中国航天空气动力技术研究院,北京,100074
谌君谋*(1986-),博士,高级工程师,研究方向:激波风洞气动理论,高焓流动环境的建立与诊断,内流道精细化设计,气动物理试验技术. E-mail: shenjunmou@163.com
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
谌君谋, 陈星, 易翔宇, 等. 大尺寸自由活塞激波风洞重活塞软着陆关键技术[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(10): 30−41.
SHEN Junmou, CHEN Xing, YI Xiangyu, et al. Key technology of heavy piston soft landing in large-scale free piston shock tunnels[J]. 2023, 41(10): 30-41.
谌君谋, 陈星, 易翔宇, 等. 大尺寸自由活塞激波风洞重活塞软着陆关键技术[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(10): 30−41. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0009
SHEN Junmou, CHEN Xing, YI Xiangyu, et al. Key technology of heavy piston soft landing in large-scale free piston shock tunnels[J]. 2023, 41(10): 30-41. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2023.0009.
高焓激波风洞的驱动技术决定了风洞总焓和总压试验能力。重活塞压缩加热技术具有驱动性能强和运行灵活性高等特点,是高焓激波风洞关键驱动技术。针对重活塞发射效能、重活塞与壁面摩擦、膜片破膜等情况带来的大尺寸重活塞难以安全软着陆问题,通过理论分析、动网格数值模拟和试验验证相互结合的手段,分析了重活塞实际运动过程的影响因素,建立了重活塞调谐运行方法,获得了稳定的驱动压力,可为不同的模拟需求提供对应的试验状态。研究了质量为205 kg、275 kg的重活塞在压缩管中运行最高速度分别超过350 m/s、450 m/s的软着陆过程,获得了压缩管末端总压15 MPa、总温3450 K和总压45 MPa、总温4845 K的定压试验状态。本研究解决了大尺寸自由活塞激波风洞重活塞软着陆难题,保障了世界最大尺寸自由活塞驱动的FD-21高焓激波风洞中、质量为数百千克的重活塞、在长度为75 m的压缩管中的运行安全。
The driving technology of a high-enthalpy shock tunnel determines the wind tunnel's total enthalpy and total pressure. The heavy piston compression heating technology is the key driving technology of high-enthalpy shock tunnels
which shows strong driving performance and high operational flexibility. Given the difficulty in the soft landing of a large-size heavy piston caused by the launch efficiency of the heavy piston
the friction between the heavy piston and the wall
the diaphragm breaking
etc.
the influencing factors of the actual moving process of the heavy piston are analyzed by combining theoretical analysis
dynamic grid numerical simulation and experimental verification
and the tuned operation method of the heavy piston is established. The FD-21 high enthalpy shock tunnel with the world's largest free piston drive ensures the safe operation of the piston with a mass of hundreds of kilograms in the compression tube with a length of 75 m. It obtains a stable driving pressure
providing corresponding test states for different simulation requirements. This paper studies the soft landing process of heavy pistons with a 205 kg and 275 kg mass in compression tubes when the maximum speed exceeds 350 m/s and 450 m/s
respectively. The soft landing of heavy pistons in large free pistons shock wind tunnels is solved. The constant pressure test conditions with a total pressure of 15 MPa and a total temperature of 3450 K
as well as a total pressure of 45 MPa and a total temperature of 4845 K at the end of the compression tube
are obtained.
ANDERSON JR J D. Hypersonic and high-temperature gas dynamics[M]. Amer Inst of Aeronautics, 2019. ISBN-13: 978-1624105142.
LU F K, ARNOLD D M. Advanced hypersonic test facilities[M]. Reston, VA: AIAA, Inc. , 2002. ISBN-13: 978-1563475412.
HANNEMANN K, SCHRAMM J M, WAGNER A, et al. The high enthalpy shock tunnel göttingen of the German aerospace center (DLR)[J ] . Journal of Large-Scale Research Facilities, 2018, 4: A133. https://elib.dlr.de/126006/2/ELIB-Eintrag-2018-HannemannK-126006-Paper.pdf doi: 10.17815/jlsrf-4-168
JIANG Z L. Progresses on experimental techniques of hypersonic and high-enthalpy wind tunnels[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(3): 347-355. (in Chinese)
GU S, OLIVIER H. Capabilities and limitations of existing hypersonic facilities[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2020, 113: 100607. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100607
CHEN X, SHEN J M, BI Z X, et al. Review on the development of the free-piston high enthalpy impulse wind tunnel and its testing capacities[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(4): 65-80. (in Chinese)
SHEN J M, CHEN X, BI Z X, et al. Review on experimental technology of high enthalpy shock tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(4): 543-554. (in Chinese)
HOLDEN M, WADHAMS T, MACLEAN M, et al. Experimental studies in LENS I and X to evaluate real gas effects on hypervelocity vehicle performance[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2007. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-204
TSAI C Y, BAKOS R J. Mach 7-21 flight simulation in the HYPILSE shock tunnel[C]//23rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Fort Worth, TX, 2002: 345-355.
LENARTZ M T, WANG B, GRNIG H. Development of a detonation driver for a shock tunnel[C]//20rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Shepherd, CA, 1996: 153-158.
STALKER R J, MORGAN R G. The university of Queensland free piston shock tunnel T-4: Initial operation and preliminary calibration[C]//4th National Space Engineering Symposium, 1988: 182-198. NASA CR-181721.
HORNUNG H. Experimental hypervelocity flow simulation, needs, achievements and limitations[C]//1st Pacific International Conference on Aerospace Science and Technology, Tainan, 1993.
MCGILVRAY M, DOHERTY L J, MORGAN R G, et al. T6: the Oxford university stalker tunnel[C]// 20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 2015. AIAA 2015-3545. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-3545
HANNEMANN K. High enthalpy flows in the HEG shock tunnel: experiment and numerical rebuilding (invited)[C]// 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2003. AIAA 2003–0978. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-978
ITOH K, TAKAHASHI M, KOMURO T. Effect of throat melting on nozzle flow characteristic in high enthalpy shock tunnel[C]//22nd International Symposium on Shock Waves, 1999: 459-464.
SHEN J M, MA H D, LI C, et al. Initial testing of a 2m Mach-10 free-piston shock tunnel[M]//31st International Symposium on Shock Waves 2. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 213-219. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91017-8_26
STALKER R J. Use of argon in a free-piston shock tunnel[R]. AIAA 66-169.
HORNUNG H, BELANGER J. Role and techniques of ground testing for simulation of flows up to orbital speed[C]//16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conference, 1990. AIAA 90-1377. doi: 10.2514/6.1990-1377
HORNUNG H G. The piston motion in a free piston driver for shock tubes and tunnels[R]. GALCIT. FM88-1, 1988.
BECK W H, EITELBERG G, MCINTYRE T J, et al. The high enthalpy shock tunnel in Göttingen (HEG)[M]//Shock Waves. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992: 677-682. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77648-9_106
LABRACHERIE L, DUMITRESCU M P, BURTSCHELL Y, et al. On the compression process in a free-piston shock-tunnel[M]. Shock Waves, 1993, 3: 19-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF01414744 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77648-9_106
XU L G, WANG G. Numerical method of calculating performance parameters of a heavy piston compressor[J]. Journal of China University of Science and Technology, 1994, 24(3): 277-283. (in Chinese)
ITOH K, UEDA S, KOMURO T, et al. Improvement of a free piston driver for a high-enthalpy shock tunnel[J]. Shock Waves, 1998, 8(4): 215-233. DOI: 10.1007/s001930050115
ZHU H, SHEN Q, GONG J. The constant pressure time of piston driver in free piston shock tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(1): 45-50, 56. (in Chinese)
LI H Y, LI Z H, LÜ Z G, et al. Arbitrary Lagrangian eulerian simulation of free piston compression tube[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016, 48(2): 348-352. (in Chinese)
YI X Y. Flow analysis and state adjustment of free piston shock tunnel[R]. Beijing: The 11th Research Academy of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation. , Post doctoral Exit Report 2020 (in Chinese).
SHEN J M. Establishment and diagnosis of flow environment in FD-21 high enthalpy shock tunnel[D]. Beijing: The 11th Research Academy of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, 2021
LYU Z G, CHANG Y, ZHONG Y, et al. Primary research on key technologies of piston driving in expansion tunnel[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2016, 22(2): 215-220. (in Chinese)
TANNO H, KOMURO T, SATO K, et al. Basic characteristics of the free-piston driven expansion tube JAXA HEK-X[C]//32nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Washington, D. C. . Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3817
ANDRIANATOA A, GILDFIND D, MORGAN R. Preliminary development of high enthalpy conditions for the X3 expansion tube[C ] //20th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Perth, Australia, 2016. https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/imarusic/proceedings/20/538%20Paper.pdf
ANDRIANATOS A, GILDFIND D E, MORGAN R G. Driver condition development for high-enthalpy operation of the X3 expansion tube[M]//31st International Symposium on Shock Waves 2. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 297-304. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91017-8_37
STENNETT S, GILDFIND D E, JACOBS P A. Optimising the X3R reflected shock tunnel free-piston driver for long duration test times[M]//31st International Symposium on Shock Waves 2. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 189-196. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91017-8_23
SUN R M, SHEN J M, CHEN X. Speed measurement of free piston in high energy shock tunnel[J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2020, 47(6): 58-62. (in Chinese)
谌君谋, 陈星, 孙日明. FD-21高焓激波风洞运行与操作手册[R]. 国防科技工业科技报告, Q10-203-2022-00579, 2022.
SHEN J M, CHEN X, BI Z X, et al. Latest progress of FD-21 high energy pulse wind tunnel[C]//19th Shock and Shock Tube Conference, Xia men, 2020(in Chinese).
陈星, 毕志献, 谌君谋, 等. 一座新型大尺寸高焓激波风洞调试进展[C]//中国力学大会-2017暨庆祝中国力学学会成立60周年大会论文集, 北京, 2017: 1292-1303.
JOHNSON G R, COOK W H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 21(1): 31-48. DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9
BLAZEK J. Computational fluid dynamic: principles and application[M]. Elsevier Science, Oxford, 2005. ISBN 13: 9780080445069.
CHEN R, Wang Z. An improved LU-SGS scheme with faster convergence for unstructures grids of arbitrary topology[C]// 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, U. S. A, 1999. AIAA 99-0935. doi: 10.2514/6.1999-935
SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1992. AIAA 92-0439. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-439
谌君谋, 陈星, 毕志献, 等. 一种大尺寸自由活塞高焓激波风洞模拟飞行环境的方法[P]. G01M9/02: CN111024357A, 2019-12-11.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621