ARMALY B F, DURST F, PEREIRA J C F, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 127(1): 473-496. DOI:10.1017/S0022112083002839

DRIVER D M, SEEGMILLER H L. Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channel flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1985, 23(2): 163-171. DOI:10.2514/3.8890

CHIANG T P, SHEU T W H. A numerical revisit of backward-facing step flow problem[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1999, 11(4): 862-874. DOI:10.1063/1.869958

NIE J H, ARMALY B F. Three-dimensional convective flow adjacent to backward-facing step - effects of step height[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2002, 45(12): 2431-2438. DOI:10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00345-3

NIE J H, ARMALY B F. Reverse flow regions in three-dimensional backward-facing step flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(22): 4713-4720. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.05.027

CHEN Y T, NIE J H, HSIEH H T, et al. Three-dimensional convection flow adjacent to inclined backward-facing step[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2006, 49(25-26): 4795-4803. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.06.014

RANI H P, SHEU T W H, TSAI E S F. Eddy structures in a transitional backward-facing step flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 588: 43-58. DOI:10.1017/s002211200700763x

RATHA D, SARKAR A. Analysis of flow over backward facing step with transition[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 71-81. DOI:10.1007/s11709-014-0270-x

CHOI H H, NGUYEN V T, NGUYEN J. Numerical investigation of backward facing step flow over various step angles[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 154: 420-425. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.508

DRIVER D M, SEEGMILLER H L, MARVIN J G. Time-dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1987, 25(7): 914-919. DOI:10.2514/3.9722

HUNT J C R, ABELL C J, PETERKA J A, et al. Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 86(1): 179-200. DOI:10.1017/s0022112078001068

SU Q. Numerical study of coupled flow field between helicopter and warship[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020 (in Chinese).

LI T. Research on Kernel-Based associative memories, clustering algorithms and their applications[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022 (in Chinese).

SEDDON J, NEWMAN S. Basic helicopter aerodynamics[M]. BeiJing: National Defense Industry Press, 2014.

SEDDON J, NEWMAN S, 著. 直升机空气动力学基础[M]. 王建新, 等译. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014.

LI Z. Numerical study of Ship/Rotorcraft Coupled Airflow Field[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022 (in Chinese).

CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Numerical study of helicopter rotors in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6): 1813-1832. DOI:10.2514/1.c032535

UK Civil Aviation Authority. Standards for offshore helicopter landing areas[S ] . CAA CAP 437, 2016. https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP437%20Ed8%20Am2%20(July2021).pdf

ZHAO W Y, LIU H, FU B X. Safe operating envelopes of onboard helicopter and its flight test[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2002, 20(4): 48-50, 60. (in Chinese)

TAI T C, CARICO D. Simulation of DD-963 ship airwake by Navier-Stokes method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1995, 32(6): 1399-1401. DOI:10.2514/3.46892

WILKINSON C, ZAN S J, GILBERT N, et al. Modelling and simulation of ship air wakes for helicopter operations : A collaborative venture[C]//Symposium on Fluid Dynamics Problems of Vehicles Operating Near or in the Air-Sea Interface, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1999.

FORREST J S, OWEN I. An investigation of ship airwakes using Detached-Eddy Simulation[J]. Computers Fluids, 2010, 39(4): 656-673. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.11.002[LinkOut]

CHENEY B T, ZAN S J. CFD code validation data and flow topology for the technical cooperation program AEAR-TP2 simple frigate shape[R]. LTR-A-035.

REDDY K R, TOFFOLETTO R, JONES K R W. Numerical simulation of ship airwake[J]. Computers Fluids, 2000, 29(4): 451-465. DOI:10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00033-X

TAI T C. Airwake simulation of modified TTCP/SFS ship[R ] . ADA 419015, 2003. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA419015.pdf

YESILEL H, EDIS F O. Ship airwake analysis by CFD methods[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2007, 936(1): 674-677. DOI:10.1063/1.2790239

SINGH S N, SRINIVASAN B, SHUKLA S. RANS study of flow characteristics over flight deck of simplified frigate ship[C]//DFD14 Meeting of the American Physical Society. 2014. doi: 10.13140/2.1.3132.4167

WOODSON S, GHEE T. A computational and experimental determination of the air flow around the landing deck of a US navy destroyer (DDG)[C]//23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-4958

WU Y P. The research and applications of CFD to calculation the flow field on warship deck[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2006(3): 1-4. (in Chinese)

LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Discussion on comparability of scaled models for CFD numerical simulation for ship airwake[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2008, 3(6): 45-48. (in Chinese)

LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Influences of different airflow situations for ship airwake[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2009, 31(9): 38-42. (in Chinese)

LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Simplified evaluation of ship airwake characteristics for takeoff/landing of shipborne aircraft[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2010, 5(1): 39-42. (in Chinese)

QU F, LU C, JIANG Z F, et al. CFD numerical simulation of ship air-wake[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(5): 23-27. (in Chinese)

GAO Y, LIU C M. Numerical calculation of frigate ship airwake[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2013, 34(5): 599-603. (in Chinese)

GAO Y, LIU C M, HE Z. Research on CVN deck vortices structure characteristics caused by wind direction changes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(3): 310-315. (in Chinese)

LIU C M, GAO Y. Research on the airwake characteristics of flight deck for different frigate ship models[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46(3): 80-85. (in Chinese)

LIU C M. Numerical simulation of turbulent wind field around large-scale marine structures[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2014 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7666/d.D595371

WANG J L, GAO Y, LIU C M. Numerical simulation of typical frigate airwake on flight deck[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 47(5): 86-90. (in Chinese)

WANG J L, GAO Y. The influence of ship tail structure to airwake on helicopter operation area[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(10): 148-154. (in Chinese)

WANG J L. Numerical research of ship airwake characteristic[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016 (in Chinese). doi: 10.7666/d.Y3177578

GAO Y, XIE H S. The numerical simulation of flow around the warship during ramp ski-jump take-off[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2008, 26(4): 513-518. (in Chinese)

LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N. Influence of ship motion on flow field over modified simple frigate shapes[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2021, 38(3): 520⁃534. DOI:10.16356/j.1005-1120.2021.03.016

LI C M, JIANG W J, CHENG J, et al. Comparisons of DES and LES turbulent model for simulation of surface ship airwake[C]//ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea. 2016 doi: 10.1115/OMAE2016-55037

POLSKY S. A computational study of unsteady ship airwake[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002: 1022. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-1022

LIU J M, LONG L N, MODI A. Higher order accurate solutions of ship airwake flow fields using parallel computers[C ] //The American Helicopter Society 54th Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 1998. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/l/n/lnl/papers/ahs_nato.pdf

HEALEY J. A data base for flight in the wake of a ship[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1992. AIAA-92-0295. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-295

SHARMA A, LONG L. Airwake simulations on an LPD 17 ship[C]//15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2001: 2589. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-2589

SEZER-UZOL N, SHARMA A, LONG L N. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of ship airwake[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2005, 219(5): 369-392. DOI:10.1243/095441005x30306

ZAN S. Technical comment on “computational-fluid-dynamics based advanced ship-airwake database for helicopter flight simulation”[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(5): 1007. DOI:10.2514/2.6890

BOGSTAD M C, HABASHI W G, AKEL I, et al. Computational-fluid-dynamics based advanced ship-airwake database for helicopter flight simulators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2002, 39(5): 830-838. DOI:10.2514/2.3003

POLSKY S, BRUNER C. Time-accurate computational simulations of an LHA ship airwake[C]//18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2000: 4126. doi: 10.2514/6.2000-4126

ZHANG F, XU H, BALL N. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow over SFS 2 ship model[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009: 81. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-81

POLSKY S. CFD prediction of airwake flowfields for ships experiencing beam winds[C]//21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-3657

POLSKY S, IMBER R, CZERWIEC R, et al. A computational and experimental determination of the air flow around the landing deck of a US navy destroyer (DDG): part II[C]//37th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Miami, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2007: 4484. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-4484

SHUKLA S, SINGH S N, SRINIVASAN B, et al. A computational study of modified TTCP/SFS ship airwakes[C]// International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology, India, RINA, 2015. doi: 10.3940/rina.icsotin15.2015.01

LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N. Numerical study of the flow over the modified simple frigate shape[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021, 235(12): 1551-1565. DOI:10.1177/0954410020977752

LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N. Influence of sudden change in pitching motion on ship flow field[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(3): 80-89. (in Chinese)

THORNBER B, STARR M, DRIKAKIS D. Implicit large eddy simulation of ship airwakes[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2010, 114(1162): 715-736. DOI:10.1017/s0001924000004218

GRINSTEIN F, FUREBY C. Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows[C]//36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1998. doi: 10.2514/6.1998-537

VISBAL M R, RIZZETTA D P. Large-eddy simulation on curvilinear grids using compact differencing and filtering schemes[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124(4): 836-847. DOI:10.1115/1.1517564

VISBAL M, MORGAN P, RIZZETTA D. An implicit LES approach based on high-order compact differencing and filtering schemes (invited)[C]//16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003: 4098. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-4098

ZONG K, ZHAO P C, WANG J L, et al. Simulation application of S-A and MILES model in SFS 2 ship airwake[J ] . Ship Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 83-87. (in Chinese)

SPALART P R, JOU W H, STRELETS M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for winds, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C ] //Advances in DNS/LES, 1997: 137-148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236888805

SPALART P R, DECK S, SHUR M L, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20(3): 181-195. DOI:10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0

SHUR M L, SPALART P R, STRELETS M K, et al. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001

FORREST J S, OWEN I, PADFIELD G D, et al. Detached-Eddy Simulation of ship airwakes for piloted helicopter flight simulation[C ] //International Aerospace CFD Conference, Paris, 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237730657_Detached-Eddy_Simulation_of_ship_airwakes_for_piloted_helicopter_flight_simulation

FORREST J S, OWEN I, PADFIELD G D, et al. Ship-helicopter operating limits prediction using piloted flight simulation and time-accurate airwakes[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(4): 1020-1031. DOI:10.2514/1.C031525

CAO G, CHENG J, BI X B, et al. Investigation on the numerical simulation of ship airwake based on DES[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(3): 48-54. (in Chinese)

TAN H. The numerical simulation of frigate surface flow field with DES method[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017 (in Chinese).

WANG Z L. Study of numerical simulation method for the air flow field around the ship deck[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2018(3): 6-10. (in Chinese)

VAN MUIJDEN J, BOELENS O, VAN DER VORST J, et al. Computational ship airwake determination to support helicopter-ship dynamic interface assessment[C]//21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013: 3078. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-3078

ZHAO R, RONG J L, LI H X, et al. Entropy-based detached-eddy simulation of the airwake over a simple frigate shape[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 7(11): 168781401561693. doi: 10.1177/1687814015616930

MORA R B. Experimental investigation of the flow on a simple frigate shape (SFS)[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014: 818132. DOI:10.1155/2014/818132

WATSON N A, KELLY M F, OWEN I, et al. Computational and experimental modelling study of the unsteady airflow over the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 172: 562-574. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.024

LI K W, ZHEN Z Y, SUN Y L. Effects of deck motion and ship airwake on Ski-Jump takeoff performance of carrier-based aircraft[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2016, 33(4): 510-518.

SUN W S, BI Y Q, BAI C H. Research on shipboard effect of naval helicopter[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2006, 36(2): 9-12. (in Chinese)

MOON J, DOMERCANT J C, MAVRIS D. A simplified approach to assessment of mission success for helicopter landing on a ship[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2015, 13(3): 680-688. DOI:10.1007/s12555-013-0092-y

YANG J. Study of influence of warship hangar door on helicopter's take-off and landing characteristics[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2017, 35(4): 10-13. (in Chinese)

CHEN M H, CAO Y H. Flow field simulation and safety analysis of shipborne helicopter landing area [C]//2018 National Conference on Industrial Hydrodynamic. Beijing, 2018 (in Chinese).

MA S, WU J, WANG C, et al. Experimental study on the interference between rotor and ship in windless environment[C]//2019 National Conference on Industrial Hydrodynamic. Beijing, 2019: 209-220 (in Chinese).

CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Coupling flight mechanics and CFD: numerical simulation of shipborne rotors[J ] . The Aeronautical Journal. 2017, 122(1247): 42-82. doi: 10.1017/aer. 2017.112. https://1library.net/document/eqo2gw5y-coupling-flight-mechanics-cfd-numerical-simulation-shipborne-rotors.html

ERM L. A preliminary study of the airwake model used in an existing SH-60B/FFG- 7 helicopter/ship simulation program[R ] . ADA 28428, 1994. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA284282.pdf

FORTENBAUGH R. Progress in mathematical modeling of the aircraft operational environment of DD 963 class ships[C]//5th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference for Future Space Systems, Boulder, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1979: 1677. doi: 10.2514/6.1979-1677

WANG C R, ZHU Y B. A study on the method of calculation for helicopter-ship take-off/landing flight envelope[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1996, 14(1): 36-40. (in Chinese)

SUN C W, GAO Z, SUN W S. Analysis of unmanned helicopter hovering in ship flow field over flight deck[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 1999, 31(6): 614-619. (in Chinese)

XU G, HU G C, WANG Y L, et al. Research on helicopter hover on flight deck in complicated airflow field[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2015, 47(2): 205-211. (in Chinese)

JI H L, CHEN R L, LI P. Numerical simulation of a helicopter operating in a reconstructed ship airwake based on POD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(3): 771-779. (in Chinese)

LANDSBERG A, BORIS J, SANDBERG W, et al. Analysis of the nonlinear coupling effects of a helicopter downwash with an unsteady ship airwake[C]//33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1995. doi: 10.2514/6.1995-47

TATTERSALL P, ALBONE C, SOLIMAN M, et a l. Prediction of ship air wakes over flight decks using CFD[C ] //AGARD Fluid Dynamics Symposium on Fluid Dynamics of Vehicles Operating Near or In the Air-Sea Interface, 1998. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238395488_Prediction_of_Ship_Air_Wakes_over_Flight_Decks_using_CFD

WAKEFIELD N H, NEWMAN S J, WILSON P A. Helicopter flight around a ship's' superstructure[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2002, 216(1): 13-28. DOI:10.1243/0954410021533391

POLSKY S. Progress towards modeling ship/aircraft dynamic interface[C]//2006 HPCMP Users Group Conference (HPCMP-UGC'06), Denver, CO, USA. IEEE, 2006: 163-168. doi: 10.1109/HPCMP-UGC.2006.59

HUANG B. Numerical study of coupled flowfield and flight envelop for shipborne helicopters[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016 (in Chinese).

HUANG B, XU G H, SHI Y J. Research on influence of hangar door opening and closing on landing flowfield for shipborne helicopters[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2015, 47(2): 198-204. (in Chinese)

ZHAO W Y. Research on test approach to complex wake between the helicopter rotor induced flow and the warship airwake[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2007, 25(2): 72-74, 77. (in Chinese)

SU D C, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Numerical simulatin of coupled flow field of helicopter/ship[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 520853. (in Chinese)

DU Y H. Numerical simulation of coupled flow field of helicopter/ship[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018 (in Chinese).

CHEN H J, XU G H, SHI Y J, et al. Coupled flow field numerical simulation study of ship-borne tilt-rotor aircraft landing area[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2020, 38(1): 21-26, 34. (in Chinese)

SU D C, SHI Y J, XU G H. Numerical study of the rotational direction effect on aerodynamic loading characteristics of shipborne helicopter rotor[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2019, 123(1263): 635-657. DOI:10.1017/aer.2019.20

HU C J, AN Q L, WANG X C. Calculation of shipboard helicopter's landing operating envelope by CFD method[J]. Science Technology Review, 2019, 37(13): 70-75. (in Chinese)

WANG C. Numerical simulation of flowfield in a helicopter landing process[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2019 (in Chinese).

GENG X, SUN P, ZHONG J J. Influence of wind direction on flow field structure of the ship-borne helicopter rotor[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(3): 465-471. (in Chinese)

GENG X. The study of composite flow field of the helicopter rotor and ship deck[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2014 (in Chinese).

SUN P, GENG X, ZHAO J, et al. Influence of wind directions on the flow field structures of helicopter rotor and deck[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(8): 1802-1810. (in Chinese)

ZHANG S J, ZHAO J, SUN P, et al. Numerical study of influence of multiple helicopter rotors on warship deck flow field[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2015, 55(5): 457-463. (in Chinese)

STEIJL R, BARAKOS G, BADCOCK K. A framework for CFD analysis of helicopter rotors in hover and forward flight[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2006, 51(8): 819-847. DOI:10.1002/fld.1086

ROSENFELD N, KIMMEL K, SYDNEY A J. Investigation of ship topside modeling practices for wind tunnel experiments[C]//53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2015: 0245. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-0245

SCHWARZ T, PAHLKE K. Generation of an advanced helicopter experimental aerodynamic data base for CFD validation–The European GOAHEAD project[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 19(1): 1-2. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2011.09.007

LEE R G, ZAN S J. Wind tunnel testing of a helicopter fuselage and rotor in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2005, 50(4): 326-337. DOI:10.4050/1.3092869

Li T, Wang YB, Zhao N, et al. Numerical simulation study on the coupled flow field of ship/helicopter above the motion deck[C]//19th National Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Nanjing, 2021 (in Chinese).

LEE Y, SILVA M. CFD-modeling of rotor flowfield aboard ship[C]//48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-867

ZONG K, ZONG W, LI H X, et al. Research of simulation methods on landing flow field for shipborne helicopters[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(3): 124-130, 139. (in Chinese)