1. 中国科学院 力学研究所,北京,100190
2. 中国科学院大学 工程科学学院,北京,100049
李曌斌(1988-),男,河北唐山人,博士后,研究方向:深远海风能开发的耦合动力学. E-mail:zhaobin.li@imech.ac.cn
杨晓雷*,研究员,研究方向:湍流、风能、计算流体力学. E-mail:xyang@imech.ac.cn
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
李曌斌, 董国丹, 秦建华, 等. 浮式风力机运动形式对尾迹大尺度运动的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 231−239.
LI Zhaobin, DONG Guodan, QIN Jianhua, et al. Coherent flow structures in the wake of floating wind turbines induced by motions in different degrees of freedom[J]. 2022, 40(4): 231-239.
李曌斌, 董国丹, 秦建华, 等. 浮式风力机运动形式对尾迹大尺度运动的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 231−239. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0057
LI Zhaobin, DONG Guodan, QIN Jianhua, et al. Coherent flow structures in the wake of floating wind turbines induced by motions in different degrees of freedom[J]. 2022, 40(4): 231-239. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0057.
为研究浮式风力机尾迹在平台运动下的演化特征和机理,本文通过线性稳定性分析和大涡模拟方法,分析了浮式风力机在纵荡、横荡和艏摇三种形式下作简谐运动时的尾迹。利用线性稳定性理论,用周向波数表示了不同运动形式引起的尾迹扰动,预测了尾迹在轴对称和非轴对称两种理想扰动下的敏感频率。稳定性分析表明:当纵荡运动的无量纲频率在0.3 ≤
St
≤ 0.5时最易引发尾迹失稳;横荡和艏摇运动的最敏感频率在0.2 ≤
St
≤ 0.4范围内;在三种运动形式下,低频(
St
≤ 0.1)和高频(
St
≥ 1.0)扰动均不会明显增长。随后,利用大涡模拟研究了不同形式、不同频率的浮式风力机刚体运动对尾迹产生的影响,检验了线性稳定性理论预报浮式风力机尾迹失稳演化的能力,并比较了不同运动形式、频率下的尾迹动态特征。研究结果表明:在
St
= 0.3条件下,远尾迹在风力机纵荡运动下出现交替的收张运动,而在横荡、艏摇状况下将发生侧向的蜿蜒,将对下游风力机施加较大的交变载荷;在
St
= 0.1和
St
= 1.0的各形式运动影响下,尾迹均未发生明显的大尺度运动,不会对下游风力机的动态载荷产生明显的影响。最后,从风力机尾迹演化的角度讨论了浮式风力机设计中应重点考虑的刚体运动形式和频率范围,指出应慎重评估无量纲频率在
St
= 0.3附近的风力机运动对尾迹演化的作用。
Accurate prediction of wake flows is essential for wind turbine structure design and wind farm layout optimization. This paper investigates floating offshore wind turbines' wake flows induced by the surge
sway
and yaw of platforms by employing the linear stability theory and large-eddy simulations. Perturbations induced by different motion
s are represented by different circumferential wavenumbers in the stability analysis. The analysis shows that the wake flows are the most unstable when the dimensionless frequency ranges from 0.3 ≤
St
≤ 0.5 for surge motion and 0.2 ≤
St
≤ 0.4 for sway and yaw motions. No apparent amplification is found for low-frequency (
St
≤ 0.1) and high-frequency (
St
≥ 1.0) disturbances regardless of motion types. The large-eddy simulation confirms the results of the stability analysis. At
St
= 0.3
the surge motion leads to periodic contraction and expansion of the wake flow
while the other two motions result in lateral meandering that may induce large unsteady loads for downstream turbines. On the other hand
motions at
St
= 0.1 and
St
= 1.0 do not lead to apparent large-scale wake motions
yielding negligible unsteady loads for downstream turbines. Consequently
special attention is required to platform motions around
St
= 0.3 due to their potential hazards on downstream turbines.
YANG X L, SOTIROPOULOS F. A review on the meandering of wind turbine wakes[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(24): 4725. DOI:10.3390/en12244725
WANG T G, TIAN L L, ZHONG W, et al. Aerodynamic research progress in wind energy Ⅱ: Inflow and wake characteristics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(4): 1-28(in Chinese).
LI Z B, YANG X L. Large-eddy simulation on the similarity between wakes of wind turbines with different yaw angles[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 921: A11. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2021.495
LARSEN G C, MADSEN H A, THOMSEN K, et al. Wake meandering: a pragmatic approach[J]. Wind Energy, 2008, 11(4): 377-395. DOI:10.1002/we.267
MEDICI D, ALFREDSSON P H. Measurements on a wind turbine wake: 3D effects and bluff body vortex shedding[J]. Wind Energy, 2006, 9(3): 219-236. DOI:10.1002/we.156
GUPTA V, WAN M P. Low-order modelling of wake meandering behind turbines[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 877: 534-560. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2019.619
MAO X, SØRENSEN J N. Far-wake meandering induced by atmospheric eddies in flow past a wind turbine[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 846: 190-209. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2018.275
YANG X L, SOTIROPOULOS F. Wake characteristics of a utility-scale wind turbine under coherent inflow structures and different operating conditions[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2019, 4(2): 024604. DOI:10.1103/physrevfluids.4.024604
HEISEL M, HONG J R, GUALA M. The spectral signature of wind turbine wake meandering: a wind tunnel and field-scale study[J]. Wind Energy, 2018, 21(9): 715-731. DOI:10.1002/we.2189
SEBASTIAN T, LACKNER M. Analysis of the induction and wake evolution of an offshore floating wind turbine[J]. Energies, 2012, 5(4): 968-1000. DOI:10.3390/en5040968
TRAN T T, KIM D H. A CFD study into the influence of unsteady aerodynamic interference on wind turbine surge motion[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 90: 204-228. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.013
DE VAAL J B, HANSEN M O , MOAN T. Effect of wind turbine surge motion on rotor thrust and induced velocity[J]. Wind Energy, 2014, 17(1): 105-121. DOI:10.1002/we.1562
CHEN G, LIANG X F, LI X B. Modelling of wake dynamics and instabilities of a floating horizontal-axis wind turbine under surge motion[J]. Energy, 2022, 239: 122110. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122110
LEE H, LEE D J. Effects of platform motions on aerodynamic performance and unsteady wake evolution of a floating offshore wind turbine[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 143: 9-23. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.134
KOPPERSTAD K M, KUMAR R, SHOELE K. Aerodynamic characterization of barge and spar type floating offshore wind turbines at different sea states[J]. Wind Energy, 2020, 23(11): 2087-2112. DOI:10.1002/we.2547
LIU Y M, WANG B, LIU Q S, et al. Research on dynamic response of super large floating wind turbine under wind-wave misalignment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2022, 44(2): 383-393 (in Chinese).
LI Z B, DONG G D, YANG X L. Onset of wake meandering for a floating offshore wind turbine under side-to-side motion[J ] . Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 934: A29. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13842
BATCHELOR G K, GILL A E. Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1962, 14(4): 529-551. DOI:10.1017/s0022112062001421
YANG X L, SOTIROPOULOS F, CONZEMIUS R J, et al. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow past wind turbines/farms: the Virtual Wind Simulator (VWiS)[J]. Wind Energy, 2015, 18(12): 2025-2045. DOI:10.1002/we.1802
YANG X L, MILLIREN C, KISTNER M, et al. High-fidelity simulations and field measurements for characterizing wind fields in a utility-scale wind farm[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 281: 116115. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116115
YANG X L, HONG J R, BARONE M, et al. Coherent dynamics in the rotor tip shear layer of utility-scale wind turbines[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 804: 90-115. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2016.503
YANG X L, PAKULA M, SOTIROPOULOS F. Large-eddy simulation of a utility-scale wind farm in complex terrain[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 229: 767-777. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.049
YANG X L, SOTIROPOULOS F. A new class of actuator surface models for wind turbines[J]. Wind Energy, 2018, 21(5): 285-302. DOI:10.1002/we.2162
YANG X L, ZHANG X, LI Z L, et al. A smoothing technique for discrete delta functions with application to immersed boundary method in moving boundary simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228(20): 7821-7836. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.023
RAMACHANDRAN G K V, ROBERTSON A, JONKMAN J M, et al. Investigation of response amplitude operators for floating offshore wind turbines[C ] // 23rd International Ocean, Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, 2013. NREL/CP-5000-58098. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/58098.pdf
OMASICCHIO G R, AVOSSA A M, RIEFOLO L, et al. Dynamic modelling of a spar buoy wind turbine[C]//ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 2017. doi: 10.1115/OMAE2017-62246
XIONG X L, LYU P, CHEN W L, et al. Self-similarity in the wake of a semi-submersible offshore wind turbine considering the interaction with the wake of supporting platform[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 156: 328-341. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.071
YANG H Z, GE M W, GU B, et al. The effect of swell on marine atmospheric boundary layer and the operation of an offshore wind turbine[J]. Energy, 2022, 244: 123200. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123200
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621