实用化壁面切应力测量技术的综述与展望

高南; 刘玄鹤

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0450

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

实用化壁面切应力测量技术的综述与展望

研究综述 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 实用化壁面切应力测量技术的综述与展望
- A review of wall-shear-stress measurement techniques for practical applictions
- 空气动力学学报 2023年41卷第3期页码：1-24
- 作者机构：
  
  大连航华科技有限公司,大连,116024
- 作者简介：
  
  高南*（1974-），男，辽宁铁岭人，现为加拿大新不伦瑞克大学机械工程系副教授，研究方向：实验流体力学. E-mail：ngao@unb.ca，hanghualab@126.com
  刘玄鹤（1987-），男，辽宁辽阳人，博士，研究方向：实验流体力学. E-mail：xuanhe0722@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然基金项目（12172111，91752101）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0450
  中图分类号： O357.4+3
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高南, 刘玄鹤. 实用化壁面切应力测量技术的综述与展望[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(3): 1−24.

GAO Nan, LIU Xuanhe. A review of wall-shear-stress measurement techniques for practical applictions[J]. 2023, 41(3): 1-24.
高南, 刘玄鹤. 实用化壁面切应力测量技术的综述与展望[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(3): 1−24. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0450

GAO Nan, LIU Xuanhe. A review of wall-shear-stress measurement techniques for practical applictions[J]. 2023, 41(3): 1-24. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0450.

摘要

本文围绕“实用化”这一主题对低速条件下常用的壁面切应力测量方法进行综述。实用化壁面切应力测量技术指的是能够方便、可靠、经济地测量运载工具局部摩阻的方法。具体包括天平法、近壁速度法、普莱斯顿管法、图像法、热膜法等。在实用化过程中，现有的测量方法展现出各自的优缺点，其中缺点包括：不便于安装、使用与维护；传感器对运载工具姿态、振动、加速度、温度变化等因素有过大的响应；传感器无法标定或标定结果不唯一；传感器结构强度弱、易损坏、易被污染或易氧化变性；传感器昂贵导致无法实现大规模部署，等等。这些缺点限制了实际应用。本文分析了多种方法的特点和局限性，介绍了应用案例，并评估了实用化潜力。本文重点介绍了新型双层热膜摩阻测量技术。该技术利用一种具有上、下两层金属膜的双层“三明治”热膜传感器测量壁面切应力，两层热膜在相同的温度下协同工作，这样下层热膜“封堵”了上层热膜产生的热量，使其仅传给流体，进而解决了困扰该技术发展的热损失问题。该方法可根据上层热膜的发热量直接计算壁面切应力的大小，这一“免标定”特性提高了测量的便利性及可靠性，令其具有良好的实用化前景。

Abstract

This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of currently available wall-shear-stress measurement techniques for practical applications

such as over the surfaces of air and land vehicles. These techniques include the direct methods

such as the shear-stress balance and the MEMS balance

and the in-direct methods

such as Preston tube

vision-based methods

and hot-film sensors. This paper concludes that these techniques suffer problems of convenience or reliability

and are often too expansive for a large amount of implementation

none of them is capable of practical applications. The MEMS-based hot-film sensor is promising because it is low-cost

relatively convenient

and fast-response. However

major shortcomings in reliability are still to be solved

e.g. most of the Joule heat generated by the film transfer to the wall instead of the fluids

reducing the measurement sensitivity and creating unwanted sensitivities to other parameters. As a result of these unwanted sensitivities

the calibration results were found to drift with time. This well-recognized heat-loss problem excludes hot-film methods from practical applications

as well as quantitative laboratory investigations. The recent development of a dual-layer sandwich-structured hot-film technology effectively solves the heat-loss problems. In this method

two layers of thin metal films are stacked together with a thin insulation layer in-between. Two separate constant-temperature-anemometry systems keep both films at the same working temperature so that the lower film blocks the heat generated by the upper film

making them only transfer to fluids and reducing the heat loss to the substrate to as low as 5% of the total heat generation. The dual-film technique significantly improves the sensitivity and reliability of the hot-film method

making it promising for practical applications. In this paper

the details of this dual-layer hot-film sensor and the related calibration-free measurement technique were reviewed.

关键词

Keywords

references

ABBAS A, DE VICENTE J, VALERO E. Aerodynamic technologies to improve aircraft performance[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 28(1): 100-132. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2012.10.008

PERLIN M, DOWLING D R, CECCIO S L. Freeman scholar review: passive and active skin-friction drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2016, 138(9): 091104. DOI:10.1115/1.4033295

PRANDTL L, OSWATITSCH K, WIEGHARDT K. Fuher durch die stromungslehre[M]. GUO Y, LU S J, ed . Beijing: Science Press, 1981.

SCHLICHTING H, GERSTEN K. Boundary-layer theory[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017.

WINTER K G. An outline of the techniques available for the measurement of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1979, 18: 1-57. DOI:10.1016/0376-0421(77)90002-1

HANRATTY T J, CAMPBELL J A. Measurement of wall shear stress[M]//GOLDSTEIN R J, ed. Fluid mechanics measurements. Hemisphere Publ. Corp. , 1983: 559-615.

HARITONIDIS J H. The measurement of wall shear stress[M]//GAD-EL-HAK M, ed. Advances in Fluid Mechanics Measurements. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1989: 1–97. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-83787-6

NAUGHTON J W, SHEPLAK M. Modern developments in shear-stress measurement[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(6–7): 515–570. DOI:10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00031-3

KORNILOV V, LITVINENKO Y A, PAVLOV A A, et al. Skin-Friction measurements in an incompressible pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer. Review of techniques and results[C ] //International Conference on Methods of Aerophysical Research, 2002. ADA 409118. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a409118.pdf

KLEWICKI J C, SARIC W S, MARUSIC I, et al. Wall-bounded flows[M]// TROPEA C, YARIN A L, FOSS J F, ed. Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 871–908.doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30299-5

KASAGI N, SUZUKI Y, FUKAGATA K. Microelectromechanical systems–based feedback control of turbulence for skin friction reduction[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 41: 231-251. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165221

VINUESA R, RL R. Measurement of wall-shear stress[M]. DISCETTI S, IANIRO A, ed. Experimental Aerodynamics. CRC Press, 2017: 393–428.

ÖRLÜ R, VINUESA R. Instantaneous wall-shear-stress measurements: advances and application to near-wall extreme events[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2020, 31(11): 112001. DOI:10.1088/1361-6501/aba06f

BROWN K C, JOUBERT P N. The measurement of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers with adverse pressure gradients[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1969, 35(4): 737-757. DOI:10.1017/s0022112069001418

SCHETZ J. Direct measurement of skin friction in complex flows[C]//48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010: 44. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-44

WALSH M J. Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets[C]//20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1982. doi: 10.2514/6.1982-169

WALSH M J. Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(4): 485-486. DOI:10.2514/3.60126

BECHERT D W, BRUSE M, HAGE W. Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2000, 28(5): 403-412. DOI:10.1007/s003480050400

BECHERT D W, BARTENWERFER M. The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 206: 105-129. DOI:10.1017/s0022112089002247

KRISHNA T M, DE SILVA C M, MARUSIC I. New drag balance facility for skin-friction studies in turbulent boundary layer at high Reynolds numbers[C ] //17th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference 2010. https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/imarusic/publications/Conferences/Krishna_AFMC_2010.pdf

CHENG X, WONG C W, ZHOU Y. A floating-element force balance of high resolution for friction drag measurement[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2020, 32(3). doi:10.1088/1361-6501/abb33d

FERREIRA M A, RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ E, GANAPATHISUBRAMANI B. An alternative floating element design for skin-friction measurement of turbulent wall flows[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59(10): 1-15. DOI:10.1007/s00348-018-2612-2

CHADWICK K M, DETURRIS D J, SCHETZ J A. Direct measurements of skin friction in supersonic combustion flow fields[C]//ASME 1992 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Cologne, Germany. 2015. doi: 10.1115/92-GT-320

BOWERSOX R D W, SCHETZ J A, CHADWICK K, et al. Technique for direct measurement of skin friction in high enthalpy impulsive scramjet flowfields[J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(7): 1286-1291. DOI:10.2514/3.12677[LinkOut]

PADMANABHAN A. Silicon micromachined sensors and sensor arrays for shear-stress measurements in aerodynamic flows[D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997.

PADMANABHAN A, GOLDBERG H, BREUER K D, et al. A wafer-bonded floating-element shear stress microsensor with optical position sensing by photodiodes[J]. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 1996, 5(4): 307-315. DOI:10.1109/84.546410

SCHMIDT M A, HOWE R T, SENTURIA S D, et al. Design and calibration of a microfabricated floating-element shear-stress sensor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1988, 35(6): 750–757. DOI:10.1109/16.2527

ZHE J, MODI V, FARMER K R. A microfabricated wall shear-stress sensor with capacitative sensing[J]. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2005, 14(1): 167-175. DOI:10.1109/JMEMS.2004.839001

DING G H, MA B H, DENG J J, et al. Analytical model for structure design of floating element wall shear stress micro-sensor with capacitive sensing[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(3): 53-59. (in Chinese)

HYMAN D, PAN T, RESHOTKO E, et al. Microfabricated shear stress sensors, part 2: testing and calibration[J]. AIAA Journal, 1999, 37(1): 73-78. DOI:10.2514/2.666

SHAJII J, NG K-Y, SCHMIDT M A. A microfabricated floating-element shear stress sensor using wafer-bonding technology[J]. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 1992, 1(2): 89–94. DOI:10.1109/84.157363

KONG X, POULAIN A, NATHAN P, et al. Fabrication and calibration of directionally-resolved micropillars using off-the-shelf piezoresistive dies[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2019, 19(4): 1252–1259. DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2018.2881497

MILLS D A, BARNARD C, SHEPLAK M. Characterization of a hydraulically smooth wall shear stress sensor for low-speed wind tunnel applications[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0478

MILLS D A, PATTERSON W, FREIDKES B, et al. Temperature sensitivity reduction of a capacitive wall shear stress sensor system for low-speed wind tunnels[C]//AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, VIRTUAL EVENT. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2021. doi: 10.2514/6.2021-0022

TU H Z, LI J Q, MING X, et al. Direct measurement technique of wall shear stress using MEMS sensors in a high-speed wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 22(3): 94-97, 104. (in Chinese)

FAN X, JIANG N. Skin friction measurement in turbulent boundary layer by mean velocity profile method[J]. Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 27(1): 28-30. (in Chinese)

BRUUN H H. Hot-wire Anemometry[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

HUTCHINS N, CHOI K S. Accurate measurements of local skin friction coefficient using hot-wire anemometry[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(4-5): 421-446. DOI:10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00027-1

DENGEL P, FERNHOLZ H H, HESS M. Skin-friction measurements in two- and three-dimensional highly turbulent flows with separation[C]//Advances in Turbulence, 1987. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-83045-7_53

SHENG J, MALKIEL E, KATZ J. Using digital holographic microscopy for simultaneous measurements of 3D near wall velocity and wall shear stress in a turbulent boundary layer[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2008, 45(6): 1023-1035. DOI:10.1007/s00348-008-0524-2

LI W F, ROGGENKAMP D, HECKEN T, et al. Parametric investigation of friction drag reduction in turbulent flow over a flexible wall undergoing spanwise transversal traveling waves[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59(6): 1-18. DOI:10.1007/s00348-018-2559-3

WANG J, PAN C, WANG J. Characteristics of fluctuating wall-shear stress in a turbulent boundary layer at low-to-moderate Reynolds number[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(7): 074605. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.074605

ABU ROWIN W, GHAEMI S. Streamwise and spanwise slip over a superhydrophobic surface[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 870: 1127-1157. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2019.225

LIU T F, WANG X W, TANG Z Q, et al. TRPIV experimental study of the effect of superhydrophobic surface on the coherent structure of turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 33(3): 90-96. (in Chinese)

KÄHLER C J, SCHOLZ U, ORTMANNS J. Wall-shear-stress and near-wall turbulence measurements up to single pixel resolution by means of long-distance micro-PIV[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 41(2): 327-341. DOI:10.1007/s00348-006-0167-0

LI W F, ROGGENKAMP D, JESSEN W, et al. Reynolds number effects on the fluctuating velocity distribution in wall-bounded shear layers[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2017, 28(1): 015302. DOI:10.1088/1361-6501/aa4e9e

PATERNA E, MOONEN P, DORER V, et al. Mitigation of surface reflection in PIV measurements[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2013, 24(5): 057003. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/24/5/057003

CLAUSER F H. The Turbulent Boundary Layer[J]. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 1954, 4: 1–51. DOI:10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70370-3.

BROCKIE N J W, BAKER C J. The aerodynamic drag of high speed trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990, 34(3): 273–290. DOI:10.1016/0167-6105(90)90156-7

DUNKER C. An in-flight investigation of a turbulent boundary layer at Reynolds numbers up to Re θ = 49, 400[J ] . Experiments in Fluids, 2020, 62(1): 1-12. DOI:10.1007/s00348-020-03072-9

WEI T, SCHMIDT R, MCMURTRY P. Comment on the Clauser chart method for determining the friction velocity[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2005, 38(5): 695-699. DOI:10.1007/s00348-005-0934-3

GUBIAN P A, STOKER J, MEDVESCEK J, et al. Reply to “Comment on ‘Evolution of wall shear stress with Reynolds number in fully developed turbulent channel flow experiments’ ”[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(12): 127602. DOI:10.1103/physrevfluids.5.127602

STURZEBECHER D, ANDERS S, NITSCHE W. The surface hot wire as a means of measuring mean and fluctuating wall shear stress[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2001, 31(3): 294-301. DOI:10.1007/s003480100284

AFARA S, MEDVESCEK J, MYDLARSKI L, et al. Development of a wall-shear-stress sensor and measurements in mini-channels with partial blockages[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(5): 1-10. DOI:10.1007/s00348-014-1734-4

FERNHOLZ H H, JANKE G, SCHOBER M, et al. New developments and applications of skin-friction measuring techniques[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 1996, 7(10): 1396-1409. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/7/10/010

ALFREDSSON P H, JOHANSSON A V. , HARITONIDIS J H等. The fluctuating wall-shear stress and the velocity field in the viscous sublayer[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1988, 31(5): 1026. DOI:10.1063/1.866783

SPAZZINI P G, DI-CICCA G M, IUSO G, et al. Flow control downstream of a backward facing step: a DPIV study[C ] //23rd International Congress of Aeronautical Science. . https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2002/PAPERS/394.PDF

SPAZZINI P G, IUSO G, ONORATO M, et al. Unsteady behavior of back-facing step flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2001, 30(5): 551–561. DOI:10.1007/s003480000234

EATON J K, JEANS A H, ASHJAEE J, et al. A wall-flow-direction probe for use in separating and reattaching flows[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1979, 101(3): 364-366. DOI:10.1115/1.3448978

PATEL V C. Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1965, 23(1): 185. DOI:10.1017/s0022112065001301

BECHERT D W. Calibration of Preston tubes[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(1): 205–206. DOI:10.2514/3.13048

SUTARDI, CHING C Y. Effect of tube diameter on Preston tube calibration curves for the measurement of wall shear stress[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2001, 24(3-4): 93-97. DOI:10.1016/S0894-1777(01)00042-5

ACKERMAN J D, WONG L, ETHIER C R, et al. Preston-static tubes for the measurement of wall shear stress[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1994, 116(3): 645-649. DOI:10.1115/1.2910326

VAGT J D, FERNHOLZ H. Use of surface fences to measure wall shear stress in three-dimensional boundary layers[J]. Aeronautical Quarterly, 1973, 24(2): 87-91. DOI:10.1017/s0001925900006478

SANDBORN V A, SEONG S H. Fence probe measurement of flow reversal in separating turbulent boundary layers[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2012, 53(2): 391-399. DOI:10.1007/s00348-012-1295-3

ECK M, RÜCKERT R, PEITSCH D. Advanced application of a sublayer fence probe in highly instationary turbomachinery flows: observations on prestall instabilities[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2019, 60(3): 1-17. DOI:10.1007/s00348-019-2686-5

RUDERICH R, FERNHOLZ H H. An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1986, 163: 283-322. DOI:10.1017/s0022112086002306

SAVELSBERG R, SCHIFFER M, OBERMEIER E, et al. Calibration and use of a MEMS surface fence for wall shear stress measurements in turbulent flows[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2012, 53(2): 489-498. DOI:10.1007/s00348-012-1304-6

ZHAO J S. Investigation on wall shear stress measurement in supersonic flows with shock waves using shear-sensitive liquid crystal coating[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 85: 453-463.DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.034

GROßE S, SCHRÖDER W. Mean wall-shear stress measurements using the micro-pillar shear-stress sensor MPS 3 [J ] . Measurement Science and Technology, 2008, 19(1): 015403. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/19/1/015403

GNANAMANICKAM E P, NOTTEBROCK B, GROßE S, et al. Measurement of turbulent wall shear-stress using micro-Pillars[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2013, 24(12): 124002. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/24/12/124002

LI Q H, STAVROPOULOS-VASILAKIS E, KOUKOUVINIS P, et al. Micro-pillar sensor based wall-shear mapping in pulsating flows: in situ calibration and measurements in an aortic heart-valve tester[J ] . Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2021, 105: 103346. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103346

BRÜCKER C, BAUER D, CHAVES H. Dynamic response of micro-pillar sensors measuring fluctuating wall-shear-stress[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2007, 42(5): 737-749. DOI:10.1007/s00348-007-0282-6

TANNER L H, BLOWS L G. A study of the motion of oil films on surfaces in air flow, with application to the measurement of skin friction[J]. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 1976, 9(3): 194-202. DOI:10.1088/0022-3735/9/3/015

BROWN J L, NAUGHTON J W. The thin-oil-film equation[R]. NASA/TM 1999-208767, NASA-Ames Research Center, 1999.

NAUGHTON J W, ROBINSON J, DURGESH V. Oil-Film interferometry measurement of skin friction - analysis summary and description of Matlab program[C]//20th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, 2003. ICIASF '03, Gottingen, Germany. IEEE: 169-178. doi: 10.1109/ICIASF.2003.1274866

NAUGHTON J W, LIU T. Photogrammetry in oil-film interferometry[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(7): 1620-1629. DOI:10.2514/1.24634

DRIVER D M. Application of oil-film interferometry skin-friction measurement to large wind tunnels[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 34(6): 717–725. DOI:10.1007/s00348-003-0613-1

HAFF J, SCHÜLEIN E, HENNING A, et al. Wall Shear Stress Measurements on a Double-Decker Train[M]//New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics VI.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64519-3_61

GAO N, CHING C Y, EWING D, et al. Flow and heat transfer measurements in a planar offset attaching jet with a co-flowing wall jet[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 78: 721-731. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.07.008

GAO N, NAUGHTON J, EWING D. Measurements of wall shear stress of an offset attaching planar jet with co-flow[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-646

WOODIGA S, SALAZAR D M, WEWENGKANG P, et al. Skin-friction topology on tail plate for tractor—trailer truck drag reduction[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2018, 21(6): 1017-1029. DOI:10.1007/s12650-018-0506-2

LIU T S. Skin-friction and surface-pressure structures in near-wall flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(10): 3887-3896. DOI:10.2514/1.J057216[LinkOut]

WANG C Y, CHANG C C. New closed-form thermal boundary layer solutions in shear flow with power-law velocity[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2019, 141(6): 5–7. DOI:10.1115/1.4042489

LUDWIEG H. Instrument for measuring the wall shearing stress of turbulent boundary layers[R]. NACA TM 1284 .

BELLHOUSE B J, SCHULTZ D L. Determination of mean and dynamic skin friction, separation and transition in low-speed flow with a thin-film heated element[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1966, 24(2): 379–400. DOI:10.1017/S0022112066000715

ACKERBERG R C, PATEL R D, GUPTA S K. The heat/mass transfer to a finite strip at small Péclet numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 86(1): 49-65. DOI:10.1017/s0022112078001007

BELLHOUSE B J, SCHULTZ D L. The measurement of fluctuating skin friction in air with heated thin-film gauges[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1968, 32(4): 675–680. DOI:10.1017/S0022112068000959

SUN B Y, MA B H, DENG J J, et al. Research progress on thermal wall shear stress sensors[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(2): 26-33, 43. (in Chinese)

TROPEA C, YARIN A L, FOSS J F. Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics[M]//TROPEA C, YARIN A L, FOSS J F, ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.

MOHAMMED-TAIFOUR A, WEISS J, SADEGHI A, et al. A detailed procedure for measuring turbulent velocity fluctuations using constant-voltage anemometry[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56(9): 174. DOI:10.1007/s00348-015-2045-0

SARMA G R, COMTE-BELLOT G. Automated constant voltage anemometer for measurements with fluid temperature drifts[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2002, 73(3): 1313-1317. DOI:10.1063/1.1447303

COMTE-BELLOT G, SARMA G R. Constant voltage anemometer practice in supersonic flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(2): 261–270. DOI:10.2514/3.14726

HAGHIRI A A, FALLAHPOUR N, MANI M, et al. Experimental study of boundary layer in compressible flow using hot film sensors through statistical and qualitative methods[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29(11): 4671-4679. DOI:10.1007/s12206-015-1013-1

LEUCKERT J, ERDMANN R, NITSCHE W, et al. On transition detection at high subsonic freestream Mach numbers using thermoresistive surface sensors[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2011. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-879

BINNS J R, ALBINA F O, BURNS I A. Looking for “laminars”: measuring intermittency on the America's Cup race course[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2009, 33(5): 865-874. DOI:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.03.003

FERCHICHI M, TAVOULARIS S. Scalar probability density function and fine structure in uniformly sheared turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 461: 155-182. DOI:10.1017/s0022112002008285

HODSON H P, HUNTSMAN I, STEELE A B. An investigation of boundary layer development in a multistage LP turbine[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1994, 116(3): 375–383. DOI:10.1115/1.2929424

HODSON H P. Boundary-layer transition and separation near the leading edge of a high-speed turbine blade[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1985, 107(1): 127–134. DOI:10.1115/1.3239672

GRIFFIN P C, DAVIES M R D. On the use of hot film sensors in the investigation of fluid dynamic phenomena in the near wall region[C ] //16th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines. http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/whittle/rigs/symposium/papers/3-1.pdf

WOLFF S, BRUNNER S, FOTTNER L. The use of hot-wire anemometry to investigate unsteady wake-induced boundary-layer development on a high-lift LP turbine cascade[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2000, 122(4): 644–650. DOI:10.1115/1.1311282

JIANG N, SIMON T W. Transition in low-pressure turbines: Effects of unsteady acceleration and turbulence intensity[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2005, 19(2): 148–155. DOI:10.2514/1.9954

CHABERT T, DANDOIS J, GARNIER É. Experimental closed-loop control of separated-flow over a plain flap using extremum seeking[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2016, 57(3): 1-17. DOI:10.1007/s00348-016-2123-y

LIANG G H, WANG Y C, MEI D Q, et al. Flexible capacitive tactile sensor array with truncated Pyramids as dielectric layer for three-axis force measurement[J]. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2015, 24(5): 1510-1519. DOI:10.1109/JMEMS.2015.2418095

LI Z Y, GUO S, BAI H L, et al. Combined flow and heat transfer measurements of backward facing step flows under periodic perturbation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 130: 240–251. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.077

PACKARD N, BONS J. Transient aerodynamic response to leading edge flow control[C]//6th AIAA Flow Control Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-2805

ANSELL P J, BRAGG M B. Measurement of unsteady flow reattachment on an airfoil with an ice shape[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(3): 656-659. DOI:10.2514/1.J052519

STACK J, MANGALAM S, BERRY S. A unique measurement technique to study laminar-separation bubble characteristics on an airfoil[C]//19th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1987: 1–8. doi: 10.2514/6.1987-1271

RUDMIN D, BENAISSA A, POIREL D. Detection of laminar flow separation and transition on a NACA-0012 airfoil using surface hot-films[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2013, 135(10): 1–6. DOI:10.1115/1.4024807

MIAU J J, TU J K, CHOU J H, et al. Sensing flow separation on a circular cylinder by micro-electrical-mechanical-system thermal-film sensors[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(10): 2224-2230. DOI:10.2514/1.17408

SHAQARIN T, BRAUD C, COUDERT S, et al. Open and closed-loop experiments to identify the separated flow dynamics of a thick turbulent boundary layer[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2013, 54(2): 1-22. DOI:10.1007/s00348-012-1448-4

MOES T R, SARMA G R. Flight demonstration of a shock location sensor using constant voltage hot-film anemometry flight demonstration of a shock location sensor using constant voltage hot-film anemometry[R]. NASA TM 4806. .

MANGALAM A, DAVIS M. Ground/Flight correlation of aerodynamic loads with structural response[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009: 1–16. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-881

RETHMEL C, LITTLE J, TAKASHIMA K, et al. Flow separation control using nanosecond pulse driven DBD plasma actuators[J]. International Journal of Flow Control, 2011, 3(4): 213–232. DOI:10.1260/1756-8250.3.4.213

WHALLEY R D, PARK J S, KUSHWAHA A, et al. Low-drag events in transitional wall-bounded turbulence[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2017, 2(3): 034602. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.034602

DESGEORGES O, LEE T, KAFYEKE F. Multiple hot-film sensor array calibration and skin friction measurement[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2002, 32(1): 37-43. DOI:10.1007/s003480200004

LONG R, WHITE E. Real-time measurement of skin friction using calibrated multi-element hotfilm arrays[C]//28th Aerodynamic Measurement Technology, Ground Testing, and Flight Testing Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-3012

SHEN X, TIAN Y K, ZHANG X, et al. Calibration and uncertainty analysis of MEMS wall shear stress sensor[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(3): 66-71. (in Chinese)

YAN Y C, JIANG C Y, MA B H, et al. Review of the calibration methods and devices for wall shear stress[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(2): 20-25. (in Chinese

HAO S Y, XIA Y F, XU H. Experimental study on the bed shear stress under breaking waves[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2017, 31(3): 308-316. DOI:10.1007/s13344-017-0036-z

HAO S Y, XIA Y F, XU H, et al. Preliminary application of hot-film wall shear stress sensor under breaking waves[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 31(3): 60-65. (in Chinese)

MCCROSKEY W J, DURBIN E J. Flow angle and shear stress measurements using heated films and wires[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1972, 94(1): 46-52. DOI:10.1115/1.3425384

SARMA G R, MOES T R. Demonstration of skin friction measurements featuring in situ estimation of conduction loss using constant voltage anemometers and surface hot-films[J ] . Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76(5): 055102. DOI:10.1063/1.1896621

JIANG F K, TAI Y C, GUPTA B, et al. A surface-micromachined shear stress imager[J]. Proceedings of Ninth International Workshop on Micro Electromechanical Systems, 1996: 110-115. DOI:10.1109/MEMSYS.1996.493838

NAGAOKA Y, ALEXANDER H G, LIU W, et al. Shear stress measuremens on an airfoil surface using micro-machined sensors[J]. JSME International Journal Series B, 1997, 40(2): 265–272. DOI:10.1299/jsmeb.40.265

MEHMOOD Z, HANEEF I, ALI S Z, et al. Sensitivity enhancement of silicon-on-insulator CMOS MEMS thermal hot-film flow sensors by minimizing membrane conductive heat losses[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 19(8): 1860. DOI:10.3390/s19081860

QU Y L, CHOW W W Y, OUYANG M X, et al. Ultra-low-powered aqueous shear stress sensors based on bulk EG-CNTs integrated in microfluidic systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2008, 7(5): 565-572. DOI:10.1109/TNANO.2008.928572

QUE R Y, ZHU R. A compact flexible thermal flow sensor for detecting two-dimensional flow vector[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2015, 15(3): 1931-1936. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN. 2014.2367017http://dx. doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2367017

SAWADA T, TERASHIMA O, SAKAI Y, et al. A technique for the measurement of wall shear stress based on micro fabricated hot-film sensor[C]// ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2013. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2013-63091

SUN B Y, WANG P B, MA B H, et al. Effects of annealing on the temperature coefficient of resistance of nickel film deposited on polyimide substrate[J]. Vacuum, 2019, 160: 18-24. DOI:10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.016

SUN B Y, MA B H, LUO J, et al. Sensing elements space design of hot-film sensor array considering thermal crosstalk[J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2017, 265: 217-223. DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2017.08.042

KIMURA M, TUNG S, LEW J, et al. Measurements of wall shear stress of a turbulent boundary layer using a micro-shear-stress imaging chip[J]. Fluid Dynamics Research, 1999, 24(6): 329-342. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5983(99)00002-7

LIU C, HUANG J B, ZHU Z J, et al. A micromachined flow shear-stress sensor based on thermal transfer principles[J]. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 1999, 8(1): 90-99. DOI:10.1109/84.749408

HO C, TAI Y. Micro-Electro-Mechanical-Systems (MEMS) and fluid flows[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 30(1): 579–612. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.579

HUANG J B, JIANG F K, TAI Y C, et al. A micro-electro-mechanical-system-based thermal shear-stress sensor with self-frequency compensation[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 1999, 10(8): 687–696. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/10/8/303

BREUER K S, BAYT R L, NAYAAR A. Measurement of shear stress and temperature using MEMS fabricated sensors[C]//Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Nashville, Tennessee, USA. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1999. doi: 10.1115/imece1999-0272

LÖFDAHL L, KÄLVESTEN E, HADZIANAGNOSTAKIS T, et al. An integrated silicon based wall pressure-shear stress sensor for measurements in turbulent flows[M]//Advances in Turbulence VI. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996: 465–469. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0297-8_131

RUEDI J D, NAGIB H, ÖSTERLUND J, et al. Evaluation of three techniques for wall-shear measurements in three-dimensional flows[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(5): 389-396. DOI:10.1007/s00348-003-0650-9

ETRATI A, BHILADVALA R B. Frequency response analysis of guard-heated hot-film wall shear stress sensors for turbulent flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2014, 46: 61-69. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.12.004

ETRATI A, ASSADIAN E, BHILADVALA R B. Analyzing guard-heating to enable accurate hot-film wall shear stress measurements for turbulent flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 70: 835-843. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.11.069

AJAGU C O, LIBBY P A, LARUE J C. Modified gauge for time-resolved skin-friction measurements[J]. The Review of Scientific Instruments, 1982, 53(12): 1920-1926. DOI:10.1063/1.1136906

OSORIO O D, SILIN N. Wall shear stress hot film sensor for use in gases[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2011, 296: 012002. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/296/1/012002

LIU X H, LI Z Y, GAO N. An improved wall shear stress measurement technique using sandwiched hot-film sensors[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2018, 8(2): 137–141. DOI:10.1016/j.taml.2018.02.010

LIU X H, LI Z Y, WU C J, et al. Toward calibration-free wall shear stress measurement using a dual hot-film sensor and Kelvin bridges[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2018, 29(10): 105303. DOI:10.1088/1361-6501/aadb1b

LIU X H, WANG H, WU C J, et al. On the calibration-free two-component wall-shear-stress measurement technique using dual-layer hot-films[J]. The Review of Scientific Instruments, 2020, 91(8): 085004. DOI:10.1063/5.0006705

LIU X H. Calibration-free skin-friction measurement techniques using a dual-layer hot-film sensor[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2021(in Chinese).

WANG H. A wall shear stress measurement technique using double-layer hot-film sensor[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2021(in Chinese).

BELL D A. Electronic instrumentation and measurements[M]. Oxford University Press, 2013.

SUN B Y, GAO W, WANG P B, et al. Sandwich structured flexible thermal shear stress sensor with improved performance[C]//2020 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. IEEE, : 653-656. doi: 10.1109/MEMS46641.2020.9056242

YAN Y C, JIANG C Y, CHEN R B, et al. Highly sensitive flow sensor based on flexible dual-layer heating structures[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 20(22): 6657. DOI:10.3390/s20226657

SUMER B M, ARNSKOV M M, CHRISTIANSEN N, et al. Two-component hot-film probe for measurements of wall shear stress[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1993, 15(6): 380-384. DOI:10.1007/BF00191776

BRUUN H H, TROPEA C. The calibration of inclined hot-wire probes[J]. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 1985, 18(5): 405-413. DOI:10.1088/0022-3735/18/5/011

BRUUN H H. A note on static and dynamic calibration of constant-temperature hot-wire probes[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 76(1): 145-156. DOI:10.1017/s00221120

LEKAKIS I. Calibration and signal interpretation for single and multiple hot-wire/hot-film probes[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 1996, 7(10): 1313-1333. DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/7/10/004

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

类HyTRV升力体阻尼/交叉动导数特性分析

大展弦比飞行器突风响应数值计算

某型电动跑车尾翼气动设计的仿真与试验研究

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

风扇叶片颗粒侵蚀特性的多因素分析与模拟