1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 空气动力学国家重点实验室,绵阳,621000
2. 中国科学技术大学 近代力学系,合肥,210000
李博(1992-), 男, 甘肃定西人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:气动噪声控制.E-mail:lib044@mail.ustc.edu.cn
万振华(1986-), 副教授, 研究方向:气动噪声、流动稳定性与浮力湍流.E-mail:wanzh@ustc.edu.cn
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
李博, 张彭俊燚, 万振华, 孙德军. 基于伴随方法的方腔噪声主动控制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 964-970.
LI Bo, ZHANG Pengjunyi, WAN Zhenhua, et al. Adjoint-based active control of open cavity noise[J]. 2020, 38(5): 964-970.
李博, 张彭俊燚, 万振华, 孙德军. 基于伴随方法的方腔噪声主动控制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 964-970. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0112.
LI Bo, ZHANG Pengjunyi, WAN Zhenhua, et al. Adjoint-based active control of open cavity noise[J]. 2020, 38(5): 964-970. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0112.
基于伴随方法的梯度求解具有与设计变量数目无关的特点,适合多参数、高维度的优化控制。本文基于伴随方法对非定常二维可压缩方腔流致噪声开展了初步的主动控制研究,其长深比
L
/
D
=2,基于深度的雷诺数(
Re
)为3000。同时,为了实现长时域的流动控制,引入预测控制技术提高伴随过程的稳定性,成功实现对长时域流动噪声的主动控制。方腔上方的剪切层由于Kelvin-Helmholtz不稳定性快速增长,卷起的旋涡会撞击到后拐角从而产生强的噪声辐射。在开展方腔噪声控制之前,首先开展了流场对后拐角附近激励的敏感性分析,结果表明后拐角压力振荡对方腔前缘边界层附近区域非常敏感。因此,在方腔前缘边界层附近区域基于伴随方法施加了二维时空变化的体积力,并成功降低了噪声辐射。结果表明当前的主动控制改变了近场声源区压力振荡分布,在全辐射方向上抑制了噪声,总声压级最大降幅约2 dB。
The gradient solution based on adjoint method is independent of the number of design variables
which is suitable for multiple parameters
high-dimensional optimizations. An adjoint-based preliminary active control of flow-induced noise is carried out on an unsteady compressible cavity flow. In order to realize the long-time flow control
we introduce the predictive control technology in order to improve the stability of the adjoint process
which successfully achieves the long-time active control of flow-induced noise. Present paper is devoted to studying two-dimensional compressible cavity flow
the length/depth ratio is 2 and the depth-based Reynolds number is 3000. The shear layer above the cavity undergoes rapid growth due to Kelvin-Helmholtz instability
the rolled-up vortices will impinge on the rear edge of the cavity and produce intensive noise radiation. Before applying noise control
the sensitivity analysis is firstly performed for the whole flow field to the excitation near the rear edge
the results indicate that the pressure oscillations near the rear edge are sensitive to the flow in the boundary layer region close to the leading edge
which is suitable for applying control excitations. Therefore
the two-dimensional spatiotemporal forcing based on the adjoint method in the shear layer region close to the leading edge is employed
which decreases the noise radiation successfully. The results show that the active control changes the distribution of near-field pressure oscillations in the region of noise sources
and the noise radiation is suppressed at all directions with a maximum reduction of overall sound pressure levels about 2 dB.
WAN Z H, ZHOU L, SUN D J. Numerical investigation of flow-induced oscillations and noise from a rectangular cavity[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(3):291-298.(in Chinese) doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2012.03.003
BRUGGEMAN J C, HIRSCHBERG A, VAN DONGEN M E H, et al. Self-sustained aero-acoustic pulsations in gas transport systems:experimental study of the influence of closed side branches[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1991, 150(3):371-393. doi:10.1016/0022-460X(91)90893-O
KOOK H, MONGEAU L, BROWN D V, et al. Analysis of the interior pressure oscillations induced by flow over vehicle openings[J]. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 1997, 45(6):223. doi:10.3397/1.2828444
ROVIG G W, BOHNKER B K, PAGE J C. Hearing health risk in a population of aircraft carrier flight deck personnel[J]. Military Medicine, 2004, 169(6):429-432. doi:10.7205/MILMED.169.6.429
MCGREGOR O W, WHITE R A. Drag of rectangular cavities in supersonic and transonic flow including the effects of cavity resonance[J]. AIAA Journal, 1970, 8(11):1959-1964. doi:10.2514/3.6032
STANEK M, RAMAN G, KIBENS V, et al. Control of cavity resonance through very high frequency forcing[C ] //6th Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Lahaina, HI. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2000. doi: 10.2514/6.2000-1905
YU Y H. Measurements of sound radiation from cavities at subsonic speeds[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1977, 14(9):838-843. doi:10.2514/3.58863
COMTE P, DAUDE F, MARY I. Simulation of the reduction of unsteadiness in a passively controlled transonic cavity flow[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24(8):1252-1261. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.08.001
YANG D G, LIU J, WANG X S, et al. Analysis of design method and aeroacoustics characteristics inside typical cavity[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3):432-439, 448.(in Chinese) doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0201
VIKRAMADITYA N S, KURIAN J. Pressure oscillations from cavities with ramp[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12):2974-2984. doi:10.2514/1.43068
LEE Y, KANG M, KIM H, et al. Passive control techniques to alleviate supersonic cavity flow oscillation[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(4):697-703. doi:10.2514/1.30292
SAROHIA V, MASSIER P F. Control of cavity noise[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1977, 14(9):833-837. doi:10.2514/3.58862
WILLIAMS D, FABRIS D, IWANSKI K, et al. Closed-loop control in cavities with unsteady bleed forcing[C ] //38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2000. doi: 10.2514/6.2000-470
CATTAFESTA L, ALVI F, WILLIAMS D, et al. Review of active control of flow-induced cavity oscillations (invited)[C ] //33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003. doi: 10.2514/6.2003-3567
GHARIB M. Response of the cavity shear layer oscillations to external forcing[J]. AIAA Journal, 1987, 25(1):43-47. doi:10.2514/3.9576
SHAW L, NORTHCRAFT S. Closed loop active control for cavity acoustics[C ] //5th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Bellevue, WA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1999 doi: 10.2514/6.1999-1902
MICHEAU P, CHATELLIER L, LAUMONIER J, et al. Active control of a self-sustained pressure fluctuation due to flow over a cavity[C ] //10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Manchester, GREAT BRITAIN. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2004 doi: 10.2514/6.2004-2851
DEBIASI M, SAMIMY M. Logic-based active control of subsonic cavity flow resonance[J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(9):1901-1909. doi:10.2514/1.4799
GAO C, ZHANG X Q, HE Y Y, et al. Applications of continuous adjoint method in 2D hypersonic inlet optimization[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(1):21-26.(in Chinese) doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0214
FAN B C, ZHANG H, CHEN Z H, et al. Adjoint-based optimal control of flow aroud cylinder[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25(s2):97-101.(in Chinese)
LIU Q, GMEZ F, THEOFILIS V. Control of flow instabilities in an open aircraft bay model cavity[C ] //46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Washington, D.C.. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2016. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3317
BEWLEY T, MOIN P, TEMAM R. DNS-based predictive control of turbulence:an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 447:179-225. doi:10.1017/S0022112001005821
WEI M, FREUND J B. A noise-controlled free shear flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 546(-1):123-152. doi:10.1017/S0022112005007093
KIM J, BODONY D J, FREUND J B. Adjoint-based control of loud events in a turbulent jet[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 741:28-59. doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.654
SCHULZE J, SESTERHENN J. Optimal distribution of porous media to reduce trailing edge noise[J]. Computers Fluids, 2013, 78:41-53. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.12.022
YAMOUNI S, SIPP D, JACQUIN L. Interaction between feedback aeroacoustic and acoustic resonance mechanisms in a cavity flow:a global stability analysis[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 717:134-165. doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.563
OTERO J. Development and application of an adjoint-based optimal flow control framework for compressible direct numerical simulations[D]. University of Southampton, 2017.
XIAO D, PAPADAKIS G. Nonlinear optimal control of transition due to a pair of vortical perturbations using a receding horizon approach[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 861:524-555. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.919
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621