可重复使用宽域高速飞行器低速段动力方案分析与选型

陈操斌; 牛军

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0318

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

可重复使用宽域高速飞行器低速段动力方案分析与选型

专栏——吸气式组合动力 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 可重复使用宽域高速飞行器低速段动力方案分析与选型
- Analysis and selection of engine schemes for reusable wide-range high-speed aircraft in the low-speed phase
- 空气动力学学报 2022年40卷第1期页码：150-164
- 作者机构：
  
  北京动力机械研究所,北京,100074
- 作者简介：
  
  陈操斌（1994-），甘肃平凉人，硕士，助理工程师，主要研究方向：预冷发动机总体性能. E-mail：ccbs123456@163.com
  牛军*（1975-），安徽颖上人，博士，研究员，主要研究方向：预冷发动机技术. E-mail：bbniu2020@sina.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金（52175154）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0318
  中图分类号： V236
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈操斌, 牛军. 可重复使用宽域高速飞行器低速段动力方案分析与选型[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(1): 150−164.

CHEN Caobin, NIU Jun. Analysis and selection of engine schemes for reusable wide-range high-speed aircraft in the low-speed phase[J]. 2022, 40(1): 150-164.
陈操斌, 牛军. 可重复使用宽域高速飞行器低速段动力方案分析与选型[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(1): 150−164. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0318

CHEN Caobin, NIU Jun. Analysis and selection of engine schemes for reusable wide-range high-speed aircraft in the low-speed phase[J]. 2022, 40(1): 150-164. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0318.

摘要

为快速评估不同类型的发动机方案在可重复使用宽域高速飞行器上的适用性，对飞行器动力方案中至为关键的低速段动力方案进行了综述分析。系统研究了不同动力方案在解决宽域工作问题方面基本原理的差异，给出了各方案的工作过程及宽域工作性能，并概括分析了典型方案所适配的目标飞行器的基本情况，为飞行器总体动力方案的设计提供参考。研究结果表明：宽域高速飞行器任务需求差异对低速段动力方案的选择具有重要影响；宽域加速型任务与高速巡航型任务差异较大，但随着飞行器马赫数上限的增加，两种任务模式下低速段动力方案选择的差异开始变小；对于某一确定飞行任务的宽域高速飞行器，满足其加速需求的低速段动力方案也不唯一；基于涡扇的变循环发动机方案、燃料直接预冷发动机方案及火箭冲压RBCC与现货涡轮发动机组合的方案在加速型任务与高马赫数巡航型任务中均可适用；基于现货发动机改造及组合的低速段动力方案，在低成本、高敏捷的两级入轨飞行器第一级中应用前景较好。

Abstract

In order to quickly evaluate the applicability of different types of engine schemes for reusable wide-range high-speed aircraft

those engine schemes in the low-speed phase which is the most critical part for the feasibility evaluation

are reviewed. The difference in basic principles between different propulsion schemes for solving the wide-range work problems is systematically studied. The working process and performance of each scheme are given

and the target aircraft adapted to the typical scheme is summarized and analyzed to support the engine scheme design. The research results show that different mission requirements of the wide-range high-speed aircraft have important impacts on the selection of low-speed-phase engine schemes

especially between the wide-range acceleration mission and the high-speed cruise mission. However

as the upper limit of the aircraft's Mach number increases

the difference in the selection of propulsion schemes in the low-speed phase between the two missions is narrowed. For a wide-range high-speed aircraft with a certain flight mission

the low-speed power scheme that can meet its requirement is not unique. The variable cycle engine scheme based on turbofans

the fuel precooling engine scheme

and the combined RBCC and turbofan scheme are all applicable to the acceleration mission as well as the high Mach number cruise mission. The low-speed engine schemes based on the modification and combination of existing engines have a good application prospect in the first stage of the two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) vehicle with low cost and high agility.

关键词

Keywords

references

YIN C L. The modeling and characteristics analisis of over/under TBCC[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese)

LING W H, HOU J L, WEI B X, et al. Technical challenge and potential solution for aerospace combined cycle engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(10): 2171-2176. (in Chinese)

ZHANG M Z, LI B, WANG J, et al. Thinking about RBCC propulsion system[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2013, 39(1): 1-7. (in Chinese)

HUANG C. Research on air turbo ramjet expander engine component matching and performance optimization[D]. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018. (in Chinese)

BULMAN M, SIEBENHAAR A. Combined cycle propulsion: aerojet innovations for practical hypersonic vehicles[C]//17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, San Francisco, California, 2011. AIAA 2011-2397. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-2397

WEI B X, LING W H, GANG Q, et al. Analysis of key technologies and propulsion performance research of TRRE engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(2): 298-305. (in Chinese)

WANG J F, WANG X D, LI J W, et al. Overview on aerodynamic design of cruising waverider configuration for hypersonic vehicles[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(5): 705-728.

GRAHAM R H. SR-71 Flight Manual: the official pilot's handbook declassified and expanded with commentary[M]. Voyageur Press, 2016.

ZHANG SHENGSHENG, ZHEGN XIONG, LYU YA, et al. Research progress of oversea combined cycle propulsion technology[J]. Science Technology Review, 2020, 38(12): 33-53, 181. (in Chinese)

YANG T Y, ZHANG Y J, RUI C S. High speed turbine engine technology development[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2013, 26(6): 26-30. (in Chinese)

ZHANG M Y, WANG Z X, ZHANG X B, et al. Simulation of installed performance of high-speed single-shaft turbojet with bypass bleed cycle[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(6): 1201-1209. (in Chinese).

CONNERS T R. Predicted performance of a thrust-enhanced SR-71 aircraft with an external payload[C]//ASME 1995 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Houston, Texas, USA. 1995. doi: 10.1115/95-GT-116

BARTOLOTTA P A, MCNELIS N B, SHAFER D G. High speed turbines: Development of a turbine accelerator (RTA) for space access[J]. 12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies, 2003. AIAA 2003- 6943.

MCNELIS N, BARTOLOTTA P. Revolutionary turbine accelerator (RTA) demonstrator[C]//AIAA/CIRA 13th International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies Conference, Capua, Italy. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-3250

DAVOUDZADEH F, BUEHRLE R, LIU N S, et al. Numerical simulation of the RTA combustion rig[C ] // 40th Combustion, 28th Airbreathing Propulsion, 22nd Propulsion Systems Hazards, 4th Modeling and Simulations Joint Subcommittees Meetings, 2005. NASA/TM-2005-213899. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050215564/downloads/20050215564.pdf

BRADLEY M, BOWCUTT K, MCCOMB J, et al. Revolutionary turbine accelerator (RTA) two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) vehicle study[C]//38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-3902

GOYVAERTS J. Modelling and simulation of the revolutionary turbine accelerator[D]. Belgium: Von Karman Institute, 2009.

XU S Y, ZHU Z L, LIU Z D, et al. Research on mode transition characters of revolutionary turbine accelerator[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(3): 516-526. (in Chinese)

FUJIMURA T, ISHII K, TAKAGI S, et al. HYPR90-T turbo engine research for HST combined cycle engine[R]. SAE Technical Paper 951991, 1995. DOI:10.4271/951991

MIYAGI H, KIMURA H, CABE J, et al. Combined cycle engine research in Japanese HYPR program[C]//34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cleveland, OH, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1998. AIAA-98-3278. doi: 10.2514/6.1998-3278

WANG Z X, ZHANG M Y, ZHANG X B, et al. Development status and key technologies of variable cycle turbofan-ramjet engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(9): 1921-1934, 1915. (in Chinese)

BALEPIN V. Method and apparatus for reducing the temperature of air entering a compressor of a turbojet engine by variably injecting fluid into the incoming air[P]. United States Patent, Mar. 20, 2001.

BALEPIN V, ENGERS R, TERRY S. MIPCC technology development[R]. ISABE-2005-1297.

BALEPIN V, LISTON G. The Steam Jet - Mach 6+ turbine engine with inlet air conditioning[C]//37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2001. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-3238

CARTER P, BALEPIN V. Mass injection and precompressor cooling engines analyses[C]//38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002. doi: 10.2514/6.2002-4127

YOUNG D, OLDS J. Responsive access small cargo affordable launch (RASCAL) independant performance evaluation[C]//AIAA/CIRA 13th International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies Conference, Capua, Italy. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-3241

SATO T, TANATSUGU N, HATTA H, et al. Development study of the ATREX engine for TSTO spaceplane[C]//10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Kyoto, Japan. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2001. AIAA 1026-1839. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-1839

SATO T, KOBAYASHI H, TANATSUGU N, et al. Development study of the precooler of the ATREX engine[C]//12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies, Norfolk, Virginia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-6985

KOBAYASHI H, SUZUKI H. Optimal design of hypersonic turbojet engines for two-stage-to-orbit spaceplane[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(4): 741-749. DOI:10.2514/1.31987

KOBAYASHI H, TAGUCHI H, KOJIMA T, et al. Performance analysis of Mach 5 hypersonic turbojet developed in JAXA[C]//18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2012. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-5839

ISOMURA K, OMI J. A comparative study of an ATREX engine and a turbo jet engine[C]// 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2001. AIAA 2001-3239. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-3239

SATO T, TAGUCHI H, KOBAYASHI H, et al. Development study of precooled-cycle hypersonic turbojet engine for flight demonstration[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2007, 61(1-6): 367-375. DOI:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.012

WEBBER H, FEAST S, BOND A. Heat exchanger design in combined cycle engines[J]. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 2009, 54(4): 122-130.

VARVILL R, BOND A. A comparison of propulsion concepts for SSTO reusable launchers[J ] . Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 2003, 56(3-4): 108-117. http://astra.tdyn.org/intro-public-files/100Y-SpaceShip-and-nPods/comparison-propulsion-systems-ssto-launchers-skylon-JBIS_v56_108-117.pdf

DAVIS P. Progress on SKYLON and SABRE[R ] . IAC-15, D2, 1, 8, x31601. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289579461_Progress_on_SKYLON_and_SABRE

DRISCOLL S, VARVILL R, BARTHJ. The SABRE engine-concept and development status[R]. SP2018_506.

JIVRAJ F, VARVILL R, BOND A, et al. The scimitar precooled Mach 5 engine[C ] //2nd European Conference for Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), Brussels, Belgium, 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263849692_The_Scimitar_Precooled_Mach_5_Engine

VILLACÉ V F. Simulation, design and analysis of air-breathing combined-cycle engines for high speed propulsion[D ] . von Karman Institute, Belgium. 2013. https://oa.upm.es/23340/1/VICTOR_FERNANDEZ_VILLACE.pdf

HU Y. Design and optimization research on air turbo rocket[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)

LIU Y. Study on sub-combustion mode and mode transition operation process of RBCC[D]. Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007. (in Chinese)

LIU Y, GAO Y G, PU X H, et al. Operation matching model and analysis between an air inlet and a compressor in an Air Turbo Rocket[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 81: 306-315. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.015

LI Y Z, LI Z, LI G X, et al. Performance analysis of hypersonic aircraft with ATR/ramjet combined power[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2018, 44(3): 6-11. (in Chinese)

STEELANT J. Sustained hypersonic flight in Europe: technology drivers for LAPCAT II[C]//16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Bremen, Germany. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009. doi: 10.2514/6.2009-7240

HYDE E, ESCHER W, RODDY J. Marquardt's Mach 4.5 supercharged ejector ramjet high-performance aircraft engine project[C]//36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Las Vegas, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2000. doi: 10.2514/6.2000-3109

OLDS J, BRADFORD J. SCCREAM (Simulated Combined-Cycle Rocket Engine Analysis Module) - A conceptual RBCC engine design tool[C]//33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, WA, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1997. AIAA 97-2760. doi: 10.2514/6.1997-2760

PAN H. Study on dynamic characteristics and modeling of RBCC engine[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015. (in Chinese)

ZHANG M Z, LU Y Y. Consideration once again to rocket ramjet combined engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(10): 2219-2226. (in Chinese)

SIEBENHAAR A, BOGAR T. Integration and vehicle performance assessment of the aerojet “TriJet” combined-cycle engine[C]//16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Bremen, Germany. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2009 doi: 10.2514/6.2009-7420

WEI B X, LING W H, LUO F T, et al. Propulsion Performance Research and status of TRRE Engine experiment[C]//21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Xiamen, China. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-2351

DU W H, DENG X Y, MA Y, et al. System design for single-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle utilizing RBCC propulsion[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2019(6): 60-66. (in Chinese)

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

热防护材料动态烧蚀形貌结构光视觉测量技术

水滴撞击运动超疏水表面特性及其调控

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

风扇叶片颗粒侵蚀特性的多因素分析与模拟

大展弦比飞行器突风响应数值计算