1. 南昌航空大学 飞行器工程学院,南昌,330063
2. 南方科技大学 力学与航空航天工程系,深圳,518055
3. 陆军装备部驻南京地区第三军事代表室,南京,210000
成志勇(1995—),广东清远人,博士研究生,研究方向:计算空气动力学,流固耦合动力学. E-mail: zc297270@gmail.com
杨佑绪*(1983—),甘肃景泰人,副教授,研究方向:飞行器设计,气动弹性力学. E-mail: zgdy_1@163.com
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
成志勇, 杨佑绪, 卢嘉成, 等. 动力布局对分布式电推进飞机气动性能的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(5): 81−96.
CHENG Zhiyong, YANG Youxu, LU Jiacheng, et al. Effects of power layout on aerodynamic performance of distributed electric propulsion aircraft[J]. 2024, 42(5): 81-96.
成志勇, 杨佑绪, 卢嘉成, 等. 动力布局对分布式电推进飞机气动性能的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(5): 81−96. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0070
CHENG Zhiyong, YANG Youxu, LU Jiacheng, et al. Effects of power layout on aerodynamic performance of distributed electric propulsion aircraft[J]. 2024, 42(5): 81-96. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0070.
分布式电推进(DEP)飞机气动综合收益受分布式动力/机翼强气动耦合效应的影响,揭示其变化规律及流动机理是开展分布式电推进飞行器设计的关键。本文针对分布式螺旋桨-机翼布局,基于涡格法-激励盘理论(VLM-ADT)气动特性快速求解方法开展DEP布局气动性能研究,重点研究了螺旋桨数量、旋转方向、螺旋桨间隔3个要素对升阻比
L
/
D
、功率载荷
T
/
P
、总效率
L
/
P
等气动性能指标的影响。结果表明:随着螺旋桨数量的增加叠加效应会减弱,升阻比减小,但总效率增大。当螺旋桨数量小于等于5时,同向旋转构型的升阻比大于反向旋转构型。当螺旋桨数为7时,反向旋转构型升阻比大于同向旋转构型。与同向旋转构型相比,桨盘载荷增加时,反向旋转构型的升阻比会增加。分布式螺旋桨密集布置在翼尖时会同时增加升力和阻力;当翼尖螺旋桨固定在翼尖、其他螺旋桨密集布置在机翼中心附近时,翼尖螺旋桨的上洗效应会削弱翼尖涡,具有增升减阻效果,且升力比螺旋桨集中在翼尖构型时增加得更多。
In order to carry out the design of distributed electric propulsion (DEP) aircraft
it is important to understand the flow mechanism and the changing law of aerodynamic comprehensive gain of DEP aircraft under strong coupling effects of the distributed power and the wing. Aiming at distributed propeller-wing layouts
the present study investigates the aerodynamic performance of DEP configurations based on the VLM-ADT (vortex lattice method - actuator disk theory) fast solver for aerody
namic characteristics. The effects of three factors
i.e.
the propeller number
the rotating direction
and the propeller spacing
on the aerodynamic performance metrics such as the lift-to-drag ratio
L
/
D
the power load
T
/
P
and the overall efficiency
L
/
P
are studied in particular. As the number of propellers increases
the lift-to-drag ratio decreases
but the overall efficiency increases. When the number of propellers is not larger than 5
the lift-to-drag ratio of the co-rotating configuration is greater than that of the counter-rotating configuration. When the number of propellers is 7
the lift-to-drag ratio of the counter-rotating configuration is greater than that of the co-rotating configuration. Compared to the co-rotating configuration
the lift-to-drag ratio of the counter-rotating configuration increases when the propeller disk load is increased. The distributed propellers increase the lift and drag at the same time when they are densely concentrated at the wing tip. When the wing-tip propeller is fixed at the wing tip while the other propellers are densely concentrated near the center of the wing
it has the effect of increasing the lift and reducing the drag
and the lift increase is more than that of the propeller concentrating at the wing tip.
HUANG J . Survey on design technology of distributed electric propu lsion aircraft[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021 , 42 ( 3 ): 624037 (in Chinese).
GOHARDANI A S, DOULGERIS G, SINGH R . Challenges of future aircraft propulsion: A review of distributed propulsion technology and its potential application for the all electric commercial aircraft[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011 , 47 ( 5 ): 369 − 391 .
GOHARDANI A S . A synergistic glance at the prospects of distributed propulsion technology and the electric aircraft concept for future unmanned air vehicles and commercial/military aviation[J ] . Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013 , 57 : 25 − 70 .
KONG X H, ZANG Z R, LU J W, et al . Review of electric power system of distributed electric propulsion aircraft[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018 , 39 ( 1 ): 021651 (in Chinese).
KIM H D, PERRY A T, ANSELL P J. A review of distributed electric propulsion concepts for air vehicle technology[C]//2018 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS), Cincinnati, OH, USA. IEEE, 2018: 1−21.
Veldhuis L L M. Propeller wing aerodynamic interference[D]. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 2005.
MISIOROWSKI M, GANDHI F, ANUSONTI-INTHRA P . Computational analysis of rotor-blown-wing for electric rotorcraft applications[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2020 , 58 ( 7 ): 2921 − 2932 .
SINNIGE T, VAN ARNHEM N, STOKKERMANS T C A, et al . Wingtip-mounted propellers: Aerodynamic analysis of interaction effects and comparison with conventional layout[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 2019 , 56 ( 1 ): 295 − 312 .
DEERE K A, VIKEN S, CARTER M, et al. Computational analysis of powered lift augmentation for the LEAPTech distributed electric propulsion wing[C]//35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: 3921.
YANG X C, WANG Y T, MENG D H, et al . Study on wing slipstream effects of distributed propellers with different rotating directions[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019 , 37 ( 1 ): 89 − 98 (in Chinese).
YANG W, FAN Z L, WU W H, et al . Optimal design of distributed propeller layout considering slipstream effect[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021 , 39 ( 3 ): 71 − 79 (in Chinese).
KONSTADINOPOULOS P, THRASHER D F, MOOK D T, et al . A vortex-lattice method for general, unsteady aerodynamics[J ] . Journal of Aircraft, 1985 , 22 ( 1 ): 43 − 49 .
KATZ J, PLOTKIN A. Low-speed aerodynamics[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press, 2001: 400−404.
CONWAY J T . Analytical solutions for the actuator disk with variable radial distribution of load[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995 , 297 : 327 − 355 .
CONWAY J T . Exact actuator disk solutions for non-uniform heavy loading and slipstream contraction[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998 , 365 : 235 − 267 .
CONWAY J . Prediction of the performance of heavily loaded propellers with slipstream contraction[J ] . Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, 1998 , 44 ( 3 ): 169 − 174 .
CONWAY J. Analytical solutions for the general non-axisymmetric linearized actuator disk[C]//21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003: 3521.
CHENG Z Y, YANG Y X, ZHANG X C, et al. Rapid evaluation method for aerodynamic characteristics of distributed electric propulsion aircraft concept schemet[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(11): 3047−3058(in Chinese).
MCCORMICK B W. Aerodynamics of V/STOL flight[M]. London: Academic Press, 1967.
PATTERSON M D, DASKILEWICZ M J, GERMAN B. Simplified aerodynamics models to predict the effects of upstream propellers on wing lift[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 1673.
PATTERSON M D, DERLAGA J M, BORER N K. High-lift propeller system configuration selection for NASA's SCEPTOR distributed electric propulsion flight demonstrator[C]//16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Washington, D. C. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016: 3922.
HONY Y, LEE D, YEE K, et al . Enhanced high-order scheme for high-resolution rotorcraft flowfield analysis[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2022 , 60 ( 1 ): 144 − 159 .
LITHERLAND B L, BORER N K, ZAWODNY N S. X-57 maxwell high-lift propeller testing and model development[C]//AIAA AVIATION 2021 FORUM, Virtual Event. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021: 3193.
VIKEN J K, VIKEN S, DEERE K A, et al. Design of the cruise and flap airfoil for the X-57 maxwell distributed electric propulsion aircraft[C]//35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, Colorado. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017: 3922.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621