1. 北京航空航天大学 能源与动力工程学院,北京,100191
2. 上海交通大学 航空航天学院,上海,200240
3. 北京航空航天大学杭州创新研究院(余杭) 航空学院,杭州,310023
王浩(1995-),男,安徽人,博士研究生,研究方向:湍流模型,流转捩. E-mail:zy1704317@buaa.edu.cn
徐晶磊*,副研究员,研究方向:湍流模型,转捩模型,气动热,涡流减阻. E-mail:xujl@buaa.edu.cn
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
王浩, 徐晶磊. CKDO一方程模型计算高超声速横流转捩[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(2): 75−82.
WANG Hao, XU Jinglei. CKDO one-equation RANS simulation on transition of hypersonic cross flow[J]. 2023, 41(2): 75-82.
王浩, 徐晶磊. CKDO一方程模型计算高超声速横流转捩[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(2): 75−82. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0296
WANG Hao, XU Jinglei. CKDO one-equation RANS simulation on transition of hypersonic cross flow[J]. 2023, 41(2): 75-82. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0296.
高超声速横流转捩集湍流-激波作用、可压缩、横流、转捩等难题于一身,基于雷诺平均N-S方程(RANS)的转捩建模是一项挑战。本文采用CKDO-tran计算高超声速横流转捩的经典标模—HIFiRE-5,分可压缩性效应、雷诺数效应和迎角效应进行评估,发现:不考虑可压缩效应的KDO-tran模型无法给出准确的预测,而不引入特定转捩机理,CKDO-tran仍然可以预测一系列雷诺数工况的高超声速横流转捩。迎角0°时,CKDO-tran可以较好地预测出双肺叶转捩图像,迎角为4°时,CKDO-tran产生的转捩线提前,但给出了与实验相似的转捩图像,具有进一步开发的潜力。对4°工况进行来流湍流度敏感性的研究发现,随着来流湍流度减小,CKDO-tran产生的转捩线逐渐后移,并且转捩图像与实验的相似性逐渐减弱直至消失。 通过对迎角效应进行的分析,推测出来流-激波相互作用的建模是消除迎角效应的关键。
Hypersonic cross-flow transition problem contains turbulence-shock effects
compressibility
cross-flow
transition
and many other phenomenons. This work employs the CKDO-tran model to simulate HIFiRE-5 which is a canonical model for hypersonic cross-flow transition. The compressibility effect
Reynolds number effectand attack angle effectare studied. It is found that the KDO-tran model without considering the compressibility effect cannot give an accurate prediction on transition
while it can predict the hypersonic cross-flow transition at different Reynolds number conditions
without introducing a specific transition mechanism. When the angle of attack is 0°
CKDO-tran can better predict the transition image of the two lobes; when the angle of attack is 4°
the transition line yielded by CKDO-tran starts too early
but the transition pattern is similar to the measurements. Therefore
CKDO-tran model is promising and deserves further development. The sensitivity study of inflow turbulence intensity shows that
along with the decrement of inflow turbulence intensity
the predicted transition pattern gradually deviates from the true pattern for the 4° attack angle case. Finally
the attack angle effect is analyzed
and it is speculated that accurate modeling of the freestream turbulence-shock interaction is the key to eliminate the attack angle effect.
LI F, XIE S F, BI Z S X, et al. Experimental study of several on aerodynamic problems on hypersonic vehicles[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2014, 42(5): 1-7. (in Chinese)
XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, CHEN J Q, et al. Progress in transition models for cross-flow instabilities[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 254-264. (in Chinese)
SUZEN Y B, HUANG P G. Modeling of flow transition using an intermittency transport equation[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2000, 122(2): 273-284. DOI:10.1115/1.483255
MENTER F R, LANGTRY R B, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables—part I: model formulation[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3): 413. DOI:10.1115/1.2184352
LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12): 2894-2906. DOI:10.2514/1.42362
FU S, WANG L. Wang Liang. Simulation of hypersonic boundary layer transition based on Reynolds average method [J]. Science in China (Series G: Physics, Mechanics Astronomy), 2009, 39(4): 617-626. (in Chinese)
ZHANG Y F, HE K, ZHANG Y R, et al. Improvement and validation of menter's transition model for hypersonic flow simulation[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37(4): 397-402. (in Chinese)
ZHANG Y F, ZHANG Y R, CHEN J Q, et al. Numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary layer transition based on the flow solver chant 2.0[C]// 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Xiamen, China. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2017 doi: 10.2514/6.2017-2409
XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, YUAN X X, et al. C-γ-Re θ model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction[J ] . Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 196-204. (in Chinese)
BAI J Q, ZHANG Y, XU J L, et al. Construction and its application of a new one-equation turbulence model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(7): 1804-1814. (in Chinese)
XU J L, ZHANG Y, BAI J Q. One-equation turbulence model based on extended bradshaw assumption[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(6): 1433-1441. DOI:10.2514/1.J053039
XU J L, ZHOU Y, QIAO L, et al. One-equation transition model based on turbulent kinetic energy transport[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(4): 741-749. (in Chinese)
XU J L, XU D, ZHANG Y, et al. Capturing transition with flow-structure-adaptive KDO RANS model[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 85: 150-157. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.009
Wilcox D C. Turbulence modeling for CFD[M]. La Canada, CA: DCW industries, 1998.
JIANG L, CHOUDHARI M, CHANG C L, et al. Numerical simulations of laminar-turbulent transition in supersonic boundary layer[C]// 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, California. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006 doi: 10.2514/6.2006-3224
徐家宽. 基于 RANS 方程的多速域边界层转捩模式构造方法及应用研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2017.
JULIANO T, SCHNEIDER S. Instability and transition on the HIFiRE-5 in a Mach 6 quiet tunnel[C]// 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, Illinois. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2010 doi: 10.2514/6.2010-5004
JULIANO T J, ADAMCZAK D, KIMMEL R L. HIFiRE-5 flight test heating analysis[C]// 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, National Harbor, Maryland. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2014. doi: 10.2514/6.2014-0076
JULIANO T J, BORG M P, SCHNEIDER S P. Quiet tunnel measurements of HIFiRE-5 boundary-layer transition[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(4): 832-846. DOI:10.2514/1.J053189
JULIANO T J, PAQUIN L, BORG M P. Measurement of HIFiRE-5 boundary-layer transition in a Mach-6 quiet tunnel with infrared thermography[C]// 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016 doi: 10.2514/6.2016-0595
SINHA K, BALASRIDHAR S J. Conservative formulation of the k-ϵ turbulence model for shock-turbulence interaction[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(8): 1872-1882. DOI:10.2514/1.J052289
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621