基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究

邓晨; 陈功; 王文正; 郑凤麒; 施孟佶

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究
- Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data
- 空气动力学学报 2022年40卷第6期页码：45-50
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 空气动力学国家重点实验室,绵阳,621000
  2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
  3. 电子科技大学航空航天学院,成都,611731
  4. 飞行器集群智能感知与协同控制四川省重点实验室,成都,611731
- 作者简介：
  
  邓晨（1994-），男，四川绵阳人，硕士研究生，研究方向：气动建模和数据融合. E-mail：253605656@qq.com
  陈功*（1985-），男，湖北黄冈人，博士，研究方向：飞行动力学及控制. E-mail：success850012@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家数值风洞工程（ NNW）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257
  中图分类号： V211.3;TP18
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
邓晨, 陈功, 王文正, 等. 基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 45−50.

DENG Chen, CHEN Gong, WANG Wenzheng, et al. Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data[J]. 2022, 40(6): 45-50.
邓晨, 陈功, 王文正, 等. 基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 45−50. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257

DENG Chen, CHEN Gong, WANG Wenzheng, et al. Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data[J]. 2022, 40(6): 45-50. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0257.

摘要

飞行试验受飞行轨迹和试验激励的限制，通过飞行遥测数据辨识得到的实飞气动数据只能分布于飞行轨迹上的少量特征段。风洞试验由于受地面模拟能力的限制，试验数据与实飞飞行数据存在一定的天地差异。为了弥补飞行试验辨识数据和风洞试验数据的“缺陷”，以一种典型轴对称飞行器为研究对象，对上述两种不同来源的气动数据进行数据融合方法研究。首先，通过气动力参数辨识方法得到飞行器沿实际飞行轨迹的六分量真实气动数据，然后比较与地面试验数据的差异性和一致性；最后分别采用基于梯度信息和基于高斯过程回归的数据融合方法对两种来源的气动数据进行融合。融合建模结果表明，两种融合模型预测数据均比单源模型精度更高；如果高、低精度数据的梯度信息较为一致，则基于梯度信息的数据融合方法效果更好；而基于高斯过程回归的数据融合方法能够给出融合数据的置信区间，有利于分析不确定度。

Abstract

Due to the correlation between flight and ground test data

there is a certain difference between the wind tunnel test data and the flight test data. Limited by the flight trajectory and test excitation

the flight test data distributes in a small characteristic sections of the flight trajectory. And due to the limitation of ground simulation capabilities

wind tunnel tests have certain differences between the test data and the actual flight data. In order to remedy these limitations

researches of the data fusion algorithm based on above two different sources of aerodynamic data are conducted. Firstly

through the aerodynamic parameter identification method

the six-component real aerodynamic data of the aircraft along the actual flight trajectory are obtained

and then compare the difference and consistency with the wind tunnel test data. Finally

two kinds of data fusion methods based on gradient information and Gaussian process regression were used to fuse the two sources of aerodynamic datas. The results show that both the prediction data of the two fusion models are more accurate than the single source model; if the gradient information of the high and low precision data is more consistent

the data fusion method based on the gradient information is more effective; while the data fusion method based on the Gaussian process regression could obtain the confidence interval of the fusion data

which is useful to the analysis of uncertainty.

关键词

Keywords

references

YANG Y, ZHANG H, ZHENG H T. Difficulties in aerodynamic design problems of the winged hypersonic reentry vehicle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 49-57. (in Chinese)

YE L. Research of variable forward-sweep wing tailless aircraft aerodynamic configuration design[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2019, 37(2): 36-40. (in Chinese)

HE K F, QIAN W Q, WANG Q, et al. Application of data fusion technique in aerodynamics studies[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 777-782. (in Chinese)

WANG W Z, GUI Y W, HE K F, et al. Aerodynamic data fusion technique exploration[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 524-528. (in Chinese)

HE K F, WANG W Z, QIAN W Q. Mathematic modeling for the missile aerodynamics with tail- wing according to wind-tunnel test results[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 18(4): 62-66. (in Chinese)

ZHAO Q J, LIU R Y. Modeling of aircraft nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics at high angle attack based on random forest[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017, 37(11): 1171-1177. (in Chinese)

LI F G, ZHAO H. Modeling a plane-symmetric flight vehicle under limited states[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2016, 39(3): 417-421, 443. (in Chinese)

CHEN D H, ZHAO X H, WU K Y, et al. The correlation study of nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics of aircrafts with low aspect ratio[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2002, 20(1): 72-77. (in Chinese)

LUO C T, HU Z M, LIU Y F, et al. Research progress on ground-to-flight correlation of aerodynamic force and heating data from hypersonic wind tunnels[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(3): 78-89. (in Chinese)

MORELLI E A, KLEIN V. Accuracy of aerodynamic model parameters estimated from flight test data[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1997, 20(1): 74-80. DOI:10.2514/2.3997

MORELLI E. Flight test maneuvers for efficient aerodynamic modeling[C]//Proc of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, Oregon. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2011. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-6672

WANG W Z, ZHENG K P, CHEN G, et al. Application research of data-mining method to flight test data analysis and aerodynamic parameter identification[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(6): 778−782 (in Chinese).

YANG M, WANG Q, HE K L. UAV flight test parameter identification research[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2017, 35(4): 77-80. (in Chinese)

LI S Y, GAO Z B, LIU Z Y, et al. Study on UAV's aerodynamic parameter identification method based on telemetry data[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2017, 35(3): 32-36. (in Chinese)

WANG Q, HE K F, QIAN W Q, et al. Aerodynamic modeling of spatial maneuvering aircraft at high angle of attack[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2004, 25(5): 447-450. (in Chinese)

HUANG D, ZHENG W X. Unsteady aerodynamic modeling method using differential equations based on wind tunnel test[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2014, 46(4): 599-602. (in Chinese)

HAN Z H. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: a review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225. (in Chinese)

LI B Y, ZHANG L G, QIU Q H, et al. An advanced first order and second moment method based on gradient analytical solution of Kriging surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(5): 222629. (in Chinese)

SUN B, YAO H T, LIU T. Short-term wind speed forecasting based on Gaussian process regression model[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(29): 104-109, 5. (in Chinese)

SEEGER M. Gaussian processes for machine learning[J]. International Journal of Neural Systems, 2004, 14(2): 69-106. DOI:10.1142/s0129065704001899

HE Z K, LIU G B, ZHAO X J, et al. Overview of Gaussian process regression[J]. Control and Decision, 2013, 28(8): 1121-1129, 1137. (in Chinese)

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于GPR模型的多保真气动力建模方法

基于多精度深度神经网络的汽车气动外形优化设计方法

面向民机标模的宽域高雷诺数小样本气动建模方法研究

基于 XGBoost 的多源气动数据融合建模

基于物理信息神经网络的气动数据融合方法