动态舱门对空腔复杂流动和噪声特性影响分析

李晓东; 姜蔚婉; 屈崑; 蔡晋生

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0045

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

动态舱门对空腔复杂流动和噪声特性影响分析

专栏——内埋武器舱 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 动态舱门对空腔复杂流动和噪声特性影响分析
- Investigations of complex cavity flows and noise induced by moving cavity doors
- 空气动力学学报 2022年40卷第3期页码：175-189
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北工业大学航空学院,西安,710072
  2. 中国航空工业集团成都飞机设计研究所,成都,610091
- 作者简介：
  
  李晓东（1991-），男，山东潍坊人，硕士，研究方向：计算流体力学方法. E-mail：lixd_1991@163.com
  屈崑*，男，陕西西安人，博士，副教授，研究方向：计算流体力学方法，高超声速飞行器设计，并行计算. E-mail：kunqu@nwpu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0045
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李晓东, 姜蔚婉, 屈崑, 等. 动态舱门对空腔复杂流动和噪声特性影响分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(3): 175−189.

LI Xiaodong, JIANG Weiwan, QU Kun, et al. Investigations of complex cavity flows and noise induced by moving cavity doors[J]. 2022, 40(3): 175-189.
李晓东, 姜蔚婉, 屈崑, 等. 动态舱门对空腔复杂流动和噪声特性影响分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(3): 175−189. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0045

LI Xiaodong, JIANG Weiwan, QU Kun, et al. Investigations of complex cavity flows and noise induced by moving cavity doors[J]. 2022, 40(3): 175-189. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0045.

摘要

为研究运动舱门对内埋弹舱（空腔）非定常流场和舱内噪声特性的影响，开发了应用于运动问题的动态嵌套重叠网格组装方法，采用改进的脱体涡模拟方法对亚声速流场（

= 0.6）进行了高精度数值模拟。首先采用空腔标准模型（M219）验证所用的高精度数值格式的有效性，然后应用发展的方法对干净空腔（C201）、带静态舱门（30°、60°、90°和120°）的空腔以及运动舱门的空腔进行模拟，并分析静、动态舱门对空腔湍流流场和腔内气动噪声的影响。针对运动舱门的非稳态非定常流动问题，采用经验模态分解方法分析空腔中的湍流脉动特征和声压级。通过分析研究结果发现，与干净空腔相比，舱门小开度（30°）时，舱门会限制法向和展向的流动，从而降低腔内流场与外部流场的流动掺混和交换，腔内壁面总声压级比干净空腔低5～8 dB，但是两者变化趋势一致，且二阶Rossiter模态频率偏高；在打开角度较大（60°以后）时，舱门对腔内流动的影响主要表现在展向，此时空腔上方的剪切层涡结构运动的高度更高，舱门阻碍噪声的展向传播，使得腔内的总声压级升高（3～10 dB不等），二阶Rossiter模态的强度增大。然而舱门开启过程中，腔内总声压级介于小开度与大开度之间，与干净空腔水平相当；在舱门打开角度为90°时，腔内总声压级呈现与准定常模拟结果类似的分布，该研究对真实弹舱的流动分析与设计有指导价值。

Abstract

Turbulent flows in cavities play an important role in the generation of cavity noise and are inevitably modulated by moving doors. This paper proposes a dynamic hierarchical overset method and integrates it into Improved Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulations to characterize the impact of non-stationary doors on cavity flows. The numerical methods

validated using a canonical cavity (M219)

are applied to simulate subsonic (

= 0.6) flow fileds in cavities (C201) without doors

with stationary doors (with opening angles of 30°

60°

90°

and 120°)

and with moving doors. Turbulence statistics and cavity noise in a statistically unsteady flow induced by moving doors are analyzed using the Empirical Mode Decomposition. For stationary doors with an opening angle of 30°

cavity flow is constrained in the cross-flow directions

suppressing the mixture between flows inside and outside the cavity. This results in a lower Overall Sound Pressure Level (OASPL) by 5～8 dB compared to the one in a cavity without doors and the frequency of the second Rossiter mode becomes higher

while the trend exhibits similar changes. In contrast

when the opening angles of stationary doors are larger (≥60°)

shear layers over cavities are further away from the cavity floor than those in cases with smaller opening angles. The noise propagation is restricted in the spanwise direction

yielding higher OASPL (by 3～10 dB) at the cavity floor and amplified second Rossiter mode. OASPL for cavities with the opening of doors is comparable to those in a clean cavity. However

when the opening angle of moving doors is around 90°

the distribution of OASPL is similar to that in a cavity with stationary vertical doors.

关键词

Keywords

references

LAWSON S J, BARAKOS G N. Review of numerical simulations for high-speed, turbulent cavity flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(3): 186-216. DOI:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.11.002

ROWLEY C W, WILLIAMS D R. Dynamics and control of high-Reynolds-number flow over open cavities[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 38: 251-276. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092057

LI X D, LIU J D, GAO J H. Numerical simulation of flow-induced oscillation and sound generation in a cavity[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38(5): 599-604. (in Chinese)

WAN Z H, ZHOU L, SUN D J. Numerical investigation of flow-induced oscillations and noise from a rectangular cavity[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(3): 291-298. (in Chinese)

ROCKWELL D, NAUDASCHER E. Review—self-sustaining oscillations of flow past cavities[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1978, 100(2): 152-165. DOI:10.1115/1.3448624

WANG X S, YANG D G, LIU J, et al. Progress of research on noise induced by compressible flow over cavities[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(3): 1-16. (in Chinese)

LIU J, YANG D G, WANG X S, et al. Effect of turbulent boundary layer thickness on a three-dimensional cavity flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(2): 475-483. (in Chinese)

ILLINGWORTH S J, MORGANS A S, ROWLEY C W. Feedback control of cavity flow oscillations using simple linear models[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 709: 223-248. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2012.330

ROSSITER J E. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow overrectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds[R ] . ARC/RM-3438, 1964. https://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1826.2/4020/arc-rm-3438.pdf?sequence = 1isAllowed = y

HELLER H H, HOLMES D G, COVERT E E. Flow-induced pressure oscillations in shallow cavities[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1971, 18(4): 545-553. DOI:10.1016/0022-460X(71)90105-2

BLAIR A B, STALLINGS R L. Cavity door effects on aerodynamic loads of stores separating from cavities[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1989, 26(7): 615-620. DOI:10.2514/3.45811

LAWSON S J, BARAKOS G N. Computational fluid dynamics analyses of flow over weapons-bay geometries[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(5): 1605-1623. DOI:10.2514/1.C000218

CASPER K M, WAGNER J L, BERESH S J, et al. Fluid-structure interactions on a tunable store in complex cavity flow[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(4): 1501-1512. DOI:10.2514/1.C035050

SHETA E F, HARRIS R E, GEORGE B, et al. Loads and acoustics prediction on deployed weapons bay doors[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2017, 139(3): 31007. DOI:10.1115/1.4035701

LOUPY G J M, BARAKOS G N, TAYLOR N J. Cavity flow over a transonic weapons bay during door operation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 55(1): 339-354. DOI:10.2514/1.C034344

SHI A M, YE Z Y, YANG Y N. Calculation and analysis for aerodynamic loads acting on interior weapon cabin's door[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2007, 37(3): 5-6, 16. (in Chinese)

ZHANG P H, WANG M, DENG Y Q, et al. Numerical simulation of store separation and door operation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(3): 277-281, 293. (in Chinese)

WU J F, XU L W, FAN Z L, et al. Investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of internal bay's door[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(6): 744-748. (in Chinese)

WU J F, XU L W, GUO H T, et al. Investigation on dynamic simulation technology of internal weapons bay's doors opening and closing[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 29(4): 88-94. (in Chinese)

YAN P P, ZHANG Q F, JIN M. Effect of bay door on separation characteristics of internal store[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(6): 1120-1130. (in Chinese)

SHUR M L, SPALART P R, STRELETS M K, et al. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001

CHEN S Y, CHEN Y C, XIA Z H, et al. Constrained large-eddy simulation and detached eddy simulation of flow past a commercial aircraft at 14 °s angle of attack[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2013, 56(2): 270-276. DOI:10.1007/s11433-013-4990-z

XU J, CAI J S, LIU Q H, et al. Flow simulations by enhanced implicit-hole-cutting method on overset grids[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(5): 1401-1409. DOI:10.2514/1.C032283

CAI J S, PAN S C, LI W F, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations of a nonslender delta wing with leading-edge vortex flap[J]. Computers Fluids, 2014, 99: 1-17. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.011

XU J, QU K, CAI J S. Flow simulations for NASA CRM wing-body-tail with implicit hole cutting method[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 378: 355-361. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.378.355

WHITE J, BAURLE R, FISHER T, et al. Low-dissipation advection schemes designed for large eddy simulations of hypersonic propulsion systems[C]//48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-4263

WADA Y, LIOU M S. A flux splitting scheme with high-resolution and robustness for discontinuities[C]//32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1994: 83.

DUCROS F, FERRAND V, NICOUD F, et al. Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 152(2): 517-549. DOI:10.1006/jcph.1999.6238

BLAZEK J. Computational fluid dynamics: Principles and applications[M]. Oxford, UK: ELSEVIER, 2001. doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-19038-1

PAN S C. Investigation of flow control and mechanism based on multi-scale numerical simulation of turbulence[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechinical University, 2013 (in Chinese).

LARCHEVêQUE, LIONEL, SAGAUT, et al. Large-eddy simulation of a compressible flow in a three-dimensional open cavity at high Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 516, 265-301. doi: 10.1017/S0022112004000709

LI X D, QU K, CAI J S. A dynamic assembling method based on adaptive tree structure for hierarchical overset grids[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(3): 120243. (in Chinese)

HUNT J C R, WRAY A A, MOIN P. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows[R ] //Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, 2. Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program, 1988: 193-208. N89-24555. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19890015184/downloads/19890015184.pdf

冯金富, 杨松涛, 刘文杰. 战斗机武器内埋关键技术综述[J]. 飞航导弹. 2010(7): 71-74.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

分离涡模拟方法在内埋弹舱机弹分离模拟中的应用

基于Ac-准则的最优输入设计方法

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

类HyTRV升力体阻尼/交叉动导数特性分析

风扇叶片颗粒侵蚀特性的多因素分析与模拟