偏航失效时海上风力机不同停机位置下响应特性

杨庆山; 赵聪杰; 黄国庆; 周绪红; 顾水涛; 蒋博闻

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0438

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

偏航失效时海上风力机不同停机位置下响应特性

专栏——高性能海上风机结构及其空气动力学前沿研究 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 偏航失效时海上风力机不同停机位置下响应特性
- Response characteristics of offshore wind turbines under different parking positions considering yaw control system failure
- 空气动力学学报 2022年40卷第4期页码：181-190
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆大学土木工程学院,重庆,400044
- 作者简介：
  
  杨庆山（1968-），男，博士，教授，主要从事结构风工程和风电研究. E-mail：qshyang@cqu.edu.cn
  黄国庆*（1976-），男，博士，教授，主要从事结构风工程和风电研究. E-mail：ghuang1001@gmail.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目（52178456）;“111 计划”高性能风电设施及其高效运行学科创新引智基地（B18062）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0438
  中图分类号： TM315
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨庆山, 赵聪杰, 黄国庆, 等. 偏航失效时海上风力机不同停机位置下响应特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 181−190.

YANG Qingshan, ZHAO Congjie, HUANG Guoqing, et al. Response characteristics of offshore wind turbines under different parking positions considering yaw control system failure[J]. 2022, 40(4): 181-190.
杨庆山, 赵聪杰, 黄国庆, 等. 偏航失效时海上风力机不同停机位置下响应特性[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 181−190. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0438

YANG Qingshan, ZHAO Congjie, HUANG Guoqing, et al. Response characteristics of offshore wind turbines under different parking positions considering yaw control system failure[J]. 2022, 40(4): 181-190. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0438.

摘要

我国东南沿海台风频发，严重威胁着海上风力机的结构安全。台风诱发的强风和巨浪，可能对风力机的控制和供电系统造成损害，导致风力机偏航系统失效。风力机因无法实现实时对风而载荷骤增，从而造成风力机破坏甚至倒塌。为研究海上风力机在偏航失效工况下的响应特性，以5 MW导管架式海上风力机为研究对象，计算了偏航失效时不同停机位置下风力机结构的动力响应，同时分析了风力机叶片、塔筒及下部结构响应随偏航角的变化规律以及停机位置对响应结果的影响。研究表明：偏航失效时，偏航角的大小和叶片停机位置对风力机结构响应影响显著；部分偏航角下风力机叶片甚至出现气弹失稳现象；综合整个偏航范围来看，采用空转策略或者叶片方位角处于90°停机位置的停摆策略时，风力机结构各部分响应值相对较小，应对偏航失效最为有利。

Abstract

Typhoon occuring in the southeast coast of China seriously threatens the structure safety of offshore wind turbines (OWTs). The strong wind and high wave induced by typhoon may damage the control and electric power network system of OWTs

which will lead to the failure of yaw control systems. The load of OWTs increases sharply due to the inability to align with the real-time wind direction

which may lead to some damage or even collapse accidents. In order to study the response characteristics of OWTs in the case of yaw control system failure

taking the 5 MW OC4-jacket supported OWT as an example

numerical calculations were performed to investigate the dynamic responses of the OWT at various yaw angles under different parking positions. Variation of the response of the blades

tower and substructure with the yaw angle was obtained

and the effect of the parking position on the response was analyzed. The results show that

in the case of yaw control system failure

the response of OWTs is very sensitive to the yaw angle and the parking position

and the blade can even suffer an aeroelastic instability at certain yaw angles. Based on the results in the whole yaw angle range

when the turbine is in an idling state or in a standstill state with a 90° parking position

the response of OWTs is relatively weak

thus it is most advantageous to deal with the yaw control system failure condition.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG J Q, CHEN Z Q. Analysis of risks and measures on the blade damage of offshore wind turbine during strong typhoons—enlightenment from Red Bay wind farm[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2010, 12(11): 32-34. (in Chinese)

LI Z Q, CHEN S J, MA H, et al. Design defect of wind turbine operating in typhoon activity zone[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2013, 27: 165-172. DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.08.013

吴远伟. 台风对沿海风电机组的危害及对策[J]. 风能, 2015(2): 88-93. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9219.2015.02.023

HALLOWELL S T, MYERS A T, ARWADE S R, et al. Hurricane risk assessment of offshore wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 125: 234-249. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.090

LIAN J J, JIA Y Y, WANG H J. Numerical simulation for characteristics of wind loads of 2.5 MW wind turbine under typhoon[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2018, 39(3): 611-618. (in Chinese)

KIM E, MANUEL L. Hurricane-induced loads on offshore wind turbines with considerations for nacelle yaw and blade pitch control[J]. Wind Engineering, 2014, 38(4): 413-423. DOI:10.1260/0309-524x.38.4.413

KE S T, YU W, WANG T G, et al. Wind loads and load-effects of large scale wind turbine tower with different halt positions of blade[J]. Wind and Structures, 2016, 23(6): 559-575. DOI:10.12989/was.2016.23.6.559

YIN L L, LO K H, WANG S S. Effects of blade pitch, rotor yaw, and wind–wave misalignment on a large offshore wind turbine dynamics in western gulf of Mexico shallow water in 100-year return hurricane[J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2017, 139(1): 011901. DOI:10.1115/1.4034330

KE S T, WANG X H. Analysis on wind-induced response and stability of large wind turbine systems considering blade yaw and interference effects[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 45(7): 61-70. (in Chinese)

LIAN J J, JIA Y Y, WANG H J, et al. Numerical study of the aerodynamic loads on offshore wind turbines under typhoon with full wind direction[J]. Energies, 2016, 9(8): 613. DOI:10.3390/en9080613

JONKMAN J, BUTTERFIELD S, MUSIAL W, et al. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development[R]. NREL/TP-500-38060. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2009. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/38060.pdf doi: 10.2172/947422

ZHOU D C, DUAN Z D. The Gumbel-logistic model for joint probability distribution of extreme-value wind speeds and effective wave heights[J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2003, 21(2): 45-51. (in Chinese)

WEI K, ARWADE S R, MYERS A T, et al. Effect of wind and wave directionality on the structural performance of non-operational offshore wind turbines supported by jackets during hurricanes[J]. Wind Energy, 2017, 20(2): 289-303. DOI:10.1002/we.2006

International Electrotechnical Commision (IEC). Wind turbines Wind Turbines-part 1: Design Requirements-Part 1: Design requirements[S]. IEC 61400-1, 2009.

MARINO E, GIUSTI A, MANUEL L. Offshore wind turbine fatigue loads: the influence of alternative wave modeling for different turbulent and mean winds[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 102: 157-169. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.023

SHARMA J N, DEAN R G. Second-order directional seas and associated wave forces[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1981, 21(1): 129-140. DOI:10.2118/8584-PA

MORISON J R, JOHNSON J W, SCHAAF S A. The force exerted by surface waves on piles[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1950, 2(5): 149-154. DOI:10.2118/950149-G

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

热防护材料动态烧蚀形貌结构光视觉测量技术

个体间距对多扑翼气动噪声的影响特性

风扇叶片颗粒侵蚀特性的多因素分析与模拟

基于Ac-准则的最优输入设计方法