet in the expansion part of the mixing section

and the mixing section should make the jet attach its wall. The second throat should make the jet momentum transfer uniformly in the flow field. If the second throat is too small or too large

it can reduce the jet deflection angle and make the jet momentum transfer non-uniformly in the flow field. The expansion angle of the expansion section should be increased to just enough to not prevent the jet from deflecting

as the jet can attach the wall asymmetrically if the expansion section is too large. A large outlet height can increase the jet offset

but if the outlet is too high

it can prolong the stagnation of the jet on both sides of the expansion section. Comparison of the separation control effect of different actuators shows that the drag reduction rate of the deflection flap with the present designed actuator is 3.8 times that of other typical actuators.

关键词

Keywords

references

LIU Y, LI C P, ZHANG T J, et al . Numerical simulation of oscillating jet control for trailing edge continuous deflection wing[J ] . Aeronautical Science and Technology, 2020 , 31 ( 5 ): 36 − 43 (in Chinese).

CHENG Y Z, LI Y H, HUO F P, et al . Numerical simulation of oscillating excitation separation flow control over airfoils[J ] . Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2002 , 42 ( 12 ): 1644 − 1646,1666 (in Chinese).

BRAY H C. Cold weather fluidic fan spray devices and method: US4463904[P]. 1984-08-07.

STOUFFER R D. Liquid oscillator device: US4508267[P]. 1985-04-02.

TEWES P, TAUBERT L, WYGNANSKI I. On the use of sweeping jets to augment the lift of a λ-wing[C]//28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Chicago, Illinois. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010: 4689.

MELTON L P, KOKLU M. Active flow control using sweeping jet actuators on a semi-span wing model[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 1817.

SEELE R, GRAFF E, LIN J, et al. Performance enhancement of a vertical tail model with sweeping jet actuators[C]//51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013: 411.

WHALEN E A, LACY D S, LIN J C, et al. Performance enhancement of a full-scale vertical tail model equipped with active flow control: AIAA-2015-0784[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. . Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 0784.

ANDINO M Y, LIN J C, WASHBURN A E, et al. Flow separation control on a full-scale vertical tail model using sweeping jet actuators[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 0785.

ZHU Z Q, WANG K, HUANG B E . Active flow control for enhancing vertical tail efficiency[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018 , 39 ( 5 ): 121684 (in Chinese).

MELTON L P, KOKLU M, ANDINO M, et al. Sweeping jet optimization studies[C]//8th AIAA Flow Control Conference, Washington, D. C. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 4233.

VATSA V N, DUDA B M, LIN J C, et al. Numerical simulation of a simplified high-lift CRM configuration embedded with fluidic actuators[C]//AIAA AVIATION Forum. Atlanta: AIAA, 2018: 3063.

LIN J C, MELTON L P, HANNON J, et al. Wind tunnel testing of active flow control on the high lift common research model[C]//AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 3723.

MELTON L P, LIN J C, HANNON J A, et al. Sweeping jet flow control on the simplified high-lift version of the common research model[C]//AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 3726.

VATSA V N, LIN J C, MELTON L P, et al. CFD and experimental data comparisons for conventional and AFC-enabled CRM high-lift configurations[C]//AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Virtual Event. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020: 2939.

BOBUSCH B C, WOSZIDLO R, BERGADA J M, et al . Experimental study of the internal flow structures inside a fluidic oscillator[J ] . Experiments in Fluids, 2013 , 54 : 1559 .

BOBUSCH B C, WOSZIDLO R, KRÜGER O, et al. Numerical investigations on geometric parameters affecting the oscillation properties of a fluidic oscillator[C]//21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013: 2709.

PARK S, KO H, KANG M, et al . Characteristics of a supersonic fluidic oscillator using design of experiment[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2020 , 58 ( 6 ): 2784 − 2789 .

SEO J H, ZHU C, MITTAL R . Flow physics and frequency scaling of sweeping jet fluidic oscillators[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2018 , 56 ( 6 ): 2208 − 2219 .

KOKLU M . Effect of a coanda extension on the performance of a sweeping-jet actuator[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2016 , 54 ( 3 ): 1131 − 1134 .

SUN Q X, WANG W B, HUANG Y, et al . Key factors affecting the separation control effect of oscillating jets[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2024 , 42 ( 2 ): 56 − 67 (in Chinese).

SUN Q X, WANG W B, HUANG Y . Oscillation characteristics of suction and oscillatory blowing actuator[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022 , 43 ( 8 ): 125627 (in Chinese).

PARK S, KO H, KANG M, et al. An experimental study of the characteristics of a supersonic fluidic oscillator utilizing the design of experiment[C]//AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 3395.

OSTERMANN F, WOSZIDLO R, NAYERI C, et al. Experimental comparison between the flow field of two common fluidic oscillator designs[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 0781.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

影响振荡射流分离控制效果的关键因素

考虑来流风速特征的风电机组超短期功率预测方法

垂直轴翼型气动特性与变桨力矩影响机制研究

差分格式应用于非均匀网格的精度保持算法

基于CFD-CSD耦合仿真的风力机气弹稳定性及载荷分析