1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 空天技术研究所,绵阳,621000
刘红阳(1991-),女,吉林四平人,助理研究员,研究方向:飞行器多学科优化设计,空气动力学. E-mail:airclean2022@163.com
余永刚*,高级工程师,研究方向:飞行器设计,空气动力学. E-mail:lenkoo@tom.com
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
刘红阳, 周铸, 余永刚, 等. 宽体客机气动标模CHN-T2设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(10): 15−29.
LIU Hongyang, ZHOU Zhu, YU Yonggang, et al. Design of a standard aerodynamic model CHN-T2 for wide-body aircraft[J]. 2023, 41(10): 15-29.
刘红阳, 周铸, 余永刚, 等. 宽体客机气动标模CHN-T2设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(10): 15−29. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0026
LIU Hongyang, ZHOU Zhu, YU Yonggang, et al. Design of a standard aerodynamic model CHN-T2 for wide-body aircraft[J]. 2023, 41(10): 15-29. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0026.
发展商用运输机标模是我国独立发展具有自主知识产权的先进民用飞机的重要支撑手段,对验证CFD技术和确认风洞试验品质具有重要意义。结合国内外主流宽体商业客机的布局特点和气动设计需求,基于自主开发的AMDEsign设计平台,设计研发了宽体客机标模CHN-T2。标模设计马赫数0.85,设计升力系数0.48。模型充分体现了主流宽体商用客机典型的双通道机身/超临界机翼/平立尾/翼吊通气短舱等几何特征,具有典型的部件间强干扰/激波分离/转捩等流场特征以及优异的高亚声速巡航/高升阻比气动效率等性能特征。通过气动外形优化设计、短舱吊挂组件影响及雷诺数效应等研究,并结合风洞试验数据对比分析,最终确认CHN-T2模型巡航升阻比达到21.8、阻力发散马赫数约为0.872、抖振边界大于1.3倍巡航升力系数、风洞试验准雷诺数为3 × 10
7
。研究认为,CHN-T2模型具有良好的气动性能,能够作为先进宽体客机气动标模进行应用推广。通过持续建立的丰富气动数据库和流场影像,可有力支撑宽体客机流动机理分析、CFD技术验证与确认、先进风洞试验技术发展验证、CFD与风洞数据相关性等研究。
The development of commercial transport aircraft standard model is an important support for developing advanced civil aircraft with independent intellectual property rights
as well as the verification of CFD technique and wind tunnel test quality. Combined with the layout characteristics and aerodynamic design requirements of mainstream wide-body commercial aircrafts at home and abroad
a standard model CHN-T2 for the wide-body aircraft is designed based on the self-developed design platform AMDesign. The design Mach number is 0.85
and t
he design lift coefficient is 0.48. The CHN-T2 model can fully represent typical geometric characteristics of mainstream wide-body aircraft
such as the twin-aisle fuselage
supercritical wing
horizontal/vertical tail wing
and wing suspension nacelle. CHN-T2 has typical flow characteristics such as strong interference between components
shock wave separation
boundary layer transition
etc. It also has excellent performance characteristics such as high subsonic cruise and high lift-drag-ratio aerodynamic efficiency. Aerodynamic shape optimization design
nacelle suspension component influence
Reynolds number effect and wind tunnel test are carried out in the present study. The results show that the cruising lift-drag-ratio of the CHN-T2 model reaches 21.8
the drag divergence Mach number is about 0.872
the buffeting boundary is greater than 1.3 times the cruising lift coefficient
and the quasi Reynolds number in wind tunnel tests is 3×10
7
. The CHN-T2 model has excellent aerodynamic performance and can be applied as an advanced aerodynamic standard model for wide-body aircraft. By continuously enriching the aerodynamic database and flow field images
the model can effectively support the analysis of flow mechanisms for wide-body aircraft
CFD technique verification and confirmation
advanced wind tunnel test technique development
and correlation research between CFD and wind tunnel test data.
ANTON P S, JOHNSON D J, BLOCK M, et al. Wind tunnel and propulsion test facilities: Supporting analyses to an assessment of NASA’s capabilities to serve national needs[R]. California: RAND, RAND-TR134, 2004. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2004/RAND_TR134.pdf
MALIK M, BUSHNELL D. Role of computational fluid dynamics and wind tunnels in aeronautics R and D[R]. Hampton: NASA, NASA/TP-2012-217602, 2012. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120016316/downloads/20120016316.pdf
SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD vision 2030 study: a path to revolutionary computational aerosciences[R]. Hampton: NASA, NASA/CR-2014-218178, 2014. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140003093/downloads/20140003093.pdf?attachment=true
WANG Y T, LIU G, CHEN Z B. Summary of the first aeronautical computational fluid dynamics credibility workshop[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2): 247-261, 246. (in Chinese)
ZHAN P G, LUO Y P. Primary research on the standard system of air vehicle calibration models used in wind tunnel test[J]. World Standardization Quality Management, 2011(11): 28-31. (in Chinese)
ZHENG Q Y, LIU S Y, LIANG Y H. Numerical simulation of the flowfields around the DLR-F4 wing-body configuration[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2010, 31(8): 1029-1033.
REDEKER G. A selection of experimental test cases for the validation of CFD codes[R]. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, AGARD-AR-303, 1994. https://www.abbottaerospace.com/downloads/agard-ar-303-vol-1/?wpdmdl=1530&ind=1457491413501 https://www.abbottaerospace.com/downloads/agard-ar-303-vol-2/?wpdmdl=1531ind=1457491505518
WANG Y T, WANG G X, ZHANG Y L. Drag prediction of DLR-F6 configuration with TRIP2.0 software[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(1): 108-113. (in chinese)
BRODERSEN O, STUERMER A. Drag prediction of engine-airframe interference effects using unstructured Navier-Stokes calculations[C]// 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2001. AIAA-2001-2414. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-2414
MAKAROV V, FEDORCHENKO Y, SHORSTOV V, et al. CIAM, sukhoi NCT and irkut contribution to HiLiftPW-2[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014. AIAA -2014-2399. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-2399
VASSBERG J, DEHAAN M, RIVERS M, et al. Development of a common research model for applied CFD validation studies[C]//26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2008. AIAA -2008-6919. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-6919
HARTWICH P M, DICKEY E D, et al. AFC-enabled simplified high-lift system integration study[R]. Langley Research Center, NASA/CR-2014-218521. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140012783/downloads/20140012783.pdf
ZHAO Z, HE X, ZHANG L P, et al. Numerical research of NASA high-lift trap wing model based on HyperFLOW[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 594-602.
HUA J, ZHONG M, ZHENG S, et al. Design and database applications of CAE-AVM model cruise configuration[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(4): 133-147, 132. (in Chinese)
ZHONG M, HUA J, WANG H, et al. Design and verification of high-lift configuration of civil aircraft standard model CAE-AVM-HL[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(4): 158-167. (in Chinese)
YU Y G, ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, et al. Aerodynamic design of a standard model CHN-T1 for single-aisle passenger aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3)505-513.
方宝瑞. 飞机气动布局设计[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 1997: 1131.
HUANG J T, GAO Z H, YU J, et al. A typical integrated design method for aerodynamic shape optimization of large civil aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(2): 522369. (in Chinese)
朱心雄. 自由曲线曲面造型技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000: 239-247.
LI C G, CAI Q, ZHANG B F, et al. Free-form deformation in aircraft geometry modeling[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 1998, 16(2): 226-231. (in Chinese)
WANG G, LEI B Q, YE Z Y. An efficient deformation technique for hybrid unstructured grid using radial basis functions[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2011, 29(5): 783-788.
牟斌. 流动控制数值模拟研究[D]. 绵阳: 中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2006.
HUANG J T, LIU G, ZHOU Z, et al. Investigation of gradient computation based on discrete adjoint method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4): 554-562. (in Chinese)
HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, YU J, et al. Sensitivity analysis of design variables considering intake and exhaust effects[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(2): 250-258. (in Chinese)
ALMOHAMMADI K M, INGHAM D B, MA L, et al. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) mesh independency techniques for a straight blade vertical axis wind turbine[J]. Energy, 2013, 58: 483-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.012
张锡金. 气动设计[M]//《飞机设计手册》总编委会. 飞机设计手册(第6册), 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2002: 261.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621