变来流下翼型动态失速的协同射流控制数值模拟

贾天昊; 高超; 许和勇; 徐泽阳

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0156

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

变来流下翼型动态失速的协同射流控制数值模拟

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 变来流下翼型动态失速的协同射流控制数值模拟
- Numerical simulation on dynamic stall control of airfoil based on co-flow jet under variable free stream
- 空气动力学学报 2023年41卷第9期页码：59-69
- 作者机构：
  
  西北工业大学翼型、叶栅空气动力学国家级重点实验室,西安,710072
- 作者简介：
  
  贾天昊（1998-），男，四川绵阳人，硕士研究生，研究方向：动态失速及相关流动控制研究. E-mail：jiatianhao621000@163.com
  高超*（1960-），男，陕西榆林人，教授，研究方向：复杂流动控制及应用，跨声速空气动力学. E-mail：chaogao2020@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金（12172299，11972306）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0156
  中图分类号： TP69;O358;TJ011+.5
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
贾天昊, 高超, 许和勇, 等. 变来流下翼型动态失速的协同射流控制数值模拟[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(9): 59−69.

JIA Tianhao, GAO Chao, XU Heyong, et al. Numerical simulation on dynamic stall control of airfoil based on co-flow jet under variable free stream[J]. 2023, 41(9): 59-69.
贾天昊, 高超, 许和勇, 等. 变来流下翼型动态失速的协同射流控制数值模拟[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(9): 59−69. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0156

JIA Tianhao, GAO Chao, XU Heyong, et al. Numerical simulation on dynamic stall control of airfoil based on co-flow jet under variable free stream[J]. 2023, 41(9): 59-69. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0156.

摘要

针对直升机前飞时旋翼在变来流下出现动态失速的问题，发展了基于协同射流的翼型动态失速控制方法。选取NACA0012翼型为研究对象，基于转捩SST湍流模型求解非定常雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程，开展不同参数下协同射流控制翼型动态失速的数值模拟。研究结果表明，协同射流能够有效抑制变来流条件下的翼型动态失速。在变来流下，射流流道对翼型原始气动特性产生不利影响，功率系数的增长速度快于射流动量系数的增加，协同射流存在具有较好控制效果的最佳工作区间。协同射流通过与主流掺混来加速涡系演化，以抑制动态失速，通过增强弦向气流的动能以克服逆压梯度，从而抑制流动分离和促进流动再附着。在马赫数0.283、减缩频率0.151、前进比0.25的条件下，协同射流使翼型升力提高、阻力下降、负俯仰力矩峰降低、流动再附着提前，翼型气动特性得到明显改善。

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of dynamic stall of helicopter rotors under variable free stream during forward flight

a dynamic stall control method of airfoils based on the co-flow jet (CFJ) is developed. Taking NACA0012 airfoil as the research object

the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved based on the transition SST turbulence model

and numerical simulations of the dynamic stall of airfoils controlled by CFJ under different parameters are carried out. The results show that CFJ can effectively suppress the dynamic stall of airfoils. Under the condition of variable free stream

the jet channel has a negative impact on the original aerodynamic characteristics of the airfoil

and the power coefficient increases much faster than the jet momentum coefficient. There is an optimal working condition for CFJ to achieve the best control effect. CFJ accelerates the evolution of multi-vortex by mixing with the mainstream to suppress the dynamic stall

and enhances the kinetic energy of the chordwise flow to overcome the adverse pressure gradient to suppress flow separation and promote flow reattachment. Under the condition of Mach number 0.283

reducing frequency 0.151 and advance ratio 0.25

CFJ can increase the lift of the airfoil

reduce the drag and the negative pitching moment peak

and advance the reattachment of the flow. The overall aerodynamic characteristics of the airfoil are obviously improved by the CFJ control.

关键词

Keywords

references

CARR L W. Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1988, 25(1): 6-17. DOI:10.2514/3.45534

MCCROSKEY W J. Unsteady airfoils[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1982, 14: 285-311. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fl.14.010182.001441

BENTON S I, VISBAL M R. The onset of dynamic stall at a high, transitional Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 861: 860-885. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2018.939

ZHAO Q J, JING S M, ZHAO G Q, et al. Review of research progress on dynamic stall mechanism and unsteady design of rotor airfoils[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(6): 70-84. (in Chinese)

WANG Q, ZHAO Q J, ZHAO G Q. Unsteady aerodynamic characteristic analysis of rotor airfoil under variational free stream velocity condition[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(2): 364-372. (in Chinese)

HIRD K, FRANKHOUSER M W, GREGORY J W, et al. Compressible dynamic stall of an SSC-A09 airfoil subjected to coupled pitch and freestream Mach oscillations[C]//70th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Canada, 2014.

HWANGBO H, DING Y, EISELE O, et al. Quantifying the effect of vortex generator installation on wind power production: an academia-industry case study[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 113: 1589-1597. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.009

BRÜDERLIN M, ZIMMER M, HOSTERS N, et al. Numerical simulation of vortex generators on a winglet control surface[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 71: 651-660. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.018

GERONTAKOS P, LEE T. PIV study of flow around unsteady airfoil with dynamic trailing-edge flap deflection[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2008, 45(6): 955. DOI:10.1007/s00348-008-0514-4

HEINE B, MULLENERS K, JOUBERT G, et al. Dynamic stall control by passive disturbance generators[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(9): 2086-2097. DOI:10.2514/1.J051525

LEI J M, LIU Q Y, LI T. Suction control of laminar separation bubble over an airfoil at low Reynolds number[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019, 233(1): 81-90. DOI:10.1177/0954410017727025

REZAEIHA A, MONTAZERI H, BLOCKEN B. Active flow control for power enhancement of vertical axis wind turbines: leading-edge slot suction[J]. Energy, 2019, 189. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116131

GAO C, NI Z S, XUE M, et al. Forebody vortex control with a wire-based DBD plasma actuator[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021(2): 39-52.

SINGHAL A, CASTAÑEDA D, WEBB N, et al. Control of dynamic stall over a NACA 0015 airfoil using plasma actuators[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(1): 78-89. DOI:10.2514/1.j056071

WU Y, LI Y H. Progress and outlook of plasma flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 381-405. (in Chinese)

LUO Z B, XIA Z X, DENG X, et al. Research progress of dual synthetic jets and its flow control technology[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(2): 252-264, 251. (in Chinese)

ZHOU Y, LUO Z B, WANG L, et al. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control: review[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(3): 025027. (in Chinese)

TAYLOR K, AMITAY M. Dynamic stall process on a finite span model and its control via synthetic jet actuators[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(7): 077104. DOI:10.1063/1.4927586

ZHA G C, PAXTON C. A novel airfoil circulation augment flow control method using co-flow jet[C]//2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, Portland, Oregon. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2004. AIAA 2004-2208. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-2208

CAR D, KUPROWICZ N J, ESTEVADEORDAL J, et al. Stator diffusion enhancement using a re-circulating co-flowing steady jet[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vienna, Austria. 2008: 309-322. ASME GT2004-53086. doi: 10.1115/GT2004-53086

LIU J Q, CHEN R Q, YOU Y C, et al. Numerical investigation of dynamic stall suppression of rotor airfoil via improved co-flow jet[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(3): 169-184. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2021.07.041

ZHA G C, CARROLL B, PAXTON C, et al. High performance airfoil using co-flow jet flow control[C]//43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005: 1260. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-1260

WANG B Y, HADDOUKESSOUNI B, LEVY J, et al. Numerical investigations of injection-slot-size effect on the performance of coflow jet airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(6): 2084-2091. DOI:10.2514/1.37441

YANG Y C, ZHA G C. Super-lift coefficient of active flow control airfoil: What is the limit?[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017. AIAA 2017-1693. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-1693

YANG H Q, XU H Y, YE Z Y. Study on the flow control of the airfoil dynamic stall using the Co-flow jet[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2018, 9(4): 566-576. (in Chinese)

KHOSHNEVIS A, YAZDANI S, SAIMIPOUR E. Analysis of co-flow jet effects on airfoil at moderate Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 58(3): 685-695. DOI:10.15632/jtam-pl/122266

MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605. DOI:10.2514/3.12149

MENTER F R, LANGTRY R B, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part I: Model formulation[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3): 413. DOI:10.1115/1.2184352

MCALISTER K, PUCCI S, MCCROSKEY W, et al. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil sections. Volume 2. Pressure and force data[R]. NASA-TM-84245-VOL-2, 1982.

DANO B, ZHA G C, CASTILLO M. Experimental study of co-flow jet airfoil performance enhancement using discreet jets[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011. AIAA 2011-0941. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-941

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

旋翼翼型俯仰沉浮耦合动态失速特性

椭圆翼型动态失速流场模态分解与重构

零质量射流控制翼型跨声速激波抖振特性

动态失速及其实验方法与测量技术研究进展

旋翼翼型动态失速非定常介质阻挡放电流动控制研究