1. 西安交通大学 电子与信息学部 自动化科学与工程学院,西安,710049
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心,绵阳,621000
刘霞(1983-),女,博士研究生,湖南耒阳人,研究方向:气动数据建模和融合、深度学习. E-mail:liuhu95@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
连峰*(1981-),男,教授,研究方向:智能流体力学、多目标跟踪. E-mail:lianfeng1981@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
刘霞, 冯文晖, 连峰, 等. 基于物理信息神经网络的气动数据融合方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(8): 87−96.
LIU Xia, FENG Wenhui, LIAN Feng, et al. Aerodynamic data fusion method based on physics-informed neural network[J]. 2023, 41(8): 87-96.
刘霞, 冯文晖, 连峰, 等. 基于物理信息神经网络的气动数据融合方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(8): 87−96. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0060
LIU Xia, FENG Wenhui, LIAN Feng, et al. Aerodynamic data fusion method based on physics-informed neural network[J]. 2023, 41(8): 87-96. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0060.
为了解决训练传统深度神经网络对大数据的依赖问题,气动数据中包含的物理结构信息需要被充分利用。物理信息神经网络(physics-informed neural network
PINN)是一种非监督的学习算法,采用深度神经网络直接逼近流场偏微分方程的解,因此适用于气动数据的建模。然而训练PINN时,损失函数反映的是抽样点处神经网络所拟合的偏微分方程值的偏差,对于复杂的非线性偏微分方程,这一偏差不能准确反映神经网络所拟合的函数与微分方程解函数的偏差,而且用神经网络拟合初始条件和边界条件时,不可避免存在拟合误差,误差随空间和时间累计,这使PINN的建模精度相比传统的模型没有优势。为了解决这些问题,本文把PINN与流场的计算流体动力学(Computational Fluid Dynamics
CFD)仿真结果进行融合,在流场抽样点处的损失函数中增加了PINN在该点的输出与流场在该点的CFD值偏差,从而提高了神经网络的建模精度。根据CFD仿真时使用的模型,融合方式采用瞬时模式或时均模式。测试结果表明该方法能够有效提高PINN的建模精度。
To solve the issue that conventional deep neural networks(DNN) needs prohibitively vast amount of data
the structure information contained in aerodynamic data needs to be fully utilized. Physics-informed neural network (PINN) is an unsupervised learning algorithm that uses deep neural networks to directly approximate solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs) of the flow fields
thus suitable for modeling aerodynamic problems. However
during the training process of PINN
the loss function only depicts the deviation of PDE at the training sample points
and for complex nonlinear partial differential equations
this deviation cannot accurately reflect the error between the function fitted by neural networks and the solution of PDEs. Moreover
errors inevitably exist in the boundary and initial conditions when fitted with neural networks
which accumulate in space and time
making the modeling accuracy of PINN less favorable compared to traditional models. In order to address the above issue
the present study integrates PINN with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation results of the flow fields
which adds the deviation between PINN output and CFD value in the loss function at sampling points of the flow field
thus improving the modeling accuracy of the neural network. According to the model used in CFD simulations
the fusion mode can adopt instantaneous mode or time-averaged mode. Experimental results suggest that the proposed method can effectively improve the modeling accuracy of PINN.
DENG C, CHEN G, WANG W Z, et al. Aerodynamic data fusion algorithms based on aerodynamic model and uncertainly[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(4): 117-123. (in Chinese)
WANG X, NING C J, WANG W Z, et al. Intelligent fusion method of multi-source aerodynamic data for flight tests[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(2): 12-20. (in Chinese)
MOHAMMADI-AMIN M, ENTEZARI M M, ALIKHANI A. An efficient surrogate-based framework for aerodynamic database development of manned reentry vehicles[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2018, 62(5): 997-1014. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.06.022
CARY A W, CHAWNER J, DUQUE E P, et al. CFD vision 2030 road map: progress and perspectives[C]// AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, Virtual Event. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021: AIAA2021-2726. doi: 10.2514/6.2021-2726
PERDIKARIS P, RAISSI M, DAMIANOU A, et al. Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2017, 473(2198): 20160751. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0751
BENGIO Y, COURVILLE A, VINCENT P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, 35(8): 1798-1828. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50
QIAN W Q, ZHAO T, HUANG Y, et al. Modeling and data mining of engineering airfoil aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(6): 175-183. (in Chinese)
ZHANG J, ZHANG G B, CHENG Y Q, et al. A multi-task learning method for large discrepant aerodynamic data[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 64-72. (in Chinese)
HU L W, ZHANG J, XIANG Y, et al. Neural networks-based aerodynamic data modeling: a comprehensive review[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 90805-90823. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993562
CUOMO S, DI COLA V S, GIAMPAOLO F, et al. Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: where we are and what’s next[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2022, 92(3): 88. DOI: 10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z
RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
RAISSI M, YAZDANI A, KARNIADAKIS G E. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations[J]. Science, 367( 6481): 1026–1030. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4741
CHENG C, ZHANG G T. Deep learning method based on physics informed neural network with resnet block for solving fluid flow problems[J]. Water, 2021, 13(4): 423. DOI: 10.3390/w13040423
JAGTAP A D, KAWAGUCHI K, KARNIADAKIS G E. Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 404: 109136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109136
ZHU Y H, ZABARAS N, KOUTSOURELAKIS P S, et al. Physics-constrained deep learning for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification without labeled data[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 394: 56-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.024
HE Q Z, BARAJAS-SOLANO D, TARTAKOVSKY G, et al. Physics-informed neural networks for multiphysics data assimilation with application to subsurface transport[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2020, 141: 103610. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103610
GAO H, SUN L N, WANG J X. PhyGeoNet: physics-informed geometry-adaptive convolutional neural networks for solving parameterized steady-state PDEs on irregular domain[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 428: 110079. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110079
KHARAZMI E, ZHANG Z Q, KARNIADAKIS G E M. hp -VPINNs: Variational physics-i nformed neural networks with domain decomposition[J ] . Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 374: 113547. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113547
YANG L, MENG X H, KARNIADAKIS G E. B-PINNs: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 425: 109913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109913
JAGTAP A D, KHARAZMI E, KARNIADAKIS G E. Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: applications to forward and inverse problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 365: 113028. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028
ALIAKBARI M, MAHMOUDI M, VADASZ P, et al. Predicting high-fidelity multiphysics data from low-fidelity fluid flow and transport solvers using physics-informed neural networks[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2022, 96: 109002. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.109002
SIRIGNANO J, SPILIOPOULOS K. DGM: a deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 375: 1339-1364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.029
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621