中车青岛四方机车车辆股份有限公司,青岛,266111
蒋欣(1970-),山东青岛人,正高级工程师,研究方向:城市轨道交通列车总体设计研发. E-mail:sf-jiangxin@cqsf.com
杜俊涛*(1983-),湖北襄阳人,高级工程师,研究方向:高速磁浮列车空气动力学及车体结构设计. E-mail:dujuntao@cqsf.com
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
蒋欣, 杜俊涛, 尚克明. 尾部吹气控制对城轨列车气动阻力的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(7): 120−129.
JIANG Xin, DU Juntao, SHANG Keming. Influence of tail-blowing control on aerodynamic drag of urban rail trains[J]. 2023, 41(7): 120-129.
蒋欣, 杜俊涛, 尚克明. 尾部吹气控制对城轨列车气动阻力的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(7): 120−129. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0113
JIANG Xin, DU Juntao, SHANG Keming. Influence of tail-blowing control on aerodynamic drag of urban rail trains[J]. 2023, 41(7): 120-129. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0113.
为了探索尾部吹气控制对城市轨道交通列车气动阻力的影响,采用基于Realizable
k
-
ε
两方程模型的DDES方法模拟列车明线运行时的车身周围流场结构,分析了在尾车不同位置施加吹气控制,以及不同吹气速度的影响规律,并通过风洞试验结果验证了文章选用的数值模拟方法。研究结果表明:压差阻力是列车阻力的重要来源,约占总阻力的80.1%,摩擦阻力占比约为19.9%;列车尾车设置吹气控制可显著减小列车气动阻力,且对列车压差阻力的影响远大于摩擦阻力;不同吹气方案下,尾车减阻效果最显著,其次是中间车,最高减阻率分别为27.6%和 4.6%;分离点区域压力和流向涡强度是影响列车阻力的重要因素,吹气边界靠近流向涡涡核时可弱化流向涡强度,特定吹气边界控制下列车尾车压差阻力的减阻率高达31.9%;列车气动减阻率随吹气速度增大而增大,当吹气速度由0.2
U
增大至0.4
U
时,整车气动减阻率由7.9%增大至12.2%,继续增大至0.6
U
气动减阻效果减弱,整车减阻率增大至12.9%;集中吹气点通过改变吹气方向与壁面切线方向的夹角来控制尾流结构,当集中吹气点从距尾车鼻尖点1.5 m增大至5.0 m时,列车气动减阻率由12.9%减小至11.3%。
In order to explore the influence of tail-blowing control on the aerodynamic resistance of urban rail trains
the DDES method based on realizable
k
-
ε
two-equation model is used to simulate the flow structures around the train body on open railways
and the numerical method is verified by wind tunnel test results. The influence of the tail-blowing control at different positions and different blowing speeds is analyzed. The results show that
the pressure drag is an
important source of the train resistance
accounting for about 80.1% of the total resistance
while the friction drag accounts for about 19.9%. The air blowing control can significantly reduce the aerodynamic resistance of the train
with much greater influence on the pressure drag than the friction drag. Under different air blowing schemes
the drag reduction effect on the rear car is most significant
followed by the middle car
with the highest drag reduction rates of 27.6% and 4.6%
respectively. The pressure in the separation area and the strength of the streamwise vorticity are important factors affecting the train resistance. When the blowing boundary is close to the core of the streamwise vortex
the streamwise vorticity is weakened. When the blowing speed increases from 0.2
U
to 0.4
U
the drag reduction rate increases from 7.9% to 12.2%. When the blowing speed further increases to 0.6
U
the drag reduction effect weakens
with the overall drag reduction rate reaching 12.9%. The wake structure varies with the angle between the blowing direction and the wall tangential direction. When the central blowing point increases from 1.5 m to 5.0 m from the nose tip of the tail car
the aerodynamic drag reduction rate of the train decreases from 12.9% to 11.3%.
潘永琛. 高速列车边界层及尾流流动的数值研究[D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2018.
LI T, DAI Z Y, LIU J L, et al. Review on aerodynamic drag reduction optimization of high-speed trains in China[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 59-80. (in Chinese)
YU Y Z, LIU T H, XIA Y T, et al. Development and prospect of aerodynamic drag-reduction technologies for trains at higher speed (400 + km/h) [J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(5): 83−94(in Chinese)
TIAN H Q. Train aerodynamics[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2007: 159-161(in Chinese).
LIN P, LIU D X. Reduction of aerodynamic drag on intercity railway through car bottom structure optimization[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(5): 763-773. (in Chinese)
CHOI B, HONG Y, LEE B, et al. Adaptive flow separation control over an asymmetric airfoil[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2018, 19(2): 305-315. DOI:10.1007/s42405-018-0029-z
WANG Y T, SUN Z X, JU S J, et al. Influence of groove microstructures on the aerodynamic performance of high speed trains under crosswind[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(5): 132-141. (in Chinese)
BECK N, LANDA T, SEITZ A, et al. Drag reduction by laminar flow control[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(1): 252. DOI:10.3390/en11010252
DU J, GONG M, TIAN A Q, et al. Study on the drag reduction of the high-speed train based on the bionic non-smooth riblets[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2014, 11(5): 70-76. (in Chinese)
DU J, LIANG X F, LI G B, et al. Numerical simulation of rainwater accumulation and flow characteristics over windshield of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(1): 198-209. DOI:10.1007/s11771-020-4288-z
ZHU H Y, HU H T, YIN B C. Research on aerodynamic resistance and noise of high-speed train with convex non-smooth surface[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2020, 37(4): 88-95. (in Chinese)
BARROS D, BORÉE J, CADOT O, et al. Forcing symmetry exchanges and flow reversals in turbulent wakes[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 829. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2017.590
HAFFNER Y, CASTELAIN T, BORÉE J, et al. Manipulation of three-dimensional asymmetries of a turbulent wake for drag reduction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 912: A6. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2020.1133
GAO G Q, YAN X, PENG K S, et al. Primary research on drag reduction of train based on plasma flow[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(4): 855-862. (in Chinese)
HUANG S, YU Y, LI Z W, et al. Study of Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of High-speed Train Based on Tail Jet-flow Control[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2021, 43(11): 38-46.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621