CHAPMAN D R. Computational aerodynamics development and outlook[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(12):1293-1313. doi:10.2514/3.61311

WANG Y T, LIU G, CHEN Z B. Summary of the first aeronautical computational fluid dynamics credibility workshop[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):247-261, 246. (in Chinese)

YAN C, XI K, YUAN W, et al. Review of the drag prediction workshop series[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(6):776-784. (in Chinese)

RUMSEY C, RIVERS S M, MORRISON J. Study of CFD variation on transport configurations from the second drag-prediction workshop[C ] //Proc of the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2004. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-394

SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD Vision 2030 Study: A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences[R]. NASA/CR-2014-218178, 2014.

YAN C, YU J, XU J L, et al. On the achievements and prospects for the methods of computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(5):562-589. (in Chinese)

SPALART P R. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2000, 21(3):252-263. doi:10.1016/s0142-727x(00)00007-2

DURBIN P A. Some recent developments in turbulence closure modeling[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 50(1):77-103. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045020

HANJALI' K. Second-moment turbulence closures for CFD:needs and prospects[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1999, 12(1):67-97. doi:10.1080/10618569908940816

Rumsey C L. Turbulence modeling verification and validation: AIAA-2014-0201[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2014.

JOHNSON F, TINOCO E, YU J. Thirty years of development and application of CFD at boeing commercial airplanes, Seattle[C ] //16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2003 doi: 10.2514/6.2003-3439

RUMSEY C, SMITH B, HUANG G. Description of a website resource for turbulence modeling verification and validation[C ] //Proc of the 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, Illinois. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-4742

HANJALIC' K. Will RANS survive LES? A view of perspectives[C ] //Proceedings of ASME Conference on ASME 2004 Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering Summer Conference, 2009: 715-725. doi: 10.1115/HT-FED2004-56356

CECORA R, RADESPIEL R, EISFELD B, et al. Differential Reynolds-stress modeling for aeronautics[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(3):739-755. doi:10.2514/1.J053250

TUCKER P G. Computation of unsteady turbomachinery flows:Part 1:Progress and challenges[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(7):522-545. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.06.004

WILCOX D A. Simulation of transition with a two-equation turbulence model[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(2):247-255. doi:10.2514/3.59994

JONES W P, LAUNDER B E. The calculation of low-Reynolds-number phenomena with a two-equation model of turbulence[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1973, 16(6):1119-1130. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(73)90125-7

HADŽIĆ I, HANJALIĆ K. Separation-induced transition to turbulence:second-moment closure modelling[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2000, 63(1-4):153-173. doi:10.1023/A:1009980119240

LANGTRY R, SJOLANDER S. Prediction of transition for attached and separated shear layers in turbomachinery[C ] //38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2002 doi: 10.2514/6.2002-3641

ZHENG X Q, LIU C Q, LIU F, et al. Turbulent transition simulation using the k - ω model[J ] . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1998, 42(5):907-926. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19980715)42:5 907::aid-nme3933.0.co; 2-t

RUMSEY C L. Apparent transition behavior of widely-used turbulence models[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2007, 28(6):1460-1471. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.04.003

FU S, WANG L. Progress in turbulence/transition modelling[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(3):409-416. (in Chinese)

EMMONS H W. The laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer-part I[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1951, 18(7):490-498. doi:10.2514/8.2010

DHAWAN S, NARASIMHA R. Some properties of boundary layer flow during the transition from laminar to turbulent motion[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 3(4):418-436. doi:10.1017/S0022112058000094

GOSTELOW J P, BLUNDEN A R, WALKER G J. Effects of free-stream turbulence and adverse pressure gradients on boundary layer transition[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1994, 116(3):392-404. doi:10.1115/1.2929426

MAYLE R E. The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines[C ] //Proceedings of the ASME 1991 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition. Orlando, Florida, USA: 1991. doi: 10.1115/91-GT-261

ADDISON J S, HODSON H P. Modeling of unsteady transitional boundary layers[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1992, 114(3):580-589. doi:10.1115/1.2929182

SCHULTE V, HODSON H P. Prediction of the becalmed region for LP turbine profile design[C ] //Proceedings of ASME Conference on ASME 1997 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, 2014 doi: 10.1115/97-GT-398

FVRST J, PŘÍHODA J, STRAKA P. Numerical simulation of transitional flows[J]. Computing, 2013, 95(1):163-182. doi:10.1007/s00607-012-0266-0

LIBBY P A. On the prediction of intermittent turbulent flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 68(2):273-295. doi:10.1017/S0022112075000808

LIBBY P A. Prediction of the intermittent turbulent wake of a heated cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1976, 19(4):494-501. doi:10.1063/1.861505

DOPAZO C. On conditioned averages for intermittent turbulent flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1977, 81(3):433-438. doi:10.1017/S0022112077002158

CHEVRAY R, TUTU N K. Intermittency and preferential transport of heat in a round jet[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 88(1):133-160. doi:10.1017/S0022112078002025

CHO J R, CHUNG M K. A k-ε-γ equation turbulence model[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1992, 237:301-322. doi:10.1017/s0022112092003422

Savill A M. The Savill-Launder-Younis (SLY) RST intermittency model for predicting transition[C]. ERCOFTAC Bulletin, 1995, 24: 37-41.

STEELANT J, DICK E. Modeling of laminar-turbulent transition for high freestream turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(1):22-30. doi:10.1115/1.1340623

SUZEN Y B, HUANG P G. Modeling of flow transition using an intermittency transport equation[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2000, 122(2):273-284. doi:10.1115/1.483255

BOR Y, HUANG P, HULTGREN L, et al. Predictions of separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions using an intermittency transport equation[C ] //39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2001. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-446

PECNIK R, SANZ W, GEHRER A, et al. Transition modeling using two different intermittency transport equations[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2003, 70(1-4):299-323. doi:10.1023/B:APPL.0000004983.49982.69

CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition:what we know, where shall we go[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(3):311-337. (in Chinese)

周玲.高超声速边界层转捩模式研究[D].北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2013.

HAO Z H, YAN C, ZHOU L, et al. Development of a boundary layer parameters identification method for transition prediction with complex grids[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 231(11):2068-2084. doi:10.1177/0954410016660872

LANGTRY R, MENTER F. Transition modeling for general CFD applications in aeronautics[C ] //43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-522

LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12):2894-2906. doi:10.2514/1.42362

HAO Z H, YAN C, QIN Y P, et al. Improved γ-Reθt model for heat transfer prediction of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 107:329-338. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.11.052

DURBIN P. An intermittency model for bypass transition[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2012, 36:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.03.001

GE X, AROLLA S, DURBIN P. A bypass transition model based on the intermittency function[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2014, 93(1):37-61. doi:10.1007/s10494-014-9533-9

MENTER F R, SMIRNOV P E, LIU T, et al. A one-equation local correlation-based transition model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2015, 95(4):583-619. doi:10.1007/s10494-015-9622-4

MAYLE R E, SCHULZ A. The path to predicting bypass transition[J]. Journal of Turbo machinery, 1997, 119(3):405-411.

BRADSHAW P. Turbulence:the chief outstanding difficulty of our subject[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1994, 16(3-4):203-216. doi:10.1007/BF00206540

WALTERS D K, LEYLEK J H. A new model for boundary-layer transition using a single-point RANS approach[C ] //Proceedings of ASME Conference on ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2008: 67-79. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2002-32740

KEITH WALTERS D, COKLJAT D. A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of transitional flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(12):121401. doi:10.1115/1.2979230

QIN Y P, YAN C, HAO Z H, et al. A laminar kinetic energy transition model appropriate for hypersonic flow heat transfer[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 107:1054-1064. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.11.012

QIN Y P, YAN C, HAO Z H, et al. An intermittency factor weighted laminar kinetic energy transition model for heat transfer overshoot prediction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 117:1115-1124. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.081

LIU Z J, ZHAO Y T, CHEN S S, et al. Predicting distributed roughness induced transition with a four-equation laminar kinetic energy transition model[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 99:105736. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.105736

CHEN C P, ZHAO Q J, SUN X L. Investigation on a improved laminar kinetic energy transition model[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(8):1424-1428.

WARREN E S, HASSAN H. A transition closure model for predicting transition onset[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1998, 35(5):769-775. doi:10.4271/975502

WANG L, FU S. Development of an intermittency equation for the modeling of the supersonic/hypersonic boundary layer flow transition[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2011, 87(1):165-187. doi:10.1007/s10494-011-9336-1

WANG L, FU S, CARNARIUS A, et al. A modular RANS approach for modelling laminar-turbulent transition in turbomachinery flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2012, 34:62-69. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.01.008

ZHAO Y T, YAN C, LIU H K, et al. Assessment of laminar-turbulent transition models for Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator aeroshell in convection heat transfer[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 132:825-836. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.025

ZHAO Y T, LIU H K, LIU Z J, et al. Numerical study of the cone angle effects on transition and convection heat transfer for hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator aeroshell[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 110:104406. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104406

ZHOU L, YAN C, HAO Z H, et al. Improved k-ω-γ model for hypersonic boundary layer transition prediction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 94:380-389. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.11.048

ZHOU L, LI R F, HAO Z H, et al. Improved k-ω-γ model for crossflow-induced transition prediction in hypersonic flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115:115-130. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.08.013

ZHAO Y T, LIU H K, ZHOU Q, et al. Quantification of parametric uncertainty in k-ω-γ transition model for hypersonic flow heat transfer[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 96:105553. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2019.105553

ZHAO Y T, YAN C, LIU H K, et al. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of flow parameters for transition models on hypersonic flows[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 135:1286-1299. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.071

ZHANG J C, FU S. An efficient Bayesian uncertainty quantification approach with application to k-ω-γ transition modeling[J]. Computers Fluids, 2018, 161:211-224. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.11.007

VIZINHO R, MORGADO J, PÁSCOA J, et al. Analysis of transitional flow in 3D geometries using a novel phenomenological model[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 45:431-441. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2015.06.018

DURAISAMY K, DURBIN P A. Transition modeling using data driven approaches[R]//Proceedings of the Summer Program, Stanford CA: Center for Turbulence Research, 2014.

PARSH E J, DURAISAMY K, A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning[J ] . Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 305: 758-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.012

BLAZEK J. Boundary conditions[M ] //Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 267-297. doi: 10.1016/b978-008043009-6/50010-8

TORO E F. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. doi:10.1007/b79761

LIOU M S. Ten years in the making-AUSM-family[C ] //15th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA, United States: 2001. doi: 10.2514/6.2001-2521

ZHA G C. Low diffusion efficient upwind scheme[J]. AIAA Journal, 2005, 43(5):1137-1140. doi:10.2514/1.7726

TORO E F, VÁZQUEZ-CENDÓN M E. Flux splitting schemes for the Euler equations[J]. Computers Fluids, 2012, 70:1-12. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.08.023

Peery K M, and Imlay S T. Blunt-Body Flow Simulations: AIAA-88-2904[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1988.

KIM S S, KIM C, RHO O H, et al. Cures for the shock instability:Development of a shock-stable Roe scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 185(2):342-374. doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00037-2

PANDOLFI M, D'AMBROSIO D. Numerical instabilities in upwind methods:analysis and cures for the "carbuncle" phenomenon[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 166(2):271-301. doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6652

KITAMURA K, SHIMA EIJI, NAKAMURA Y, et al. Evaluation of Euler fluxes for hypersonic heating computations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48(4):763-776. doi:10.2514/1.41605

LIOU M S. Open problems in numerical fluxes: proposed resolutions[C]//20th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii: 2011. AIAA 2011-3055.

陆金甫, 关治.偏微分方程数值解(第三版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2016.

QU F, YAN C, YU J, et al. A study of parameter-free shock capturing upwind schemes on low speeds' issues[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2014, 57(6):1183-1190. doi:10.1007/s11431-014-5547-8

GUILLARD H, NKONGA B. On the behaviour of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit: a review[J ] . 2017, 18: 203-231. doi: 10.1016/bs.hna.2016.09.002

TURKEL E. Preconditioning techniques in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 31(1):385-416. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.385

LI X S, GU C W. An All-Speed Roe-type scheme and its asymptotic analysis of low Mach number behaviour[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(10):5144-5159. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.037

LI X S, GU C W. Mechanism of Roe-type schemes for all-speed flows and its application[J]. Computers Fluids, 2013, 86:56-70. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.07.004

QU F, YAN C, SUN D, et al. A new Roe-type scheme for all speeds[J]. Computers Fluids, 2015, 121:11-25. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.007

SIMMONDS N, TSOUTSANIS P, ANTONIADIS A F, et al. Low-Mach number treatment for Finite-Volume schemes on unstructured meshes[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2018, 336:368-393. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2018.04.076

CHEN S S, YAN C, LIN B X, et al. A new robust carbuncle-free roe scheme for strong shock[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2018, 77(2):1250-1277. doi:10.1007/s10915-018-0747-1

XIE W J, LI W, LI H, et al. On numerical instabilities of Godunov-type schemes for strong shocks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 350:607-637. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.08.063

QU F, SUN D. Investigation into the influences of the low-speed flows' accuracy on RANS simulations[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 70:578-589. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2017.08.031

QU F, YAN C, SUN D, et al. A parameter-free upwind scheme for all speeds' simulations[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2015, 58(3):434-442. doi:10.1007/s11431-014-5759-y

QU F, YAN C, SUN D. Investigation into the influences of the low speed's accuracy on the hypersonic heating computations[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 70:53-58. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.11.009

FEY M. Multidimensional upwinding. part II. decomposition of the Euler equations into advection equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 143(1):181-199. doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.5959

WENDROFF B. A two-dimensional HLLE Riemann solver and associated Godunov-type difference scheme for gas dynamics[J]. Computers Mathematics with Applications, 1999, 38(11-12):175-185. doi:10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00296-5

REN Y X. A robust shock-capturing scheme based on rotated Riemann solvers[J]. Computers Fluids, 2003, 32(10):1379-1403. doi:10.1016/S0045-7930(02)00114-7

BALSARA D S. Multidimensional HLLE Riemann solver:Application to Euler and magnetohydrodynamic flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(6):1970-1993. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.11.018

BALSARA D S. A two-dimensional HLLC Riemann solver for conservation laws:Application to Euler and magnetohydrodynamic flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(22):7476-7503. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.12.025

MANDAL J C, SHARMA V. A genuinely multidimensional convective pressure flux split Riemann solver for Euler equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 297:669-688. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2015.05.039

HU L J, YUAN L. A genuinely multidimensional Riemann solver based on the TV splitting[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 38(3):243-264. (in Chinese)

QU F, SUN D, BAI J Q, et al. A genuinely two-dimensional Riemann solver for compressible flows in curvilinear coordinates[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 386:47-63. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.030

WANG Z J, FIDKOWSKI K, ABGRALL R, et al. High-order CFD methods:current status and perspective[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013, 72(8):811-845. doi:10.1002/fld.3767

JIANG G S, SHU C W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 126(1):202-228. doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0130

DON W S, BORGES R. Accuracy of the weighted essentially non-oscillatory conservative finite difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 250:347-372. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.05.018

FU L, HU X Y, ADAMS N A. A family of high-order targeted ENO schemes for compressible-fluid simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 305:333-359. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.037

LELE S K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like res-olution[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 103(1):16-42. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90324-r

LI X L, LENG Y, HE Z W. Optimized sixth-order monotonicity-preserving scheme by nonlinear spectral analysis[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013, 73(6):560-577. doi:10.1002/fld.3812

DENG X G, ZHANG H X. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 165(1):22-44. doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6594

ZHANG H X, HE G H, ZHANG L. Some important problems for high order accurate difference scheme solving gas dynamic equations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1993, 11(4): 347-356. (in Chinese)

TSOUTSANIS P, TITAREV V A, DRIKAKIS D. WENO schemes on arbitrary mixed-element unstructured meshes in three space dimensions[J]. Journal of Computati onal Physics, 2011, 230(4):1585-1601. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.023

WANG Q, REN Y X, PAN J H, et al. Compact high order finite volume method on unstructured grids III:Variational reconstruction[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 337:1-26. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.031

WANG Z J, LIU Y, MAY G, et al. Spectral difference method for unstructured grids II:extension to the Euler equations[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2007, 32(1):45-71. doi:10.1007/s10915-006-9113-9

LIU Y, VINOKUR M, WANG Z J. Spectral (finite) volume method for conservation laws on unstructured grids V:Extension to three-dimensional systems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 212(2):454-472. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2005.06.024

COCKBURN B, HOU S, SHU C W. The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. IV. The multidimensional case[J ] . Mathematics of Computation, 1990, 54(190): 545-581. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-1010597-0

HUYNH H T. A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous galerkin methods[C ] //18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Miami, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2007. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-4079

BROOKS A N, HUGHES T J R. Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1982, 32(1-3):199-259. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(82)90071-8

DUMBSER M, BALSARA D S, TORO E F, et al. A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(18):8209-8253. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.05.025

WEI L, HE L X, DENG X G, et al. A class of hybrid DG/FV methods for conservation laws II:Two-dimensional cases[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(4):1104-1120. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.03.032

XU K. A gas-kinetic BGK scheme for the navier-stokes equations and its connection with artificial dissipation and Godunov method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 171(1):289-335. doi:10.1006/jcph.2001.6790

ZHANG S H, ZHANG Y T, SHU C W. Multistage interaction of a shock wave and a strong vortex[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(11):116101. doi:10.1063/1.2084233

LIU X L, ZHANG S H. Direct numerical simulation of the interaction of 2D shock wave and shear layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2013, 45(1):61-75. (in Chinese)

李虎.轴对称超声速射流激波噪声数值模拟研究[D].绵阳: 中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2016.

WANG B Y, ZHA G C. Numerical simulation of transonic limit cycle oscillations using high-order low-diffusion schemes[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2010, 26(4):579-601. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.02.003

Sun D, Guo Q, Li C, et al. Direct numerical simulation of effects of a micro-ramp on a hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(12):126101. doi:10.1063/1.5123453

LI Q, GUO Q L, SUN D, et al. A fourth-order symmetric WENO scheme with improved performance by new linear and nonlinear optimizations[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2017, 71(1):109-143. doi:10.1007/s10915-016-0293-7

WANG Y T, SUN Y, MENG D H, et al. High-order numerical simulation of CRM wing-body model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(3):98-105. (in Chinese)

HARTMANN R, HARLAN M M. Curved grid generation and DG computation for the DLR-F11 high lift configuration[C]//Eccomas Congress. Crete Island, Greece: 2016.

WANG Y T, SUN Y, WANG G X, et al. High-order accuracy numerical simulation of DLR-F6 wing-body configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9):2923-2929. (in Chinese)

JIANG Z H, YAN C. High order accurate methods in numerical simulation of hypersonic heat transfer[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 37(12):1529-1533. (in Chinese) doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2011.12.002

MAVRIPLIS D J. Progress in CFD discretizations, algorithms and solvers for aerodynamic flows[C ] //AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, Texas. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2019: 2944. doi: 10.2514/6.2019-2944

GASSNER G J, BECK A D. On the accuracy of high-order discretizations for underresolved turbulence simulations[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2013, 27(3-4):221-237. doi:10.1007/s00162-011-0253-7

YU J, YAN C, JIANG Z H. Effects of artificial viscosity and upwinding on spectral properties of the discontinuous Galerkin method[J]. Computers Fluids, 2018, 175:276-292. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.014

SUN Y Z, WANG Z J, LIU Y. Efficient implicit non-linear LU-SGS approach for viscous flow computation using high-order spectral difference method[C ] //18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Miami, Florida. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2007. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-4322

YU M L, WANG L. A high-order flux reconstruction/correction procedure via reconstruction formulation for unsteady incompressible flow on unstructured moving grids[J]. Computers Fluids, 2016, 139:161-173. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.05.028

HAGA T, GAO H Y, WANG Z. Efficient solution techniques for high-order methods on 3-D anisotropic hybrid meshes[C ] //49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2011: 45. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-45

NASTASE C R, MAVRIPLIS D J. High-order discontinuous Galerkin methods using an hp-multigrid approach[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 213(1):330-357. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.022

PERSSON P O, PERAIRE J. Newton-GMRES preconditioning for discontinuous galerkin discretizations of the navier-stokes equations[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2008, 30(6):2709-2733. doi:10.1137/070692108

DIOSADY L T, MURMAN S M. Tensor-product preconditioners for higher-order space-time discontinuous Galerkin methods[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 330:296-318. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.11.022

LUO H, BAUM J D, LHNER R. A fast, matrix-free implicit method for compressible flows on unstructured grids[M ] //Sixteenth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. USA: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 1998: 73-78. doi: 10.1007/bfb0106564

XIA Y D, LUO H, FRISBEY M, et al. A set of parallel, implicit methods for a reconstructed discontinuous Galerkin method for compressible flows on 3D hybrid grids[J]. Computers Fluids, 2014, 98:134-151. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.01.023

JIANG Z H, YAN C, YU J. High-order discontinuous Galerkin solver on hybrid anisotropic meshes for laminar and turbulent simulations[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2014, 35(7):799-812. doi:10.1007/s10483-014-1834-9

ZHOU C, WANG Z J. An evaluation of implicit time integration schemes for discontinuous high order methods[C ] //Proc of the 21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-2688

LUO H, SEGAWA H, VISBAL M R. An implicit discontinuous Galerkin method for the unsteady compressible Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Computers Fluids, 2012, 53:133-144. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.10.009

WANG L, MAVRIPLIS D J. Implicit solution of the unsteady Euler equations for high-order accurate discontinuous Galerkin discretizations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 225(2):1994-2015. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2007.03.002

VERMEIRE B C, NADARAJAH S. Adaptive IMEX time-stepping for the correction procedure via reconstruction scheme[C ] //Proc of the 21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2013. doi: 10.2514/6.2013-2687

PAZNER W, PERSSON P O. Stage-parallel fully implicit Runge-Kutta solvers for discontinuous Galerkin fluid simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 335:700-717. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.01.050

BASSI F, BOTTI L, COLOMBO A, et al. Linearly implicit Rosenbrock-type Runge-Kutta schemes applied to the Discontinuous Galerkin solution of compressible and incompressible unsteady flows[J]. Computers Fluids, 2015, 118:305-320. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.06.007

VAN LEER B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1979, 32(1):101-136. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1

BURBEAU A, SAGAUT P, BRUNEAU C H. A problem-independent limiter for high-order runge-kutta discontinuous galerkin methods[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 169(1):111-150. doi:10.1006/jcph.2001.6718

HENRICK A K, ASLAM T D, POWERS J M. Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes:Achieving optimal order near critical points[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 207(2):542-567. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2005.01.023

BORGES R, CARMONA M, COSTA B, et al. An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(6):3191-3211. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.038

ZHANG S H, SHU C W. A new smoothness indicator for the WENO schemes and its effect on the convergence to steady state solutions[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2007, 31(1-2):273-305. doi:10.1007/s10915-006-9111-y

ZHANG S H, JIANG S F, SHU C W. Improvement of convergence to steady state solutions of Euler equations with the WENO schemes[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2011, 47(2):216-238. doi:10.1007/s10915-010-9435-5

QIU J X, SHU C W. A comparison of troubled-cell indicators for runge:kutta discontinuous galerkin methods using weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiters[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2005, 27(3):995-1013. doi:10.1137/04061372X

DUMBSER M, ZANOTTI O, LOUBÈRE R, et al. A posteriori subcell limiting of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 278:47-75. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.08.009

LOUBERE R, DUMBSER M, DIOT S. A new family of high order unstructured MOOD and ADER finite volume schemes for multidimensional systems of hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2014, 16(3):718-763. doi:10.4208/cicp.181113.140314a

VONNEUMANN J, RICHTMYER R D. A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1950, 21(3):232-237. doi:10.1063/1.1699639

BALDWIN B S, MACCORMACK R W. Interaction of strong-shock wave with turbulent boundary layer: AIAA-74-558[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1974.

JAMESON A, SCHMIDT W, TURKEL E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes[C ] //14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1981. doi: 10.2514/6.1981-1259

PERSSON P O, PERAIRE J. Sub-cell shock capturing for discontinuous galerkin methods[C ] //44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2006. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-112

HUGHES T J R, MALLET M. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics:IV. A discontinuity-capturing operator for multidimensional advective-diffusive systems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1986, 58(3):329-336. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(86)90153-2

ZINGAN V, GUERMOND J L, MOREL J, et al. Implementation of the entropy viscosity method with the discontinuous Galerkin method[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 253:479-490. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2012.08.018

BARTER G E, DARMOFAL D L. Shock capturing with PDE-based artificial viscosity for DGFEM:Part I. Formulation[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(5):1810-1827. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.11.010

MORO D, NGUYEN N C, PERAIRE J. Dilation-based shock capturing for high-order methods[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2016, 82(7):398-416. doi:10.1002/fld.4223

HESTHAVEN J Y, JAN S. A study of several artificial viscosity models within the discontinuous galerkin framework[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2020, 27(5):1309-1343. doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2019-0118

TYACKE J, VADLAMANI N R, TROJAK W, et al. Turbomachinery simulation challenges and the future[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 110:100554. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.100554

VINCENT P, WITHERDEN F, VERMEIRE B, et al. Towards green aviation with python at petascale[C ] //SC'16: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. IEEE, 2016: 1-11. doi: 10.1109/SC.2016.1

VERMEIRE B C, WITHERDEN F D, VINCENT P E. On the utility of GPU accelerated high-order methods for unsteady flow simulations:a comparison with industry-standard tools[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 334:497-521. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.049

CANTWELL C D, MOXEY D, COMERFORD A, et al. Nektar++:an open-source spectral/hp element framework[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2015, 192:205-219. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.008

WITHERDEN F D, FARRINGTON A M, VINCENT P E. PyFR:an open source framework for solving advection-diffusion type problems on streaming architectures using the flux reconstruction approach[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2014, 185(11):3028-3040. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.07.011

LÓPEZ-MORALES M, BULL J R, CRABILL J, et al. Verification and Validation of HiFiLES: a High-Order LES unstructured solver on multi-GPU platforms[C]//AIAA Aviation. 2014. AIAA 2014-3168.

BANGERTH W, HARTMANN R, KANSCHAT G. deal.II:a general-purpose object-oriented finite element library[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2007, 33(4):24. doi:10.1145/1268776.1268779

DURAISAMY K, SPALART P R, RUMSEY C L. Status, emerging ideas and future directions of turbulence modeling research in aeronautics[J]. NASA Technical Memorandum, 2017.