1. 南京航空航天大学 土木与机场工程系,南京,211106
2. 南京航空航天大学 江苏省风力机设计高技术研究重点试验室,南京,210016
3. 河海大学 力学与材料学院,南京,211100
柯世堂*(1982-),男,安徽池州人,教授,博导,研究方向:建筑结构抗风抗震. E-mail:keshitang@163.com
陆曼曼(1994-),男,内蒙古人,硕士研究生,研究方向:建筑结构抗风抗震. E-mail:lumanmen@163.com
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
柯世堂, 陆曼曼, 吴鸿鑫, 等. 基于风洞试验15 MW风力机叶片颤振后形态与能量图谱研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 169−180.
KE Shitang, LU Manman, WU Hongxin, et al. Experimental study on the post-flutter morphological chracteristics and energy dissipation of a 15 MW wind turbine blade[J]. 2022, 40(4): 169-180.
柯世堂, 陆曼曼, 吴鸿鑫, 等. 基于风洞试验15 MW风力机叶片颤振后形态与能量图谱研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 169−180. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0417
KE Shitang, LU Manman, WU Hongxin, et al. Experimental study on the post-flutter morphological chracteristics and energy dissipation of a 15 MW wind turbine blade[J]. 2022, 40(4): 169-180. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0417.
现有风力机叶片颤振分析大多关注颤振临界状态预测,忽略了非线性更为显著的颤振后形态和能量耗散。本文基于变分渐进梁截面法设计了新型超长柔性叶片气动-刚度-质量映射一体化三维弹性模型,采用高速摄像技术和高频六分量天平进行了同步测振、测力风洞试验,分析了风力机叶片颤振敏感风向区间与临界风速组合规律,最后基于叶尖风振响应、气动阻尼和能量,系统研究了风振敏感工况风振响应下风力机叶片能量演变规律和颤振临界风速后的形态特性,揭示了风力机叶片颤振后能量耗散机制。研究表明:提出的风力机叶片弹性模型设计和试验方法能有效模拟结构动力性能与颤振行为;风力机叶片的桨距角93°~96°和284°~286°区间属于风振敏感区间,在该区间内超过临界风速即可发生大幅锁频振动;存在能量积累突变界线,超过该界线对应风速后的能量积累尤为显著,表现出风致振动能量随时间呈现显著的非平稳特性;颤振后气动负阻尼是结构系统发散的主要原因。
Most existing flutter analyses of wind turbine blades focus on predicting critical flutter states. While the post-flutter morphological evolution and the associated energy dissipation
well-known for the prominent non-linear effect
are usually ignored. To characterize this non-linear phenomenon
a three-dimensional aeroelastic model of ultra-long flexible blades is proposed using the variational progressive beam section method. And synchronous measurements of vibration and force are carried out in a wind tunnel using high-speed cameras and a high-frequency six-component balance. The flutter sensitivity of wind turbine blades to the wind direction and speed is firstly analyzed. Later
the post-flutter morphological characteristics and the energy dissipation of wind turbine blades subjected to wind-induced vibration are systematically studied. Results indicate that the proposed aeroelastic model and the experimental method can effectively capture the post-flutter dynamic process. The pitch angles of wind turbine blades prone to the wind-induced vibration fall in two ranges
namely 93° ~ 96° and 284° ~ 286°
in which high-frequency locking vibrations can occur beyond the critical wind speed. At the same time
the energy accumulation becomes particularly significant at higher wind speeds
indicating that the wind-induced vibrations are non-stationary. The negative post-flutter aerodynamic damping is the main reason for the divergence of structural systems.
KE S T, WANG X H, WANG T G, et al. Study on wind-induced effects of large wind turbine system considering blade pitch angle and interference effect[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 280-288. (in Chinese)
WANG L, LIU X W, KOLIOS A. State of the art in the aeroelasticity of wind turbine blades: Aeroelastic modelling[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 64: 195-210. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.007
KE S T, YU W L, WANG T G, et al. Aerodynamic performance and wind-induced effect of large-scale wind turbine system under yaw and wind-rain combination action[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 136: 235-253. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.123
CHEN X, XU J Z. Structural failure analysis of wind turbines impacted by super typhoon Usagi[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 60: 391-404. DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.028
CHEN B, WANG K, LIU J, et al. The impact of super typhoon Saomai(0608)on the offshore environment near the Yangtze Estuary[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(8): 1402-1412. (in Chinese)
王力雨, 许移庆. 台风对风电场破坏及台风特性初探[J]. 风能, 2012(5): 74-79.
周盛, 等. 叶轮机气动弹性力学引论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1989: 202-231.
HUANG J D, XIA H J, LI D Y, et al. Nonlinear aeroelastic modal analysis of large wind turbine flexible blades[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(14): 180-187. (in Chinese)
VATNE S R. Aeroelastic instability and flutter for a 10MW wind turbine[D]. Norwegian: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2011.
ZHAO L, HU C X, ZHOU Z Y, et al. Post flutter energy map for H-shaped bridge girder[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica, 2021, 51(5): 505-516. (in Chinese)
LI Y L, ZHU J Q, TANG H J. Aeroelastic simulation of vortex-induced vibration and flutter based on CFD/CSD coupling solution[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(12): 85-89, 114. (in Chinese)
YANG C, YANG L, XIE C C. Development of aerodynamic methods in aeroelastic analysis for high aspect ratio flexible wings[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6): 1009-1018, 983. (in Chinese)
XU F Y, YANG J, ZHANG M J, et al. Experimental investigations on post-flutter performance of a bridge deck sectional model using a novel testing device[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 217: 104752. DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104752
胡传新. 典型桥梁断面颤振迟滞效应和气动力演变机理[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2020.
TANG R Y, ZHAO M L, WU Y J. The application of the force measurement method on experimental study of airfoil dynamic stall[J]. Aerodynamic Experiment and Measurement Control, 1995(2): 16-20.
JIAO Y Q, ZHANG B Q, JIN C X, et al. Experimental technique on direct measuring of aerodynamics performance of airfoil[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 19 (2): 40-44.
YU J M, CHEN C, MENG F D, et al. Numerical studies of wind turbine blade gas film heating[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(4): 524-529. (in Chinese)
孙皓. 风力机翼型失速颤振的试验与数值模拟研[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
YU D O, KWON O J. Predicting wind turbine blade loads and aeroelastic response using a coupled CFD-CSD method[J]. Renewable Energy, 2014, 70: 184-196. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.033
黄俊东. 基于特征值分析的后掠叶片的气弹阻尼分析方法研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2020.
YU W B, HODGES D H, VOLOVOI V, et al. On Timoshenko-like modeling of initially curved and twisted composite beams[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2002, 39(19): 5101-5121. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00399-2
SUATEAN B, GALETUSE S, COLIDIUC A, et al. Aeroelastic problems of wind turbine blades[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings, Rhodes (Greece). AIP, 2010, 1281(1). doi: 10.1063/1.3498270
BISPLINGHOFF R L, ASHLEY H. HALFMAN R L. Aeroelasticity[M]. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley publishing Company Incorporated, 1955.
LI D B, LU Q H. Test analysis of experiments in engineering vibration[M]. Tsinghua University Press, 2004.
EVAN G, JENNIFER R, LATHA S, et al. IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-megawatt offshore reference wind turbine[R ] . National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO, USA, 2020. NREL/TP-5000-75698. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf doi: 10.2172/1603478
ZHU L D, GAO G Z. Influential factors of soft flutter phenomenon for typical bridge deck sections[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(9): 1289-1294, 1382. (in Chinese)
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621