高超声速边界层转捩的若干问题及工程应用研究进展综述

段毅; 姚世勇; 李思怡; 余平

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0041

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

高超声速边界层转捩的若干问题及工程应用研究进展综述

专栏——中国流动稳定性和转捩研究40年 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 高超声速边界层转捩的若干问题及工程应用研究进展综述
- Review of progress in some issues and engineering application of hypersonic boundary layer transition
- 空气动力学学报 2020年38卷第2期页码：391-403
- 作者机构：
  
  中国运载火箭技术研究院空间物理重点实验室,北京,100076
- 作者简介：
  
  段毅*(1977-), 男, 研究员, 主要从事高超声速空气动力学、计算流体力学研究.E-mail:duanyeebj@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFA0401200）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0041
  中图分类号： O357.4+1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
段毅, 姚世勇, 李思怡, 余平. 高超声速边界层转捩的若干问题及工程应用研究进展综述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(2): 391-403.

DUAN Yi, YAO Shiyong, LI Siyi, et al. Review of progress in some issues and engineering application of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. 2020, 38(2): 391-403.
段毅, 姚世勇, 李思怡, 余平. 高超声速边界层转捩的若干问题及工程应用研究进展综述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(2): 391-403. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0041.

DUAN Yi, YAO Shiyong, LI Siyi, et al. Review of progress in some issues and engineering application of hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. 2020, 38(2): 391-403. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0041.

摘要

高超声速飞行器绕流存在着激波、边界层、流动分离、稀薄气体效应和高温气体效应等多种复杂流动现象的空气动力学问题，其中高超声速边界层转捩既是空气动力学的基础问题，也是高超声速流动研究的热点和难点。若能对边界层转捩进行准确预示及有效控制，则可以实现对飞行器气动力热特性的精细设计，改进飞行器性能，提高任务执行能力。文章针对工程中具有复杂外形飞行器存在的典型失稳特征进行了研究进展回顾，提出了工程实际中亟需解决的复杂边界层转捩问题，明确了高超声速边界层转捩研究的工程应用方向。文章最后还对高超声速边界层的流动控制进行了回顾，以期在今后高超声速飞行器设计中实现对边界层的流动控制，提高飞行器的飞行性能。

Abstract

A variety of complicated flow phenomena such as shock wave

boundary layer

flow separation

rarefied gas effects and real gas effects exist in the flows over hypersonic flight vehicles. The hypersonic boundary layer transition is not only a basic aerodynamics issue

but also a hot topic and challenging subject in the research of hypersonic flows. The accurate prediction and the effective control of boundary layer transition can achieve meticulous design of aerodynamic force and heating

thus improving the vehicle performance and enhancing the mission capability. In this paper

the research progress in typical instability characteristics commonly existed in the flight vehicles with complex configurations in engineering is reviewed

and the complicated issues of boundary layer transition in engineering practice which are urgent to be solved are proposed. Meanwhile

the engineering application direction of the research on hypersonic boundary layer transition is specified. Moreover

the investigations on flow control of hypersonic boundary layer are reviewed in order to realize the boundary layer control in the design of hypersonic vehicle in future to enhance the flight performance.

关键词

Keywords

references

ZHEN H P, JIANG C W. Overview of hypersonic vehicle HTV-2[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2013(6):7-13. (in chinese)

HAN H T, WANG Y L. Investigation on boundary layer transition of HTV-2 and the relative basic project[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2015(1):38-44. (in chinese)

WHITEHEAD A H. NASP aerodynamics[R]. AIAA-89-5013, 1989.

SCHNEIDER S P. Flight data for boundary-layer transition at hypersonic and supersonic speeds[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1999, 36(1):8-20.

LIN T C. Influence of laminar boundary-layer transition on entry vehicle designs[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(2):165-175.

FEDOROV A. Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43(1):79-95.

YU P, DUAN Y, CHEN J. Some aerodynamic issues in hypersonic flight[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):7-23. (in chinese)

XLE S F, YANG W B, SHEN Q. Review of progresses in hypersonic boundary layer transition mechanism and its applications[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3):714-723(in chinese). (in chinese)

CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition:what we know, where shall we go[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(3):311-337. (in chinese)

GAO J. The method of the stability analysis and receptivity to acoustics in supersonic boundary layers[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2014. (in chinese)

LUO J S. Transition and prediction for hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):357-372. (in chinese)

MORKOVIN M V. On the many faces of transition[M]//Viscous Drag Reduction. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1969: 1-31.

FEDOROV A V, KHOKHLOV A P. Prehistory of instability in a hypersonic boundary layer[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2001, 14:359-275.

FEDOROV A, TUMIN A. Initial-value problem for hypersonic boundary-layer flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(3):379-389.

FEDOROV A V. Receptivity of a high-speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 491:101-129.

ZHONG X L, MA Y B. Boundary-layer receptivity of Mach 7.99 flow over a blunt cone to free-stream acoustic waves[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 556:55.

ZHONG X L, WANG X W. direct numerical simulation on the receptivity, instability, and transition of hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Annual Review Of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 44(1):527-561.

HUANG Y, ZHONG X L. Numerical Study Of Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Receptivity With Freestream Hotspot Perturbations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(12):2652-2672.

YU G T. Application of e-N method and prediction of disturbances propagation in three-dimensional hypersonic boundary layers[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2016. (in chinese)

MACK L M. Boundary-layer linear stability theory[J]. AGRAD Report. 1984: No. 709.

STETSON K, THOMPSON E, DONALDSON J, et al. Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. I-Sharp cone[C]//16th Fluid and Plasmadynamics Conference, Danvers, MA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA-83-1761, 1983.

STETSON K, THOMPSON E, DONALDSON J, et al. Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. Ⅲ -Sharp cone at angle of attack[C]//23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA-84-0006, 1985.

STETSON K, THOMPSON E, DONALDSON J, et al. Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. Ⅲ-Sharp cone at angle of attack[C]//23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA-85-0492, 1985.

STETSON K, THOMPSON E, DONALDSON J, et al. Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. IV-On unit Reynolds number and environmental effects[C]//4th Joint Fluid Mechanics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA-86-1087, 1986.

STETSON K, THOMPSON E, DONALDSON J, et al. Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. V-Tests with a cooled model[C]//20th Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Buffalo, NY, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA-89-1895, 1989.

SU C H, ZHOU H. Stability analysis and transition prediction of hypersonic boundary layer over a blunt cone with small nose blunmess at zero angle of attack[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2007, 28(5):505-513. (in chinese)

DONG M, LUO J S. Mechanism of transition in a hypersonic sharp cone boundary layer with zero angle of attack[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2007, 28(8):912-920.

ZHU Y D, ZHANG C H, CHEN X, et al. Transition in hypersonic boundary layers:role of dilatational waves[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10):3039-3049.

GRAYW E. The effect of wing sweep on laminar flow[R]. RAE TM Aero 255, 1952.

ZHANG S L. The instability and wave propagation in the hypersonic 2: 1 elliptic cone boundary layer[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2016. (in chinese)

JULIANO T J, BORG M P, SCHNEIDER S P. Quiet tunnel measurements of HIFiRE-5 boundary-layer transition[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(4):832-846.

BORG M P, KIMMEL R L, STANFIELD S. Traveling crossflow instability for the HIFiRE-5 elliptic cone[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015, 52(3):664-673.

BORG M P, KIMMEL R L. Simultaneous infrared and pressure measurements of crossflow instability modes for HIFiRE-5[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA 2016-0354, 2016.

KIMMEL R, ADAMCZAK D, BORGM, et al. Transition on hypersonic vehicles with crossflow[R]. AFRL-RQ-WP-TR-2017-0149, 2017.

DINZL D J, CANDLER G V. Direct simulation of hypersonic crossflow instability on an elliptic cone[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(6):1769-1782.

ZHAO L. Study on instability of stationary crossflow vortices in hypersonic swept blunt plate boundary layers[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2017.

HAN Y F, MA S X, SU C H. Numerical study on cross-flow transition in three-dimensional hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4):522-529. (in chinese)

ZHOU L, YAN C, HAO Z H, et al. Transition model and transition criteria for hypersonic boundary layer flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(4):1092-1102. (in chinese)

ZHANG Y F, ZHANG Y R, CHEN J Q, et al. Numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary layer transition based on the flow solver chant 2.0[C]//21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Xiamen, China. Reston, Virginia: AIAA 2017-2409, 2017.

LI F, CHOUDHARI M, CHANG CL, et al. Development and breakdown of Görtler vortices in high speed boundary layers[R]. AIAA 2010-705, 2010.

SOUZA L F. On the odd and even secondary instabilities ofGörtler vortices[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2017, 31(4):405-425.

ROGENSKI J K, DE SOUZA L F, FLORYAN J M. Influence of pressure gradients on the evolution of thegörtler instability[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(9):2916-2921.

YU M, YUAN X J. The effect of Görtler instability on hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2016, 6(2):97-99.

REN J. Secondary instabilities of Görtler vortices in high-speed boundary layers and control on flow transition[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua Univesity, 2015. (in chinese)

POLLD I A. Some aspects of the flow near a swept attachment line with particular reference to boundary layer transition[R]. CoA Report No. 7805, 1978.

HEEG R S. Stability and transition of attachment-line flow[D]. Enschede: Universiteit Twente, 1998.

HALL P, MALIK M R, POLL D I A. On the stability of an infinite swept attachment line boundary layer[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1984, 395(1809):229-245.

SPALART P R. Direct numerical study of leading-edge contamination[R]. AGARD CP-438, 1989.

JIMÉNEZ J, MARTEL C, AGVÍ J C, et al. Direct numerical simulation of transition in the incompressible leading edge boundary layer[R]. ETSIA MF-903, 1990.

THEOFILIS V. Numerical experiments on the stability of leading edge boundary layer flow:A two-dimensional linear study[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1993, 16(2):153-170.

JOSLIN R. Direct simulation of evolution and control of nonlinear instabilities in attachment-line boundary layers[C]//32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA-94-0826, 1994.

JOSLIN R D. Direct simulation of evolution and control of three-dimensional instabilities in attachment-line boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 291:369-392.

LIN R S, MALIK M R. Stability and transition in compressible attachment-line boundary-layer flow[R]. SAE Paper 952041, 1995.

LIN R S, MALIK M R. On the stability of attachment-line boundary layers. Part 1. The incompressible swept Hiemenz flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 311:239.

MACK C J, SCHMID P J, SESTERHENN J L. Global stability of swept flow around a parabolic body:connecting attachment-line and crossflow modes[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 611:205-214.

THEOFILIS V. On linear and nonlinear instability of the incompressible swept attachment-line boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 355:193-227.

MALIK M R, ANDERSON E C. Real gas effects on hypersonic boundary-layer stability[J]. Physics of Fluids A:Fluid Dynamics, 1991, 3(5):803-821.

MALIK M R. Hypersonic flight transition data analysis using parabolized stability equations with chemistry effects[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2003, 40(3):332-344.

JOHNSON H B, SEIPP T G, CANDLER G V. Numerical study of hypersonic reacting boundary layer transition on cones[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1998, 10(10):2676-2685.

HE Y, MORGAN R G. Transition of compressible high enthalpy boundary layer flow over a flat plate[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 1994, 98(972):25-34.

GRONVALL J E, JOHNSON H B, CANDLER G V. Boundary-layer stability analysis of the high enthalpy shock tunnel transition experiments[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2014, 51(2):455-467.

WARTEMANN V, WAGNER A, WAGNILD R, et al. Code to code comparison on hypersonic high enthalpy transitional boundary layers[C ] //2018 AIAA Aerospace sciences Meeting, 2018. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-0351

STUCKERT G, REED H L. Linear disturbances in hypersonic, chemically reacting shock layers[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(7):1384-1393.

STEMMER C. Hypersonic transition investigations in a flat-plate boundary-layer flow at M=20[C]//35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference And Exhibit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2005-5136, 2005.

HUDSON M L, CHOKANI N, CANDLER G V. Linear stability of hypersonic flow in thermochemical nonequilibrium[J]. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35:958-964.

CLARKE J F, McCHESNEY M. The dynamics of real gases[M]. Butterworths, London, 1966.

KLINE H L, CHANG C L, LI F. Hypersonic chemically reacting boundary-layer stability using LASTRAC[C]//2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Reston, Virginia: AIAA 2018-3699, 2018.

SCHNEIDER S P. Effects of roughness on hypersonic boundary-layer transition[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(2):193-209.

BERRY S A, BERGER K, HORVATH T J. Flight experiment verification of shuttle boundary layer transition prediction tool[C]//46th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Washington, D. C.. Reston, Virginia: AIAA 2016-3533, 2016.

CORKE T C, BAR-SEVER A, MORKOVIN M V. Experiments on transition enhancement by distributed roughness[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1986, 29(10):3199.

GASTER M. Understanding the effects of surface roughness on the growth of disturbances[C]//46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Washington, D. C.. Reston, Virginia: AIAA 2016-4384, 2016.

BREHM C, DACKERMANN T, GRYGIER F, et al. Numerical investigations of the influence of distributed roughness on blasius boundary layer stability[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2011-563, 2011.

REDA D C, WILDER M C, PRABHU D K. Transition experiments on slightly blunted cones with distributed roughness in hypersonic flight[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(10):2248-2254.

FUJⅡ K. Experiment of the two-dimensional roughness effect on hypersonic boundary-layer transition[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2006, 43(4):731-738.

BOUNTIN D, CHIMITOV T, MASLOV A, et al. Stabilization of a hypersonic boundary layer using a wavy surface[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(5):1203-1210.

CHANG C L, CHOUDHARI M, VENKATACHARI B S, et al. Effects of cavities and protuberances on transition over hypersonic vehicles[C]//41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2011-3245, 2011.

TANG Q, ZHU Y D, CHEN X, et al. Development of second-mode instability in a Mach 6 flat plate boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(6):064105.

ZHU D H, YUAN X J, YANG W B. Mechanism of hypersonic transition induced by a roughness element and its application[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(1):68-77. (in chinese)

LI C, DONG M. Impact of local cavities on evolution of the second-mode disturbances in hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(10):2203-2210.

NACHTSHEIM P R, LARSON H K. Crosshatched ablation patterns in Teflon[J]. AIAA Journal, 1971, 9(8):1608-1614

MORKOVIN M V. Critical evaluation of transition from laminar to turbulent shear layers with emphasis on hypersonically traveling bodies[R]. AFFDL-TR-68-149, 1969.

PAPPAS C C, OKUNO A F. Heat-transfer measurement for binary gas laminar boundary layers with high rates of injection[R]. NASATN-D-2473, 1964.

DEMETRIADES A, LADERMAN A J, Von SEGGERN L, et al. Effect of Mass Addition on the Boundary Layer of a Hemisphere at Mach 6[J]. Journal Spacecraft, 1976, 13(8):508-509.

SCHNEIDER S. Hypersonic boundary-layer transition with ablation and blowing[C]//38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, Washington. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2008-3730, 2008.

SCHNEIDER S P. Hypersonic boundary-layer transition with ablation and blowing[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2010, 47(2):225-237.

WANG L, LUO Z B, XIA Z X, et al. Review of actuators for high speed active flow control[J]. Scientia Sinica(Technologica), 2012, 42(10):1103-1119. (in chinese)

WANG D Q, XU C H, JIANG C W, et al. Research progress of control technique for hypersonic flow[J]. Aerodynamic Missiles Journal, 2015(9):24-30. (in chinese)

CHEN F J, BERRY S A. HyBoLT flight experiment[M]. NASA/TM-2010-216725, 2010.

MALMUTH N, FEDOROV A, SHALAEV V, et al. Problems in high speed flow prediction relevant to control[C]//2nd AIAA, Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 1998-2695, 1998.

FEDOROV A V, MALMUTH N D, RASHEED A, et al. Stabilization of hypersonic boundary layers by porous coatings[J]. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39(4):605-610.

RASHEED A, HORNUNG H G, FEDOROV A V, et al. Experiments on passive hypervelocity boundary-layer control using an ultrasonically absorptive surface[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40:481-489.

FEDOROV A, SHIPLYUK A, MASLOV A, et al. Stabilization of a hypersonic boundary layer using an ultrasonically absorptive coating[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 479:99-124.

MASLOV A, SHIPLYUK A, SIDORENKO A, et al. Hypersonic laminar flow control using a porous coating of random microstructure[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2006-1112, 2006.

FEDOROV A, KOZLOV V, SHIPLYUK A, et al. Stability of hypersonic boundary layer on porous wall with regular microstructure[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(8):1866-1871.

BRōS G A, INKMAN M, COLONIUS T, et al. Second-mode attenuation and cancellation by porous coatings in a high-speed boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 726:312-337.

LUKASHEVICH S V, MASLOV A A, SHIPLYUK A N, et al. Stabilization of high-speed boundary layer using porous coatings of various thicknesses[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(9):1897-1904.

FEDOROV A, MALMUTH N. Parametric studies of hypersonic laminar flow control using a porous coating of regular microstructure[C]//46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2008-588, 2008.

ZHAO R, LIU T, WEN C Y, et al. Theoretical modeling and optimization of porous coating for hypersonic laminar flow control[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(8):2942-2946.

SHIPLYUK A, BOUNTIN D, MASLOV A, et al. Nonlinear aspects of hypersonic boundary layer stability on a porous surface[C]//42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2004-255, 2004.

BOUNTIN D, CHIMITOV T, MASLOV A, et al. Stabilization of a hypersonic boundary layer using a wavy surface[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(5):1203-1210.

DE TULLIO N, SANDHAM N D. Direct numerical simulation of breakdown to turbulence in a Mach 6 boundary layer over a porous surface[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2010, 22(9):094105.

SCHMISSEUR J D. Hypersonics into the 21st century:a perspective on AFOSR-sponsored research in aerothermodynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 72:3-16.

GERMAIN P, HORNUNG H G. Transition on a slender cone in hypervelocity flow[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1997, 22:183-190.

ADAM P H, HORNUNG H G. Enthalpy effects on hypervelocity boundary-layer transition:ground test and flight data[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1997, 34(5):614-619.

BEIERHOLM A K, LEYVA I, LAURENCE S J, et al. Transition delay in a hypervelocity boundary layer using nonequilibrium CO 2 injection[R ] . GALCIT Report FM 2008.001, 2008.

LEYVA I, LAURENCE S, BEIERHOLM A, et al. Transition delay in hypervelocity boundary layers by means of CO2/acoustic instability interactions[C ] //47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orla ndo, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA 2009-1287, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1287

LEYVA I A, JEWELL J S, LAURENCE S, et al. On the impact of injection schemes on transition in hypersonic boundary layers[C]. AIAA 2009-7204, 2009.

WAGNILD R M, CANDLER G, LEYVA I A, et al. Carbon dioxide injection for hypervelocity boundary layer stability[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2010-1244, 2010.

LEYVA I A. Transition delay in hypervelocity boundary layers by means of vibrational relaxation and acoustic instability interactions[R]. AFRL-RQ-ED-TR-2013-0054, 2013.

JEWELL J S, WAGNILD R, LEYVA I A, et al. Transition within a hypervelocity boundary layer on a 5-degree half-angle cone in air/CO 2 mixtures[C ] //51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum And Aerospaces Exposition. Grapevine, Texas: AIAA 2013-0523, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-523

FEDOROV A V, SOUDAKOV V, LEYVA I A. Stability analysis of high-speed boundary-layer flow with gas injection[C]//7th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference, Atlanta, GA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA 2014-2498, 2014.

JEWELL J S, LEYVA I A, PARZIALE N J, et al. Effect of gas injection on transition in hypervelocity boundary layers[C]//28th International Symposium on Shock Waves. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 735-740.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高温气体效应下流动转捩及超声速模态的线性演化

高超声速三维边界层转捩数值研究进展及预测软件

柔性仿羽毛结构抑制边界层转捩的初步探索

壁温对钝三角翼边界层稳定性及转捩影响

高超声速流动稳定性及转捩工程应用若干研究进展