地面效应对射流增升翼型性能影响实验研究

姜裕标; 王万波; 赵光银; 赖庆仁; 车兵辉

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0101

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

地面效应对射流增升翼型性能影响实验研究

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 地面效应对射流增升翼型性能影响实验研究
- Experimental investigation on blowing control airfoil influenced by ground effect
- 空气动力学学报 2020年38卷第5期页码：887-895
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北工业大学航空学院,西安,710072
  2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
  
  姜裕标(1969-), 男, 江西上饶人, 研究员, 研究方向:流动控制.E-mail:ybjiang@sohu.com
  王万波(1984-), 助理研究员, 研究方向:流动控制.E-mail:bowanw@163.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0101
  中图分类号： V211.4
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
姜裕标, 王万波, 赵光银, 赖庆仁, 车兵辉. 地面效应对射流增升翼型性能影响实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 887-895.

JIANG Yubiao, WANG Wanbo, ZHAO Guangyin, et al. Experimental investigation on blowing control airfoil influenced by ground effect[J]. 2020, 38(5): 887-895.
姜裕标, 王万波, 赵光银, 赖庆仁, 车兵辉. 地面效应对射流增升翼型性能影响实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 887-895. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0101.

JIANG Yubiao, WANG Wanbo, ZHAO Guangyin, et al. Experimental investigation on blowing control airfoil influenced by ground effect[J]. 2020, 38(5): 887-895. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0101.

摘要

采用射流控制可以有效增加飞机升力、改善起降性能，而地面效应是分析飞机起降性能必须要考虑的因素。为了研究地面效应对射流增升翼型气动性能的影响，通过表面压力测量和PIV流场测量，详细对比研究了无射流条件下基本翼型、定常射流控制翼型及脉冲射流控制翼型在地面效应影响下的气动性能和流场特性。研究表明：受地面效应影响，基本翼型和射流增升翼型升力线斜率降低，升力减小，失速提前；有无地面效应时，脉冲射流的增升效果都大于定常射流；相同的射流动量系数下，距地越近，分离控制效果越差，升力也越小。

Abstract

The lift can be effectively increased and the take-off and landing characteristics can be greatly improved by using blowing control

while ground effect must be considered when analyzing the performance of take-off and landing. In order to investigate the ground effect of the airfoil using blowing to enhance lift

the aerodynamic characteristics of the basic airfoil

steady blowing control airfoil and pulse blowing control airfoil are experimentally investigated by surface pressure and PIV flow field measurement. The results show that the lift coefficient and the lift coefficient slope of the basic airfoil and the blowing control airfoil decrease in ground effect

the separation restrain ability of pulse blowing control is stronger than that of steady blowing with and without ground effect

and the lift enhancement is smaller with ground effect than that without ground effect using pulse blowing at the same control conditions.

关键词

Keywords

references

HSIUN C M, CHEN C K. Aerodynamic characteristics of a two-dimensional airfoil with ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1996, 33(2):386-392.

MI B G, ZHAN H, ZHU J. Numerical simulation on aerodynamic characteristic of clean and multi-element airfoils in ground effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(6):822-827. (in Chinese)

AHMED M R, SHARMAB S D. An investigation on the aerodynamics of a symmetrical airfoil in ground effect[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2005, 29(6):633-647.

QU Q L, WANG W, LIU P Q, et al. Aerodynamics and flow mechanics of a two-element airfoil in ground effect: AIAA-2015-0550[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015

QU Q L, WANG W, LIU P Q, et al. Airfoil aerodynamics in ground effect for wide range of angles of attack[J]. AIAA JOURNAL. 2015, 53(4):1048-1061

STEINBACH D. Experimental and theoretical investigations of the flow around airfoil systems with ground effect[R]. DFVLR, 1985.

QIN X G, LIU P Q, QU, Q L, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis on aerodynamics of three-element airfoil in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(4): 890-896.(in Chinese)

YANG W, LIN F, YANG Z. Investigation on application of high-lift configuration to wing-in-ground effect[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 226(3):260-271.

ZHANG X, JONATHAN Z. Aerodynamics of a double-element wing in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(6):1007-1016.

JIANG Y B, WANG W B, CHANG Z Q. Numerical simulationof aerodynamic characteristic of slot-less flap airfoil with steady blowing in ground effect[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(6):120751. (in Chinese)

XIAO T, DAI Q. The experimental study of aerodynamics and flow structures of a wing with Gurney flaps in ground effect[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinca, 2013, 31(5):572-578(in Chinese).

ZERIHAN J, ZHANG X. Aerodynamics of Gurney flaps on a wing in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(5):772-780.

LI Y J, LUO Z B, DENG X, et al. Experimental investigation on flow separation control of stalled NACA0015 airfoil using dual synthetic jetacturator[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(3):817-825. (in Chinese)

WANG W B, ZHANG R P, HUANG Z B, et al. Test research of two-element airfoil lift enhancement by plasma actuator[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(1):64-68. (in chinese)

ZHU Z Q, WU Z C. Study of the circulation control technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(2):411-428. (in Chinese)

THIEDE P. EUROLIFT-advanced high lift aerodynamics for transport aircraft[J]. Air Space Europe, 2001, 3(3-4):105-108.

RALF R, HEIKO G. The european high lift project EUROLIFT II-objectives, approach, and structure[R]. AIAA-2007-4296. Miami: AIAA, 2007.

FOLLEN G J, DEL ROSARIO R, WAHLS R, et al. NASA's fundamental aeronautics subsonic fixed wing project: Generation N+3 technology portfolio. SAE International[J]. 2011-01-2521.

SMITH D M, DICKEY E, VONKLEIN T. The ADVINT program[R]. AIAA-2006-2854. San Francisco: AIAA, 2006.

ALLEY N R, STEELE J, NEIDHOEFER J C. Development of a cruise-efficient extreme-STOL-capable demonstrator UAV[R]. AIAA 2010-3450. Atlanta: AIAA, 2010.

KANISTRAS K, SAKA P C, VALAVANIS K P. UC2AV: unmanned circulation control aerial vehicle for short takeo and enhanced payload[R]. AIAA 2016-3412. Washington: AIAA, 2016.

LIN J C, ANDINO M Y, ALEXANDER M G. An overview of active flow control enhanced vertical tail technology development[R]. AIAA 2016-0056. San Diego: AIAA 2016.

WANG W B, JIANG Y B, HUANG Y, et al. Influence of pulse blowing onslotless flap airfoil aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(11):122118. (in Chinese)

TONG Z J, LIU P Q, DUANG H S.Numerical simulation of the flap blowing and suction control for two dimension multi-element airfoil[J]. Aircraft Design, 2010, 30(4):10-15.

JIAO Y Q, LU Y. Research on flow separation control on multi-element airfoil using air-blowing[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2015, 32(2):215-220. (in Chinese)

HAO X, LIU F, WANG B. The numerical simulation research on high lift enhancement strategies of STOL aircraft based on flap and slat blowing[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2016, 7(4):408-418. (in Chinese)

ZHU X J, LI F, OU D B, et al. Numerical simulation of flow control in lift-increase effect using air blowing[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2020, 38(1):66-72. (in chinese)

WANG Y K, LI Q, ZHOU P, et al. Effect of pulse blowing on flow over control surface: AIAA 2013-0848[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2013.

SUN W P, YANG K Z, QIN H J. Design and test of a jet flap for a large amphibian[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(4):903-909. (in Chinese)

WANG M X, SUN W P, QIN H J. Optimization design of an internal blown flap used in large amphibian[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1):300-309. (in Chinese)

LIU R, BAI J Q, QIU Y S, et al.Effects of geometrical parameters of internal blown flap and its optimal design[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(1):58-66. (in Chinese)

PATTERSON B W, ANGLE G M, SMITH J E. Lift enhancement of circulation control as influenced by ground effect: AIAA 2011-3652[R]. Hawaii: AIAA, 2011.

PATTERSON B W, ANGLE G M, SMITH J E. Circulation control lifting surface argument by ground effect:AIAA 2012-0860[R]. Tennessee:AIAA, 2012.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于非线性耦合本构关系的高速磁流体控制数值模拟

开槽轨道对高速磁浮列车气动特性的影响

临近空间长航时无人机飞发一体气动设计研究进展

“无人机飞发气动综合设计”专栏序言

斜爆轰发动机：斜爆轰波在受限空间中的起爆与稳定