高速列车转向架区域气动噪声风洞实验研究

陈羽; 刘嘉楠; 杨志刚; 毛懋; 王毅刚

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0173

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

高速列车转向架区域气动噪声风洞实验研究

高速列车空气动力学专栏 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 高速列车转向架区域气动噪声风洞实验研究
- Wind tunnel experiment of aerodynamic noise in bogie section of high-speed trains
- 空气动力学学报 2021年39卷第5期页码：111-119
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 同济大学上海地面交通工具风洞中心,上海,201804
  2. 同济大学上海市地面交通工具空气动力学与热环境模拟重点试验室,上海,201804
  3. 北京民用飞机技术研究中心,北京,102211
- 作者简介：
  
  陈羽*（1986-），男，山西太原人，博士，工程师，硕导，研究方向：高速列车空气动力学与气动声学. E-mail：08_yu_chen@tongji.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金（52002283）;上海地面交通专业技术服务平台项目（19DZ2290400）;上海市地面交通工具空气动力与热环境模拟重点实验室项目（18DZ2273300）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0173
  中图分类号： U292.91
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈羽, 刘嘉楠, 杨志刚, 等. 高速列车转向架区域气动噪声风洞实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(5): 111−119.

CHEN Yu, LIU Jianan, YANG Zhigang, et al. Wind tunnel experiment of aerodynamic noise in bogie section of high-speed trains[J]. 2021, 39(5): 111-119.
陈羽, 刘嘉楠, 杨志刚, 等. 高速列车转向架区域气动噪声风洞实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(5): 111−119. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0173

CHEN Yu, LIU Jianan, YANG Zhigang, et al. Wind tunnel experiment of aerodynamic noise in bogie section of high-speed trains[J]. 2021, 39(5): 111-119. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2021.0173.

摘要

转向架区域是高速列车最主要的气动噪声源。通过风洞试验的方法，测量了1∶20转向架区域的舱内气动噪声和压力，分析了动车转向架、拖车转向架舱内气动噪声和脉动压力的速度标度律，及其随雷诺数的变化规律。结果表明：近场气动噪声标度律分析可以区分转向架舱内湍流脉动压力和声压，舱内湍流脉动压力能量随速度的3.2～3.9次方增加，声压级随速度的6～8次方增加，两者的分界线频率，转向架舱后壁高于舱顶部。气动噪声为具有多个峰值的宽频带噪声，频率不随雷诺数变化的峰值噪声由声共振导致，频率随雷诺数增加而增大的峰值噪声为气流冲击轮对下部导致。转向架区域的气动噪声的峰值频率与转向架舱、轮对尺寸有关，宽频带噪声受转向架形式影响。该研究结果可为理解转向架区域气动噪声源特性及降噪控制提供理论和数据支撑。

Abstract

The bogie section is a dominant aerodynamic noise source of high-speed trains. Using wind tunnel experiments

the aerodynamic noise and pressure inside the cavity of a 1∶20 bogie section are measured. The scaling law of aerodynamic noise and pressure fluctuation in the motor bogie (MB) and trailer bogie (TB) cavities and their dependence on the Reynolds number are analyzed. The results show that turbulent pressure fluctuation and sound pressure can be distinguished by the scaling law analysis of the near-field aerodynamic noise in the bogie sections

i.e.

the turbulent pressure fluctuation power in the cabin increases with the 3.2-3.9 power of the velocity

while the sound pressure level increases with the 6-8 power of the velocity. The cutoff frequency on the back wall of the bogie section is higher than that on the top wall. The aerodynamic noise has a broadband frequency spectrum with multiple peaks

which are generated by the acoustic resonance and do not vary with the Reynolds number. The tonal noise whose frequency increases with the increase of the Reynolds number

is generated by the airflow impinging on the lower part of the wheelset. The peak frequencies of aerodynamic tonal noise in the bogie area are related to the dimension of the bogie cavity and the wheelset

while the broadband noise level can be affected by the form of the bogie. The results provide theory and data support for a deep understanding of the aerodynamic noise sources and the noise reduction control inside the bogie section.

关键词

Keywords

references

DING S S, CHEN D W, LIU J L. Research, development and prospect of China high-speed train[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(1): 35-50. (in Chinese)

HE B, XIAO X B, ZHOU Q, et al. Investigation into external noise of a high-speed train at different speeds[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A (Applied Physics Engineering), 2014, 15(12): 1019-1033. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A1400307

SHENG X, CHENG G, THOMPSON D. Modelling wheel/rail rolling noise for a high-speed train running along an infinitely long periodic slab track[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020, 148(1): 174. DOI: 10.1121/10.0001566

YAMAZAKI N, KITAGAWA T, UDA T, et al. Evaluation method for aerodynamic noise generated from the lower part of cars in consideration of the characteristics of under-floor flows on shinkansen trains[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2016, 57(1): 61-68. DOI: 10.2219/rtriqr.57.1_61

YUAN M M, SHEN A, LU F, et al. Operational transfer path analysis and noise sources contribution for China railway high-speed(CRH)[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(21): 189-196. (in Chinese)

FRÉMION N, VINCENT N, JACOB M, et al. Aerodynamic noise radiated by the intercoach spacing and the bogie of a high-speed train[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 231(3): 577-593. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2546

GAO Y, WANG Y G, WANG J T, et al. Testing study of aerodynamic noise for high speed train model in aero-acoustic wind tunnel[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2013, 32(6): 506-510. (in Chinese)

LAUTERBACH A, EHRENFRIED K, LOOSE S, et al. Microphone array wind tunnel measurements of Reynolds number effects in high-speed train aeroacoustics[J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2012, 11(3-4): 411-446. DOI: 10.1260/1475-472x.11.3-4.411

LATORRE IGLESIAS E, THOMPSON D J, SMITH M, et al. Anechoic wind tunnel tests on high-speed train bogie aerodynamic noise[J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2017, 5(2): 87-109. DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2016.1274685

YAMAZAKI N, UDA T, KITAGAWA T, et al. Influence of bogie components on aerodynamic bogie noise generated from shinkansen trains[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2019, 60(3): 202-207. DOI: 10.2219/rtriqr.60.3_202

MUELLER T J, PRASAD M G. Aeroacoustic measurements[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2003, 56(5): B66-B67. DOI: 10.1115/1.1584413

MINELLI G, YAO H D, ANDERSSON N, et al. An aeroacoustic study of the flow surrounding the front of a simplified ICE3 high-speed train model[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 160: 107125. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107125

YUAN H D, YANG Z G, WANG Y G, et al. Experimental analysis of hydrodynamic and acoustic pressure on automotive front side window[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 476: 115296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115296

HE Y Z, WAN R X, LIU Y M, et al. Transmission characteristics and mechanism study of hydrodynamic and acoustic pressure through a side window of DrivAer model based on modal analytical approach[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2021, 501: 116058. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116058

LECOQ D, PÉZERAT C, THOMAS J H, et al. Extraction of the acoustic component of a turbulent flow exciting a plate by inverting the vibration problem[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2014, 333(12): 2505-2519. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.02.003

ZHANG J, XIAO X B, SHENG X Z, et al. Sound source localisation for a high-speed train and its transfer path to interior noise[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s10033-019-0375-1

ZHU Y J. Research on acoustic oscillation over the duct cavity and suppression with piezoelectric vibrator[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010. (in Chinese)

LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1952, 211(1107): 564-587. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1952.0060

CURLE N. The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1955, 231(1187): 505-514. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1955.0191

ZHU J Y, HU Z W, THOMPSON D J. Flow simulation and aerodynamic noise prediction for a high-speed train wheelset[J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2014, 13(7-8): 533-552. DOI: 10.1260/1475-472x.13.7-8.533

ROSSITER J E. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds[R]. Aeronautical Research Council, RM3438, 1964.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

关键区域优化对高速列车横风气动特性影响

基于LBM方法的LAGOON起落架噪声预测与降噪方法研究

挡风墙距离影响高速列车气动性能LES研究

高速列车开孔式风阻制动板设计及安装参数研究

大型气动声学风洞折线型集气口段流场特性数值研究与试验验证