1. 南京航空航天大学 江苏省风力机设计高技术研究重点实验室,南京,210016
2. 南京航空航天大学 民航学院,南京,210016
钱晓航(1997-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向:风力机空气动力学. E-mail:qianxiaohang@nuaa.edu.cn
王同光*(1962-),教授,研究方向:风力机空气动力学. E-mail: tgwang@nuaa.edu.cn
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
钱晓航, 郜志腾, 王同光, 等. 百米级大柔性风电叶片非线性气弹响应分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 220−230.
QIAN Xiaohang, GAO Zhiteng, WANG Tongguang, et al. Nonlinear aeroelastic response analysis of 100-meter-scale flexible wind turbine blades[J]. 2022, 40(4): 220-230.
钱晓航, 郜志腾, 王同光, 等. 百米级大柔性风电叶片非线性气弹响应分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(4): 220−230. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0321
QIAN Xiaohang, GAO Zhiteng, WANG Tongguang, et al. Nonlinear aeroelastic response analysis of 100-meter-scale flexible wind turbine blades[J]. 2022, 40(4): 220-230. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0321.
随着风电叶片迈入百米量级,叶片尺寸和柔性持续增大,几何非线性对叶片结构动态响应的影响更加明显。为解决大柔性叶片的非线性气动弹性计算问题,采用基于Legendre谱有限元的几何精确梁理论,耦合叶素动量理论,建立了大尺寸风电叶片气动弹性分析方法,通过带有预弯的悬臂梁算例验证了几何精确梁模型的准确性。最后,以NREL 5 MW和IEA 15 MW风力机为例,分别采用线性模态叠加法和非线性几何精确梁方法计算了61.5 m叶片和117 m叶片在全工况稳态风和湍流风条件下的动态响应。结果表明,从5 MW到15 MW风力机叶片,由于几何非线性效应引起的叶尖挥舞位移和叶根挥舞弯矩数值偏差分别增加21.35%和21.23%,叶片一阶摆振模态频率也存在3.2%的偏差。百米级叶片非线性效应对叶片动态响应、摆振模态等气动弹性特性影响较大,应充分考虑非线性气动弹性对叶片设计的影响,以保障风力机的运行安全性。
As wind turbine blades reach the 100-meter-scale
the blade size and flexibility keep increasing
which makes the geometric nonlinear effect on the structural dynamic response of the blade more severe. In order to solve the problem of nonlinear aero-elastic calculation of highly flexible blades
an aeroelastic analysis method for highly flexible blades has been established by coupling the Legendre spectral finite element based geometrically exact beam theory and the blade element momentum theory. The calculation result of a curved beam agrees well with the analytical solution
validating the prediction accuracy of the geometrically exact beam theory. By taking the NREL 5 MW and IEA 15 MW wind turbines as examples
the linear and nonlinear dynamic response of a 61.5 m blade and a 117 m blade under both steady-state and turbulent wind conditions are calculated. The results show that
for the 5 MW and 15 MW wind turbines
due to the negligence of the nonlinear effect
the numerical differences of the flapwise tip deflection and the flapwise root moment are increased by 21.35% and 21.23%
respectively
and there is also a 3.2% difference in the frequency of the first edgewise mode. The nonlinear effect of the 100-meter-scale blades has a great impact on the aeroelastic characteristics such as the blade dynamic response and the edgewise mode
thus it should be fully considered in the blade design to ensure the operational safety of wind turbines.
WANG Q, SPRAGUE M A, JONKMAN J, et al. BeamDyn: a high-fidelity wind turbine blade solver in the FAST modular framework[J]. Wind Energy, 2017, 20(8): 1439-1462. DOI:10.1002/we.2101
CAO J F, WANG T G, WANG X. Geometric nonlinear dynamics response of large-scale wind turbine[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(14): 182-187, 214. (in Chinese)
LYU J N, LIU Z Q, ZHAO L, et al. Large-scale wind turbine aeroelastic responses analysis[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(1): 125-129. (in Chinese)
RINKER J, GAERTNER E, ZAHLE F, et al. Comparison of loads from HAWC 2 and OpenFAST for the IEA wind 15 MW reference wind turbine[J ] . Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 1618: 052052. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052052
ZHOU X D, HUANG K F, LI Z. Geometrically nonlinear beam analysis of composite wind turbine blades based on quadrature element method[J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2018, 104: 87-99. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.05.007
WU T H, HONG J Z, LIU Z Y. Advances of geometrically exact 3D beam theory[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2013, 8(11): 1126-1130. (in Chinese)
CHEN J G, SHEN X, WANG G, et al. Aeroelastic modeling for wind turbine blade based on lifting surface model and nonlinear beam theory[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2018, 39(7): 1469-1475. (in Chinese)
王珍. 绝对节点坐标梁单元与几何精确梁单元对比研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2017.doi: 10.26948/d.cnki.gbjlu.2017.001219
YU W B, HODGES D H, VOLOVOI V, et al. On Timoshenko-like modeling of initially curved and twisted composite beams[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2002, 39(19): 5101-5121. DOI:10.1016/s0020-7683(02)00399-2
DOEVA O, MASJEDI P K, WEAVER P M. Static deflection of fully coupled composite Timoshenko beams: an exact analytical solution[J]. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 2020, 81: 103975. DOI:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.103975
GAO Z T, LI Y, WANG T G, et al. Modelling the nacelle wake of a horizontal-axis wind turbine under different yaw conditions[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 172: 263-275. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.140
GAO Z T, LI Y, WANG T G, et al. Recent improvements of actuator line-large-eddy simulation method for wind turbine wakes[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 511-526. DOI:10.1007/s10483-021-2717-8
LI Y J, WANG T G, QIAN Y R. Dynamic response of the wind turbine blade bending in the rotational plane[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(5): 659-664. (in Chinese)
GAO Z T, QIAN X H, WANG T G. Spectral partition characteristics of wind turbine load response under different atmospheric stability[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2021, 47: 101421. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101421
ZHANG L, DING Q W, LI C, et al. Comparative study on effects of wind load on motion characteristics of different offshore floating wind turbine platforms[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 302-311. (in Chinese)
YU W B, BLAIR M. GEBT: a general-purpose nonlinear analysis tool for composite beams[J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(9): 2677-2689. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.007
LYU P, LIAO M F, YIN Y J. An aero-elastic analysis method for wind turbine blades with geometrically nonlinear effect[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 34(12): 1805-1812. (in Chinese)
BATHE K J, BOLOURCHI S. Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1979, 14(7): 961-986. DOI:10.1002/nme.1620140703
GUNTUR S, JONKMAN J, SIEVERS R, et al. A validation and code-to-code verification of FAST for a megawatt-scale wind turbine with aeroelastically tailored blades[J]. Wind Energy Science, 2017, (2): 443-468. https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/2/443/2017/wes-2-443-2017.pdf doi: 10.5194/wes-2016-42
JONKMAN J, BUTTERFIELD S, MUSIAL W, et al. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 2009. doi: 10.2172/947422
GAERTNER E, RINKER J, SETHURAMAN L, et al. IEA wind TCP task 37: definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt offshore reference wind turbine[R]. NREL/TP-5000-75698, 2020. doi: 10.2172/1603478
QU X Q, LI Y, TANG Y G, et al. Comparative study of short-term extreme responses and fatigue damages of a floating wind turbine using two different blade models[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 97: 102088. DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2020.102088
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621