TSTO并联分离激波/边界层干扰流动特性分析

范孝华; 张庆虎; 罗磊; 林敬周; 唐志共

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0184

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

TSTO并联分离激波/边界层干扰流动特性分析

研究专栏——高超声速多体分离试验技术与计算分析 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- TSTO并联分离激波/边界层干扰流动特性分析
- Flow-field characteristics analyses on shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction of TSTO parallel separation
- 空气动力学学报 2023年41卷第5期页码：87-97
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
  2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
  3. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
  
  范孝华（1988-），男，贵州贵阳人，博士研究生，研究方向：高超声速激波/边界层干扰. E-mail：fanxiaohua@cardc.cn
  唐志共*（1965-），男，博士，院士/研究员，研究方向：高超声速空气动力学. E-mail：tangzhigong@126.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0184
  中图分类号： V211;V411
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
范孝华, 张庆虎, 罗磊, 等. TSTO并联分离激波/边界层干扰流动特性分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(5): 87−97.

FAN Xiaohua, ZHANG Qinghu, LUO Lei, et al. Flow-field characteristics analyses on shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction of TSTO parallel separation[J]. 2023, 41(5): 87-97.
范孝华, 张庆虎, 罗磊, 等. TSTO并联分离激波/边界层干扰流动特性分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(5): 87−97. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0184

FAN Xiaohua, ZHANG Qinghu, LUO Lei, et al. Flow-field characteristics analyses on shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction of TSTO parallel separation[J]. 2023, 41(5): 87-97. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0184.

摘要

针对两级入轨飞行器的缩比模型，通过试验与数值模拟相结合的方式，在马赫数6条件下开展典型级间距状态的激波/边界层干扰流场研究，详细分析干扰区壁面及空间的流动结构与特性。结果表明：试验中模型壁面边界层在激波入射之前为层流状态，在强激波干扰后迅速转捩为湍流状态，因此试验结果在第一道激波作用结束之前与层流计算结果吻合，而在第一道激波作用结束之后与湍流计算结果一致；激波/边界层干扰呈现复杂的三维流动特征和明显的开放结构，强激波在壁面形成的高压区呈弧状向下游展开，轨道级头部产生的入射激波在级间来回反射，强度依次递减；同时，干扰区内存在展向弯曲的主分离线与再附线、沿流向排列的二次分离线与再附线、流动剪切形成的旋涡结构以及包括鞍点、结点、焦点在内的临界点；层流边界层受到激波作用形成的分离区明显大于湍流边界层，同时开放特征更为显著。

Abstract

Through the combination of wind-tunnel tests and numerical simulations

the shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction (SWBLI) of interstage flow fields within typical stage clearances of a Two-Stage-To-Orbit (TSTO) scaled model at Mach number 6 is studied. Flow fields in the interference areas are analyzed in detail. Results show that the impingement of shock waves induces the boundary layers to transit rapidly to turbulent states

which numerical simulations have accurately captured. SWBLI induces complex three-dimensional flow characteristics with prominent open features. The high wall pressure induced by the strong shock wave spreads downstream in an arc. The incident shock wave generated by the orbiter head constantly reflects between the two stages and gradually weakens. Meanwhile

the spanwise curved principal separation and reattachment lines

streamwise aligned secondary separation and reattachment lines

and critical points

including saddle

node

focus

and vortical structure induced by shear layers

are also observed in the interference areas. The shock wave impingement induces a larger separation area and more obvious open features in the laminar state than in the turbulent state.

关键词

Keywords

references

WEINGERTNER S. SAENGER - the reference concept of the German hypersonics technology program[C]// 5th International Aerospace Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Munich, Germany. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1993. doi: 10.2514/6.1993-5161

GRIESEMER P, MUELLER J, PALUSZEK M. System design of a reusable, horizontal take-off/horizontal landing two stage to orbit vehicle[C]// 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Nashville, TN. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-7169

HAN P X, CUI N G, MU R J, et al. Survey on development of RBV in Japan and Europe[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2010(4): 31-36 (in Chinese).

HAN P X, MU R J, CUI N G, et al. A survey on development of reusable booster vehicle in USA[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2010(5): 56-61 (in Chinese).

FUJIKAWA T, TSUCHIYA T, TOMIOKA S. Multi-objective, multidisciplinary design optimization of TSTO space planes with RBCC engines[C]// 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-0650

SIPPEL M, TRIVAILO O, BUSSLER L, et al. Evolution of the SpaceLiner towards a Reusable TSTO-Launcher[C] // 67th International Astronautical Congress, Guadalajara, Mexico, 2016.

LIU L, YANG X F, XIAO G M, et al. Weight and size estimation method of two-stage-to-orbit reusable launch vehicles[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6): 927-933 (in Chinese).

WEI Y Y. Major technological issues of aerospace vehicle with combined-cycle propulsion[J]. Aerospace Technology, 2022(1): 1-12 (in Chinese).

SONG W, AI B C. Review of multibody separation dynamics[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 025950 (in Chinese).

DULEPOV N, LANSHIN A, SOKOLOVA O, et al. Propulsion systems for TSTO airplane-accelerators of different types[C]// 10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Kyoto, Japan. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2001. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-1914

OZAWA H, HANAI K, IBRAHIM M, et al. Experimental analysis of TSTO aerodynamic heating problems at hypersonic speed[C]// 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, Ohio. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2008. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-2671

UEMATSU T, ISHIDA T, ASO S, et al. Reduction of aerodynamic interference for separation of two-stage reuseable launch vehicles[C]. // 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2009.

UEMATSU T, ASO S, TANI Y. Aerodynamic interference reduction method for two-stage launch vehicles supersonic separation[C]// 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2011. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-388

UEMATSU T, ASO S, TANI Y. Supersonic flight separation simulation for TSTO launch vehicles considering shock wave interaction reduction[C]// 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2012. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-253

WANG Y, WANG Y P, XUE X P, et al. Numerical investigation on safe stage separation problem of a tsto model at Mach 7[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(2): 526-542 (in Chinese).

JIA J H, FU D B, HE Z P, et al. Hypersonic aerodynamic interference investigation for a two-stage-to-orbit model[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 168: 138-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.11.038

CHENG J M, CHEN R Q, QIU R F, et al. Rongqian C, Ruofan Q, et al. Aerothermodynamic study of Two-Stage-To-Orbit system composed of wide-speed-range vehicle and rocket[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 183: 330-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.11.034

TANG W, LIU S S, YU L, et al. Conceptual design of TBCC based TSTO configurations for stage seperation investigation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 698-704, 721 (in Chinese).

PENG D, XIE F T, LIU X, et al. Experimental study on hypersonic shock-body interaction between bodies in close proximity using translucent fast pressure- and temperature-sensitive paints[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2020, 61(5): 120. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-020-02948-0

CHEN J Q, WU X J, ZHANG J, et al. FlowStar: general unstructured-grid CFD software for national numerical windtunnel (NNW)project[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 625739 (in Chinese).

TANG J, CUI P C, JIA H Y, et al. Robust adaptation techniques for unstructured hybrid mesh[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(10): 122894 (in Chinese).

KANAMORI M, SUZUKI K. Three-dimensional shock wave detection based on the theory of characteristics[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(9): 2126-2132. DOI: 10.2514/1.j051922

SANDHAM N D, SCHÜLEIN E, WAGNER A, et al. Transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 752: 349-382. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.333

SHRESTHA P, HILDEBRAND N J, DWIVEDI A, et al. Interaction of an oblique shock with a transitional Mach 5.92 boundary layer[C]// 46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Washington, D. C. . Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3647

CURRAO G M D, CHOUDHURY R, GAI S L, et al. Hypersonic transitional shock-wave-boundary-layer interaction on a flat plate[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(2): 814-829. DOI: 10.2514/1.j058718

BABINSKY H, HARVEY J. Shock wave-boundary-layer interactions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

个体间距对多扑翼气动噪声的影响特性

热防护材料动态烧蚀形貌结构光视觉测量技术

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

某型电动跑车尾翼气动设计的仿真与试验研究

水滴撞击运动超疏水表面特性及其调控