典型光学窗口流场的气动光学效应数值模拟

谭小童; 许和勇; 田仁治

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0052

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

典型光学窗口流场的气动光学效应数值模拟

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 典型光学窗口流场的气动光学效应数值模拟
- Numerical simulation of aero-optical effect of flow around typical optical windows
- 空气动力学学报 2023年41卷第6期页码：71-80
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北工业大学翼型、叶栅空气动力学国家级重点实验室,西安,710072
  2. 代尔夫特理工大学航空航天工程学院,代尔夫特,荷兰,999025
- 作者简介：
  
  谭小童（1999-），男，湖北人，硕士研究生，研究方向：气动光学. E-mail：2020260145@mail.nwpu.edu.cn
  许和勇，教授，研究方向：计算流体力学，流动控制，气动光学. E-mail：xuheyong@nwpu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  翼型、叶栅空气动力学国家级重点实验室基金
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0052
  中图分类号： O436
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
谭小童, 许和勇, 田仁治. 典型光学窗口流场的气动光学效应数值模拟[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(6): 71−80.

TAN Xiaotong, XU Heyong, TIAN Renzhi. Numerical simulation of aero-optical effect of flow around typical optical windows[J]. 2023, 41(6): 71-80.
谭小童, 许和勇, 田仁治. 典型光学窗口流场的气动光学效应数值模拟[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(6): 71−80. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0052

TAN Xiaotong, XU Heyong, TIAN Renzhi. Numerical simulation of aero-optical effect of flow around typical optical windows[J]. 2023, 41(6): 71-80. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0052.

摘要

采用延迟脱体涡模拟方法计算共形光学窗口转塔和平面光学窗口转塔的绕流流场，并根据绕流流场定量分析在转角0°、90°和180°下两种光学窗口的气动光学效应和远场衍射结果。采用Zernike多项式拟合波前，并结合自适应光学分析两种光学窗口所发射光线的传输性能。结果表明：在无自适应光学矫正下，平面光学窗口在0°和180°转角下的光线传输性能优于共形光学窗口，90°则相反；在自适应光学矫正平移、倾斜、离焦和像散等低阶项时，共形光学窗口在90°和180°转角下其光线传输性能都优于平面光学窗口；而在0°转角下，两种光学窗口的光线传输性能相近。随着转角的增大，两种光学窗口气动光学效应中的高阶项不断减小。值得注意的是，近场畸变的光线在远场衍射后的光强峰值可能会大于未畸变光线远场衍射的光强，且其光强峰值位置会严重偏移。

Abstract

Delayed detached eddy simulation (DDES) is used to simulate the flow field around the conformal optical window turret and the flat optical window turret. The aero-optical effect and the far-field diffraction result of the two optical windows at 0°

90° and 180° angles are quantitatively analyzed based on the flow field around the turret. Zernike polynomial is applied to fit the wavefront distortion

and the adaptive optics is used to analyze the propagation performance of the two optical windows. The results show that the beam transmission performance of the flat optical window is better than that of the conformal one at the angles of 0° and 180° without adaptive optical correction

while the beam transmission performance of the conformal window at 90° angle is better than that of the flat one. When the adaptive optics correct these low-order terms including piston

tilt

defocus and astigmatism

the beam transmission performance of the conformal optical window is better than that of the flat one at the angles of 90° and 180°. At the angle of 0°

the beam transmission performance of the two optical windows is similar. With the increase of the angle

the high-order terms of the two windows decrease continuously. It is worth noting that the peak intensity of the distorted beam after diffraction in the far field may be larger than that of the undistorted beam in the far field. Meanwhile

the location of the peak intensity will be seriously offset.

关键词

Keywords

references

KAN W, MENG W. Aero-optics of subsonic turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 696: 122-151. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2012.11[LinkOut]

DING H L, YI S H, ZHU Y Z, et al. Experimental investigation on aero-optics of supersonic turbulent boundary layers[J]. Applied Optics, 2017, 56(27): 7604-7610. DOI:10.1364/AO.56.007604[PubMed]

VISBAL M. Numerical simulation of aero-optical aberration through a weakly compressible shear layer[C]// 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, Texas. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2009. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-4298

FITZGERALD E J, JUMPER E J. The optical distortion mechanism in a nearly incompressible free shear layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 512: 153-189. DOI:10.1017/s0022112004009553[LinkOut]

MANI A L, MOIN P, WANG M. Computational study of optical distortions by separated shear layers and turbulent wakes[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 625: 273-298. DOI:10.1017/s0022112008005697[LinkOut]

DONG S, KARNIADAKIS G E, EKMEKCI A, et al. A combined direct numerical simulation–particle image velocimetry study of the turbulent near wake[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 569: 185-207. DOI:10.1017/s0022112006002606[LinkOut]

GORDEYEV S, CRESS J A, SMITH A, et al. Aero-optical measurements in a subsonic, turbulent boundary layer with non-adiabatic walls[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(4): 045110. DOI:10.1063/1.4919331[LinkOut]

WHITE M, MORGAN P, VISBAL M. High fidelity aero-optical analysis[C]// 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2010. DOI:10.2514/6.2010-433

VUKASINOVIC B, GLEZER A, GORDEYEV S, et al. Fluidic control of a turret wake: aerodynamic and aero-optical effects[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(8): 1686-1699. DOI:10.2514/1.J050085[LinkOut]

GORDEYEV S, JUMPER E. Fluid dynamics and aero-optics of turrets[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2010, 46(8): 388-400. DOI:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.06.001[LinkOut]

KALENSKY M, GORDEYEV S, JUMPER E J. In-flight studies of aero-optical distortions around AAOL-BC[C]//Proc of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 3253. doi: 10.2514/6.2019-3253

WANG M, MANI A L, GORDEYEV S. Physics and computation of aero-optics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 44: 299-321. DOI:10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101152[LinkOut]

JUMPER E J, GORDEYEV S. Physics and measurement of aero-optical effects: past and present[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 49: 419-441. DOI:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060315[LinkOut]

ANDINO M, PINIER J, SCHMIT R, et al. Flow control over a cylindrical turret using synthetic jets[C]// 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2008: 736. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-736

WOSZIDLO R, TAUBERT L, WYGNANSKI I. Manipulating the flow over spherical protuberance in a turbulent boundary layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(2): 437-450. DOI:10.2514/1.39930[LinkOut]

VUKASINOVIC B, GLEZER A, GORDEYEV S, et al. Hybrid control of a turret wake[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(6): 1240-1255. DOI:10.2514/1.J050634[LinkOut]

YIN X L. Principles of Aero-optics[M]. Beijing: China Aerospace Press, 2003 (in Chinese).

LI G C. Aero-optics[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006 (in Chinese).

SHI K T, MA H D. Progress in computational aero-optics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2): 186-192. (in Chinese)[万方]

SUN X W, LIU W, CHAI Z X. Method of investigation for numerical simulation on aero-optical effect based on WCNS-E-5[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(5): 2017-2029. DOI:10.2514/1.J057961[LinkOut]

SUN X W, Liu W. Research progress of aero-optical effect: a survey[C]//CCTAM, Hangzhou, 2019: 1-42.

DING H L, YI S H, ZHAO X H, et al. Experimental investigation on aero-optics imitation of hypersonic optical dome with supersonic film[J]. Physics of Gases, 2018, 3(6): 26-34 (in Chinese).

DING H L, YI S H, ZHAO X H, et al. Experimental investigation on aero-optical mitigation of hypersonic optical dome using microvortex generators[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(6): 2653-2658. DOI:10.2514/1.J058084[LinkOut]

DONG H, XU M. Space-time characteristics of the aero-optical effect around turrets[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 1001002. (in Chinese)[万方]

ZHANG Y D, RAO C H, LI X Y. Adaptive optics and laser control[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2016 (in Chinese).

DONG H, ZHANG J Z, XU M. Simulation on mean flow-field aero-optic effect of airborne optical platform[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2012, 32(2): 0201003. (in Chinese)[万方]

SPALART P. R. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C]//First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Ruston, LA, 1997.

GRITSKEVICH M S, GARBARUK A V, SCHÜTZE J, et al. Development of DDES and IDDES formulations for the k-ω shear stress transport model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2012, 88(3): 431-449. DOI:10.1007/s10494-011-9378-4[LinkOut]

MORGAN P, VISBAL M. Hybrid RANS/LES simulations for flow around two turret configurations[C]// 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2008. doi: 10.2514/6.2008-550

TIAN R Z, XU H Y, DONG Q L, et al. Numerical investigation of aero-optical effects of flow past a flat-windowed cylindrical turret[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(5): 056103. DOI:10.1063/1.5144704[LinkOut]

MORGAN P E, VISBAL M R. Hybrid Reynolds-averaged navier-stokes/large-eddy simulation investigating control of flow over a turret[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(6): 1700-1717. DOI:10.2514/1.C031239[LinkOut]

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

激光内通道传输的气动光学热效应数值模拟

离心通风机降噪研究进展

水滴撞击运动超疏水表面特性及其调控

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

基于LBM方法的LAGOON起落架噪声预测与降噪方法研究