1. 西北工业大学 航空学院,西安,710072
2. 西安交通大学 机械结构强度与振动国家重点实验室,西安,710049
3. 西北工业大学 无人系统技术研究院,西安,710072
王玉轩(1998-),男,山东淄博人,硕士研究生,研究方向:转捩-湍流模式. E-mail:709049671@qq.com
徐家宽*,男,博士,副教授,研究方向:转捩-湍流模式,流动稳定性,计算流体力学. E-mail:jk.xu@nwpu.edu.cn
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王玉轩, 徐家宽, 张扬, 等. 横流驻波增长因子模式在跨声速边界层的应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 108−116.
WANG Yuxuan, XU Jiakuan, ZHANG Yang, et al. Applications of transition model based on amplification factor of stationary crossflow waves in transonic boundary layers[J]. 2022, 40(6): 108-116.
王玉轩, 徐家宽, 张扬, 等. 横流驻波增长因子模式在跨声速边界层的应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 108−116. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0188
WANG Yuxuan, XU Jiakuan, ZHANG Yang, et al. Applications of transition model based on amplification factor of stationary crossflow waves in transonic boundary layers[J]. 2022, 40(6): 108-116. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0188.
经过近半个世纪的研究表明,在航空航天飞行器表面边界层的转捩预测方面,基于线性稳定性理论(linear stability theory
LST)的e
N
方法是国内外知名研究机构非常信赖的方法之一,然而传统的线性稳定性理论求解过程较为复杂,难以推广应用到复杂的气动外形。随着当地化转捩模式的快速发展,将传统线性稳定性理论的分析流程模式化,即将线性稳定性理论分析转化为一个CFD问题,成为研究热点。在Coder Maughmer发展了二维Tollmien-Schlichting(T-S)波的增长因子输运方程之后,本文作者于2019年首次提出了低速边界层的横流驻波增长因子输运方程,并在2020年将其拓展至跨声速流动。本文选取了只针对跨声速后掠翼边界层横流转捩的试验标模验证该方法的合理性和精确性。经过验证,所提出的横流关键指示因子的当地化预测公式构造合理,增长因子模式的预测结果与标准LST和风洞试验结果吻合良好。
After nearly half a century’s research
it is known that the e
N
method based on linear stability theory (LST) is one of the most reliable methods for the boundary layer transition prediction. However
the traditional LST is difficult to be applied to complex aerodynamic configurations due to its complicated process of searching for the solution. With the rapid development of local-variable-based transition models
it has become a research hotspot to model the analysis process of the traditional LST
that is
to transform
the LST analysis into a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problem. After Coder Maughmer developed the transport equation for the amplification factor of two-dimensional Tollmien-Schlichting (T-S) waves
the amplification factor transport equation for stationary crossflow waves in incompressible boundary layers was first proposed in 2019 and then extended to transonic flows in 2020 by the present authors. In this study
a wind-tunnel test model that only targets the crossflow transition of a transonic swept wing boundary layer was selected to verify the rationality and accuracy of the method. It is shown that
the proposed local prediction formula for the key indicator factor of crossflow is reasonable
and the prediction results based on the amplification factor are in good agreement with the standard LST and wind tunnel test results.
GRAHAM W, XU D K. Europe launches 'Clean Sky' 2 plan[J], International Aviation, 2014(8): 79-80 (in Chinese).
KLEBANOFF P, TIDSTROM K, SARGENT L. The three dimensional nature of boundary layer instability[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1962, 12: 1-34. doi: 10.1017/S0022112062000014
SMITH A, GAMBERONI N. Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory[R]. Douglas Aircraft Company Rept. ES-26388, Long Beach, CA, 1956.
VAN INGEN J. A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1956.
MACK L M. Stability of three-dimensional boundary layers on swept wings at transonic speeds[C]//Symposium IUTAM III. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989: 209-223. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-83584-1_18
CEBECI T. Stability and transition: theory and application[M]. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
MALIK M. Boundary-layer transition prediction toolkit: AIAA-1997-1904 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 1997. doi: 10.1142/9789812812957_0047
CHANG C L. Langley stability and transition analysis code (LASTRAC) version 1.2 user manual[R]. NASA TM-2004-2133233, 2004. doi: 10.1.1.75.3574
HUANG Z F, LU X Z, YU G T. Cross-flow instability analysis and transition prediction of airfoil boundary layer[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(1): 14-20. (in Chinese)doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2012.0062
SONG W P, WU M M, ZHU Z, et al. Transition prediction methods towards significant drag reduction via laminar flow technology[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2): 213-228. (in Chinese)doi: 10.7638/KQDLXXB-2018.0035
PERRAUD J, ARNAL D, CASALIS G, et al. Automatic transition predictions using simplified methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(11), 2676-2684. doi: 10.2514/1.42990
KRUMBEIN A. e- N transition prediction for 3D wing configurations using database methods and a local, linear stability code[J ] . Aerospace Science and Technology, 2008, 12(8): 592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2008.01.005
KRUMBEIN A, KRIMMELBEIN N, GRABE C. Streamline-based transition prediction techniques in an unstructured computational fluid dynamics code[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(5): 1548-1564. doi: 10.2514/1.J054990
FISCHER J S, SOEMARWOTO B I, VAN DER WEIDE E T A. Automatic Transition Prediction in a Navier–Stokes Solver Using Linear Stability Theory[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021: 1-18. doi: 10.2514/1.J059910
CROUCH J D, NG L L. Variable N -factor method for transition prediction in three-dimensional boundary layers[J ] . AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(2): 211-216. doi: 10.2514/2.973
LANGTRY R, MENTER F. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12): 2894-2906. doi: 10.2514/1.42362
GRABE C, NIE S Y, KRUMBEIN A. Transport modeling for the prediction of crossflow Transition[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(8): 3167-3178. doi: 10.2514/1.J056200
LANGTRY R, SENGUPTA K, YEH D, et al. Extending the γ – Re θt local correlation based transition model for crossflow effects: AIAA-2015-2474[R ] . Reston: AIAA, 2015. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-2474
ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y, CHEN J, et al. Numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary layer transition based on the flow solver chant 2.0[C]//21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, AIAA 2017-2409, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-2409
HAO Z, YAN C, QIN Y, et al. Improved γ-Reθt model for heat transfer prediction of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 107: 329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.11.052
WALTERS K, COKLJAT D. A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of transitional flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(12): 121401. doi: 10.1115/1.2979230
FU S, WANG L. RANS modeling of high-speed aerodynamic flow transition with consideration of stability theory[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013, 58: 36-59. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.004
ZHOU L, LI R, HAO Z, et al. Improved k-ω-γ model for crossflow-induced transition prediction in hypersonic flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115: 115-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.08.013
YANG M, XIAO Z. Distributed roughness induced transition on wind-turbine airfoils simulated by four-equation k-ω-γ-Ar transition model[J]. Renewable energy, 2019, 135: 1166-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.091
XU J, BAI J, QIAO L, et al. Fully local formulation of a transition closure model for transitional flow simulations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10): 3015-3023. doi: 10.2514/1.J054808
XU J, BAI J, FU Z, et al. Parallel compatible transition closure model for high-speed transitional flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(9): 3040-3050. doi: 10.2514/1.J055711
XU J, BAI J, QIAO L, et al. Development of a computational fluid dynamics compatible mathematical model for boundary layer transitional flows in low-disturbance environment[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 86: 487-496. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.036
QIAO L, XU J, BAI J, et al. Fully local transition closure model for hypersonic boundary layers considering crossflow effects[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(5): 1692-1706. doi: 10.2514/1.J059765
DRELA M, GILES M. Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low-Reynolds number airfoils[J]. AIAA Journal, 1987, 25(10): 1347-1355. doi: 10.2514/3.9789
CODER J, MAUGHMER M. Computational fluid dynamics compatible transition modeling using an amplification factor transport equation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(11): 2506-2512. doi: 10.2514/1.J052905
CODER J. Enhancement of the amplification factor transport transition modeling framework[C]// 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2017-1709, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-1709
CARNES J, CODER J. Effects of crossflow transition on the S-76 and PSP rotors in hover[C]//AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. 2020: 0773. doi: 10.2514/6.2020-0773
SARIC W S, REED H L, WHITE E B. Stability and transition of three-dimensional boundary layers[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 35(1): 413–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161045
XU J, BAI J, ZHANG Y, et al. Transition study of 3D aerodynamic configures using improved transport equations modeling[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(4): 874-881. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.06.002
XU J, HAN X, QIAO L, et al. Fully local amplification factor transport equation for stationary crossflow instability[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(7): 2682-2693. doi: 10.2514/1.J057502
XU J, QIAO L, BAI J. Improved local amplification factor transport equation for stationary crossflow instability in subsonic and transonic flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(12): 3073-3081. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.012
GRABE C, NIE S Y, KRUMBEIN A. Transition transport modeling for the prediction of crossflow transition[C]//34th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference. 2016: 3572. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3572
KRIMMELBEIN N, KRUMBEIN A. Validation of transition modeling techniques for a simplified fuselage configuration[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 118: 107043. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107043
FEY U, EGAMI Y, ENGLER R. High Reynolds number transition detection by means of temperature sensitive paint[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2006: 514. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-514
SHI Y, YANG T, BAI J, et al. Research of transition criterion for semi-empirical prediction method at specified transonic regime[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 88: 95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.012
SHI Y, CAO T, YANG T, et al. Estimation and analysis of hybrid laminar flow control on a transonic experiment[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(1): 118-132. doi: 10.2514/1.J058266
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621