1. 中国航空研究院,北京,100012
2. 西北工业大学,西安,710072
钟敏*(1986-),女,重庆人,高级工程师,研究方向:设计空气空气动力学. E-mail:zhongmin@cae.ac.cn
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
钟敏, 华俊, 王浩, 等. 民机标模高升力构型CAE-AVM-HL设计及验证[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 158−167.
ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, WANG Hao, et al. Design and verification of high-lift configuration of civil aircraft standard model CAE-AVM-HL[J]. 2022, 40(4): 158-167.
钟敏, 华俊, 王浩, 等. 民机标模高升力构型CAE-AVM-HL设计及验证[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 158−167. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0021
ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, WANG Hao, et al. Design and verification of high-lift configuration of civil aircraft standard model CAE-AVM-HL[J]. 2022, 40(4): 158-167. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2022.0021.
气动标模高升力构型可用于起降状态复杂流动机理研究、CFD软件验证、低速风洞试验能力建设及增升系统噪声测试。民机气动标模高升力构型CAE-AVM-HL设计过程中采用基于代理模型的数值优化方法,优化流程包含样本建立、参数化几何外形、代理模型建立、遗传算法寻优。机翼增升装置形式为“前缘连续变弯下垂 + 前缘缝翼 + 后缘单缝富勒襟翼”。该民机气动标模高升力构型风洞测试模型在德国Deharde公司完成加工,在德荷大型低速风洞DNW-LLF完成风洞测试,试验马赫数0.2,雷诺数3×10
6
,测试内容包括测力、测压、测机翼和襟翼变形、转捩效应,以及丝线、油流、PIV试验等。针对前缘变弯下垂和前缘缝翼交界处的流动干扰现象,提出了抗流动分离的设计方案,CFD计算结果和风洞油流试验结果均显示设计方案缓解了前缘变弯下垂和前缘缝翼间的流动干扰。该构型最终风洞测量所得最大升力系数2.56,失速迎角19°,满足设计要求。
The high-lift configuration of aerodynamic standard model can be used in various aspects
such as complex flow mechanism study
CFD software verification
low-speed wind tunnel capability research and aero-acoustic test. In the design process of the high-lift configuration of the civil aircraft aerodynamic standard model CAE-AVM-HL
numerical optimization based on the surrogate model is adopted. The optimization process includes sample establishment
geometry parameterization
surrogate model establishment and genetic algorithm optimization. The final form of the high-lift wing is featured with a variable camber droop-nose leading edge
a leading-edge slat and a single slot trailing-edge flap. The wind tunnel test model of civil aircraft aerodynamic standard model with high lift configuration CAE-AVM-HL was processed by Deharde company in Germany
and was tested in the German-Dutch large low-speed wind tunnel DNW-LLF at Mach number 0.2 and Reynolds number 3 million. The wind tunnel test includes force/pressure/deformation measurement
transition trip effect
silk tuft/oil flow
PIV measurement
etc. In view of the influence of the flow interaction between the droop-nose leading edge and the leading-edge slat
an anti-flow separation design scheme is proposed. Both CFD calculation and wind tunnel test show that the anti-flow separation design scheme alleviates the flow interference. The final measured maximum lift coefficient of the configuration is 2.56 and the stall angle of attack is 19°
which meet the design requirements.
ZHU Z Q, CHEN Y C, WU Z C, et al. Numerical simulation of high lift system configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(3): 257-262. (in Chinese)
LAVY D W, VASSBERG J C, WAHLS RA, et al. Summary of data from the first AIAA CFD drag predictioon workshop[C ] //40nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2002-0841, 2002. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030007848/downloads/20030007848.pdf
LAFLIN K, BRODERSEN O, RAKOWITZ M, et al. Summary of data from the second AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop (invited)[C]//42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA 2004-555, 2004. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-555
VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M, et al. Abridged summary of the third AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(3): 781-798. DOI:10.2514/1.30572
VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M R, et al. Summary of the fourth AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(4): 1070-1089. DOI:10.2514/1.c032418
LEVY D W, LAFLIN K R, TINOCO E N, et al. Summary of data from the fifth computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(4): 1194-1213. DOI:10.2514/1.c032389
TINOCO E N, BRODERSEN O, KEYE S, et al. Summary of data from the sixth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop: CRM cases 2 to 5[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA-2017-1208, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-1208
SLOTNICK J, HANNON J, CHAFFIN M. Overview of the First AIAA CFD high lift prediction workshop[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011. AIAA-2011-0862. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-862
RUMSEY C L, SLOTNICK J P. Overview and summary of the second AIAA high lift prediction workshop[C]//52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, National Harbor, Maryland. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA-2014-0747, 2014. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-0747
LIN J C, PACK MELTON L G, VIKEN S, et al. High lift common research model for wind tunnel testing: an active flow control perspective[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA 2017-0319, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0319
LACY D S, SCLAFANI A J. Development of the high lift common research model (HL-CRM): a representative high lift configuration for transonic transports[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, AIAA 2016-0308, 2016. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-0308
钟敏, 华俊, 王钢林, 等. 面向高亚音速远程飞机的CFD验证与风洞试验相关性研究[C]//第八届中国航空学会青年科技论坛论文集, 2018.
HUA J, ZHENG S, ZHONG M, et al. Recent development of a CFD-wind tunnel correlation study based on CAE-AVM investigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(3): 419-428. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.01.017
ZHONG M, ZHENG S, WANG G L, et al. Correlation analysis of combined and separated effects of wing deformation and support system in the CAE-AVM study[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(3): 429-438. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.01.015
GEBBINK R, WANG G L, ZHONG M. High-speed wind tunnel test of the CAE aerodynamic validation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(3): 439-447. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2018.01.010
HUA J, ZHENG S, ZHONG M, et al. Design and verification study of an aerodynamic validation model[C ] //7th Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, 2015. http://cae-dnw-workshop.dnw.aero/uploads/files/e151125aFinal00167-APISAT-2015-CAE-HUA.pdf
ZHONG M, WANG G L, HUA J. Study of model deformation and sting interference to the aerodynamic estimations of the CAE-AVM model[C ] //30 th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, DCC, Daejeon, Korea, ICAS-2016-2.7. 2, 2016. https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2016/data/papers/2016_0405_paper.pdf
GEBBINK R T, WANG G L, ZHONG M. High-speed wind tunnel test of the CAE-AVM for CFD validation purposes[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas, AIAA 2017-0332, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0332
ZHONG M, HUA J, SUN X S, et al. Data correlation between aerodynamic validation model and CFD-wind tunnel[J]. Aeronautical Science Technology, 2020, 31(1): 1-16. (in Chinese)
《飞机设计手册》总编委会, 编. 飞机设计手册, 第5册: 民用飞机总体设计[R]. 程不时, 分册主编. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2005.
艾德·奥波特, 著. 运输类飞机的空气动力设计[M]. 顾诵芬, 吴兴世, 杨新军, 译. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2010.
WANG H J, LUO W, ZHANG R. The analysis of noise features for multi-element airfoil based on slat configuration parameters[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2018, 9(1): 53-61. (in Chinese)
GUO T B, BAI J Q, LI L, et al. The morphing trailing-edge wing optimization design of the civil aircraft[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica, 2018, 48(1): 55-66. (in Chinese)
LI X F, ZHANG M J, WANG W J, et al. Research on variable camber wing technology development[J]. Aeronautical Science Technology, 2020, 31(2): 12-24. (in Chinese)
YANG Y, WANG Z G, LYU S S. Comparative study of two lay-up sequence dispositions for flexible skin design of morphing leading edge[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(7): 271-278. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.035
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621